Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Saturn V

Illbay writes "Space.com has a great story about a company in Colorado that has introduced an incredibly detailed scale model of the Saturn V rocket booster that flies a lot like the real thing! Apogee Components has "taken the time to research the actual vehicles and then used that information correctly in creating the kits," with a scientist from the team that designed the Delta 2 rocket on staff. I remember the old Estes model rocket version of the Saturn V back in the 60s, but they were not very detailed and very difficult to get to fly properly. Looks like Apogee might have a winner."

47 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Scale by momerath2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Standing more than 62 inches (1.6 meters) tall and weighing about three pounds (1.4 kilograms) at launch, the most detailed reproduction of a Saturn 5 readily available today is 1/70th the size and 1/2,166,666th the weight of the original.

    "It's just a matter of scale as far as the rockets are concerned. The laws of physics don't change,"


    Try telling that to a 2-atom-wide model rocket.

    The laws of physics are a tad different on the quantum scale. ;-)

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    1. Re:Scale by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The question is, how many atoms in size does your model have to have before you have something recognizable as a Saturn V, whose design can carry out all the basic functions of a Saturn V? We're talking about multiple stages of rocket here, with propellant, and so on. (The site is pretty slow so I'm not interested in all the details.) The model uses solid rocket engines, so your model can too within the purposes of this question.

      The model might end up being less than 100 atoms across, though I doubt it. I'm guessing at least 500. Still quite small enough to make it a considerably different game than the larger rockets... But a question whose answer I am genuinely interested in. Anyone having tea with drexler tomorrow?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Scale by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Funny
      You could build a pretty nice planetary model with 2 atoms though. Even with only one in fact.

      No, you can't. I won't Bohr you with the details of why you're wrong (or at least about 50 years out of date).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:Scale by Buran · · Score: 2, Funny

      But on the Rutherford hand ... the atom model on the Greek 10-drachma piece was rather spiffy lookin'.

    4. Re:Scale by pVoid · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It's just a matter of scale as far as the rockets are concerned. The laws of physics don't change

      The laws might not change, but the constants in the equations do. Specifically, air is much 'more viscous' for a model, after all, if the model is 1/70th the scale, then the atmospehere it's going in should be 1/70th of a bar.

      Also the drag coefficient of everything doesn't scale properly. It's really a question of scalability, and I think the IT crowd of all people should understnad that.

  2. Very interesting by edmz · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm not much of a fan of rockets nor space flying history, but this quote from the saturn 5 page got me quite interested:
    The sound waves could easily pulverize a human's skeleton if he was unlucky enough to be within a mile of the launch pad. Even at further distances, the sound waves felt like someone was thumping on your chest with their fists.
    1. Re:Very interesting by EvanED · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep. As with the Shuttle launches, the noise is actually what makes the safe distance 3 miles, not anything having to do with the rocket exhaust.

    2. Re:Very interesting by mraymer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In fact, according to History Channel's show Modern Marvels, the only man-made sound louder than a Saturn V at liftoff is the detonation an atomic bomb.

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    3. Re:Very interesting by twiddlingbits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are at least two errors in your post. 1) Safe distance has nothing to do with Sound at all, it's the maximum range of the debris pattern at ground level if it blew up on the pad. 2) The Saturn V launch was close to 200db, while thats VERY VERY loud, its not going to kill you. It's not as loud as say a 155mm howitzer, but its louder than most jets. Think standing at the end of the runway and see a jumbo jet taking off and then add a bit. 200db WILL make you stone deaf but it won't kill you. NASA also had the exhaust of the Saturn V channeled down under the Pad and massive water Jets also sprayed the pad to keep it cool and it also reduced the sound levels. I have observed (and heard) a SSME on a Test Stand from about 300 yards away and that was insanely loud but there was not any noise dampening and I can still hear fine . But the SSMEs are not nearly the thrust of a Saturn V (393,800 pounds per each SSME vs 1.5 Million for a F-1 (of which there are 5 on a Saturn V)). Calculating acoustics effects is complicated; the level at a given distance depends on many details, such as source power and size, frequency, wavefront form, and humidity (higher humidity dampens sound faster..at the Cape it is VERY humid). Three miles sounds like an exaggeration, and without any reference data it cannot be verified.

    4. Re:Very interesting by bacon-kidney-pie · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do they actually work out how much sound would pulverise a human skeleton? I bet Nasa has a whole file on that.

    5. Re:Very interesting by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      200db is a energy density of about 100 MW/m^2.

      This will kill you in a few milliseconds.
      140db->deaf after a hour or so
      160db->deaf at once
      180db->danger of internal injurie, blood vessel ruptures, ect
      200db-> RIP
      This ofcource is only true if this noise level is reached where you are. If the 200db are 1meter below the thrusters, and you are 250m away, you may only get 150or so and still be alive and kicking.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  3. World's first by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Standing more than 62 inches (1.6 meters) tall and weighing about three pounds (1.4 kilograms) at launch, the most detailed reproduction of a Saturn 5 readily available today is 1/70th the size and 1/2,166,666th the weight of the original.

    "It's small step for man, a giant step for Mini Me" -- Dr. Evil

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  4. what a troll by segment · · Score: 3, Funny

    And I was getting all hot under the collar thinking about maybe pulling up in my model Vue tomorrow with 24's spinning, music flaring, DVD's behind the sear in a pimperrific three piece fohsachee suit, and you're talking about a rocket.

    I thought you meant the car damnit

  5. Not for long by igabe · · Score: 5, Informative

    URGENT NEWS ABOUT MODEL ROCKETRY!

    The new Homeland Security Act has many provisions that threaten rocketry in the United States. Both small rockets and high power models are affected. We need your help to make rocketry legal again. Please write your State's Senator now. Click Here for more information.

    If the video on that page becomes slashdotted, go here
    --
    tilTrue.info contechtext.info prettypowerful.info twitter.com/frets fb.com/prosody
    1. Re:Not for long by pi+eater · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just come practice your hobby in Canada, we'll allow anything! In fact, I think that my neighbour might be the world's newest nuclear power.

      geek gear

    2. Re:Not for long by HillBilly · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are you going to do with a model rocket? Shoot down a model Space Shuttle Columbia?

      Oh I'm going to be modded down for this one :)

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
  6. Why build your own Saturn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're affordably priced little cars. I'm sure buying the parts just costs more, and people haven't been building cars themselves for nearly a century.

  7. Mirror by mrwonton · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a mirror for you

    --
    Not more than you need, just more than you want
  8. Model Rocketry Is In Trouble by MountainLogic · · Score: 4, Informative

    The office of home land paranoia is really doing it's best toshut down this kind of hobby. See here for more details.

    1. Re:Model Rocketry Is In Trouble by bm_luethke · · Score: 2

      I tell you what, after reading the list of people who seem to be wanting to ban it I would say they are wrong.

      Something has to be off when the Patriot Act republicans and the anti-gun democrats vehemently agree on something.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  9. Slashdotting's effect on sales? by subk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how many of us geeks will click add-to-cart tonight?

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
  10. Reasons why I'm not impressed: by cmowire · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1) Solid rocket engines. They have made Peroxide+Gasoline rocket engines in small scale. Use one of them. At the very least a pressure fed John Carmack special style engine.
    2) One stage. The Saturn V has 3 stages. This one, and all of the injection-molded toys before it, were only 1 stage. Where's the fun in that?
    3) Injection molding. Where's the work in that?

    1. Re:Reasons why I'm not impressed: by feronti · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obviously you're not a model rocketeer:) There are several reasons for using solid rocket motors in this kit:

      1. This kit (I'm assuming; can't get to the site:) is aimed at non-high power certified members of the NAR (National Association of Rocketry) and TRA (Tripoli Rocketry Association). Non-solid non-premanufactured engines are not allowed for these classes of member at events sanctioned by either, and using them on your own is a good way to get your insurance cancelled. At Level 1 certification in either organization, you can use hybrids, but you still can't use experimental engines. IIRC, NAR does not allow experimental engines at any cert level, and TRA only allows it at Level 3.
      2. Regulatory reasons. As others have mentioned, the Homeland Security Act is very tough on the hobby. Even without that, FAA regs make flying a liquid-fueled experimental engine very difficult, IIRC.

      That said, I do have to agree about the other 2... especially if that single stage isn't a 5-engine cluster:)

    2. Re:Reasons why I'm not impressed: by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One stage. The Saturn V has 3 stages. This one, and all of the injection-molded toys before it, were only 1 stage. Where's the fun in that?
      Hmmm... The 3 stages of the Saturn V are disposable and have no recovery chutes. Seeing your $225 rocket return safely as a $12 command module.... Where's the fun in that?
  11. Good ol' rocket days by mharris007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember the good ol' days of rocket launching, always a blast; Estes was awesome back in the day. Have any of you seen the movie October Sky, that was an excellent film. Anyways, they had all kinds of scale rockets, and planes, nowhere near this detail though, but fun none the less.

    --


    ---
    Mike
    I'm going to kick the next person that I see with their karma rating in their sig.
    1. Re:Good ol' rocket days by xyote · · Score: 3, Funny

      See the movie October Sky? We were shooting steel pipes into the sky in those days (pre Estes). You took a keen interest in where those suckers came down. Mostly suger and salt peter fuel (hint don't cook this up in your kitchen unless you think soot from premature combustion is a nice decorative motif) but we had an Explorer post sponsored by IBM with geek IBM engineers as advisors with unlimited buget. Bad idea. Dialog right out of Real Genius. "Oh, don't breath any of that zinc powder. It's microgranulated and highly toxic". "Yeah, your finger will stick instantly to the strain gauge if you touch that new instant glue Kodak just invented. Let's get the razor blade and unstick your finger." "Aieeee...".

  12. Estes rocket not detailed ? by LouSir · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember getting the Estes Saturn V kit around 1971. Not detailed ? How about cutting long balsa rods exactly to spec then gluing them together to form that steel lattice work at the top of the rocket. That's detail. I never managed to complete it cause it had about 841,231 pieces. It also took about $5 in engines which in 1971 was a lot of money for a kid. LouSir

  13. Build your own Saturn V cheaper! by tsangc · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://shop.lego.com/product.asp?p=7468 :)

  14. Please Help Save Model Rocketry by physicsnerd · · Score: 5, Informative
    For more info on what's going on and how you can help go to:

    http://www.saverocketrynow.org/

  15. Still good in the rerun by poptones · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is a really old story. I don't recall if I read it here or on ars, but I first read about this thing a really, really long time ago (like maybe July, 2002?)

    Anyway, it's worth the trip to follow the links to the website of the people who make this thing. There are some fantastic MPEG clips of flights of this model that (were, maybe not are) available for download.

    Why is it so cool to watch a model fly? Check it out and see. The thing is so big nad heavy it "lifts off" just like a "real" rocket. None of this 3-2-1 disappear in a puff of smoke. You actually get several frames of liftoff before it really picks up speed... very cool.

  16. Re:I NEED one of these by sakusha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it only 5 years old? IIRC, it has to be one of the original 1970s kits to be worth anything. If it's 5 years old, it's probably still in production and thus less valuable. But put it up on eBay and see what you get. Or better yet, finish it, but not with the multiple Estes D motors, which were almost impossible to light simultaneously, rip that crap out and put in a mount for a single G engine.
    Anyway, the coolest rocket I ever built was also the last kit I ever built, a very simple design of a 2-stage rocket with a G motor and a second stage D motor. Construction was critical, it had laminated pine fins. The manufacturer said it would hit the sound barrier, and either smash to bits, or emit an audible sonic boom. But you had to stand in exactly the right spot to hear the faint boom, IIRC it was 180 feet from the launch pad. Yep, I heard the boom, it went up and up, and vanished forever. Must've gone at least 3000ft.

  17. This explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, this is what Apogee have been up to... now we know why Duke Nukem Forever is taking so long.

  18. Re:Scaling it up?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    so if we could blow it up,

    Now ain't that an unfortunate choice of words!

  19. scaled servers by skydude_20 · · Score: 2, Funny

    even their servers were built to a minature scale, not the big real machines needed for a good ol' slashdotting...

    mirrors please?

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  20. good ol' dangerous days by eamonman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish things were the 60's again:

    1. We shot rockets to the moon (whose side effects could apparently kill you)
    2. We had really powerful pesticides like DDT (although it could kil you too.)
    3. We had extra heavy and powerful cars like the dart that really did intimidate (although getting into a simple crash could kill you).

    Apparently everything tended to build character in those days. It's a testament I suppose to the advancements in technology that we don't 'build character' as much anymore ;)

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
  21. booster models by igny · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I would be interested in a working 1:60 (~1/60^3 in weight) model of the most powerful launch vehicle in the world . Imagine:

    Standing ~40 inches (1.0 meters) tall and weighing about 10 kilograms (quite chubby) at launch...

    If the scale doesnt matter in laws of physics one can expect a useful payload to be ~ 100t/60^3 ~ 460grams ~ 1 pound to be launched to low orbits, and about 100 grams to the geostationary orbit, and about 150 grams to be sent on the lunar mission trajectory.
    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  22. Re:I NEED one of these by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny
    I remember this one well, even though it's been 30 years. I actually finished it. It took me a couple of weeks.

    We brought it down to the field at the end of the street. When it launched, it quickly shot up to about twelve(yes 12) feet and begun spinning in circles wildly in place at first then right towards us. Just missed my brother as he dove behind the dirt mound that it slammed into and shattered all my hard work.

    Probably my poor construction that caused the misfire. And what a range of emotions in those few quick moments:

    Surprise -> Scared Shitless -> Elation -> Sadness

    Speaking of the Sadness after the crash, I just thought I'd mention this as I just remembered and it made me laugh again. A few years later my brother got into model airplane building. These things were a Ton of work. He brought his plane down to the elementary school as they had a nice wide open space. About 15 seconds into flight it banks left and smashes into a tree completely wasting it. He builds a second plane, back to school, 15 seconds, smashes into side of school.

  23. how about a 1x scale version by ksheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    NASA needs something to launch big heavy payloads into space. The shuttles are ok, but a unmanned vehicle would be extremely useful for shipping new sections to the ISS or a hubble replacement.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  24. Re:Speaking of Estes... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not like that. I have flown scale lear jet kits that had ducted fan engines that were gas powered. However, at $15 a gallon for the special fuel, it got expensive and I went back to prop jobs that used regular ole 2-cycle fuel (gas with oil mixture like you put into your chain saw).

    This was like 10 years ago, the engines were a tad bit under powered and expensive. I think that plane took about 5 months and $6000 with engines and all to put together. It flew fine, but couldn't do any fancy manouvers.

    Any serious R/C plane gear will cost you about $150 for a starter kit. Anything less than that is more of a toy than a hobby kit. I just got into R/C planes again and it cost me about $300 for a gas powered trainer with remote.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  25. Just from reading the Slashdot headline... by questforme · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the first milli-second I thought "Wow, a life size Saturn V Rocket!", the second thought I had was "I need more money and a bigger back yard". After half a second I caught on.

  26. not really a jet by rebelcool · · Score: 2, Informative

    a real jet takes air and compresses it and explodes it with a fuel mixture.

    that said, there *are* RC jets. They're hideously expensive and tempermental and so fast as to be very difficult to fly. Only extremely experienced fanatics can build and fly them.

    This company builds actual micro jet engines.

    --

    -

  27. Not really true .... by taniwha · · Score: 3, Insightful
    first of all it's from New Zealand and secondly it's not a rocketpowered device - it's pulse jet powered (ie it's a V1 not a V2).

    Modern hobby rockets (like I and many others fly) do one thing well (and not even that) - they go up. We have wonderfull guidance devices called 'fins' they make things go straight provided they are fast enough and there's still air around - even then you're at the mercy of the wind, the jet stream as you pass thru it (yes we do) etc etc.

    In other words hobby rockets don't have the sort of guidance system you would use when you want to hit a target - if the Congress was actually thinking rather than just reacting "people with rockets must be dangerous and could be terrorists we must do something to show that we are doling something" and they wanted to stop actual attacks on real targets they would: shut down the public GPS, ban RC model planes (or ratehr radio gear) and would never have given those 1000s of stingers to binLaden in the first place.

  28. Rocket Simulation Software is also available by shancock · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been into model rocketry for about two years now with my 12 year old son. It is great fun for both of us. Like most other hobbies, it can be approached from many levels with equal enjoyment. We got the rocket simulation software (Rock Sim) from Apogee last year. It allows you to build model rockets on the software (3D) (using standard parts from hobby stores) and test their flight and return to earth (just as important in models as in real rockets). You can then save and print out the details. There is a demo available on Apogees' site.

    Our problem has been in finding good places to launch. We get rained out alot from local rocket club launches and its hard to find places to shoot on our own. We sometimes sneak over to nearby schools with their large playgrounds early on Sunday mornings to launch. Risky in post 9/11 USA.

    Going to local rocket club launches is also fun. Not only can you shoot your own rockets off but you can watch the big and experimental rockets launching.

    A good source of beginner rockets and hybrid motors for the big boys is Pratt Hobbies. www.pratthobbies.com.

  29. blueprints are not lost by fredmosby · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:blueprints are not lost by adeyadey · · Score: 4, Funny

      To quote that article..

      In years past, rumors have abounded that in the 1970s the White House or Congress had the Saturn 5 plans destroyed "to prevent the technology from falling into the wrong hands".

      That seems doubtful -- it would be a formidable terrorist group that decided to build a Saturn 5 to wreak havoc on the world, or build a lunar base..


      There is only one such group. Picture Blofelt sitting in a chair stroking a cat. "Ah, Mr Bond, we've been expecting you.."

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  30. Re:I saw a Saturn V launch myself. by iCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tell us about the ragtime, Daddy-O ;-)