Slashdot Mirror


Hacking Samsung 4510-Based APs

zoobab writes "Some belgian linux hackers met this week-end to hack some wireless access points based on the samsung4510 chip. They have succeeded in compiling and booting a uClinux kernel on a Dlink 614ap+, which is equipped with the infamous acx100 wireless chipset. There's still some work to do, but if you want to help, open your 22mbps AP and try to built your own JTAG adaptator to get access to the flash..."

21 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Minitar too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The new Minitar (www.minitar.com) access point runs Linux. It uses the Realtek RTL8181 SoC (it's MIPS based) and if you look in the Minitar forum you will find the link for the source code. Unfortunately the good stuff such as the wireless core driver is in binary form only. Hopefully this will change soon.

  2. Linksys WRT54G runs on Linux by savaget · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Linksys WRT54G runs on Linux. a lot of hacking done on them. some have even boosted its power output by send it command through its ping utility.

  3. gotta say by aminorex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    THIS is the kind of article that I started
    reading slashdot for, pre-dotcom.

    YuGo, girl.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  4. forgot the link by savaget · · Score: 4, Informative
  5. This is making a big difference in the devel. wrld by the+man+with+the+pla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Very quickly I wish to say thank you to these hackers and similar programmers working on extending hardwares beyond original manufacturer intentions. I run a small business in India selling computer components. Many times, I am able to get much more out of inexpensive hardware due to peoples projects. In the developing world we simply cannot afford the high prices manufacturers are charging for certain equipment, but with these projects we are able to succeed. Many thanks. Rushabh.

    --
    The linux hacker
  6. Re:Grammar checking on slashdot? by toast0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to mention, what the heck is an adaptator?

    I don't think it's wise to plug a potato into an AP

  7. wow by loraksus · · Score: 2, Informative

    A 614+ is like $25 AR, the radio and antennas in it sucks but for the money it really can't be beat . . . This is quite cool.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  8. On a slightly related note... by revmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been playing around with the firmware on my (non-linux) Linksys BEFW11S4 Acess point(the WAP/router one), but I've run into an issue where, apparently there is a checksum on the firmware image files, and it cannot thus be changed without also changing the checksum to match your changes.

    Unfortunatly, I'm not leet hax0r, so I have no idea how to find the checksum in a hex editor, anyone have an idea where it would be?(yeah I've checked the first and last bits of the file.)

    --
    I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
  9. Why? by tintruder · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Though the portability of Linux is cook, one must ask why is there such an effort to install Linux on every possible device?

    Especially since virtually all such efforts result in a device less flexible, less reliable and harder to use than the original. (XBox?)

    Perhaps combining these various pools of skill (which I do not minimalize or trivialize for a moment) and supporting some real helpful and Linux-promoting projects would be a better use of resources?

    For instance, if Linux is to be a real competitor to Windows, how about using these skills to build simple distros and simple methods of installing and uninstalling apps on them that do not require arcane command line utilities and other tasks. Just insert the CD or click on the download and be done.

    Usability based on installability is the achilles heel of Linux for the masses.

    Until folks realize this and redirect their efforts to more useful pursuits, installing Linux by destroying a perfectly good AP is no more useful than installing it on a stapler.

    Right now, a typical PC user without Linux is like an Astronaut without an accordian.

  10. Mmmm, tators!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    JTAG adaptator

    Is that like Tator Tots? Say, I'm hungry.

    /me heads to kitchen for some overprocessed potato goodness.

  11. For the uninformed by Clockwurk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dlink 614ap+, which is equipped with the infamous acx100 wireless chipset.

    I have this router (and I have been nothing but pleased with it), and would like to know why the acx100 chipset is considered infamous. It seems to function correctly and the 22Mbps is a nice bonus when used with the compliant cards. Where (or rather what)'s the beef?

    1. Re:For the uninformed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lack of Linux support from TI.

      Not to mention, that seems like even the drivers for my XP machine, are crap. BSOD and other weird behaviour. Speed is good, when you can actually get it to work.

      I'd love it if it was opened up, then maybe some real programmers could make it work better. As it stands now, I get rid of my 650+ and go back to reliable old Orinoco card.

    2. Re:For the uninformed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      the acx100 chipset is considered infamous because of texas instruments' refusal to provide documentation for open source drivers (remember that this chipset is used both in APs/Routers and NICs).......anyway despite their refusal to cooperate the people over at acx100.sf.net have manage to create drivers anyway

      btw...i have to mention that i love the acx100 with its support for 256bit encryption and 802.11b+ (@ 22 mbps).........i think that there is also a low power version of the chipset in development..........

      heres hoping that this project can give me a little more flexibility for my D-link 650+ (unfortunately using the 256bit encryption breaks compatibility with anything but acx100 equiped computers)

  12. Go back to Redmond, troll. by twitter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Though the portability of Linux is cook, one must ask why is there such an effort to install Linux on every possible device?

    A cook is nice. Cookbooks are better.

    People make free drivers because the stupid devices are everwhere but limited by software. It takes lots of capital to make semiconductor devices, so there are only a few companies that do. Because of this, almost all hardware uses one of a dozen chipsets made for that kind of device. This is why Knoppix fits on a single CD and recognizes thousands of devices. Once you get a free driver, many devices can be used and you don't have to go out and buy a new one because the vendor does not make a non-free driver for the next eXPensive OS from M$. There are enough people interested in free drivers to get them. The pace is picking up and the quality is very impressive. Device drivers are a showcase of the effieciency of free software development. Everyone wins when a device driver comes out.

    Especially since virtually all such efforts result in a device less flexible, less reliable and harder to use than the original. (XBox?)

    Now you are a real troll. Obviously an Xbox that both runs M$'s games AND free software is more felxible than an Xbox that only plays M$ games.

    Usability based on installability is the achilles heel of Linux for the masses.

    So is the ignorance you display, except it's much easier to hit than a tendon.

    installing Linux by destroying a perfectly good AP is no more useful than installing it on a stapler.

    A stapler does not do iptables, run configuration utilities over a web server or act as a meshpoint. More importantly, your stapler won't tell other people about your bank account, herpese medication and other stuff most people would like to keep to themselves.

    Right now, a typical PC user without Linux is like an Astronaut without an accordian.

    A typical comercial software user is much like a typical free software user, except they are $400 poorer, have no privacy, suffer frequent crashes, and have to buy all new hardware every three years. Oh wait, that's nothing like the typical Linux user.

    t intruder, you don't get paid enough to write such drivel but you are not worth what you are paid.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Go back to Redmond, troll. by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now you are a real troll. Obviously an Xbox that both runs M$'s games AND free software is more felxible than an Xbox that only plays M$ games.

      Except they don't. You either do the software mod, and fool around with finding the appropriate cables, a copy of Mechassault, etc etc, put the modifications together, and then you can't access the XBox live settings pane anymore ( oops! ).

      Or, you modchip the console, and unless you buy a fancy-pants switching one, you can't use access the XBox live service anymore ( oops! ).

      Either way, there is some degradation of function from the original design of the console. ( Oh yes, and god help you if it requires servicing... ) Maybe it is more flexible. It certainly isn't more useful. [*]

      My XBox is an excellent gaming machine. My P4 is an excellent Linux machine. For a community that has long chanted about using 'the right tool for the job', Linux is starting to look suspiciously like a hammer, and anything with a floating point unit and mmu, a nail.

      [*] - Of course, that's no reason not to do it, if that's what floats your boat. I don't agree with grandparent posts sentiments.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  13. Re:Grammar checking on slashdot? by maggard · · Score: 2, Funny
    I don't think it's wise to plug a potato into an AP

    Thus "WiFry", as in "Would you like WiFry with your Happy Meal(tm)?"

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  14. Linksys/Broadcom release wrt54g source & toolc by Jim+Buzbee · · Score: 4, Informative

    In a related note, Linksys/Broadcom have released source code and the toolchain used in the wrt54g access point. They even have instructions on how to build your own firmware.

    Everything you need to build your own firmware is available in version 1.42.2

    Note that my wrt54g linux distribution won't work with version 1.42.2 unless your modify the firmware to re-enable the wrt54g "ping hack"

  15. Sigh by xXunderdogXx · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is one of those articles on slashdot that I wish I knew what it was talking about. I only understood "wireless" and "the" in the description. I'll keep reading.

    1. Re:Sigh by doug363 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Translation:

      Some Belgian Linux programmers ("hackers" because they have worked out how to get hardware to do things other than what it was intended to) met this week-end to get Linux running on DLink 614ap+ wireless networking access points (the little receivers that act like hubs or swtiches for wireless networks). (DLink is the brand, and 614ap+ is the model.) These access points have CPUs in them to handle configuration tasks and whatnot. The CPU in these particular access points was the Samsung 4510 chip. They have compiled and run a specialized, stripped down version of Linux called "uClinux" (the uC is an abbreviation of "microcontroller"; the micro symbol looks like a "u") on the microcontroller in the access point.

      The access points also contain a Texas Instruments ACX100 wireless chipset, which does the signal processing necessary for the 802.11b protocol that the device supports. The ACX100 also allows devices to communicate at 22mbps with other wireless network cards or access points that use the ACX100, using a proprietary method. This chipset has caused headaches for Linux users (PC Linux users) who own wireless networking cards that use this chipset, because Texas Instruments haven't released documentation on how the chipset works. This makes writing a device driver difficult, and so Linux users can't use wireless networking if they own a wireless network card based on these chipsets.

      There's still some work to do. (I think they mean that they haven't worked out how to use the ACX100 from the microcontroller.) If you want to help, and you've got one of these access points (i.e. it says it supports 22mbps and 802.11b), open up your access point. Once it is open, build a JTAG adaptor (JTAG is a protocol that is used to communicate with embedded microcontrollers and programmable hardware). Get your JTAG adaptor to plug into your PC (probably via a serial or parallel port) and read or re-write the flash memory (i.e. the memory where the program code that runs on the microcontroller is stored). If you can read the memory, sending the memory contents to these people might help them understand how the ACX100 works in more detail. I doubt you'd want to re-write the memory unless you're testing code with them and you're willing to end up with a useless brick instead of a wireless access point. From their screenshots, they have written a bootloader that they write to the access point's flash memory. The bootloader downloads uCLinux from one of the computers plugged into it (i.e. normal wired ethernet), and runs it.

  16. credit where credit is due by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    then you can't access the XBox live settings pane anymore ( oops! ).

    Free software won't keep you from Xbox Live, Microsoft will. They will kick you off Microsoft live if they detect mods of any type. Non free software is like that, oops. Go buy a Play Station instead of a M$ gimped, 700MHz PeeeCeeee if you really want to play games. Sony does a better job at Linux too, Go figure.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  17. Re:Go back to Redmond, troll ??? by SiliBelgian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Go back to Redmond, troll

    The man was talking about how we can make Linux more accessible to people who don't know much about how a pc works. He seems to be someone who likes the Open-Source Project as much as me, or you, or the next guy.
    I don't fully agree with him either. Hey, if you like the idea of running Linux on everything around you, nothing stops you from trying it, right? (except for that evil DMCA mb) However, because you seem to see everything black-white ('us' vs. 'them'), you wrongfully classified him as an M$-lover, which he is clearly not.

    Although most of your arguments perfectly make sense, let me just respond to some of them.

    People make free drivers ... Everyone wins when a device driver comes out.

    This is very true, the more hardware is supported by Linux the better. However, we are not talking about device drivers here, we are talking about embedding Linux into various devices.

    t intruder, you don't get paid enough to write such drivel but you are not worth what you are paid.

    Didn't quite understand this, sorry. Looked offensive anyway. Can't we all just get along?

    --


    "Hell hath no fury like a hippo with a machine gun."