Slashdot Mirror


Dell Moves Call Center Back to US

alphakappa writes "Fox reports that Dell is moving its call center operations for the Latitude and Optiplex computers back to the US from Bangalore, India after an onslaught of complaints from dissatisfied customers who couldn't cope with the differing accents and scripted responses. Is this the beginning of a trend where companies recognize that the quality offered by relocation to cheaper centers around the world doesn't result in customer appreciation and better quality?"

10 of 961 comments (clear)

  1. Not surprising really by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some functions outsorced to India (or wherever for that matter) work out well, and some don't. Speaking from experience, we just completed a major project with a firm in India, which helped us greatly, producing quality code with few bugs (about the same ratio as an equivalent U.S. Programmer).

    However afterwards we didn't feel that for our clientele they would provide adequate support and maintenance programming capability so they were released from there. So now it's my job to do some of the front line maintenance for this code and respond to customer issues with minor tweaks as needed.

    In short: no one solution is a magic bullet, everything needs careful analysis.

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:Not surprising really by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm not sure whether this was intended as a troll or not, but to stand up for them I'll bite:

      Their code and comments was well written easy to understand, as referenced in parent it was high quality. Honestly I think the decision to outsource that code to India was a very good decision from a business standpoint. Did it cost a coder a job here? Not really we're hiring...

      --
      ...in bed
  2. Jobs by deacent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't mind competing with other programmers for jobs, regardless of where they're from. I just wish that employers were able to recognize who is qualified for a job and who isn't. I've personally lost plenty of opportunities to US programmers who were not qualified and screwed up a project, only to have the client come back and have me fix it, except now most of their budget is gone.

  3. Re:Coming back? No. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    no the language barrier is not a problem... the Quality of the code certianly is.

    Code quality for a couple of the vertical apps we use cince it was moved "overseas" has dropped so far that several of the offices here have reverted to a version that was pre-outsourcing just to avoid the bugs and instability.

    when your product quality drops so badly that your customers will happily use a non-supported version and pay the IT guys to write a data-conversion tool to use it? something is certianly wrong....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  4. Re:Coming back? No. by RawCode · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Agreed. When the almighty buck is most important, companies will find a way to get around all barriers. It shocks me that Dell is moving the operation back to the US, instead of dealing with the issue, and hiring language coaches (and no I dont want these jobs to leave the North America to begin with). 10 to 1 says they move back with 5 years.

    Money is money. Bottom line!

  5. What, employees aren't commodities? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this the beginning of a trend where companies recognize that the quality offered by relocation to cheaper centers around the world doesn't result in customer appreciation and better quality?

    No, because that would imply that a major American company is taking a diametric turn from the growing trend to consider employees as completely interchangeable commodities.

    That happened to me in spades at my last job, from which I was unfortunately laid off recently (sad to lose the pay, not the job). I am a Windows developer with 16 years of professional programming experience and long history of developing superior code, but was directly told to write no code which could not be understood by an entry-level non-C++ programmer. This does _not_ mean to write good, clean, well-documented code. This literally means that I was not allowed to write anything more complex than brain-dead C code, even though this project was developed with Visual C++. For instance, all memory allocation was done in fixed-size arrays, meaning if you exceeded one of the many arbitrary limits, the program crashed and you had to hunt down and find the proper #define to increase to make the array big enough. Of course allocating 70-some thousand instance of some object that was used many 500 times was one of the lesser adverse side-effects of such nonsense.

    The idea of using something so simple as a CArray was beyond these people's experience and they were afraid that in bringing too much of this thinking on board, they would find themselves at a point where they couldn't swap bodies and have a new person pick (who theoretically didn't have any C++ experience) could pick it up and run with it.

    Encapsulating the hard parts to make the rest easier to use was not only met with resistance, but actively condemned. I was truly being treated as a body warming a seat rather than having my substantial skills and experience utilitized in a meaningful way.

    Why, might you ask, did they hire me then? I don't know, and no one could answer that question. On the other hand the pay was decent and it gave me something to do (struggling to keep sane from boredom is a challenge). I fear for the project, however, since I was just about the only one asking the tough questions, while the party line was to blunder along blindly and fix problems only when they showed up.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  6. Corporate propaganda - plain and simple by Marx+Marvelous · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/7345 841.htm "We did not send back any calls to the U.S.," the Dell International Services' spokeswoman in the high-tech hub of Bangalore, said on Tuesday. The spokeswoman said she did not want to be quoted by name. "Now, I don't know why Jon said that," the Dell spokeswoman in Bangalore said. "We are committed to India and we are growing."

  7. Re:Coming back? No. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And an NDA does not mean much when you're dealing with a foreign outsourcing shop. Would you want to have to go to court in a foreign country to enforce it? I wouldn't bet on you receiving a fair trial in most cases.

  8. Re:Coming back? No. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The company in North America would just say "we want software that does x."

    My experience as a consultant is that the "does x" is something like "increases sales" or "reduces costs".

    Most of project management and software design is translating "does x" into a set of requirements that can be realised as a piece of software.

    If you do not have an ability to map business requirements to software requirements in-house the likelihood of getting something usable from an offshore development company is akin to winning the Powerball lottery.

  9. Re:Coming back? No. by kcornia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was an article I read not too far back about a Pakistani woman threatening to release private medical information of patients for a particular hospital because she hadn't been paid for her transcription service.

    Turns out the hospital had outsourced it here in the US, that company had outsourced it to ANOTHER company, which then outsourced it to Pakistan.

    Speaking for myself, I'm not very thrilled with that many groups having access to my private info, let alone groups that are outside the reach of US law enforcement.