Belkin To Offer Firmware Fix For Router Hijacking
L-Train8 writes "Belkin has an announcement at the bottom of their homepage about the spam router. They have decided to disable the 'feature' that hijacks a random http request every 8 hours and redirects to a webpage advertising their parental control system. This will require a firmware upgrade. The message says details will be forthcoming.
Interestingly, while I was preparing this submission, the message changed. Originally, it included a snippy remark about how what they were doing was not spam, despite what everyone on the internet says. The new version is much less testy."
Although they remove this feature, what other 'usage statistics'-logging-features are silently embedded?
My newer D-Link 604 router has some statistics and a thorough logging function (which is displayed in the web gui). - Is all of it really visible to the end user?
It's a good bet from the manufacturers that the device will be online all the time.
Perhaps one should install a box to surveil the router/firewall, if any connections are initiated from the router?
henc
...It involves a hatchet.
Seriously, Belkin's response to this has been utterly abysmal. First they tried to justify it, only now that it's blowing up in their face do they try to remedy it.
They've lost a great deal of trust that they will never regain.
STOP MISUSING APOSTROPHES, YOU MORONS!!!
Kharma whoring for fun and profit....
cache here (as of 10 Nov 2003 20:43 EST):
Belkin is aware of some recent postings that claim that Belkin wireless routers are spamming users during the setup process and periodically thereafter. It is not now, nor has it ever been, the policy of Belkin to intentionally spam our customers or anyone else. Belkin offers a free trial of our parental control feature in our routers, and to make our customers aware of the feature itself and to give them the opportunity to take advantage of the free trial, we have tried to direct users to the information regarding the parental control features. However, since this has become a source of concern to our users, and it is Belkin policy to address the concerns of our users quickly, Belkin has decided to remove this function from the routers. Each router's firmware that incorporates parental control as an option will be changed.
We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
I was in the process of cutting and pasting Belkin's message into a story submission earlier today when it changed, so I have the original text. The message earlier today read:
Belkin is aware of some recent postings that claim that Belkin wireless routers are spamming users during the setup process and periodically thereafter. It is not now, nor has it ever been, the policy of Belkin to intentionally spam our customers or anyone else. Belkin offers a free trial of our parental control feature in our routers, and to make our customers aware of the feature itself and to give them the opportunity to take advantage of the free trial, we have tried to direct users to the information regarding the parental control features. However, since this has become a source of concern to our users, and it is Belkin policy to address the concerns of our users quickly, Belkin has decided to remove this function from the routers. Each router's firmware that incorporates parental control as an option will be changed.
Please expect more detailed information to follow early next week. Thank you.
Now we have the more concise and concilliatory
We at Belkin apologize for the recent trouble our customers have experienced with the wireless router/browser redirect issue. We will be offering firmware fixes available for download early next week. We do not have exact details yet
but we can tell you now that each Router's firmware that incorporates Parental Control as an option will be changed.
Please expect more detailed information to follow early next week. Thank you.
Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
From the google cache
"Belkin is aware of some recent postings that claim that Belkin wireless routers are spamming users during the setup process and periodically thereafter. It is not now, nor has it ever been, the policy of Belkin to intentionally spam our customers or anyone else. Belkin offers a free trial of our parental control feature in our routers, and to make our customers aware of the feature itself and to give them the opportunity to take advantage of the free trial, we have tried to direct users to the information regarding the parental control features. However, since this has become a source of concern to our users, and it is Belkin policy to address the concerns of our users quickly, Belkin has decided to remove this function from the routers. Each router's firmware that incorporates parental control as an option will be changed.
Please expect more detailed information to follow early next week. Thank you."
Every 8 hours you get redirected to a page saying "Sorry, we won't do it again. Promise."
The problem is, you do accept it so willingly. You shouldn't have to deal with this. Nobody should have to.
Advertising shouldn't be on a product that is paid for. The router should do only one thing: route packets. Anything else, if it drops packets, rewrites packets (which it does), etc, then it doesn't work properly, and a complaint to Belkin is in order, along with a request for an RMA#. If the router is designed not to work properly (as it seems), then we need to file a report with the FTC.
Belkin has lost my business, until they very aggressively do something to FIX the problems of the internet.
All that backing off here is doing, is admitting that they pushed a bit too hard. Nobody can tell me that the goal of Belkin has changed, or is any different from VeriSign's. They want to manipulate the infrastructure of the internet. They want control over my computer, and how it works.
Fuck 'em. They have to REALLY work hard to win back my business. Apologizing and issuing a firmware patch ain't good enough by half.
"People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
In case you would like to apply for Mr. Deming's job, it's available. (Scroll down to "Marketing Manager"). Or, just write careers@belkin.com.
Of course, Belkin won't accept just anyone. The "right candidate" must be able to "strategize, initiate, and execute". He or she must be able to "drive revenue" and "leverage knowledge" about "end-user sell-thru strategies" and must be able to "align resources" and "translate raw content".
The Belkin router had not only a non compliant routing algorithm, but it had also a backdoor. Remember, if you clicked on "No Thanks", then a flag INSIDE THE ROUTER would be modified to disallow the misbehavior. Namely CLICKING AN EXTERNAL WEBPAGE MODIFIED THE INSIDES OF YOUR ROUTER!!!!! Is Belkin fixing this security hole also?
Thank you.
:)
I just wish there was a more adequate explanation of UPnP in the manual. Here's a copy of it, taken directly from the manual:
"UPnP is short for Universal Plug and Play which is a networking architecture that provides compatibility among networking equipment, software, and peripherals. The DI-604 is a UPnP enabled router and will only work with other UPnP devices/softwares. If you do not want to use the UPnP functionality, it can be disabled by selecting "Disabled".
It should read:
"Leaving this stupid fucking feature on leaves you bent-over and spread-cheeked for when a piece of malicious software comes along decides block every damn port on our router. UPnP allows changes to be made without your knowledge OR consent--it allows any program to totally bypass user/admin authentication. As an added bonus, entries commited via this backdoor^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H"feature" cant' be removed without first factory-defaulting the whole goddamn router and rebooting it. Anyway, Microsoft wants us to put it here and leave it on by default. Click the box to disable it."
I think my explanation is much clearer, don't you?
Bowie J. Poag
Instant poll:
Who smoked the most crack in 2003?
(_) SCO
(_) Belkin
(_) Verisign
(_) CowboyNeal
(_) *A
(_) All of the above
Ceci n'est pas une signature