Slashdot Mirror


Wal-Mart to Launch Online Music Store

Dteyn writes "I heard on the radio today that Wal-Mart will soon be opening up an online music store to compete with the likes of Apple's iTunes and Napster. According to the radio newsguy, it's expected to be officially announced as early as next week. Looks like this 'digital music' thing is starting to catch on with the bigwigs. Finally."

46 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. Censored. by Evanrude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if all the songs will be censored like the CDs in the stores?

    --

    ~.Evanrude
    1. Re:Censored. by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I wonder if all the songs will be censored like the CDs in the stores?

      They don't censor stuff, they just refuse to carry it. Works fine for me, because I can get it cheaper at my local used music store, without dealing with the parking situation at Wally-World, and to boot, I'm supporting a local business.

      I'll never forget the time they attempted to card me for buying a PG-13 movie. I've bought liquor at Wally-World without getting carded before! Guess we have our priorities for what we gotta protect the kiddies from :)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:Censored. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Informative
      They do carry censored versions, just have a look at any recent rap releases on AMG, most will have a 'clean' version listed.

      Then again, maybe that's K-Mart. I always get the two confused.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:Censored. by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Funny
      Were you underage at the time? That's a really amusing story.

      Actually I was 22 at the time I tried to buy the movie and dressed in my work clothes (suit & tie) and I still got carded. Yet I've made beer runs to Wally-World (knew it was 24 hours for a reason) in my "rag" clothes and not gotten carded. Something is wrong with that picture....

      Personally the paranoid part of me thinks they just wanted the excuse to key my license number into their database. Doesn't explain why I've gotten away with buying booze there and not being carded thou.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Censored. by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They do carry censored versions, just have a look at any recent rap releases on AMG, most will have a 'clean' version listed.

      Yes, they do. So does iTMS. But iTMS also carries the uncensored versions. I haven't seen any examples of them only having a censored version (but then, I don't usually go hunting for explicit rap music, so I could stand corrected).

      The problem with Wally-World isn't carrying the censored CDs. The problem is refusing to carry the uncensored ones for those of us who are of age and desire to possess them. Sorry Wally-World you aren't my Mommy and Daddy. And you aren't my kids Mommy and Daddy. I can do a well enough job of supervising what my kids buy without your help....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Censored. by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 2, Funny
      knew it was 24 hours for a reason

      I love the 24-hour Walmarts because I do my weekly marketing at about 4AM every Saturday. (That's the time I get up during the week, so I see no need to change my hours on the weekend.) The great thing about shopping at that time is the fact that all the strippers just got off work. I've seen women in there that would have given ole Sam a heart attack.

      :-)

    6. Re:Censored. by nat5an · · Score: 2, Informative

      They only have the 'Clean' version of the latest Outkast album. Which also has the #1 selling song on iTMS right now.

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
  2. Rolling back prices... by ForestGrump · · Score: 5, Funny

    So will we be seeing them for 49 cents a song then?

    And I can print out a coupoun for a yellow happy face with the purchase of each song online-Walmart song right?

    Is the little tune they play with each commerical free download? or do I have to pay for that too?

    Can I buy online and pickup the songs on a cd in the store? That would be great!

    -Grump.

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  3. Too....many......music download services by dethl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why Wal-Mart, why? Isn't the industry flooded enough as is? Although Wal-Mart does make enough to offset the losses it will incur with the music service (as all music services do), its just another iTMS wannabe.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    1. Re:Too....many......music download services by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IMHO we're in a transition period, where the market is flooded with more services than you can count, and more services than can possibly survive. This is something I see as only an incredibly good thing. The competition between them all will weed out the utter trash, the competition between the better services will improve those, and in time we'll have music download services that are actually useful

      I don't consider any of the current pay-for-download services anywhere near useful yet, they all suffer from a variety of DRM, lock-in and cost problems, but more will come into the market to compete with those, on a platform that PEOPLE want, not manufacturers

    2. Re:Too....many......music download services by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 4, Insightful
      more will come into the market to compete with those, on a platform that PEOPLE want, not manufacturers

      Not if you want music owned by the RIAA record trust. Competition requires the availability of more than one different product in the first place, and the only product these stores can offer is DRM-encrusted. The RIAA won't be giving that up anytime soon without a revolt from one of it's multinational members.

  4. Also makes you wonder..... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    If they'll offer a wide range. Wal-mart tends to be somewhat puritanical on what they offer. (Marilyn Manson anyone?).
    Still for mainstream music it shouldn't be too bad. Here's an older story about Wal-Mart's controls on music sales.

    1. Re:Also makes you wonder..... by mackstann · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No thanks. I prefer listening to music.

      Not that I'm a Marilyn Manson fan, but this method of declaring some music you don't like "not music" is just stupid. The funny thing is that the music that has been called "not music" in the past has very often become some of the most popular and influential music around. Elvis, KISS, ACDC, Black Sabbath, rap/hip-hop in general, etc.

  5. Re:I own a Record Store by Aliencow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You don't sell "Sick Marilyn Manson" ?
    What's so sick about him?
    The fact he knows how to market the fuck out of his stuff ?
    Cop killer rap... Rap lyrics ever killed anyone? I know 50 cent fucking annoys me but I haven't died *yet*.
    See guys, when you don't let kids play dodgeball cause it's bad for their self-esteem they turn into Christian music store owners.

  6. Lossless by Patik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first company to sell decent music using a lossless codec will get my money. Until then, I can't justify spending $10+ for an album of crappy MP3s when I can buy the CD used for less (or even sometimes new for a dollar or two more).

  7. Will it run on thier Lindows PCs? by RumpRoast · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Online music for Linux, maybe?

    --

    My Ass hurts.
  8. How will it make money? by paxcirca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm confused as to what Walmart's impetus here is. Steve Jobs has very clearly stated that iTMS makes about squat for profit; it's just a pretty Trojan Horse to get people to buy iPods (and eventually Macs). Walmart doesn't have an MP3 player (that I'm aware) to push. Selling music to get people to buy MP3 players seems a bit more plausible than, say, selling music to get people to buy tires/clothing/cereal in Walmart stores.

    1. Re:How will it make money? by SEE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wal-Mart has one major thing Apple doesn't:

      Leverage.

      Wal-Mart already sells a massive volume of music. That gives them the leverage to drive down the record company cut of sales. "I think we'll have to cut our CD pre-orders if you can't bend on your cut of the download sales" is an incredibly useful threat to be able to use at the bargaining table.

      And forget just CD orders. How many of the major labels are owned by companies that sell other things retail? Sony sells electronics. Sony, Time Warner, and Vivendi Universal sell DVDs. Wal-Mart's purchasing power, as the #1 retailer in the U.S., is tremendous on those things, too.

      And if Wal-Mart can just get better "invoicing" terms than Apple gets, that can make it profitable just on the interest earned on the consumer's money between sale and paying the record company.

    2. Re:How will it make money? by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wal-Mart needs to understand that people don't want to download music online. They want to visit a physical store and pay artificially high prices for a limited selection of music that are willing to be raped by the RIAA.

      After all, which kinds of businesses usually succeed? Businesses that offer consumers what they want at a reasonable price? Or businesses that screw the consumer, call them thieves, sue them, pass draconian legislation, and restrict choices? After all, the only good music is RIAA music.

      Maybe now that I've posted this, Wal-Mart will reconsider. And others will stop jumping onto this music downloading fad which is not what people really want.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    3. Re:How will it make money? by Octagon+Most · · Score: 4, Informative

      And guess what, Wal-Mart is a privately held company to boot!

      I guess so, if by "privately held" you mean owned by all the shareholders that freely buy and sell WMT on the New York Stock Exchange.

  9. Coming soon .... by R33MSpec · · Score: 5, Funny

    All that is left now is Microsoft's turn:

    (1) Call it MS Tunester
    (2) Bundle with new version of Media Player
    (3) Introduce Drakonian DRM
    (5) ????
    (6) Profit!


    1. Re:Coming soon .... by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The RIAA etc. are cautious of MS as much as the OSS people. The RIAA etc want to avoid vendor lock-in with the distribution of their music, afraid of what MS would do with it. Yet, there is no open source project who in their right mind who would even bother making an open standards DRM for no reward - thus defeating the purpose.

      I am surprised that MS hasn't jumped on the bandwagon yet... but I know their strategy will be to buy out whoever wins the on-line music war... cause we all know MS can't innovate for poo-poo. (despite how much their marketing division deliberately overuse the word)

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
  10. And we would use it because...? by evn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article is pretty vague. Wal-mart is going to start an online music store to compete with other services which have been successful. Unless they can offer something darn impressive I think they'll have a hard time getting it out the door.

    Apple offers you iTunes - excellent music software that people actually want to use (just look at the number of non-US downloads for proof).

    Napster 2 offers...well, it's got plenty of name recognition - the music selection/pricing scheme is a little different and the format works on a variety of players.

    The other services (buymusic, napster, pressplay...) haven't had near the success of the iTMS. Unless walmart has some sort of killer feature that people are actually asking for they're doomed to be another smalltime player.

    what could that feature be?
    - Lossless files
    - No DRM/Regular MP3
    - Extremely cheap pricing ($.10 - $.50)
    - EVERY major artist/song represented (and more indie tracks too)
    Without one of those it's just more of the same, and there is no reason for consumers to choose walmart's startup over the much more popular ITMS or the much more established napster.

    1. Re:And we would use it because...? by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Lossless files

      That would be nice. C'mon boys what is all this broadband for after all? I'd rather spend half an hour or 45 minutes downloading 650 megs of lossless music (rough guess on my 3mbit RR download) then take a trip to the store to buy a CD. And that's the worst case scenario. You could use lossless compression to cut down a 650 meg CD by quite a bit I suspect. How well does that data compress?

      No DRM/Regular MP3

      Not going to happen as long as RIAA controls things... any other viewpoint is naive :( Not that I don't completely agree with you...

      Extremely cheap pricing ($.10 - $.50)

      Of all my complaints with iTMS (mainly DRM, but also the system resource hog that iTunes seems to be), I can't argue with the prices. Sure cheaper is always better, but $0.99 is pretty reasonable imho.

      EVERY major artist/song represented (and more indie tracks too)

      That's the biggest thing I think. There are several of my mp3s that I've been unable to find on iTMS. C'mon, what's the Internet for if we can't have instant access to every piece of music ever created by human beings in any language?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:And we would use it because...? by noewun · · Score: 2, Informative
      You do realize that iTunes is a forced download. Any time you get quicktime you are now forced to install iTunes. Although it can be removed after, I don't think counting the number of iTunes downloads is an indication of anything.

      WTF are you talking about? Last time I installed Quicktime, I installed Quicktime and nothing else.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  11. Re:Do we need another? by venicebeach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why add another store which will have the same set of songs?

    Worse, why add another store which will have a subset of the songs? The article states that Walmart is discussion with the 5 major record labels... Apple has contracted with many independent labels, and I don't really see these indies striking up a deal with Walmart.

    Also, Apple has admitted they don't make much off the store and really use it to sell iPods - what exactly is Walmart's plan here?

  12. Gives a new meaning to "rollback" by obsidianpreacher · · Score: 2, Funny
    >Downloading $HOT_NEW_SONG
    0%[..________]100%
    0%[....______]1 00%
    0%[......____]100%
    0%[........._]100%
    ERROR : CONNECTION TIMEOUT

    >Downloading $HOT_NEW_SONG
    Wal-Mart automatically Rollsback for you!
    0%[..________]100%
    0%[....______]100%
    ERRO R: CONNECTION TIMEOUT

    >Downloading $HOT_NEW_SONG
    Wal-Mart automatically Rollsback for you!
    0%[__________]100%

    ...
    --
    topreacher@signature.slashdot.org 1% rm -rf sig
  13. wal-mart will by hansoloaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    have the website designed in China and maintained by illegal immigrants in the USA.

  14. The RIAA will never survive it. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wal-Mart has a corporate policy of beating suppliers until they relent on pricing.

    Since digital music costs fractions of a penny to duplicate, the marginal cost is less than one cent, which is where the RIAA's revenue will go once they've been strong-armed by the Wal-Mart business process.

    The only way Wal-Mart will not do this is if they buy the RIAA outright and use their ownership to make up "cost" numbers.

    Note that this will be "passed on to the consumer" in the form of a 1% reduction in retail prices.

  15. The question is, how bad will it suck? by JoshuaDFranklin · · Score: 2, Informative
    I wonder if it will suck as bad compared to iTunes Music Store as their DVD rental service does compared to NetFlix.

    Just read a few of the newsgroup postings about that: Google Groups on Wal-Mart/NetFlix

  16. A minor drawback by fleener · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A minor drawback to online sales is that there will never be surplus discounts. If I can pay 50 cents a song, great, it won't matter. If not, well, I'm accustomed to paying $10 for a CD in the bargain barrel (and liking most of the songs) or $5 at a used CD shop. There is no need or cause for liquidation sales online and no way (?) to sell used electronic music without causing a big flap.

  17. Related to this... by amanpatelhotmail.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yet another music service in the works?...

    Just in my inbox:

    --------------------
    Subject: Important MP3.com Announcement

    CNET Networks, Inc announced today that it has acquired certain assets of MP3.com, Inc.

    Please be advised that on Tuesday, December 2, 2003 at 12:00 PM PST the MP3.com website will no longer be accessible in its current form.

    CNET Networks, Inc. plans to introduce a new MP3 music service in the near future. If you would like to receive email updates on this service, including an invitation to a special members-only preview, please sign up here.

    MP3.com is not transferring your personal information to CNET Networks, Inc. or any other third party.

    On behalf of all of us at MP3.com we thank you for your patronage and continued support. It has been a privilege to host one of the largest and most diverse collections of music in the world. MP3.com wishes to express its sincere thanks to each of you for making us your premier destination for music online.

    Sincerely,
    MP3.com
    --------------------

  18. Re:as long as... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny
    I hear they have a song or somesuch they sing every morning. They spell out Wal-Mart and they make YMCA-esque letter with their arms, something like that. Anyway, the point being that people who can withstand that crap for longer than a week are probably brain damaged, meaning only the lobotomized keep working there. Reverse natural selection.

    Too true. Of course it defeats evolution by providing a place where all of these lobotomized individuals can meet each other and mate. Perhaps we need some wild predatory animals at Wally World to thin the herd? ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  19. More details from the Rejected Post Machine by securitas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wal-Mart, Best Buy, Comcast to Offer Online Music

    2003-11-11 13:10:14 Wal-Mart, Best Buy, Comcast to Offer Online Music (articles,music) (rejected)

    Wal-Mart will launch its own digital music download service through its Web site later this month. Not to be outdone, Best Buy will also launch an iTunes-type online music store - with the ability to buy through in-store kiosks - based on the MusicNow service (formerly FullAudio). And today Comcast announced music downloads via Real Rhapsody for its 5 million broadband Internet subscribers. The Washington Post's Cynthia L. Webb writes about the online music frenzy and the resultant advertising onslaught due to the sheer number of entrants into the music download market, while Bloomberg's Holly M. Sanders offers an analysis of Walmart's imminent entry into online music, which is significant since Wal-Mart already controls 14 percent of global CD music sales. More at the New York Times (via SeattlePI).

  20. Re:Hehe....he said wafe... by SiliBelgian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Although it seems pretty unlikely that spending my time digging around in the OED is going o get me wafed (assuming it takes the regular past tense (the ladies love it when you talk about linguistics (almost as much as (riduclously) nested quotes))) anytime soon

    Welcome experienced LISP programmer :)

    --


    "Hell hath no fury like a hippo with a machine gun."
  21. Irony by Ogerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks like this 'digital music' thing is starting to catch on with the bigwigs. Finally.

    One problem: 'digital music' doesn't need bigwigs.

    Nor do we want them. For they bring us DRM, low quality audio, inflated prices, and they still screw our favorite artists.

    At least the next logical step is in place, however: Artists ditch their labels and sell directly online. Followed by: Artists forget about selling music itself because it's such cheap advertisement thanks to rapid online distribution that *everyone* now uses.

    1. Re:Irony by nerph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "..because it's such cheap advertisement..."

      For what? Their concerts and merchandise?

      Concerts:
      1. What good is global distribution for a small band that only plays small clubs locally?
      2. Even for a big-name band, it's damn near impossible to organize a single large-venue concert without the backing of a major label and concert promoter. Pearl Jam tried a few years ago and couldn't pull it off.

      So marketing your concerts by giving music away doesn't really help. There are some labels like Wind-Up that make their band's singles available for download, which to me has always been a great compromise.

      Merchandise:
      1. A band is lucky if 1% of the people who buy their albums actually buy merchandise as well. Once you start giving your music away that percentage will not scale with the number of people downloading the song (i.e. 100 x more listeners 100 x more merch sales). Band margins on merch sales is significant but is hardly enough to support the production of new songs.
      2. OK, there is no #2.

      The caveat to the above (and this has been speculated elsewhere), is that bands may begin to focus a lot more on singles and we may find ourselves back in the days of the 45 where bands only released singles with B-sides.

  22. Walmart will make money BECAUSE: by takochan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    they are very very good at putting pressure on suppliers to cut prices, because they are such a big volume seller.

    They know now, that without all the distribution costs of physical media, that the 90cents / track that Apple currently pays to the RIAA, can be cut down to 50 cents or less because they know this is all just pure profit for the RIAA right now. This is all fat, Walmart knows it and they have the buyer market power to make this price cut happen.

    Then they will sell those tracks to us for 60 cents, undercutting Apple, and Walmart still will make money.

    This is how Walmart always does it with whatever they sell. No reason it will be any different this time.

  23. Wal-Mart will be cheaper by kilocomp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wal-Mart has several advantages. First it can blast out info about this service though it's retail stores. Second they will be cheaper than Apple (or else they wouldn't be entering the market), Wal-Mart has a ton of power over suppliers and can get their prices very low. Apple or any of the other services don't have the brick and motor sales has leverage.
    Wal-Mart undercut Netflix's prices and they will do it to Apple.

  24. censored music by austad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With all the talk of censored music at Walmart, it might help to understand a bit about the company. They are based in Bentonville, GA. A hellhole of a place, quite a ways from a major city. Everyone in the town works for Walmart. As far as I know, everything there is owned by walmart. Gas stations, food, and even (surpise) walmart itself. Bentonville is in a dry county. That means that it's illegal to serve, sell, or buy booze in the county. People there apparently have a real problem with alcohol, think it's the devil. A friend of a friend took a consulting job there about a year ago. She was in another county at a bar and someone that worked with her saw her drinking a beer. She was fired the following monday.

    At my previous job, I had to deal with walmart as a client. They are a bunch of Nazis. They are huge, and many companies depend on them to survive, and walmart knows it. That's why they can get away with doing almost anything they want. 70% of all companies that do business with walmart either go bankrupt or get purchased by walmart.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  25. Heh by nate+nice · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like people who go to Wal-Mart know what the internet is.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  26. I use Walmart all the time. Bitches. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The have a 'Photo Center' where you upload (up to) 2meg .tifs or .jpgs. Then you can order prints from 4x6 up to 8x10 or somesuch. You can then have the prints delivered to your house, or free to any walmart - it takes about 3 days.

    As I have a walmart less than 3 blocks from my house, I pick them up there.

    When this system works, it kicks ass. It's cheap (26 cents), they can handle ass-loads of volume (I've ordered 300+ prints), consistent (color is usually pretty damn close to what I send them), fast (store the pictures on their servers for repeat prints), and free shipping.

    When this system doesn't work, I think about killing every walmart employee I see. In a small town, that's everybody. :(

    They used to only support IE, and some ass-tacular version of netscape. That hasn't gotten much better. (I use a mac for this). Their javascript is buggy. They make me go through 20 screens even though I do the same thing *every time*. Their servers are slow during the day, sometimes to the point of unusable. I get a million timeouts on the secure side, because they can't handle the load.

    Best of all, they had an issue where they 'lost' my pictures, and replaced them with some booger-eatin', twelve-sandwich makin', camero-rustin', trailer-house dentist's nightmare's people's photos.

    I took screen caps of all the good ones. I was surprised they could afford a camera. I really will have to post a link to them.

    Walmart did fix this, but only after I went through email hell (happy obvious taglines on every email = CSR death!).

    The photo center has improved, but having used it for more than a year, any music service is going to suck the big musical nuts in the sky for awhile.

    They'll compete on price like they always do, work out the kinks, and have a pretty bland selection.

    w00t - more volume, less choice.

  27. Goddamn it slashdot! by crapulent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would you please quit linking to the NY Post as a "news source"? The last time this happened was when the NY Post was claiming that McDonalds would be giving away a billion iTunes songs... which turned out to be completely untrue, an unfounded rumour.

    For the love of god, stop linking to tabloids as news! If it's reported somewhere respectable then fine, but it's not a story until you've got more than this pathetic 200 word paragraph from some grocery store checkout RAG.

  28. shameless self promotion: www.hearsaymusic.ca by warren69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey,

    The website http://www.hearsaymusic.ca is currently recruiting Indepedent Canadian Artists wanting to sell their music online in mp3 format (as well as CDs, etc.). Artists interested should e-mail contact@hearsaymusic.ca for more info.

    Cheers,
    Warren

    ps. ogg to come later

    --
    =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
    Daniel
    http://people.cinn.ca/daniel/
  29. Re:Doomed to fail, unless by bigkahunafish · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I used to think people would only drink the pure water if people enlightened them to the fact that the other water was tainted

    However, this is not always the case, otherwise people would see that Walmart only expands into markets to control and dominate them.

    I used to believe if i told people about this, they would choose against Walmart.

    I was mistaken.

    Its sad when you're right and no one will listen to you.

    --
    Eat a Chicken, You know you want to.
  30. Software? Wal-Mart? No thanks. by slyckshoes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple has experience writing Operating Systems and other various software. They have experience dealing with artist type folks (musicians, graphic artists, etc) and they also deal with hard core nerds. They have a darn good idea of what to put in an online music store and how to design/code it for scalability, high-availability, and etc. They also make hardware, which gives them another benefit and even more credibility in my book.

    What does Wal-Mart have experience with? They make flyers. And cheesy commercials. I imagine they'll hire a team to build it for them, but I'm just not convinced that someone who has little experience with software can make a music store that has the things I want. I may try it out, but Apple has my loyalty for being the first to market and doing it well.