OSDL Releases New Paper on SCO's Claims
Ridgelift writes "The Open Source Development Labs have released a paper entitled SCO: Without Fear and Without Research [PDF, HTML version at the FSF] where Eben Moglen debunks SCO's claims to copyright infringement, and also discusses how they contradict themselves by citing that the GPL is both invalid and provides them legal protection. More information at the OSDL site and via an Internet.com article."
For those of you that choose not to RTFA:
"SCO is full of shit. And oh yeah, Darl has got balls of steel."
SCO claim that there's a non compete clause in their contract with Novell, and hence, Novell may not compete with SCO.
Now, I don't see Novell running around like a madman shitting in their own bathwater and suing everyone who says "boo". Clear evidence that Novell is in no way competing with SCO's core business.
They are making all the right people mad, just like the Sex Pistols and some certain colonists before them (Boston Tea Party anyone?).
The question is, will anyone remember SCO in 5 years to mention them in the same breath as innovators like Samuel Adams and Sid Vicious? Or are they doomed to VH1 "Where are they now" type obscurity. I would hope for the former, because there is no question that what they are doing is important, and needs to be remembered.
(-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
I was wondering when I'd get my SCO fix for the day.
What, no Groklaw? How am I supposed to get in "Whatever the merits of the case, Groklaw has a really, really stupid name!" post?
OSDL PDF/FSF HTML RPT WRT SCO GPL FUD
John.
The rest of this text is because the Slashdot lameness filter thinks that I am shouting which in fact I am now because the lameness filter is lame.
but it won't shut up SCO. There is money to be made and FUD to be spread.
Welcome to the new diocese, Father. These upstanding lads are the choir...
Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
And I thought Slashdot meant this paper.
"What code are you saying is infringing?"
"What have ya got?"
I have two little kids. I frequently tell them, "Hey, let's check your diaper for content."
So there you go.
That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
[...] so that this hideous trainwreck can be put to bed.
After all, a train wreck not put to bed is a penny earned!
Darl would sue himself if his lawyers could think of a way to profit by it.
1. Call corporate meeting with lawyers
2. Order them to sue you.
3. Another drivel-filled SCO lawsuit is filed.
4. ??
5. Profit!!
See? It's easy! Anyone can do it!
For all you know I might be doing it right now.