Slashdot Mirror


First Review Of Return Of The King

dipfan writes "Newsweek has a first review of the third instalment of LOTR - and gives it two thumbs up: "Judging from a recent Newsweek screening in New Zealand, The Return Of The King is a sure contender for best picture. More than that, it could be the first franchise ever that didn't, at the end of the day, let audiences down--either because of laziness, pretension, greed or other phantom menaces. This is an especially poignant possibility at a time when we can all still smell the smoke from the wreckage of The Matrix." Fingers crossed. There's also an entertaining piece on LOTR gaffes with comments from Peter Jackson (such as 'Well, it's too late to fire anyone,' and 'We didn't think Elijah looked very good with pus')."

14 of 757 comments (clear)

  1. Re:SPOILER by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 0, Informative

    Also interesting is historical background for this chapter. LOTR was written after WWI and shire was meant to represent england which wasn't hit by war directly but war changed a whole generation of man.

  2. Except, of course, that he agreed to it. by devphil · · Score: 4, Informative


    Some of his published letters describe his feelings on the possibility of a movie. He didn't like the idea for the same reason that many of the die-hard fans don't -- it's impossible to translate everything onto the screen.

    But he wasn't dead-set against the idea. He gave his reluctant permission. (Then got really disgusted at the screenplays.)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  3. Re:SPOILER by UserGoogol · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, but they WILL have the Grey Havens, which, supposedly, should be shown with the proper degree of bittersweetness. Hopefully SOMETHING will have changed in the Shire, though.

    --
    "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  4. Re:Secrets? by Feral+Bueller · · Score: 3, Informative
    No so, Mr. Minh.

    "Lord of the Rings" was the second best selling book in western literature (behind the Bible) for years.

    Now I think it's averaging at #3 behind "Dianetics".

    Too bad their movie ("Battlefield Earth") wasn't as good.

    --
    - learn to swim.
  5. Re:SPOILER by rendler · · Score: 5, Informative
    I don't know if this was supposed to be a well crafted troll or a simple mistake. But it is very incorrect. From the foreward of LOTR:



    As for any inner meaning or 'message', it has in the intention of the author none. It is neither allegorical nor topical. ......
    The crucial chapter, 'The Shadow of the Past', is one of the oldest parts of the tale. It was written long before the foreshadow of 1939 had yet become a thread of inevitable disaster, and from that point the story would have developed along essentially the same lines, if that disaster had be averted. It's souces are things long before in mind, or in some cases already written, and little or nothing in it was modified by the war that began in 1939 or its sequels.

    --

    *shrug*
  6. Re: Have to say it... by jonabbey · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is The Man Who Would Be King that Gandalf wrote and directed, yes?

  7. Re:The matrix. by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 3, Informative

    try this

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  8. Re:Just suck it up by Chmcginn · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's the scouring of the shire, not the razing of it. It's not completely destroyed - really, only a few hobbits are actually killed - just messed up for a time while they're gone. And it doesn't change the "Good prevails over Evil" syndrome at all - by end of the story in the appendices, everything's better than it was before, Sam's the mayor, Merry the master of Buckland, and Pippin the head Took. (And Frodo gets to ride off into the sunset with Gandalf, Elrond, and the near-last of the elves.)

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  9. That was not a review. by jbum · · Score: 3, Informative

    >> Newsweek has a first review of the third instalment of LOTR - and gives it two thumbs up

    #1. That was not a review. It was a promotional
    article for the movie. Although the person writing the article appears to have seen the movie, he does not present his opinion about its quality.

    #2. No where is the phrase "two thumbs up" used, this being something only done by Ebert & The Other Guy, who are not newsweek columnists.

    #3. The word 'installment' has two Ls.

  10. Re:Sometimes it doesn't matter by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

    Case and point

    Just a nit: the phrase is "case in point".

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  11. "Hobbit blade Sting"? by Zathras11 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sting is NOT a Hobbit blade... I guess the
    reviewer didn't pay attention to the movie,
    or bother to read the book. Oh well...

  12. Re:Just suck it up by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Informative

    pecial thanks to fuckchop moderators for modding down a perfectly topical post when there are no others like it in the thread.
    it's not fucking redundant, someone mod parent up please, thanks, he makes some good points.


    The reason it was modded redundant might have been because we have had at least two dedicated Slashdot topics on this, and every time LOTR comes up someone mentions it.

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  13. Re:Frodo the white separatist by rolofft · · Score: 2, Informative

    Enough of the conjecture and hearsay already! Tolkien was adamantly anti-racist. He risked forgoing publication of the Hobbit in German to avoid giving credence to the "race-doctrine". The publisher wanted him to pledge that he had no Jewish ancestry. In Tolkien's words, "I have many Jewish friends, and should regret giving any colour to the notion that I subscribed to the wholly pernicious and unscientific race-doctrine."

    --

    "Give a man a fish and he will ask for tartar sauce and French fries!"

  14. Re:You think that's bad... by SilmarilOne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, if you read the actual words from the illustration, it does NOT say Moria. Gandalf is translating.