Slashdot Mirror


Linux-Based Musical Keyboard Workstation Debuts

Henry G. writes "Lionstracs of Italy has released the Mediastation X-76 music workstation. It runs Red Hat and KDE 3.1. The base model features a 1.67 Ghz Athlon, 512MB RAM, 80GB HD, CDRW/DVD-ROM, 8.2" LCD, and a host of other things. Full specs can be found here and pictures can be found here. To this submitter, it looks more like a keyboardized computer than a computerized keyboard."

184 comments

  1. A piano keyboard for input? by gpinzone · · Score: 4, Funny

    For playing music, it's the bomb. However, the only thing I can type in OpenOffice is "FACE"

    1. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by jawschlech · · Score: 5, Funny

      CABBAGE, actually, is the longest word you can write with musical tones. And Baggage. Face a baggage cabbage--look, whole sentences. The possibilities are virtually endless!

      --
      JAWSchlech "The secret to success is knowing who to blame for your mistakes." - Despair.com
    2. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by phraktyl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, according to /usr/dict/words on a Solaris machine, and skipping the one-letter words, you can create:

      abbe, abc, abed, accede, ace, ad, adage, add, , dded, age, babe, bad, bade, badge, bag, baggage, be, bead, bed, bee, beef, beg, cab, cabbage, cafe, cage, cede, cf, dab, dad, dead, deaf, , ecade, deed, deface, deed, deface, ebb, edge, efface, egg, facade, face, fad, fade, fag, fed, fee, feed, gab, gad, gaff, gaffe, gag, gage, gee

      You could write a thesis with those!

      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    3. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by phraktyl · · Score: 1

      That should probably be 'decade' there in the middle, without that nasty double-comma. Dang text-input boxes...

      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    4. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This _is_ a computer we're talking about, so, uh... "Face a baggage cabbage, Babbage!"

      </badjoke>

    5. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by musikit · · Score: 1

      some musician (at least ones i know) when they want to spell out a word in music they basically start over at A after G so the alphabet essential gets a mod G so G = N mod G so if you wanted to spell out your favorite super hero name in music (Which my friend did) GREEN LANTERN GDEEG EAGFEDG

    6. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Please tell you used a shell script to find those!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he just used assembler.

    8. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by phraktyl · · Score: 1

      Not even a shell script. A little grep will do it. Although I did end up reformating it in the text box---hence the typo. The long list of words tripped the lameness filter...

      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    9. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by Mr_Icon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, you could, arguably, write something in C#.

      --
      If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    10. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by micromoog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dad bagged a deaf babe.
      Egg a facade; deface!
      Deb acceded a bad deed.

    11. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by Pentagon13 · · Score: 1
      grep -v [h-z] /usr/dict/words

      acceded, baggage, cabbage, and facaded were the longest matches on my machine

    12. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you only need 8 characters to write programs in brainf*ck, the possibilities ARE endless!

    13. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by rsidd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Germans use H for B (and B for B-flat), that should help. (Thus Bach managed to encode his name into the last fugue he wrote, and it breaks off unfinished soon after he introduces that motif). Even more possibilities occur when you consider that E-flat is written Es, F-sharp is Fis, etc. Dmitry Shostakovich used DSCH (= D - Eflat - C - B) in many of his works.

    14. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dang. hehe, what a stupid american word

    15. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by manastungare · · Score: 1

      Or something like my WEP key, it's gotta be valid Hex, so it's DECAF CAFE BABE BAD DEAD FACE (with a bunch of zeros in there somewhere).

    16. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      JAWSchlech "The secret to success is knowing who to blame for your mistakes." - Despair.com

      That should be whom.

    17. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but then you would be a fuck-tard.

    18. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      The Germans use H for B (and B for B-flat), that should help.

      You have it backwards; They use H for B-flat, but aside Bach did get his name into the fugue.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    19. Re:A piano keyboard for input? by rsidd · · Score: 1
      You have it backwards; They use H for B-flat

      No. Have you heard Bach's last fugue? Then you wouldn't make that claim. You'll find a score here, look at bar 201, pg 97

  2. Already Slashdotted!! by ericdano · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, 3 comments and the site is down. :-(

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Already Slashdotted!! by NightWulf · · Score: 2, Funny

      The funny part is this line "This Website is powered by PostNuke." I guess slashdot is now more powerful than a nuke?

    2. Re:Already Slashdotted!! by bobdotorg · · Score: 1

      The funny part is this line "This Website is powered by PostNuke." I guess slashdot is now more powerful than a nuke?


      No - it just means that their IT staff employs cockroaches, which explains how their site went from zero to slashdeath in 3.7 comments.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    3. Re:Already Slashdotted!! by krymsin01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anyone who wants some more info about this product can check out this thread at Synth Zone here. That's about all I can find on it right now.

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:Already Slashdotted!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Site was fine when I went to it, but the database was down, so you couldn't see pics or features. The main page was accessible, though.

      Guess they shouldn't be running their database server on crappy hardware.......

  3. Looks just about right by Drubber · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, it doesn't look any more computerized than many other keyboard workstations out there (e.g., Yamaha Motif). The fact that you can hook up external LCDs, etc. in order to more fully exploit what's under the hood will put it a generation beyond.

    1. Re:Looks just about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More add-ons required put it a generation ahead? Maybe in the category of tearing more cash from the hands of their customers.

    2. Re:Looks just about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah looks great. I'm glad to see people following this route.

      10 years ago when I was doing DSP synthesis research
      I was pushing this philosophy very hard. Unix/Linux seemed the perfect environment for synthesis (which is often a process model) with its ability to make pipes and sockets carry raw audio signals. Sure, back then the realtime kernel aspects were a problem, but I was knocked back when my approaches to Roland and Yamaha etc were met with laughter and scepticism. [they make their own hardware]

      So after a decade someone is finally following the right path imho. What this company needs to do is develop a suite of OSS synthesis and sequencing modules based on Csound or Nyquist type technology and turn this keyboard into a kind of dedicated 'Reaktor' instrument , fully configurable native code modules running under a standard Linux OS would ROCK.

      This approach could blast a hole through the current market of music production workstations and make dedicated synthesiser, hard disk recorder and sampler units obsolete in a very short space of time. Good luck dudes.

    3. Re:Looks just about right by Drubber · · Score: 1

      What I mean is that the UIs on most keyboards suck by virtue of the fact that the designers must cram thousands of voices, features, and functions into a 320x160 display having eight function keys and a dial. The option to pay extra for a full blown screen, for example, is something that many musicians would jump at.

    4. Re:Looks just about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In UI terms it nicely fills the gap between dedicated boxes and full blown computer systems which many musos try to steer clear of.

      Many computer illiterate musicians will buy this as a 'workstation-keyboard' completely oblivious to the fact that they are buying a full on computer system and if the application level is written well enough they will never need to know, merely gain the benefits of a proper music production computer disguised as something familiar.

    5. Re:Looks just about right by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Arts was an attempt at this, sorta. It's abandoned now, last I heard.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Looks just about right by symbolic · · Score: 1


      Right. I purchased a Korg Trinity about 4 years ago, and it has a GUI touchscreen, optional hard drive, OS updates, the whole nine yards. It's an amazing piece of technology (even today), but I feel it was a bit hobbled by its measely 32-voice polyphony. If I'm reading the specs on this Lionstracs board, it has (256???) voice polyphony? I'd like to hear this thing.

    7. Re:Looks just about right by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > More add-ons required put it a generation ahead?

      No, more add-ons OPTIONAL putS it a generation ahead.

  4. Man.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Why does Slashdot go nuts over anything running Linux? I mean yeah, it's nice to see Linux being used everywhere but it's not big news.

    Shameless plug:
    Blogzine

    1. Re:Man.... by rlafflick · · Score: 2, Funny

      how come this is modded -1 insightful. Shouldn't that be inciteful?

  5. Can I run Logic on it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can I run Logic or any of the other industry-standard music applications ? If so, this would seem to be the breakthrough Linux has been waiting for in the audiophile/professional musician marketplace.

    1. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, Apple bought eMagic and Apple has a long history of porting applications to Linux such as Quicktime ... no wait ... iTunes ... no no hang on ... WebObjects ... ummmm. Apple is not interested in a 3 party OS world, it's them and Microsoft PERIOD. So long as Apple owns Logic, it will NEVER get ported to Linux because Apple like to imagine they're still number 2 even though we all know they're number 3 now.

    2. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by mirko · · Score: 1

      Since emagic has been bought by Apple, Logic only runs on MacOSX.
      And I doubt Steinberg will port Cubase SX to Linux within the next months...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a fukin retarted question. logic is the office of music

    4. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by paulbd · · Score: 0

      cubase sx has already been ported to linux. steinberg see no market for it. keep in mind that neundo (which is where the technology inside sx originates) was first written for irix ...

    5. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by sharph · · Score: 1

      one word...Ardour

    6. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by halfelven · · Score: 1

      Ardour is only for analog/digital sound, not for MIDI.
      Logic does a lot of MIDI, and that's actually the way it's used the most (sequencer on steroids).

    7. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by halfelven · · Score: 1

      If it runs Linux, you could probably run Rosegarden.
      It's pretty much a clone of an earlier Logic.

    8. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by sharph · · Score: 1

      then....

      one word....Rosegarden

    9. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by halfelven · · Score: 1

      bingo! ;-)

    10. Re:Can I run Logic on it ? by mirko · · Score: 1

      Porting not only means "make ; make install" but also organizing a support helpdesk, especially when you''re called Steinberg.
      Until then, this is a hack which is of no interest except for hackers.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  6. /.ed -- Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Problem in Database Connection

    This Website is powered by PostNuke

    Although this site is running the PostNuke software it has no other connection to the PostNuke Developers.
    Please refrain from sending messages about this site or its content to the PostNuke team, the end will result in an ignored e-mail.

    1. Re:/.ed -- Article Text by Dirus · · Score: 1
      Here are 14 screenshots from the screenshots link. (Although they aren't screenshots in the literal sense.) There was no text on the page except for the links to other parts of the site so you aren't missing anything by clicking directly on the links here.

      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

      Here are the specs from the specs link:

      Mediastation X-76 Standard

      • AMD Athlon 2200+, 1.67GHz, 266MHz bus
      • 512Mb RAM, expandable to 3Gb
      • M-ATX mainboard, 266Mhz system bus, 5 PCI expansion slots
      • ultra DMA 66/100 80Gb IDE hard disk, 100Mhz bus, CD-RW and DVD reader combo, 1.44Mb floppy drive
      • AGP-4 graphics card
      • 76 key weighted keyboard with modulation and pitch wheels
      • 256 voice polyphonic DSP
      • two 128 voice Wavetable sound modules with pitch shift and time stretch
      • 128Mb RAM on each DSP module, expandable to 256Mb for each module
      • 24 Audio Matrix Mixer I/O routing.
      • 12 Stereo I/O external jacks, 12 internal stereo I/O channels
      • 24bit D/A conversion
      • 176 double color LED buttons, eight mix faders, two master faders
      • data wheel, data slider, cursor buttons
      • 8.2" LCD, 640X480 pixel, 64.000 colors, external SVGA 1024X768, TV SVHS out
      • 4 USB2.0 ports, LAN 10/100, 2 PS/2 serial ports; mouse and keyboard, COM1, COM2, game, parallel port, VGA out, S/VHS out, 4 MIDI out
      • four programmable footswitch jacks, sustain pedal
      • MIDI in X 2, MIDI out X 4, total internal/external 20 MIDI out.
      • audio I/O; 12 stereo analog I/O jacks, four bus matrix with programmable IN/OUT routing, four microphones, two mono cue and mix outputs, two XLR main mix outputs, two XLR monitor outputs
      • 1/4 head phone jack
      • two lamps with dimmer functions (Optional)
      • internal standard power switching ATX, 350W, 220/110V
      • dimension and weight, 1170(W) 430(D) 127(H)mm, 29Kg

      Software

      • Red Hat Linux, KDE 3.1 window manager
      • Mozilla web browser, Kmail, Kwrite, CD authoring
      • Audio and MIDI sequencer, realtime midiplayer, MP3, MP4, DVD, DIVX, MPG, WAV, AVI, CD audio player
      • SEQ24 midi sequencer--customized for the Mediastation
      • style player, automatic import with EMC style converter
      • software upgrades and new applications available at no additional cost by internet download

      Mediastation X-76 Professional

      The Professional model includes all the features of the standard model and the following:

      • AMD Athlon XP 3000+, 2.167MHz, 400MHz bus
      • 4 available PCI slots for expansion
      • 1024Mb RAM, upgradable to 3072MB
      • 120Gb hard disk drive, 7200 RPM, 2Mb Cache, CD and DVD writer
  7. What a relief! by clifgriffin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You don't know how happy it makes me to know that no one will h4x0r my keyboard.

  8. Gosh dangit by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
    Right when I was about to check out the specs, /. effect. Argh..

    Anyway, before it got /.'ed, anybody catch what kind of DSP cards they were using? 256 polyphonic voices per card with a dedicated 256megs RAM. That sounds impressive.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
    1. Re:Gosh dangit by officepotato · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the DSP cards are in the synth, not the PC. I don't think those specs are that unusual for commercial synthesizers. Even on the low end, go into Radio Shack, hit the 'Demo' button on any keyboard, and try to count how many different notes, percussion instruments, etc. are playing simultaniously.

    2. Re:Gosh dangit by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
      256 polyphonic voices IS unique. Most synths/keyboards are 64/128. See, polyphonic voices are the number of voices played at the same time not one after another. The human hand can only play 20 voices (notes) at the same time .

      Since the advent of MIDI, these have slowly been going up due to the fact you can throw off a number of notes (voices) to a computer to playback. This way the performer does one part, while the computer does all the other parts.

      I just never knew they were up to 256 voices. That's enough to create your own orchestra ;)

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  9. Google cache by MP3Chuck · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Google cache by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good going, now the Google cache has also been slashdotted. :)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
  10. Website design: -1, Non-Intuitive by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The site does seem to be behaving slowly, but perhaps that's because some "expert" told the company that "surfers love clicky color-changy grafx!"

    The focal point is a picture of a keyboard, with these "helpful" navaids:
    Click on the upper left part of the Mediastation to view the features.

    Click on the upper right part of the Mediastation to view the specifications.

    Click on bottom left part of the Mediastation to view the demos.

    Click on the bottom right part of the Mediastation to view the screenshots.

    Wow, that's clear. I always think "Demo" when I look at the bottom left corner of a keyboard at Best Buy.

    It's a computerized keyboard, which implies a computer-human interface. Let's hope that the design team responsible for the web site wasn't allowed anywhere near the actual prodcuct. "Click on the penguin's right toe for MIDI Configuration!"
    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Website design: -1, Non-Intuitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know what you consider as an intuitive wedesign Mr. Robert AB-CD

    2. Re:Website design: -1, Non-Intuitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps http://www.dixie-chicks.com? :)

    3. Re:Website design: -1, Non-Intuitive by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      The AC says: I'd like to know what you consider as an intuitive wedesign

      Well, I'd send you to my own site, but I'm afraid that what it lacks in flashy, useless graphics is more than made up for by its difficult navigation, dead links, and outdated information...

      So yes, I'm PKB'ing.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    4. Re:Website design: -1, Non-Intuitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The site does seem to be behaving slowly, but perhaps that's because some "expert" told the company that "surfers love clicky color-changy grafx!" No, they are just stupid and dumb like bricks.

    5. Re:Website design: -1, Non-Intuitive by autechre · · Score: 1

      Read "Designing Web Usability" by Jakob Nielson. Great book, and not very expensive. It has plenty of examples for all of the points covered.

      The problem here is that the interface forces the user to make arbitrary connections between parts of a picture and functions/parts of the site. Without the descriptive text (which happens all too often), the user would have the additional burden of remembering which part does what. This one is a bit better than most: it clearly indicates which parts can be clicked, and uses hover to indicate what you're about to do. But it's still a completely pointless use of a large graphic. Show me a picture, sure, but give me standard, simple navigation.

      The site in my .sig was designed by me. It's certainly not perfect, but I'd hold it up against navigation like this any day.

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  11. How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before someone mods it to run Windows?

    (Laugh, it's a twist on the "How long before it runs Linux?" jokes)

    Shameless plug:
    Blogzine

    1. Re:How long by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      How long before someone mods it to run Windows?

      About 50 years, and then only as punishment for failing second grade OS design basics.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    2. Re:How long by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      gee, but for the explaination in the brackets, i would have never got it. thanks so much

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    3. Re:How long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. does that automatically, nitwit.

  12. Re:red hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, the real reason to use OBSD is because, OBSD knows music. Just take a look at the new songs for each release ;)

  13. Re:Article text in case it gets /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now that's a funny one.

  14. let's get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    in the rest of the world, it's a computerized keyboard

    in soviet russia, it's a keyboardized computer

    all clear now?

    1. Re:let's get this straight by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      Actually that would read: In the rest of the world it's a computerized keyboard.
      In soviet russia, it's keyboardized computer.
      Soviets don't seem to have 'a' or 'an' to speak of.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    2. Re:let's get this straight by Chyeburashka · · Score: 1

      Also no "is", (present tense of 'to be'), so no "'s", and computer is he, not it.

      In Soviet Russia, he keyboardized computer.

    3. Re:let's get this straight by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      that sounds right now.
      He keyboardized computer. He have wirus. You should clean now. Wery bad wirus.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
  15. Linux-Based Musical . . . by Antisthenes · · Score: 2, Funny
    Thanks to my ill-behaved crappy Windows scanner software that stuck an annoying window in front of Mozilla, I only saw the first half of the headline, which read:

    Linux-Based Musical

    And I thought that a LotR musical would be bad enough...

    1. Re:Linux-Based Musical . . . by Rex+Code · · Score: 1

      Hey, there's some potential here, methinks:

      There's no business
      like SCO business
      like no business we know

      everything about it is appealing
      stealing everything the traffic will allow
      nothing beats the pleasure they are feeling
      when they are stealing
      your linux code


      No, maybe not.

    2. Re:Linux-Based Musical . . . by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Starring Tux and the BSD Daemon... With songs like:

      Write in C
      Stop the bash
      Fsck you
      I'm your Xserver...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  16. This is good to see... by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

    Hopefully more things like this will open up the doors to more serious high-end audio tools for Linux. Lack of such things is probably the one thing keeping me from switching over completely. As for Red-Hat ... well, a custom Linux distro made for audio production workstations would garner some attention, no doubt.

  17. Do Musicians care about Linux? by StaticEngine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a musician's standpoint, I doubt many would care what OS their sound-making device is running. Most musicians just want a device that is stable, affordable, and sounds like they want it to sound. Lots of coveted synths (say, the Access Virus C) run an embedded OS, and musicians are totally happy with that.

    With software synths (Reason, Reaktor, plus the various VST and DXi synths available) gaining in popularity, a laptop and a small USB keyboard are all many electronic musicians need to get going. Factor into this the low cost (since downloading of MP3s is killing small/new artists more than it harms anyone associated with the RIAA), and the fact that even electronic musicians are not highly technically savvy ("Yo, mate, I plugged my 'board into the Insert Jack on this Mackie, becuase I want to Insert the sound, right?"), musicians will tend to go with what everyone else is using because then support is easy to find. Unless some new device offers some unique and killer sound with a dirt simple or intuitive user interface, it's just another box destined to fade into obscurity.

    1. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by Entropy248 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, we care about Linux. We care that it doesn't run Pro Tools well (or at all?), (as far as I know) does not support USB output of audio, does not run any quality professional software, and will not be supported by most major soundcard manufacturers.

    2. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by rzbx · · Score: 1

      Musicians aren't always the ones making the decisions. Think about it this way. Would a musician be the one deciding what OS to develop on?
      Many times the musician will seek help in determining what software he/she wants or needs. My friend, a musician, has been talking to me about computers, software, etc. that his group could use to record and do various other stuff. Also, I doubt that there aren't at least a few hundred musicians out there that use and maybe even develop on Linux.

      --
      Question everything.
    3. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      Well these guys definitely do.

      they even encoded it in ogg.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    4. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by RobPiano · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Sorry man, you are amazingly disconnected with the computer music scene. Although many of are enjoying macosx now, most of us know and like unix.

      Perhaps its while we are using pure-data, or STK or maybe CLAM or by chance audacity

      Linking is getting old, but being surronded by computer music, I promise you WE USE LINUX.

      Kind Regards,
      Rob

    5. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by cerebralpc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Musos care about cost. And Linux is cheap.
      Musos also care about drivers and unfortunately Linux doesn't deliver on this like Windows does.

    6. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not, but they do care about price, performance and value. If Linux helps a manufacturer create a product that satisifies musicians, then their sales go up, and the music gets better.

      On another note the people who hotrod classic instruments (like Hammond B3's) can't find enough time to do all the work that's needed. There is a huge retro market for musical instruments right now.

      Times change...perhaps one day musicians might be as interested in seeing a penguin logo on the box as they were/are to see a "General MIDI" logo.

    7. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      There's a few here who do.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it depends on what kind of musician you are .. i
      personally would Love to exploit my coding
      abilities in a dev-friendlier environment .. i'm
      hampered in this by having no *real* linux based
      choices for sound editing / sequencing (and no,
      audacity doesn't cut it). to have a native
      environment (even better, puggable with an API)
      would be Excellent

    9. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by slinkp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, we care about Linux. We care that it doesn't run Pro Tools well (or at all?),

      The latter.

      (as far as I know) does not support USB output of audio,

      This is incorrect. ALSA supports all standards-compliant USB audio and midi devices, and has done so for about a year IIRC.

      does not run any quality professional software,

      professional != commercial. At the risk of sounding like a stuck record: http://ardour.sf.net http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/rosegarden http I could go on...

      and will not be supported by most major soundcard manufacturers.

      ALSA supports RME, M-audio, and recently the Echo line (layla, gina, etc). That's prety good already, and support is only growing.

    10. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by marsu_k · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Most musicians just want a device that is stable, affordable, and sounds like they want it to sound.
      True, and Linux would fit the bill when it comes to stability and affordability. As to "sounding like they want it to sound", A/D or D/A conversion with the same sound card should produce the same results regardless of the OS. You can get ALSA support for most contemporary sound cards. But yes, VST plugin support sucks in Linux at the moment. I wish it were otherwise. Give me even a half decent multitrack with an ability to use VST effects (I really don't care that much for soft synths) and I'd remove my Windows partition. Until then I'll stick to my dual-boot box. I wish it were otherwise.
      even electronic musicians are not highly technically savvy ("Yo, mate, I plugged my 'board into the Insert Jack on this Mackie, becuase I want to Insert the sound, right?")
      Stop reading dancetech.com :-) We're not that stupid.
    11. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by StaticEngine · · Score: 1

      I wish I were joking. The former guitarist for SMP (currently half of the Seattle band Doll Factory) worked tech support at Mackie, and you would not believe the phone calls he would get. Not only is the above quote direct from a call he got, but he had irate customers who couldn't find the "custom cable" for the onboard microphones in the Mackie 8 Bus Consoles. Apparantly they thought the holes drilled in the plates above the surface mounted talkback microphones were custom jacks.

    12. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by Entropy248 · · Score: 1

      M-Audio does not support Linux. I have one of those. Both of those programs are BETA versions. Yeah, I wanna trust my $10,000 studio to BETA software. We're running Macs with ProTools, good luck getting us to convert. Why did I spend $2,000 on proven, reliable, proprietary software & hardware to find out I can give it all up and get the same thing for free with non-proprietary hardware? Because it's NOT a beta version. They barely support the de facto though not de "jure" (Latin, not French please) VST standards, refusing to bow to anyone else's extentions, preventing any optimization and further fragmenting the standard. Forget it and stick to Macs.

    13. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by LoudChris · · Score: 1

      since downloading of MP3s is killing small/new artists more than it harms anyone associated with the RIAA

      I've sold more albums through napster and kazaa, then I have at a gig, or a store.

    14. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by npsimons · · Score: 1
      From a musician's standpoint, I doubt many would care what OS their sound-making device is running.


      Not true. I'm a musician and a Linux geek. I refuse to pay outrageous fees to be shackled to proprietary software.


      While being a musician isn't my day job, I still play paid gigs, and go to rehearsals three nights a week.


      And while I'll admit that the selection of composition software for Linux is rather weak, I have a method to get around that; my day job title happens to be "computer scientist" ;-)

    15. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      "and the fact that even electronic musicians are not highly technically savvy"

      Actually not neccesarily so. You will find there is a correlation between programmers and musicians ,most of the techies I know have some sort of musical ability, and vice versa.

      Apparently the act of composing / creating music, uses the same part of the brain we use for coding. It has to do with pattern matching abilities and so forth.

      I for one would be much less likely to desire a shiny new powerbook, if I could use linux for my music needs. So I welcome this effort wholeheartedly.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    16. Re:Do Musicians care about Linux? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly a musician, but I'm most notably someone who cares about written word, graphical design, and such - in short, I'd be a printer.

      And I think GNU Lilypond absolutely rules. Definitely this is the best notation software I've seen - produces easily the most beautiful computer-printed scores I've seen. All this free.

      I like it because it allows me to work on musical scores just as easily as I work on any text. Also, it has - if I need it - support for macro-like constructs, so it also mildly interests me as a programmer. I think that on the time I've spent with the program, have also developed my own understanding on the fundamental issues of music.

      And it's also very cool as an interchange medium - the program reads plain text files that use very readable but at the same time flexible notation. I can put snippets of score on text-only places. Mouse-based note entry has ever since only made me angry! (If I want a quarter E, I'll write "e4", not click around for a minute trying to get it look right!) Also, I recently discovered the elegance of Lilypond's LaTeX2e interfacing; this is probably very important when producing well-typeset music-related documents...

      Also, be sure to read their "marketing material" (the "switch" tour and the essay on computerized music engraving, right on the front page). Every open source project should take note - a great way to market the software.

      There are still shortcomings (some of the more recently added features are not feature-complete or are, from what I heard, hacks that miraculously work - and also the MIDI output needs semi-manual unrolling of loops, which is sort of annoying)...

  18. Re:red hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh my god. this is the best troll ever. in fact, you're so good that the moderators were even fooled into thinking you were insightful...

    whop whop

  19. Notice the webhosting software by Dunark · · Score: 4, Funny

    "This Website is powered by PostNuke"

    I suppose it's appropriate if you're gonna be slashdotted.

  20. Music Open Source software by Lord+Satri · · Score: 4, Informative

    Free open source software for musicians:

    http://ardour.sourceforge.net/
    http://audacity. sourceforge.net/
    http://www.musictheory.net/

    Other interesting I forgot ?

    1. Re:Music Open Source software by rute20740 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Redhat users should check out Planet CCRMA. It's an apt archive for Redhat that provides everything you need for an audio workstation.

    2. Re:Music Open Source software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahhh! You missed some essentials for me Linux synth box...

      freqtweak : freqtweak.sourceforge.net
      (Nothing else can do what this does... Spectral delay comes close, but can't warp parts of the spectrum to others...)

      zynaddsubfx http://zynaddsubfx.sourceforge.net/

      Nice softsynth.

    3. Re:Music Open Source software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      erm, yes.

    4. Re:Music Open Source software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea and you ever tried to use them. Audacity can't even natively do voice removal. Only decent thing about Audacity is it has support for VST plugins (on windows and mac). Audacity is the only decent looking music app too, the rest are terrible. Motif for a GUI, come on.

      I like Linux a lot and use it for development and screwing around with, but it has a LONG LONG LONG way to go in the realm of music composition and processing. Don't even mention sox, no one is going to use it but the rest of the *nix nerds for processing their ripped music before it gets re-encoded into mp3, ogg, or whatever.

    5. Re:Music Open Source software by halfelven · · Score: 1
      Other interesting I forgot ?

      Rosegarden

      Ardour is appealing for enthusiastic amateurs, because they can grasp the concept easier. But you need something like Rosegarden (MIDI sequencer) to do actual music.
    6. Re:Music Open Source software by njh · · Score: 1

      Let's see:
      http://www.lilypond.org
      http://www.all-day- breakfast.com/rosegarden/
      http://rnvs.informatik. tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedi t/noteedit.html
      http://www.mutopiaproject.org/

      The last one is a site with public domain music entered as lilypond score.

    7. Re:Music Open Source software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are kidding right? you've got it the wrong way round.

    8. Re:Music Open Source software by halfelven · · Score: 1

      No i didn't. With Ardour you can _record_ the music you're making with other applications, or with hardware synthesizers. But you cannot _make_ music with that application per se.
      To actually make that music, you need some sequencers of sorts, some synthesizers, etc. That's where Rosegarden, Hydrogen, etc. enter the scene.

    9. Re:Music Open Source software by craqboy · · Score: 0
      Rezound is the program being used in the screenshots. It is MUCH better than audacity IMHO.

      Rezound Hompage

      Mod me up for having good info. I need it.

    10. Re:Music Open Source software by p3d0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I couldn't find license info on the web site. Is it GPL?

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    11. Re:Music Open Source software by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Uh why is the parent a troll? I really couldn't find the license info.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  21. Re:Why Athlon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very Funny! Those Athlons get so damn hot...

  22. Re:good work! by lspd · · Score: 1

    Has a php-nuke/post-nuke/thataware site ever withstood a slashdotting?

  23. sites down(/.ed) by FuShock · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they were hosting it off one of thier linux keyboards.

    --
    %\
  24. Re:red hat? by RobPiano · · Score: 1

    Perhaps like Planet CCRMA?

  25. Beefy back end required... by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 1

    "To this submitter, it looks more like a keyboardized computer than a computerized keyboard."

    What it is, is a music workstation - it allows you to compose, arrange, and send to disc all your musical thoughts. Whether it's music or not...

    The backend to a music workstation needs to have more guts to it these days, which is why they are letting you know what's under the hood in the OS department. My preference is to have a PC that you can trade out all the components for, including recording & mixing software and hardware. This piece of hardware here is neat, but it's too much like those cheesy Casio synthesizers. JMHO

  26. Good. by Tisephone · · Score: 1

    Professional audio is one of Linux's weak points. Kernel 2.6 might help by integrating ALSA completely and making MIDI less of a bitch to configure, but there is still vast room for improvement in setup and the available software packages. Hopefully, if this is a success, Lionstracs will be investing in relevant OSS (abbreviating for "software", not "digital dog turd masquerading as a sound system") projects.

    --
    "Neque enim lex est aequior ulla, quam necis artifices arte perire sua."
    1. Re:Good. by lightcycle · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. While many of the essential sound apps are still in beta, ALSA pretty much kicks the crap out of Coreaudio and ASIO. What's lacking now is more polished apps, and some better documentation and easier setup of ALSA, but I wouldn't categorize professional audio as a weak point of linux. Amidst the somewhat tedious clones of proprietary applications, there are some truly innovative gems, like jack for instance, which needed a sufficiently advanced OS like linux to be developed. The last few years have brought many improvements in audio for linux, and I expect the coming year to be very interesting.

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
  27. A new record! by twoslice · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think there has ever been an article that had more than 3 icons? With 6 icons - we have a new record!

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  28. Since site is down... by blackmonday · · Score: 1

    Since the site is down, let me chime in with 2 cool devices I've seen lately: PC keyboard with integrated MIDI keys and a rack-mounted device that supports VST plug-ins without a computer.Both look pretty cool, I though the musicians on here might find these interesting.

    1. Re:Since site is down... by cerebralpc · · Score: 1

      Plugzilla costs $3500...for that price I can see why I've never heard of this box before.
      It is a great idea but the price is to high.
      Most musos and engineers these days are thinking about using their old computer(s) to run software FX and their new computers for the workstation.

      I think the reason that computers will never fully take over is because computers don't really multi-task or run operations in parallel. They try to fool us by changing quickly from one task to another.
      However a 96 channel desk with heaps of outboard gear is actaully running all channels in parallel. And this makes for a better overall sound.
      By the way - most people are used to hearing music made with millions of dollars worth of equipment (on the radio). Thats why my recordings made on a $2000 laptop don't meet their expections.
      In America most radio music is propably made on SSL K Seris 96 channel desks. And there is only one of these desks in Australia!

    2. Re:Since site is down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because if there's one way to judge quality of music it's by what's being played on the radio. ...eyeroll...

    3. Re:Since site is down... by GoRK · · Score: 1

      I got a prodikeys for my girlfriend for her birthday last year. I got a bad one out of the box, but they replaced it. I was kind of dissapointed to find that while it advertises standard MIDI compatibility, this is provided by a software driver only, and the keyboard still plugs into the PS/2 port.. Thus it requires a special driver to show up as a MIDI device .. no working in Linux, etc. yet anyway... I really wonder why they didn't make it USB and have it show up as two USB devices (one MIDI interface, one HID keyboard).. makes no sense, but it works as advertised. The action on the keys is as good as most any of the synthesizers that do not have full size keys. It's not even moderately professional, but it works better than 'toy' keyboards..

  29. Zen Koan by Sneftel · · Score: 1

    What is the sound of a synthesizer getting slashdotted?

    --
    The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
  30. Answer: Some.. by msimm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First off the availability is slowly but steadily increasing. With projects like Ardour nearing major releases even professional recording studios are starting to take note. Even the home user is finding more useful tools available. And with preemptive kernels there's lots of possibilities.

    The future for Linux holds many things. Hackers composing music? You bet.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  31. yuck by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Windows keys. :(

  32. Re:Why Athlon? by paulbd · · Score: 1

    because most pro-audio apps use floating point as the basic representation of audio samples, and the athlon wipes the floor in terms of FP performance.
    intel chips not only have worse FP performance, they have an unbelievably bad problem with denormals that can cause code to slow down by factors of 4-100.

  33. How much? by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

    Can't RTFA thanks to 'the effect'. Anyone know how much they are charging for this contraption? I have been in the music business for 7 years or so, never heard of 'Lionstracs'. Is this a complete digital audio workstation? Does it offer any significant advantages? I use Logic 4.7 on a G4 tower and Logic 6 on a G3 iBook. I can hook up a usb midi controller for the keyboard if I wanted one. (I prefer to click all the notes into place with a mouse..) I can't imagine anything being more powerful than Logic at this time. Other packages have been getting better, but Logic outdoes them all these days, even pro-tools.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
    1. Re:How much? by Kadmium · · Score: 1

      From some hunting around, they're charging $5000 US + tax. The thing has two sequencers and a hard disk sampler (which supports Gigasampler and AKAI formats).

      It's supposedly being designed as a player's keyboard as well as a studio tool, but actual details are a bit sketchy. Expect video demos after NAMM (in January).

      It seems pretty 'complete' but that's a lot more subjective than it seems. I don't use half the features of Cubase SX, so even Sonar seems pretty complete to me.

      There is also some talk of supporting VST instruments with this thing, which would be absolutely awesome.

  34. Of course we do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And as usual, Slackware comes to the rescue.

    Now, if we can just exorcise the Free Software Song from the world's collective memory...

  35. Sounds like the Apple Alpha Centauri Synth by farrellj · · Score: 1

    It consisted of two boards you plugged into an Apple ][+ or better, and had a piano keyboard, and you could use the Apple to modify the patches, and create sequences, and play music on the piano keyboard. A wonderful sounding instrument that was the closest I have ever gotten to a Fairlight.

    ttyl
    Farrel

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:Sounds like the Apple Alpha Centauri Synth by acb · · Score: 1

      Apparently New Order's "Blue Monday" was sequenced using an Apple II. I wonder if they used this system.

      Also, I wonder whether Apple had any trouble from the Beatles company when they tried marketing it. (Was that before or after the agreement that Apple Computer could keep their name as long as they stayed out of anything music-related?)

    2. Re:Sounds like the Apple Alpha Centauri Synth by farrellj · · Score: 1

      I don't think that Apple actually made the Alpha Centauri, only promoted it through the Computers for Schools program.

      ttyl
      Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  36. Re:Why Athlon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in almost every benchmark the p4 kills the athlon..

  37. Movie industry key in bringing linux audio to life by blueworm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Two things need to happen before Linux can be used in a digital audio setting:

    1. Drivers for at least one professional audio card need to be written for linux. I would expect to see multi-channel recording, midi, and ASIO 2.0 drivers at the very least.
    2. Applications like Cubase, WaveLab, Sonar, and Reaktor need to become available for linux.

    We've still got quite a long way to go before this becomes a reality, but if hollywood keeps using Linux for movies then eventually they might start demanding it for their scorers. The movie industry is key in making professional Linux audio a reality.

  38. I guess it was running a 3/4 beat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably in isochronous mode too, so the rest of the notes got dropped on the floor. Can't blame them really, anything in excess of 250k bpm would have got them in trouble with Disaster Area.

  39. Re:Movie industry key in bringing linux audio to l by farrellj · · Score: 1

    Actually, there are already drivers under ALSA for pro sound cards, like RME Hammerfall Sound cards. There is the linux equivelent of ASIO, and it's called JACK, which gives real-time sound IO for Linux. And there is already a number of free and commercial applications that will do multi-tracking under Linux.

    Now all I have to do is get a sample editor under Linux for the Ensoniq EPS keyboard I have...

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  40. Re:Movie industry key in bringing linux audio to l by slinkp · · Score: 1
    1. Drivers for at least one professional audio card need to be written for linux. I would expect to see multi-channel recording, midi, and ASIO 2.0 drivers at the very least.

    You're behind the times. ALSA has drivers for the RME cards and for ICE1712-based cards (including M-audio Delta and many others). This has been true for at least a couple years, I don't remember the exact timeline. I use a Delta 66, it works beatifully. With a properly set up system, latency meets or beats any Windows / ASIO platform.

    2. Applications like Cubase, WaveLab, Sonar, and Reaktor need to become available for linux.

    It remains to be seen whether any of the existing commercial vendors will release linux ports. However, check out ardour.sf.net (currently beta) for an example of the future of open-source audio software. Other examples include Rosegarden 4 and more soft synths than you can shake a midi cable at. The infrastructure for a complete music workstation - alsa & alsa sequencer API, JACK, LADCCA, LADSPA - is now very good and still improving rapidly.

  41. Re:Movie industry key in bringing linux audio to l by blueworm · · Score: 1

    Nice to hear that some stuff has low-latency ALSA drivers for it, I didn't know that.

    My point is that while solutions may exist for linux, everything I've seen is still lacking compared with the powerhouse apps like Reaktor and Cubase. It would be nice if the big wigs would just port their stuff to linux, but hey it might happen with open source too. If it does though I still think the movie industry is going to be partly responsible for the development that results in widespread professional adoption of open-source linux based sequencers/synths/samplers/etc...

  42. Cheap is good by darxyde · · Score: 1

    Dedicated synths will always have a more robust sound in the production environment - nothing will ever replace my JP-8000, SP-808 and 202 sequencers and samplers, 12RU effects outboard, mixers, preamp etc for delivering pure, phat, phunkin sound.

    But of course, that isn't the point with this product. It's a great entry point for beginners; and may possibly be an excuse for those with weekly gigs to downsize somewhat and not have to lug multiple sequencers around.

    Many kudos to the developers; What a breath of fresh air.

    --
    Hey relax fella, you need a rest, guy.
  43. Re:Movie industry key in bringing linux audio to l by slinkp · · Score: 1

    JACK might be more accurately called the linux equivalent to ReWire than "the linux equivalent of ASIO." However, it does offer a similar callback-based development model to ASIO and apple's CoreAudio. But neither of those allow applications to transparently connect to each other the way JACK does.

  44. Re:Movie industry key in bringing linux audio to l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are drivers, but yea that's one big thing. If you can't use the "professional" sounds cards under linux, then the whole point is moot.

    I'd be VERY happy if Fruityloops was ported to Linux. Its cheap and it works for all electronic and can work for hip-hop and rap. You could theoretically compose most type of music in it, but that's not a discussion for here.

  45. Re:Why Athlon? by paulbd · · Score: 1

    "in almost every benchmark" ... sure. problem is, it doesn't beat it in the benchmarks that matter for pro-audio.

  46. Some familiar developers on this project. by slinkp · · Score: 1

    In another comment I found this link:
    http://www.synthzone.com/ubbs/Forum37/HTML/ 007355. html ... and there's a comment there from one of the developers. Apparently, other developers on this project include Rob Buse of SEQ24 (really nice little midi-loop sequencer) and Benno Senoner who we've known on the linux-audio-dev list for many years now. Congratulations guys!

  47. Re:Why Athlon? by Locutus · · Score: 1

    DON'T let "Great White" use it!

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  48. Price by slinkp · · Score: 1

    On the Synthzone forum they're talking about $5000 (US?). Ouch. Also there is talk of a later entry-level model. OTOH, it's not out of the ballpark for this market; Korg Tritons can be $3400 depending on features.

  49. X-76? by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't happen to be a Ensoniq ZR-76 would it??

    Those keyboards were so nicley laid out.

    I consider them to be the Commodore64/Amiga of keyboards.

    To bad they went the they way of the C-64.

    They were bought out by E-MU systems.

  50. Linux Keyboard? Did I hear karaoke fridays? by MissTuxie · · Score: 0

    Finally I can start composing fine karaoke songs with my Linux box! I'm sure my family can't get enough of those great 80s classics! :)

  51. Re:Movie industry key in bringing linux audio to l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asio is supported with jackd if the card supports it.
    It's just a pci transfer method.
    When you start jack, include --asio.

  52. features, capabilities by rtp405 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hi,

    While the Mediastation X-76 uses embedded Linux within some of the 11 in-house developed DSP cards, it is a hard disk based system with commodity computer components. Of course the value of commodity parts is that they're affordable and users can upgrade them.

    The eleven Lionstracs DSP cards are the result of two years and $500,000.00 U.S. of research and development. The basic system includes two wavetable DSP cards with 128 voices on each card. These cards run the sam9708 firmware which is common in high end keyboards. The system can be ugraded to run four wavetable cards, 512 voices. The X-76 is tentatively scheduled for release in April, 2004.

    Of course the OS is Linux based, with low latency and preemption patches to the kernel and it runs Alsa. With Alsa the system is able to run Jack Audio Connection Kit (JACK). Jack is a low latency audio server that automatically detects hardware ports and user defined application ports. So, routing data from one application to another is simple. Jack also inludes jack_transport where Jack clients are automatically synced to each other. Any jack client can initiate transport commands.

    Any available Linux audio applications can be run on the system. Lionstracs will package and maintain a selection of GPL licensed applications including audio, midi and video. Plus, there's modem and ethernet capabilities so software upgrades are "free" (GPL) and automatic.

    There will be three unused pci slots available on the basic X-76 system. These pci slots can be occupied with professional grade audio cards like those from RME. So you can build the workstation into a 24 track recording studio.

    With JACK and an RME audio card, the user can start Ardour (DAW), JAMin, (audio mastering tools) and Rezound (destructive wave editing). Jack enables routing of the audio chain and syncs the transports. In this scenario the audio source to the mastering tool is multitrack. Very cool!

    The X-76 has two hardware transports that can be mapped to any application transport. Of course these applications include sampler, DAW, midi sequencer, etc. One of the included applications is the Lionstracs full featured DJ mixer/player.

    Because Linux is a multitasking environment, in live performances a midi sequence that's playing can be fed into the Seq24 based style player where the beat can be changed from rock to reggae on the fly.

    The X-76 is designed for live performance where navigation speed to application interfaces is vital. There are 120 configurable hardware buttons on the top panel. The use of a mouse is not necessary.

    It also has a 116db dynamic range analog mixer matrix with master, cue and eight stereo in/outs. In a live situation you mix multitrack DAW to stereo_out:1, hardware transports to stereo_out[2,3], sampler_out:4,mic_out1and2:5, etc. This is typical functionality required in DJ/House control systems. Of course it would also be simple to sync MIDI control light mixers and beyond this, the X-76 video outputs can feed projector systems, etc.

    The disk based sampler includes time stretch, pitch correction and beat matching algorithms that are usable to +/- 30% without audio artifacts.

  53. MOD PARENT UP - REAL ARTICLE TEXT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bout time someone was able to get through to the site, how'd you do it man?

  54. BACH = Bb A C B by Speare · · Score: 1

    Apparently, in German of the day, a B-flat was written 'B', while a B was written 'H'. Johann Sebastian included the phrase Bb A C B as a signature motif in some of his works. At least, that's what I've read-- I have an ear that's more tinny than a soup can.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  55. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    if you had a beowulf cluster of keyboards...

    (what would that sound like)

  56. Re:Movie industry key in bringing linux audio to l by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    >1. Drivers for at least one professional audio
    >card need to be written for linux.

    The Delta cards work pretty darn well. But yeah, there isn't anything to compete with Cubase. I wish the Magix folks would just go ahead and release their stuff for Linux. That would do it for me. I actually prefer using Magix Audio Studio over Cubase.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  57. Cliche: Imagine a beowolf cluster of these. by FuShock · · Score: 1

    No, really imagine it. Sounds like Devo playing Dueling Banjoes, doesnt it?

    --
    %\
  58. transmission fluid temperature(TFT) display by MidoriKid · · Score: 1

    Straight from the site:

    Optional equipment

    * 15" or 17" color LCD screen transmission fluid temperature(TFT) display

  59. Backend, bah. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    The problem here is that the keyboard has become a computer, which is kind of retarted. My computer is a box. Just a box. The keyboard (the one I type on) plugs into it. The monitor and the speakers plug into it. Doesn't it make sense that the keyboard (that I'd use to play music) should plug into it, too?

    This increased modularity also means that I only have to buy one athlon xp 3000+ box to play games, make music, etc., and that I am not limited to a keyboard, but could concievably attach a turntable-like machine as well.

    Obviously this isn't very portable, but neither is a big keyboard like that.

    The one nice thing about it is its plug-and-play ness. I built my box from scratch, tweaked my OS this way and that, and bought addons carefully. This keyboard? You buy it, you bring it home and unpack it, you find a single AC power socket, and start playing. Not even an iMac has that -- you still have to get your pretty little transluscent keyboard and plug it into the USB slot somewhere, and do the same for the mouse.

    But then, do I want to listen to music from a non-tinkerer? From someone who's idea of a "remix" is to play their piano-school music with a reverb effect? The truth is, it's all hacking, and so anyone who can hack music well should be able to at least hack together a computer.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  60. Something's not right.... by Mindcry · · Score: 1

    It looks kinda like they built a nice computer case... In all the screenshots I didn't see a single one with the onboard LCD on.. and the mod wheels (pitch bend and assignable) should be to the left of the keyboard, not up in the middle of nowhere... I'm sure a company wishing to sell for over 3k$ a pop would notice such things right :) ? Its looking pretty cool, but the lack of demos or screens of ANY functions of the keyboard being used in any way suggest that they're pretty much vaporware with a cool case right now... and a floppy drive?? it comes with a cd/dvd burner, ethernet etc... why oh why? It has lots of buttons, but i didnt see any knobs, which is odd. It has sliders, but i've never seen a knobless, and it doesnt look like sliders are for more than volume or eq, though they might be assignable :) the scroll wheel also seems to be too tall, but that might just be my preference. To respond to some earlier posts... musician's mainly care about music :) whether its on linux or windows, all that matters is what it can do. Its a tool, and its very important that it just works no matter what... I honestly hope the keyboard functions are completely seperate from the OS, and the OS has hooks for recording/using the harddrive as library storage etc. I know linux is stable, but its entirely possible to nuke it if you're an idiot, and having any OS and the keyboard stuff being able to mess with each other internally is asking for trouble. And also, musician's dont tend to buy what everyone else is buying from my experience :) when i went to buy a pro keyboard, EVERYONE was buying korg tritons like candy, but the yamaha motif had just come out and after trying both extensively, the motif was better in just about every way (voice quality and price being the biggest), so guess which I got... Also, my guitarist friend was looking for a better amp, and instead of justing getting a marshall like everyone else, we went and tested about 50 different amps in the local (well, 2 hours away, but only because their the best music store ever...) store (every marshall, peavey, mesa, some hughes, etc etc etc) and since the other guitarist had a mesa triple recto, he picked up a koch (small swedish company) powertone II, which is a killer amp, even though no one has really heard of them (they have the best unintentionally funny marketing i've seen in a while).

  61. Something's not right.... by Mindcry · · Score: 1
    It looks kinda like they built a nice computer case...

    In all the screenshots I didn't see a single one with the onboard LCD on.. and the mod wheels (pitch bend and assignable) should be to the left of the keyboard, not up in the middle of nowhere... I'm sure a company wishing to sell for over 3k$ a pop would notice such things right :) ?

    Its looking pretty cool, but the lack of demos or screens of ANY functions of the keyboard being used in any way suggest that they're pretty much vaporware with a cool case right now...

    and a floppy drive?? it comes with a cd/dvd burner, ethernet etc... why oh why? It has lots of buttons, but i didnt see any knobs, which is odd. It has sliders, but i've never seen a knobless, and it doesnt look like sliders are for more than volume or eq, though they might be assignable :) the scroll wheel also seems to be too tall, but that might just be my preference.

    To respond to some earlier posts... musician's mainly care about music :) whether its on linux or windows, all that matters is what it can do. Its a tool, and its very important that it just works no matter what... I honestly hope the keyboard functions are completely seperate from the OS, and the OS has hooks for recording/using the harddrive as library storage etc. I know linux is stable, but its entirely possible to nuke it if you're an idiot, and having any OS and the keyboard stuff being able to mess with each other internally is asking for trouble.

    And also, musician's dont tend to buy what everyone else is buying from my experience :) when i went to buy a pro keyboard, EVERYONE was buying korg tritons like candy, but the yamaha motif had just come out and after trying both extensively, the motif was better in just about every way (voice quality and price being the biggest), so guess which I got...

    Also, my guitarist friend was looking for a better amp, and instead of justing getting a marshall like everyone else, we went and tested about 50 different amps in the local (well, 2 hours away, but only because their the best music store ever...) store (every marshall, peavey, mesa, some hughes, etc etc etc) and since the other guitarist had a mesa triple recto, he picked up a koch (small swedish company) powertone II, which is a killer amp, even though no one has really heard of them (they have the best unintentionally funny marketing i've seen in a while).

  62. SORRY by Mindcry · · Score: 1

    forgot my p's and missed the preview button :( I suck...

  63. Re:Why Athlon? by solidox · · Score: 1

    yeah, my XP2200+ hammers the p4 3.06ghz's in the cubase SX benchmark.
    some people would claim that the chipsets (via) used by amd boards are bad for audio, but this is crap. via chipsets are fine for audio, they may have been dodgy once upon a time but not anymore.

    --
  64. They are not unique by gtog · · Score: 0

    Openlabs released a similar synthesizer already in january 2003, called OpenSynth EKO. Their current model is called OpenSynth NEKO. The NEKO is running Microsoft Windows XP Professional.

    1. Re:They are not unique by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      Their current model is called OpenSynth NEKO. The NEKO is running Microsoft Windows XP Professional.

      Well it can't be very open then , can it if its running XP!

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  65. Noise? by Walkiry · · Score: 1

    With an Athlon under the hood I guess there're at least a couple of fans attached to the whole thing. How noisy is it? Is that much power really necessary? Is it not a factor for the purpose of this particular gizmo?

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  66. Not for me by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    1) not a full keyboard
    2) not full-size keys
    3) probably cheap springloaded action
    4) redhat is soon-to-be unsupported

    Looks like they just crammed a PC into a cheap Casio keyboard from K-mart...

  67. Source Code? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    so where can i download the source code?

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  68. I want one! by stefanb · · Score: 1
    I have no clue what this is, but I want one: :-)
    Optional equipment
    * 15" or 17" color LCD screen transmission fluid temperature (TFT) display
    from the specs page

    (It's Thin Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Display, for those who wonder.)

  69. Word from developers... by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    I sent an email re: open source blah blah,
    I got this rather sexual reply, certainly I find the prospect quite exciting.

    Hi Nick, a few things:

    We have written our own audio/midi applications (user interfaces and engines) and will release (with full sources) most of them under the GNU GPL license because we believe in the superiority of open source development model and involvement of the community.

    We are using existing opensource linux audio applications too. And to some we made improvements and fixes to accomodate them in a professional keyboard enviroment like the Mediastation.
    Of course we contribute back these the source changes to the community. Open source and community involvement is what will distinguish the Mediastation from traditional Keyboards.

    This does not mean that the Mediastation forces you to become a developer or to have to fiddle around with complex interfaces or cryptic key sequences.
    The Mediastation is designed to be a fully portable studio with keyboard and sound unit, midi/mp3/wav/ogg players, arranger/style player, multi track audio/midi sequencer, soft sythesizer and sampler.
    The usage will be as userfriendly as possible.
    To the average musician it will just look like a very powerful keyboard/studio workstation, but advanced users and developers will be able to tweak every aspect of the Mediastation.
    Third party developers will be able to write their own, fully integrated modules which they sell or give away.
    We do not place any restrictions to people wanting to develop for the Mediastation. No nasty NDAs or developers contracts. Just download the source code and SDKs and start developing.

    The software will evolve over time and users will be able to
    update and add new applications in the Mediastation by simply connecting the Keyboard to the Internet and pressing the update button.
    No rocketscience-engineer required.
    The Mediastation is designed by musicians that are live keyboards players and studio engineers with decades of experience and exactly know what a good keyboard workstation/ portable studio needs and how the user interfaces must be designed in order of being easy to use for the average musician that has no particular computer knowledge.

    The Mediastation is not on sale yet but you will be able to touch with hands a prerelease at this Winter NAMM release in January.

    Feel free to post here on the forum if you have additional questions or need more infos about the Mediastation.

    Watch out this space frequently for cutting edge news.

    cheers,
    Benno

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  70. I don't see where the price is listed. by pdxChris · · Score: 1

    How much does it cost?