Slashdot Mirror


Memory Hole Un-Redacts Redacted DOJ Memo

DrDNA writes "After a Freedom of Information Act request, the US Justice Department released a study on workplace diversity. However, nearly half of the memo was blacked-out. In what was apparently an incredible goof, it was posted in a PDF format called Image+Text. The folks at The Memory Hole simply removed the image, revealing the redacted text. The redacted text was highly critical of the DOJ's diversity efforts, as the New York Times reports." Folks, if you're going to be sneaky, at least do enough research to make sure you're really being sneaky.

8 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. your tax dollars at work by dauvis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I had information that I didn't want the public to see I would have at least made sure that the information was not accessible by someone who is using a hex editor. I made a PDA program for myself that stored passwords I had for various websites (when you have a different one for each site, it sometimes gets a little hard to keep track of them in your head). However, before I actually started using it, I looked at the binary image of the record or the PDA that was being created. Well, it turned out that the mechanism for "securely" storing the information was just making it inaccessible through the API. In the end, I had to write my own storage mechanism using a standard encryption technique. The moral of this story is, just because you can't get to it doesn't mean it's not there for someone to find.

    Of course the people/person at The Memory Hole will be labeled as a hacker/pirate/terrorist by the justice department.

  2. What they remove by big_debacle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it is most interesting to see what the government has decided shouldn't be revealed to the public. Classified sources? Nope. National Security threat? Nope. Poor HR? Yes. Discrimination within the government? Yes.

    Not to incite flames, but this speaks volumes about the Bush administration.

  3. Re:This happened once before... by epiphani · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Arent the people who do this pretty much putting a big white and red target on themselves? I was under the impression, with things like the PATRIOT act, as well as the DMCA, that this type of thing would get you detained without a lawyer.

    Granted, I'm not american, but judging how the country has been going, I'm surprised the people uncensoring these reports arent vanishing without a trace.

    --
    .
  4. Re:This happened once before... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You see, this document was supposed to be released to the public anyway. The redaction was dirty pool, and none of the information was a national secret. It was simply embarrasing to those in power.

    Truth be told the fact it was redacted in the first place is far more disturbing than the actual content that was removed. Especially since its release was the subject of a Freedom of Information Act case.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  5. Re:Still waiting... but... by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Insightful
    On the whole measuring diversity is pointless.

    The idea of equal opportunity and equal rights should be that you just hire whoever is better for the job, and hit anyone making this not so with a big stick that has a nail in it.

    Actually, according to the memo, the issue here was not just about diversity, but active discrimation. They were not hiring whoever was better for the job, they were giving better chances to caucasians: certain career opportunities were only offered to caucasians, critical information was withheld from minorities. The playing field was severly skewed against minorities. Yes, in this memo lack of diversity is just a polically correct euphemism for outright racism!

    Aiming for exactly 50% one thing or another is no less sexist/racist than only hiring women or only hiring men (etc).

    It was not about aiming at exactly 50%, but rather about aiming at anything above 0% for the minority employees!

  6. absolutely appalling by treat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Notice that the blacked out text is always negative, where positive text is left in. This makes the redacted official version a deliberate deception. The people responsible should be held accountable.

  7. Re:Memory Hole Goes To Jail by Soko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The parent post is neither troll nor funny. If I had mod points at present, it would get "+1 Insightful".

    In reality, though, I'd rather give it "+1 Scary".

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  8. Can we give the parent comment a score of 6? by bigpat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Truth be told the fact it was redacted in the first place is far more disturbing than the actual content that was removed."

    Government representatives are only supposed to keep stuff secret that would give a potential enemy vital information... blacking out anything that doesn't meet this criteria should be a hanging offense. If this report is true, then this is obviously corruption in its most base and basic form.

    Next thing you know we will be trillions of dollars in debt spending half our income on taxes with social security about to collapse and being told that everything will be okay. Oh wait a sec...