Slashdot Mirror


SCO Asks IBM To Make SCO's Case For It

acousticiris writes "According to an analysis of Friday's memorandum from SCO on Groklaw: 'If I had to characterize it in a brief sentence or two, the sentence would be that SCO tells the court, "How are we supposed to know what code IBM misappropriated? It's up to them to prove our case for us."...' It's also interesting to note that in Friday's memorandum, footnote 4, SCO uses Eric Raymond's Jargon File entry for FUD to take pot shots at IBM (footnote 4). Evidently, Eric was not pleased, according to the updated entry."

26 of 459 comments (clear)

  1. fuck me harder! by madmancarman · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems somehow fitting that SCO would link to FUD in the jargon file, since the previous entry in the jargon file is "fuck me harder". After all, isn't that what SCO is doing to their shareholders?

    --
    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
    1. Re:fuck me harder! by Jetson · · Score: 3, Funny
      It seems somehow fitting that SCO would link to FUD in the jargon file, since the previous entry in the jargon file is "fuck me harder". After all, isn't that what SCO is doing to their shareholders?

      Not yet. Right now they're playing the game of "See how big it is?" The people buying shares now won't see the ropes and whips until it's too late.

  2. SCO.... by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a desperate attempt to prevent interested parties from reading their crap, SCO has apparently taken it upon themselves to slashdot Groklaw. Impressive.

    If we can't read it we have to believe them!

  3. Amazing by finkployd · · Score: 5, Funny

    SCO files a court document which includes (to provide support for their claim) a link to a web page controlled by someone they KNOW to hate them?

    "Your Honor, we demand he change it back. We ummm didn't know website text can be changed"

    The mind boggles...

    Finkployd

  4. SCO the victim? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ya know, I just thought of something. These legal maneuverings by SCO are just SO absurd that the lawyers involved HAVE to know that. So I'm wondering - is SCO just being taken advantage of by unscrupulous lawyers, wanting to bilk stupid-ass SCO execs into thinking they can win anything?

  5. Re:Wait a minute... by Beatbyte · · Score: 5, Funny

    yes, but you would then have to assume that SCO had a case

  6. Re:My question is by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have the same thought.

    But I reminded of a Gary Larson's cartoon, where there are four panes one with a rattlesnake in the top left hand corner, a puffed-up puffer fish in the top right hand corner, a mad cat in the bottom left hand corner, and finally a wierdo wearing a trench coat, with a boot on his head, a child's
    pool floaty thing around his middle and carrying a bazooka and the caption reads: "How Nature Says, Stay Away"

    This I think applies to SCO.

  7. "ESR, meet libel law. Libel law, meet ESR." by adb · · Score: 2, Funny

    [There is no text; only Zuul.]

  8. This case couldn't be any stranger... by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...if SCO were being represented by Beavis and Butthead.

    Uhhh-huh-huh. He said infringer. Huh-huh-huh.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:This case couldn't be any stranger... by Pootie+Tang · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am the great cornSCOlio. I need I.P. for my bunghole.

    2. Re:This case couldn't be any stranger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Butthead: Huh, huh huh. Hey Beavis, pull my infringer.

      Beavis: No way butt munch!

  9. Re:IBM's not going to rush this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm sure there are many geeks who would want to pillage SCO and distribute pieces McBribe's mutilated corpse to several industry bigwigs. The skull to IBM as a trophy and maybe the ass to Gates as a warning.

  10. Re:IBM's not going to rush this.... by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Funny

    deliberately misquoted:

    "I want to live just long enough to be there when they cut off your head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next 10 generations that some code comes with too high a price. I want to look up into your lifeless eyes and wave, like this. Can you and your associates arrange that for me, Mr. McBride?"

    Kierthos

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  11. Re:umm.. dont they have the source code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why does the term "possession is 99% of the law" come to mind for this case?

    That's a good question. The original phrase is "posession is 9/10ths of the law."

  12. Re:Anything about the mice? by bj8rn · · Score: 2, Funny
    The mice got their Ph.D's[1] and are not active anymore. They are, however, instructing the schmice[2] that are running the show now (in order to get their degrees).

    [1] Actually the intergalactic equivalent of it
    [2] Practically indistinguishable from mice, except for the fact that schmice and mice can't crossbreed for some reason.

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  13. Re:Wait a minute... by clambake · · Score: 4, Funny

    IANAL

    EXACTLY! YOu AREN'T a lawyer. How can you possibly expect to know or understand any of the laws that you must live by? You can't. Just sit over there and do what we say.

  14. Poetical Geeky by bstadil · · Score: 3, Funny
    Nothing like a little FUD in the entry for "FUD".

    Not that I really agree with you but this is poetical geeky if true.

    Self referencing is a hallmark of geekdom. Like GNU = Gnu Not Unix

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  15. Re:Missing the point. by CaptBubba · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is closer to asking your hostages for some bullets because you forgot yours.

  16. We're heading for the stone age by madpierre · · Score: 2, Funny

    All this pointless litigation is ...
    Getting bloody annoying!

    Make graduation from law school a hanging offence.
    Even though hangins to good for the shyster scumbags!

    AAAAAAGGGGG!!!!

    (The red mist at the mention of the word SCO
    made me post this damn comment in the wrong
    thread once already.)

    --
    siggy played guitar
  17. Re:Wait a minute... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude, you forgot to gel back your hair after screaming "I AM ABOVE THE LAW!" Oh, and good luck on that Chewbacca Defense :P

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  18. Re:FUD: /fuhd/, n. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    wow you can get +5 informative just for reposting the information found at one of the links in the story. I wonder how many points you get for actually saying something informative?!

  19. Re:ESR, does that mean you don't like them? by carambola5 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Would you buy software from a company with this reputation?


    SCO sells software?
    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  20. Re:Eric Raymond does not own the Jargon File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "He appropritated [sic] public property for his own profit."

    Yup. Because, you know, he's gotten so rich from that Jargon file.

  21. from the jargon entry... by the_real_tigga · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...
    prev: fuck me harder - FUD - next: FUD wars
    prophetic, even...

    --
    my .sig is better than yours.
  22. IBM is more of a chip-maker than case-maker by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Funny


    SCO should look to one of the cheap asian companies like Fudin or PowMax for their cases. IBM is gonna charge an arm and a leg and the resulting boxes won't be very portable. Plus, I don't think IBM does any of the cool mod stuff with windows or cathode lights.
  23. recursive links by Space · · Score: 2, Funny

    aaaaaaaaa......
    SCO linked to a jargon file entry that links back to them. I can hear the death of webspiders recursing infinitely until they die they die the "lack o memory" death

    --
    I Don't Work Here