All-in-Wonder 9600 Pro Review
VL writes "From synthetic, to real-world game benchmarks. TV capture, DVD playback, and 2D/3D image quality... we covered all the bases with a review of All in Wonder 9600 Pro."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Aren't there a million sites out there that do hardware reviews? Or is it a slow newsday?
~S
Do they test the linux drivers, or is this another one of those "there exists only one platform, and it's name is 3DMark"-reviews?
Belief is the currency of delusion.
So you thought you'd submit a story to Slashdot to get some visitors to your site. Well done. Yes, it's a cheap way to get some publicity for a vaguely tech related site. But didn't it occur to you to ensure it could survive the slashdotting before you submitted the story?
"The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
What's so special about this review?
Indeed. Unfortunately, it's a chicken-and-egg problem: the game companies won't release Linux games because there isn't enough marketshare, but since there's no Linux games no one tries to game under Linux, so the game companies won't release Linux games....
Honestly, I don't know how well-supported the AIW cards are by the ATi Linux drivers -- and such support won't appear until enough people get together and make ATi aware of the fact that people want this functionality.
Hopefully, sooner or later someone will actually write a review on how easily the latest & greatest video hardware can be installed on the major distros and how fast they are -- this is a biggie because the toolchain and options used to compile the X server, the kernel, the drivers and the libraries make a BIG difference. Fortunately, games like UT2K3 do run under Linux AND they have integrated benchmarking capabilities. So the review wouldn't be totally bereft of benchmarks.
SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
I had an AllinWonder Pro way back in the day. Used it to sample in some digital video and back up some of my VHS tapes to HD. Drivers sucked. When I got Windows 2000, it totally broke. Since then, I've avoided the whole thing by getting a digital camera with USB drivers. Much more flexible anyways, and you can plug in external sources into the dv camera and I'm back where I was with the AllinWonder.
So here's my video card suggestion: Forget the 9600 AiW and go straight to a 9800 non-pro version. According to Tom's hardware, 20-30% performance difference over the 9600 graphically. Finally, do NOT get the Pro, XT, or SE versions of the 9800 unless you are a hardcore gamer. I was able to get a Radeon 9800/128 meg version for $185 on EBay!
The lower clock speed of the 9800 vs 9800 Pro affects performance minimally, but you can also overclock the regular 9800 to have Pro-like speeds, from what I hear.
Tom's hardware also indicated VIRTUALLY NO PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE between the 128 and 256 meg RAM versions of the RaDeon 9800 Pro card.
----
Basically, the extra RAM, fluff features ATI puts on their cards is for the kiddies. If you want to buy in, go for it. Otherwise, be smart, take advantage of the core technology by getting the 9800 -- you'll get all the performance and save $200. Save your money for dedicated, portable peripherals.
Why do hardware reviews only test the hardware out under Windows? Are there any hardware review sites that review hardware under Linux? Just because a piece of hardware performs nicely or efficiently under Windows doesn't mean the same applies under Linux.
Things are Linux oriented hardware review should cover:
1. Linux based synthetic benchmarks
2. Benchmarks under popular Linux games
3. OSS drivers (yes/no)
4. Linux support (yes/no)