The 'Perfect Space Storm' Of 1859
Polyploid Pimp writes "Bruce Tsurutani of JPL recently published a paper on the 'perfect space storm' of 1859. Apparently, this solar superstorm was so massive that it knocked out telegraphs across the Northern Hemisphere, and the aurora borealis could be seen as far south as Hawaii, Havana, and Rome. Among other interesting notes, the amount of sunlight produced in the region of this solar flare actually doubled! Although the article does not discuss in detail the effects of a solar storm of this size on our current technologies, we can all imagine (maybe something like Escape from L.A.?)"
Should be interesting to see what happens when the next large barrage of solar winds and large EM fields hit, as everyone may recall a few years ago with one storm a large number of pager satellites and base stations were disrupted, something bigger could certainly bring down large amounts of sattelite based internet infastructure and play havoc with ground based equipment (most notibly WiFi networks.)
Should we be testing equipment now to minimise the unknown impact of such a natural event?
-- Jim.
-- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
(maybe something like Escape from L.A.?
You mean... complete crap?
I saw several highly improbable hardware failures over the past week, particularly on the 22nd.
What is the likelyhood that this is related to recent unusual solar activity, as opposed to being a simple coincidence?
I'm really starting to thing there is a close connection between solar activity and economic patterns - all the recessions I can remember, 80-81, 91-92, 2000-2002 have all occured after the peak of a sunspot cycle. What happened after this storm of 1859: The US Civil War.
try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
Threres a lot of documentaion and specualtion out there about this. look up sunspot cycles and econnomy and youll find a lot. There does seem to be some sort of very loose correlation between them.
All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
The submitter had to mention Escape from L.A, bringing back a trauma I had successfully surpressed for many years. I saw it in a theater, for free at a preview screening, and still felt ripped off. I want those two hours of my life back! What an enormous waste of talent for everyone involved. I was hoping for the guilty, trashy fun of Escape From New York. Nope. It was just sad, limp and stupid. You've heard of straight to DVD? Escape from LA should have been straight to Mystery Science Theater 3000. A really crummy movie...
Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)
http://www.lawrenceperson.com/
National academies press (nap.edu) has thousands of free (public domain) books online, in pdf format. Many of them are reports of some government committees etc., but if you are prepared to dig around for a while you can find some real gems. I've read about a dozen of the books on the site, and they're really good. Check out Storms from the sun. Its an excellent book, both highly informative and very readable. Chapter 3 in particular ("A sudden conflagration") is about the 1859 storm in question. Enjoy.
Holy shit! I hope I never get trapped in a space storm that traps me in the same city as John Carpenter and Kurt Russell.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
It's getting to be so bad that the first step in research seems to be, "find a catchy name." It's more important than funding, more important even than the subject of the research. A catchy name will help get funding and therefore should determine the direction of research.
Perhaps it started in the 80s when reporters derided SDI with the title, "Star Wars." It continued with "Out of Africa" in anthropology. Now every weather event is "The Perfect Storm."
We all know that reporters are stupid. But that's no reason to dumb down science so it fits in a movie title!
Science should not be controlled by Oliver Stone.
but then I started thinking about it more carefully. If one had a magnetic event from the sun then what hit the earth would be an earth-wide, coherent magnetic pulse. In this case the larger the loop of wire the greater the current induced. And telegraphs had miles and miles of wires with macroscopically separated loops. thus the induced current must have been enormormous, hence the fires at the low impedance inductors at the ends.
On the other hand, the magnetic flux per area might not have been very large. hence modern electronics which are small, and generally have ground or back planes closs to the wires wont receive much induced current.
in other words the telegraphs were the optimal energy absorbers but modern devices should receive much lower energy coupling.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
Telegram: "THE BRITISH ARE CEUBLSJF SLKJF SJ"
City Official: Hmmm. I wonder what that meant. Try again, please.
Telegram: "GET FREE PENIS ENLARGER"
City Official: Damn ad-makers. Oh well. Back to work everybody. Nothin' here.
Table-ized A.I.
Been there. That's the reason I rarely drink Mexican beer anymore.