Slashdot Mirror


Red Sea Urchins Nearly Immortal

varjag writes "A study by scientists from Oregon State University and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory have revealed that Red Sea urchins are practically immortal. While they can die from diseases or predator attacks, it seems that their life span has no biological limit. Specimen as old as 100 and 200 years have been discovered, while previously they were expected to last no longer than 7-15 years."

107 comments

  1. Let's get this out of the way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will be no "Yoda Doll / Spiny Sea Urchin stuffed up unlikely orifice" posts with this story.

    Thank you for your cooperation.

    1. Re:Let's get this out of the way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot one:

      I, for one, welcome our new Spiny Red Sea masters!

  2. In case of slashdotting, here's the text by scumbucket · · Score: 2, Informative

    CORVALLIS, Ore. - A new study has concluded that the red sea urchin, a small spiny invertebrate that lives in shallow coastal waters, is among the longest living animals on Earth - they can live to be 100 years old, and some may reach 200 years or more in good health with few signs of age.

    The red sea urchin appears to be one of the longest living animals on Earth, with a possible lifespan of up to 200 years, according to a new study by marine zoologists at Oregon State University. (Photo by Richard Strathmann, Friday Harbor Laboratory)
    In other words, an individual red sea urchin that hatched on the day in 1805 that Lewis and Clark arrived in Oregon may still be thriving - and even breeding. The research was just published in a professional journal, the U.S. Fishery Bulletin, by scientists from Oregon State University and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. It may have important implications for management of a commercial fishery and our understanding of marine biology, as well as challenge some erroneous assumptions about the life cycle of this never-say-die marine species.

    It used to be believed that red sea urchins lived to be only seven to 15 years of age, experts say. But the newest findings are based on the use of two completely different techniques of determining sea urchin ages - one biochemical and the other nuclear - that produced the same results. The studies show red sea urchins can have a vast lifespan surpassing that of virtually all terrestrial and most marine animal species, and seem to show almost no signs of senescence, or age-related dysfunction, right up until the day that something kills them.

    "No animal lives forever, but these red sea urchins appear to be practically immortal," said Thomas Ebert, a marine zoologist at OSU. "They can die from attacks by predators, specific diseases or being harvested by fishermen. But even then they show very few signs of age. The evidence suggests that a 100-year-old red sea urchin is just as apt to live another year, or reproduce, as a 10-year-old sea urchin."

    The more mature red sea urchins, in fact, appear to be the most prolific producers of sperm and eggs, and are perfectly capable of breeding even when incredibly old. There is no sea urchin version of menopause.

    Some of the new studies on this species were done with funding support from the Pacific States Fishery Commission to gain more information about the species, its life cycle, biology, survival rate, growth patterns, and perhaps shed light on why the red sea urchin resource was declining in some areas.

    This small marine animal, which is found in shallow Pacific Ocean coastal waters from Alaska to Baja California and also elsewhere in the world's oceans, lives by grazing quietly on marine plants and deterring most predators with its pointy spines. Historically, it had been considered a nuisance.

    "In the U.S. in the 1960s, sea urchins were considered the scourge of the sea, a real menace," Ebert said. "They ate plants in kelp forests and people believed they were at least partly responsible for the decline of that marine ecosystem, so they tried to poison them, get rid of them however possible."

    But in the 1970s a commercial fishery developed in the U.S. based on sea urchins, which were sold primarily to Japan where their sex organs were considered a delicacy. They brought high prices, and at one point in the 1990s were one of the most valuable marine resources in California.

    Ebert did some early work on the red sea urchin, along with colleagues Steve Schroeter at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and John Dixon, of the California Coastal Commission. It quickly became apparent that sea urchins, among other things, grew a lot more slowly and lived a lot longer than had been believed. "Sea urchins live as male and females, and fertilization of eggs takes place while they float in the ocean," Ebert said. "The larvae then feed for a month or more before turning into tiny sea urchins."

    The red sea urchin, in

    --
    CMDRTACO CHECK YOUR EMAIL!
    1. Re:In case of slashdotting, here's the text by El · · Score: 1
      The studies show red sea urchins can have a vast lifespan surpassing that of virtually all terrestrial and most marine animal species, and seem to show almost no signs of senescence... right up until the day that something kills them."

      How exactly does one determine whether or not a sea urchin is senile?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:In case of slashdotting, here's the text by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      They start forgetting things?

  3. I wish I owned a biotech startup by superflex · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Man, this has "genetic analysis" written all over it. Screw world overpopulation problems; I wanna be immortal!
    Oh, and just cuz I can, fr0st p1st, bizzatches.

    --
    sigs are for suckers
    1. Re:I wish I owned a biotech startup by TheDredd · · Score: 1

      Micheal Jackson already has a lab full of these creatures being studied, in his quest for immortality

      But i think progress goes slow, lately, as he has other things on his mind

    2. Re:I wish I owned a biotech startup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micheal Jackson already has a lab full of these creatures being studied, in his quest for immortality

      But i think progress goes slow, lately, as he has other things on his mind

      [ Reply to This ]

      Q: What time is bedtime at Michael Jackson's house?

      A:When the big hand touches the little hand!

    3. Re:I wish I owned a biotech startup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A:When the big hand touches the little hand!
      Wouldn't that be when the big hand touches the little sausage?

    4. Re:I wish I owned a biotech startup by whorfin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Micheal Jackson already has a lab full of these creatures being studied, in his quest for immortality

      Shouldn't that be immorality?

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
  4. This explains a lot by Fux+the+Penguin · · Score: 4, Funny

    The other day I was walking by the ocean, and noticed two red sea urchins sword fighting by the shore. One beat down the other, then said "In the end, there can be only one" and chopped off the loser's head. Then there was this lightning or something, and the street lights blew out.

    1. Re:This explains a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a funny Highlander reference - why was it modded to redundant?

    2. Re:This explains a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the moderators are 'tards...

  5. Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by (trb001) · · Score: 1, Funny

    So they have recorded lifespans of 100-200 years old? Isn't this just like humans?

    But somewhat remarkably, it appears to never really stop growing. It's just very, very slow.

    Isn't this ALSO just like humans? We typically 'increase diameter' as we enter middle age too, albeit from too much beer and chips. I'm not sure I give this study a lot of credibility using the word 'immortal'.

    --trb

  6. We have found the secret to immortality! by fain0v · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I just have to find someone that can graft a human head to a sea urchin.

    1. Re:We have found the secret to immortality! by Randolpho · · Score: 1

      Nah, they just need to drink sea urchin stem cells, a la Christopher Reeve in South Park.

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    2. Re:We have found the secret to immortality! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I'd think that if you wanted to live really long, you'd graft yourself to a tree in a national park that has the best firefighting staff one can find.

      But if you want to continue to be an animal... it seems we have finally found out where Deep Reds really come from.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:We have found the secret to immortality! by whorfin · · Score: 1

      The Japanese eat it...Uni

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
  7. Someone really should ... by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 5, Funny

    Combine scorpian, red sea urchin and transistor growing e-coli DNA and produce a walking, stinging, immortal indestructable computer ... which will be obsolite by the time it hatches

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
    1. Re:Someone really should ... by torpor · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Imagine a beowulf clu ... oh, never mind.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Someone really should ... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      So you want to make a underwater version of Dust Puppy from userfriendly.org?

  8. What by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The key to their longevity appears to be always growing, but ever so slowly.

    I could see where age guessing of a slowly-changing organism would be difficult and that they would corroborate their results with nuclear information because biochemical indicators are so flat.

    This is also consistent with Duncan MacLeod and the other Immortals being under 40.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:What by buttahead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The key to their longevity appears to be always growing, but ever so slowly.

      acutally, consistant isn't indicated as the reason for long life... evolution can explain the age of these guys.

      Anything that happens after a creature stops reproducing does not contribute to evolution. So, typicaly you see creatures die soon after they stop reproducing, as there is no more need for them to exist. This has been indicated in women recently in small studies, but also makes some sence if you think about it.

      The fact that the urchins just keep on putting out sperm and eggs means that longevity can help them spread their genes more than any short lived urchin. and viola... if there is any age after which the urchins do go through a menopause... death for them will probably be within a few years after.

    2. Re:What by sunswallower · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure its that simple. Grandmas can help improve the chances of survival for their grandkids, even after menopause. The 'selfish gene' has very complicated ways of being 'selfish', some of which might even look 'altruistic'.

    3. Re:What by vigilology · · Score: 1

      The first Immortal MacLeod met, Juan Sanchez Villa-Lobos Ramirez, had to be over 40...

    4. Re:What by buttahead · · Score: 1

      Correct, some people believe this is why women live longer than men on average. women typically are the child caretakers, while the men are off at the pub. I was a little too exclusive with the word "Anything". in this particular case, the urchins do not "raise" their offspring. the involvment of the parents is not helping to lead their evolution in a different direction.

    5. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Highlander was a documentary, and the events happenend in real time."

      +4. what indeed.

      </athf>

    6. Re:What by sunswallower · · Score: 1

      Very good point: unlike humans, a sea-urchin's grandma doesnt bake cakes for her grandkids.

      I guess see the 'long life' / 'no menopause' pair as an inseparable chicken-and-egg problem.

      So, is it:

      a) they are able to reproduce at advanced ages, and this provides evolutionary pressure to increase their lifespan, OR

      b) their makeup somehow allows for them to potentially reach an advanced age, and this provides evolutionary incentive to increase the hardwired limit on the length of their reproductive careers

      I undestood your argument as a), I wonder if you think the reverse (ie. b) is also possible.

    7. Re:What by azav · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, no.

      Look at the factors that affect vertebrate aging. Aming them the telomeres falling off the ends of our DNA, Oxidative damage to cellular structures ala free radicals, etc...

      We are VASTLY more complex organisms than echinoderms on the most fundamental levels (bilateral symmetry vs radial) and what holds true for their life forms may not hold true to ours.

      FYI, radial vs bilateral symmetry in animals is a very very fundamental distingiushing factor with regards to evolutionary development. A long long long long long long time ago, there may have been a common ancestor for the urchin (an echinoderm) and us (a vertebrate). Symmetry is so fundamental that organisms to not evolve and change their symmetry. This shows that the several hundred million years of evolution that lead to the Humans and Red Sea Urchins of today may indicate that what provides immortality on one may not provide immortality in others.

      Start checking for repair mechanisms of the DNA and cellular organelles and telomere length in young and old urchins.

      Also, what about cancer? All vertebrates (even dinosaurs) get cancer. Do these echnoderms? The physiology is so vastly different between us and them that many things may not apply.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    8. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and viola... if there is any age after which the urchins do go through a menopause... death for them will probably be within a few years after.
      Who's Viola? Do you mean voila, perhaps?
    9. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that happens after a creature stops reproducing does not contribute to evolution.

      This isn't actually true. The important thing is that a creature dies when it's no longer contributing to the spread of its genes. Obviously, reproduction is the main thing you think of, but it's not the only one. For instance, some (all?) bees have a worker caste that cannot reproduce at all. It's in their benefit to live to serve the queen, because the queen is capable of having many more children that are genetically identical to the workers. In fact, it would be in the workers' interests to avoid having children even if they could, as they could only pass down 50% of their genomes in this way, whereas their mother could pass down 100% of their genomes.

    10. Re:What by buttahead · · Score: 1

      neither a nor b:

      evolution has no bearing on what happens after you stop reproducing. therefore, once you stop reproducing, evolution has no reason to prolong your existance.

      There are exceptions, as you pointed out, such as parents the raise thier offspring help to increase the offspring's chance to get to spawning age.

    11. Re:What by whorfin · · Score: 1

      Although they can get cancer, not all animals have increasing cancer rates as they age, as humans do.

      Can Turtles Live Forever?

      It's not quite immortality, but it seems that cancer is 'just another disease' in some turtles, rather than the eventual destiny of long-lived humans that don't fall to senescence.

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    12. Re:What by azav · · Score: 1

      Good example. Turtles are vertebrates like ourselves and it has been showed that most vertebrates (lizards, birds, fish, lawyers) get cancer. Plants don't. I don't think that echinoderms do either. So looking at what causes this long life in the Red Sea Urchin would be the next step. If there were a commonality between what happens in them to prevent the aging and what happens in us to make us age, then we might have something that would apply to longevity in humans.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    13. Re:What by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      I've heard people say that sharks don't get cancer. I always thought that this was probably bullshit but this page seems to have actual evidence that sharks at least have an extraordinarily low rate of cancer.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    14. Re:What by buttahead · · Score: 1

      nope... I meant viola... as in the sound of an american butchering a language.

  9. 100 ~ infinity? by _iris · · Score: 1

    Don't some species of parrot and sea turtle live to be 120 or so?

    1. Re:100 ~ infinity? by netfool · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but thats insignifigant. This is important because we previously thought they only lived to be 7-15 years old...

      --
      Left 4 Dead Gaming Group - http://www.l4dgg.com
    2. Re:100 ~ infinity? by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see Finding Nemo? Crush, the sea turtle, was 150 years old.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    3. Re:100 ~ infinity? by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Sea turtules do indeed live to be very old (with some speculation that they are "immortal" by some people). You can search for an article on them at discover.com.

    4. Re:100 ~ infinity? by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, but parrots and sea turtles show signs that they are wearing out, and will soon die. The urchins are living to the age of 120 and showing no signs of being less able to going on living for a long amount of time than very young urchins, which is why they're being labeled "immortal."

  10. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's incredibly difficult for a human to reach 100 without medical aid.. and I've never heard of a 200 year old human before. ???

  11. Sea urchin immortals?!?! by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Funny


    Oh great, now they are going to have poorly rehearsed swordfights and go on rants about "the prize".

    In the end, there can be only one sea urchin!

  12. What if? by torpor · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're only seeing the 'larval' stage of these organisms, which happens to be a few hundred years old ... and the next stage is a monstrous life-stealing alien invader of Earth, eating brains and demolishing cities?

    That would be cool. Hope its not for a few hundred years though, that would suck...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:What if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our sea urchin overlords.

    2. Re:What if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be a boon to the fresh fish market.

  13. In the end... by joeslugg · · Score: 0, Redundant

    there can be only one.

  14. Moses by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "So, Mr Urchin, were you too put out when Moses made you get out of the way when he parted the Eed Sea?"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Moses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's a lot of food in this world Mr Frodo and it's worth fighting for!

      Cute quote!

      It would be a bit funnier if you put in the necessary commas and such:
      There's a lot of food in this world, Mr. Frodo, and it's worth fighting for!
      ___________________________________^ __^ _____^
      Sorry to be a pain, but I wanted to point this out.
  15. Yawn... by BeProf · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of all the cryogenics hype when somebody froze and reanimated a frog. Why in only a couple of years before we would be able to freeze astronauts and send them to the stars!

    The problem? Fogs aren't people, and neither are Sea Urchins. Any real benefit to humanity is going to be a long time comming from this one.

    That having been said, I'd personally like nothing more than to be proven wrong.

    --
    You are attempting to read sigs. Cancel or Allow?
    1. Re:Yawn... by Bvardi · · Score: 1

      Yes but the worst thing about being proven wrong in THIS case is you'd be hearing about it for a LOOOOONNNNGGG time :)

      "Hey, remember a thousand years ago when you dismissed that urchin thing?"

    2. Re:Yawn... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of all the cryogenics hype when somebody froze and reanimated a frog.

      Er, you can freeze and thaw frogs in your fridge. They do it every winter.

      I bet you were amazed when "they" cloned a tree huh? ;- )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  16. Nearly immortal? by wizarddc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because 200 years is like FOREVER! When I heard nearly immortal, I thought theyw ould say soemthing like 500, 1000, even 5000 years old. Not 200. Don't some sea turtles live that long? Do we call them "nearly" immortal?

    --
    Th
    1. Re:Nearly immortal? by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      On the scale of a sea urchin, that's pretty damn close. Think Lobsters--the things could essentially keep growing to massive sizes, but they get eaten, stepped on, poisoned, diseased, shoved into massively deep ocean trenches and crushed into little tiny balls of lobster meat, whatnot.

      Rather, take the number with a grain of salt, and re-read the article while assuming laboratory conditions. There's a pretty big gray area between pure environmental factors which cause death (falling victim to the food chain, for example) and an organism's own slow decline because stuff just stops working after a while.

      I don't remember who said it, but the gist was that animals are supremely inefficient beings, because if they'd been designed properly, they'd just live forever through cell regeneration.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    2. Re:Nearly immortal? by fredrikj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't remember who said it, but the gist was that animals are supremely inefficient beings, because if they'd been designed properly, they'd just live forever through cell regeneration.

      No. Cell degeneration is part of the design; it results in old generations vanishing and getting replaced by new ones, ensuring that evolution makes progress. This even helps human society evolve :)

    3. Re:Nearly immortal? by falsification · · Score: 1
      RTFA. The sea urchins would be immortal, but their heads keep getting removed.

      There can be only one.

    4. Re:Nearly immortal? by vigilology · · Score: 1

      Does that mean if someone takes a lobster as a pet and keeps it safe, keeps feeding it, it will grow to 20 feet long? :-D

    5. Re:Nearly immortal? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Funny

      No. Cell degeneration is part of the design; it results in old generations vanishing and getting replaced by new ones, ensuring that evolution makes progress. This even helps human society evolve :)

      That reminds me. I'm so glad all my grandparents are finally dead.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:Nearly immortal? by pio!pio! · · Score: 0

      So if a group of scientists raised a lobster and kept it away fro being eaten, stepped on, poisoned, diseased, shoved into massively deep ocean trenches and crushed into little tiny balls of lobster meat, whatnot....we would have a monster lobster?!!?

    7. Re:Nearly immortal? by Deflagro · · Score: 1

      Uh oh, you said the E word! Better watch out, we all know the urchin was created by the almighty god!
      yay.

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    8. Re:Nearly immortal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope so!

    9. Re:Nearly immortal? by Tyreth · · Score: 0, Troll
      The problem with ageing is that there's an arbitrary 'string'. iirc, every time a cell replicates, this 'string' is cut a bit shorter. Once it's gone, the cells stop replicating. ie, it's an arbitrary limit to lifespan, and there's no reason that if this string was extended, perhaps indefinitely, that we couldn't live forever. I believe it's called telomere.

      Since this is possibly/probably a genetic trait, it is plausible that humans once lived longer, but unfortunate events left us with a shorter lifespan. Ah, here I found more details.

    10. Re:Nearly immortal? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I doubt that it would get anywhere near that big. The record for an American Lobster is about 1 meter in length. Who would volunteer to stuff that monster in a pot of boiling water?

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    11. Re:Nearly immortal? by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      A scientific explaintion involving an invisible man in the sky.

      Brilliant.

      --
      Everything seemed to be going so nice
      'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
    12. Re:Nearly immortal? by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1


      The Japanese, clever that they are, have already beaten us to it.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    13. Re:Nearly immortal? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      There is a general rule of thumb that the smaller the animal is, the shorter its life span is. Most animals the size of a red sea urchin leave under 10 years. So 200 years for an animal that size is something like 2000+ years for a primate. Which is a hell of a lot.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  17. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 2, Informative
    So they have recorded lifespans of 100-200 years old? Isn't this just like humans?

    The oldest documented human lifespan is slightly over 120 years. That's nowhere near 200. Moreover, from the article (emphasis mine):

    A new study has concluded that the red sea urchin, a small spiny invertebrate that lives in shallow coastal waters, is among the longest living animals on Earth - they can live to be 100 years old, and some may reach 200 years or more in good health with few signs of age.

    Note the bolded part. You can't find me even one 80-year old human with few signs of age...

    --
    I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
  18. If they were practically immortal... by floydigus · · Score: 1

    ...then I would expect to find some which were at least a few thousand years old, and eventually that were dozens of thousand years old. So why are the 100-200 year old ones a big deal?

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

    1. Re:If they were practically immortal... by Saige · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of non-old age means for them to die. And if you assume that those dangers are equally likely to affect a couple-year old sea urchin and the 200 year old one, it just means living to older and older ages are progressively less and less likely.

      And the fewer there are that live to the really old ages, the less likely they are to be found by people, just because they become progressively smaller percentages of the sea urchin population.

      I also doubt there are a lot of records of the various sizes of sea urchins that have been found. For all we know, there could have been thousand plus year old ones that have been collected by people, and either killed as a nuisance, or had their sex organs shipped off to a Japanese restaurant somewhere in Japan or the USA or Canada or such, and eaten in a little soy sauce, with no clue they were eating the oldest living animal on the planet. Heck, the single time I tried sea urchin may have been that one, for all we know. (note that I did not like it at all...)

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    2. Re:If they were practically immortal... by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 0
      You obviously didn't read the article, or you wouldn't be so hung up on the word 'immortal' (the actual article did say 'practically immortal'). They of course meant that they do not die from old age, but they are not, however, invincible. In other words:

      "They can die from attacks by predators, specific diseases or being harvested by fishermen. But even then they show very few signs of age. The evidence suggests that a 100-year-old red sea urchin is just as apt to live another year, or reproduce, as a 10-year-old sea urchin."

    3. Re:If they were practically immortal... by floydigus · · Score: 1

      Your post annoyed me to an unusual degree because it seemed insulting, irrelevant and patronising. So I took a look at your other posts.

      Let me just say this...

      1. Just because everyone else spends their entire time writing 'RTFA' and 'In soviet Russia' posts, doesn't mean you have to.
      2. What you may think comes across as a rapier wit in fact comes across as juvenile floundering.

      You still have a chance not to be a dickhead in your /. life, please take it. I'll be watching you.

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

  19. Lobsters too! by squidwanker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lobsters also show no signs of senescence. Just disease and predation limit their lifespans.

  20. Urchins are well protected by barakn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    and so if there's no biochemical reason for them to die then they could live to a ripe old age.

    A friend of mine was swimming off a beach in Bali and stepped on a long-spined urchin (unknown species) with both feet, which caused immediate and excruciating pain. After his brother helped him on shore, the Balinese natives broke the spines off right where they protruded from the bottoms of his feet. Then they poured lemon juice on the puncture sights and started pounding the soles of his feet with rocks, for hours. The pain was so excruciating he became delirious and started laughing.

    The treatment broke up and dissolved the spines below the skin, and that probably saved his life. Apparently there's some sort of toxin, as he was extremely sick for the next 2 weeks. Had the spines remained embedded in his feet, there would have been enough toxin to kill him, a doctor told him later.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    1. Re:Urchins are well protected by CrackHappy · · Score: 1

      Having lived on Bali and Java for some time, any idiot knows not to go walking around the ocean without sandals or shoes of some sort! That's just plain stupid, there are stone fish, sea snakes, urchins, rays, etc. etc.

      Hell... it's not wise to even walk on the ground without shoes, as there are many organisms that live in the soil that will get you too.

      Having said all that, I still love the place, my favorite country in the world.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
    2. Re:Urchins are well protected by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, nematodes might get you if you step in mud, especially in warmer places I would think.

    3. Re:Urchins are well protected by dbirchall · · Score: 1

      Ouch. Here in Hawaii we have black and banded long-spined venomous urchins, probably pretty similar to what's in Bali. They're pretty visible (if you're watching where you're going) and easily avoided (thank goodness they haven't evolved the ability to launch venomous spines like torpedoes at swimmers!) but yeah, stepping on one would be nasty. I once stepped on a non-venomous collector urchin, and that hurt enough, so I give the venomous ones a wide berth unless I'm taking pictures of them.

  21. free as in radicals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    AFAIK, The effects of aging are thought to be caused primarily by interference with cell replication by "free radicals" - oxidizing agents that damage proteins required for proper cell function.

    What could we learn from the sea urchin about preventing this type of cellular damage?

  22. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    hey mods - get this one too.

    god forbid you mention the Bible on slashdot - it upsets the liberals.

    no worries though - while you're burning in hell, i'll be singing with the angels and there's no amount of "slashdot karma" that can change that fact.

  23. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't (nearly immortal) = forever - 1

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immortal in this context means "doesn't die due to age." Infinity-1 is still infinity.

  24. IMAGINE A BEOWULF CLUSTER OF YOUR MOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously. imagine that!

  25. urchin pussy a delicacy? by dh003i · · Score: 1

    So, let me get this straight, in Japan, an urchin's pussy is considered a delicacy?

    1. Re:urchin pussy a delicacy? by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, let me get this straight, in Japan, an urchin's pussy is considered a delicacy?

      Your point being? I believe some Americans enjoy eating bulls' testicles, and they don't even have the excuse of belonging to an inscrutable oriental culture.

    2. Re:urchin pussy a delicacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno. No man has admitted to eating it.

  26. Does this mean that Highlanders.. by inteller · · Score: 1

    .....are really sea urchins? If there can be only one these little critters will never get the job done. THEY CAN'T MOVE LET ALONE SWING A SWORD!

    1. Re:Does this mean that Highlanders.. by barakn · · Score: 2, Informative

      They can move, on hundreds of tiny little tube feet.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  27. This is weak evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I don't think we can be sure that 19 centimeter sea urchins are two hundred years old.


    They say that they grow at a slow rate and they think that bigger equals older with the urchins. Maybe the big sea urchins are just big for some other reason. Genetics or a good food supply or something. There is no real evidence that they live for a hundred years.

    1. Re:This is weak evidence by illuvata · · Score: 1

      there were two independent studies. if you dont believe in the biochemical one, perhaps you will have more faith in the nuclear one.

      read the article again, and this time pay attention

  28. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by Zordak · · Score: 2, Funny
    You can't find me even one 80-year old human with few signs of age...

    Two words: Dick Clark.
    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  29. Urchins overrated by metamatic · · Score: 1

    They may be immortal, but they're nowhere near as cute as the sea otters that eat them.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  30. Hazy logic? by brianjcain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This just in -- housefly researchers determine that human beings are near immortal, with natural lifespans in excess of two months.

    1. Re:Hazy logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in -- slashdotters don't RTFA.

  31. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The oldest documented human lifespan is slightly over 120 years.

    I take it you mean the largest figure for a human lifespan accepted by modern medical science, right? I can think of some pretty old documents about human lifespans that beat 120 years hands down... most of the book of Genesis, for example. ;)

  32. Tomorrow's news: Sea Urchins extinct. by dbirchall · · Score: 2, Funny

    As soon as the nuts who take shark cartilege and all manner of other stuff in hopes of living past 120 hear about this, they'll wipe out the sea urchins...

  33. New study... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should do a study on the terrible reading comprehension skills of the average /. reader. Or perhaps simply poor understanding of the word 'immortality' is at fault? All I know is that based on their research, there is no biological reason why a red sea urchin would cease to live e.g. this species is "immortal". Further, it seems apparent that over-harvesting by fisheries would account for why none over the age of 200 can be found (because they've simply been EATEN), and even if they weren't mismanaged then I'm sure some other predator (other than human) would be eating them. Those over 100 years are extremely lucky not to have been devoured. Ok kids, this time read it again and try to pay attention!

  34. CONNOR MacLeod by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Geesh, its Connor MacLeod, the one who beat the Kurgan and won the Prize, not some lame-ass made-for-TV guy. How old are you, 12?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  35. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny
    You can't find me even one 80-year old human with few signs of age...

    Two words: Dick Clark.

    He said human!
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  36. OT offensive Michael Jackson Joke by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Micheal Jackson already has a lab full of these creatures being studied, in his quest for immortality
    But i think progress goes slow, lately, as he has other things on his mind


    The immortality thing is just a front. The real reason is that he likes handling their small pricks.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  37. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 1
    I can think of some pretty old documents about human lifespans that beat 120 years hands down... most of the book of Genesis, for example. ;)

    Sorry, fiction doesn't count as "documentation".

    --
    I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
  38. Here we are, born in the seas! by jfisherwa · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're the urchins of the aquaverse!

  39. I, for one, ... by fygment · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... welcome our Red Sea urchin overlords.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  40. they're invertebrates by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1
    They have no brains and no sex--they just release their gametes into the water (come to think of it, that may be true for the average /.er as well). Do you want to live hundreds of years like that?

    Brings to mind...
    Methuselah lived nine hundred years
    But who calls that livin'
    When no gal will give in
    To no man what's nine hundred years
  41. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, well, while you're singing with the angels, I'll be fucking your dear saintly mother, you Christian fucknut.

  42. Re:Immortal? No, just like human lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now that's comedy!

  43. Only Disease and Predator Attacks? by dbretton · · Score: 1

    How about if I cast magic missile?