Slashdot Mirror


Comparing Wireless Internet Services

Carl Oppedahl writes "AT&T has released its new "Edge" wireless Internet access service, claiming it is twice as fast (100-130K) as Sprint's "PCS Vision" wireless service (50-70K). I have written up a few comments on my experiences with the services. What data rates are others getting with Edge? I rarely get the advertised faster speeds."

162 comments

  1. But how.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Ok... I put the AOL CD in my computer but they didn't include a wireless wire. How do I connect to teh intarweb?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:But how.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      redundant? the most insightful thing on /. all year? Crack-baby mods..

    2. Re:But how.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to set us up teh box. Cutz0r any and 4ll wirez u see, then bam! W1r3l355!

    3. Re:But how.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You annoy me in ways I never dreamed possible.

  2. I can't get this... by xirtam_work · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't live on the edge :-(

  3. VPN by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I'd like is a reasonably fast wireless service that is good enough to let VPN work over it. My boss has had a terrible time getting that working on his Sprint PCS connection.

    I almost feel bad when he calls from Hawaii and he can't get access to our database from the beach chair.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    1. Re:VPN by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Methinks the problem is your VPN, not the
      network. You can VPN over much lower b/w
      links than PCS offers.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    2. Re:VPN by nstrom · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem isn't bandwidth, it's latency. Cellular links have a minimum of 300ms pings and a fair amount of packet loss. Interactive applications like VPN and VNC are more affected by this than simple downloads, unrelated to bandwidth requirements.

    3. Re:VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The problem isn't bandwidth, it's latency"
      If I was one the beach in Hawaii, it would be the latency, yeah, latency is stopping me from working......

    4. Re:VPN by amembrane · · Score: 1

      We've been able to successfully run our VPN and Citrix clients over both the Edge and Sprint PCS networks. I've never seen download speeds less than 100K on the Edge network, but we've only had the modem for a week.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    5. Re:VPN by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      Try SSH (layer 3) instead of a VPN (layer 2); it appears to be more resilient to drops than VPN services, and is just as secure. At least your connection will stay up.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    6. Re:VPN by jpostel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I use Sprint PCS Vision through a USB cable connected to my Treo 600 with a neat little app called PDAnet. I use the Cisco VPN client with no real problems. Most of my work is done through Term Services or PCAnywhere (which is a bandwidth hog).

      I have to say that most of the people that I have showed it to thought it was quite fast. The people that thought it was slow were indeed talking about latency and not throughput.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
  4. "TEH INTARWEB" OMG LOLWTF~~``!11!11! U FUNNEH!!!`` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YUO TEH JEENYUSS!!!

  5. T-Mobile is all you can eat by aminorex · · Score: 2, Informative

    T-Mobile is the only one that offers unlimited
    service, to my knowledge, in the U.S.

    I need to go to Kunming. Anybody recommend
    mobile Internet service that works in
    all major Chinese cities?

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    1. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by aminorex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Looks like Sprint offers unlimited data for
      $80 now. That's twice as much as T-Mobile.
      AT&T does not appear to offer unmetered
      service.

      Things change fast in this market.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    2. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For "Cell Phones" SprintPCS offers unlimited data service for $10-$15/month. The $80/month is only required with the "PC Modem". Even with your cell phone you connect it to your laptop and use it as a "PC Modem" (although Sprint warns against this, because they want you to pay the $80).

    3. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ATT GSM is unlimited for $80/mo. T-Mobile is $20 for unlimited on top of your voice package.

    4. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by Huogo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cingular's wireless internet express offers unlimited data for $75/month, and that can be hooked to a computer or used from a phone.

    5. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile is the only one that offers unlimited
      service, to my knowledge, in the U.S.


      Not true. Sprint PCS Vision has several "all you can eat" data plans. It's only about $5 extra a month for unlimited data.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    6. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With http://www.fido.ca you get unlimited GPRS roaming in the united states(tmobile areas). costs you only $50CANADIAN a month.

    7. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by 503 · · Score: 1

      AT&T announced a $79.99/mo unlimited data plan along with the EDGE announcement.

    8. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by PatJensen · · Score: 2, Informative
      I use T-Mobile's unlimited GPRS service out in California. (they overlay on Cingular's switches and towers) It works quite well, I connect via Bluetooth on a Nokia 3650 from my G4 and my Compaq Evo laptop. Worked great when I moved into my new house with no Internet access.

      However, The Nokia 3650 bluetooth stack is buggy as hell and my phone will randomly reboot or I will see an error that said "Unspecified error in Main.cpp" and drop my GPRS call. I average around 3-5k/s. They have multiple GPRS access points you can use - one of them has a graphic recompressing proxy that makes PDA and laptop access pretty quick. You can configure it once your connected as well. All in all T-mobile has excellent support resources on their site. I've gone the same route as this guy - I used to use AT&T and GoAmerica CDPD..

      With T-Mobile, depending on what GPRS AP you configure on your handset you can either get a proxy'd and NAT'd IP or you can get an external IP. I run Cisco's IPsec VPN software to connect back to my office on either APs and it works brilliantly, so PPTP should obviously work. Latency on the connection is about 80-200ms.

      Pat

    9. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by davidstrauss · · Score: 5, Informative
      Looks like Sprint offers unlimited data for $80 now. That's twice as much as T-Mobile. AT&T does not appear to offer unmetered service.

      I have T-Mobile "all you can eat" with the VPN option (public IP and no blocked ports). The plan is called "T-Mobile Unlimited Internet VPN" if you're curious. It costs $20 per month, and I get data rates comparable to a 56K modem connected at near full speed. I go through my Sony Ericsson T610 with bluetooth for the connection.

    10. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      Latency on the connection is about 80-200ms.

      I use T-Mobile's service over bluetooth with my T610. Its bluetooth stack is good for GPRS but seems to have problems syncing over the virtual serial port (I sometimes have to reboot the phone). My latency is 800-1400ms in Austin, TX. I have no idea why the lag is so high.

    11. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Latency is always around 600ms and up for Wireless.

      I was trouble shooting a customer out in NY, trying to figure out why he was moving around, and jumping from cellsite 2 cellsite so quickly. The guy was out on the water on a boat, and the signal was bouncing off the water. They didnt tell me that untill later. (LOL) I was able to ping his phone for over 2 hours without a problem.

      BTW, I vpn over GPRS with good results, Im really wanting that dual edge/wifi card, that will be perfect.

    12. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      Nokia makes a GPRS/WiFI PCMCIA card, check nokia.com. You might need to look at the european nokia.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    13. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by gbrayut · · Score: 1

      Glad to hear the service works as advertised. I just switched to T-mobile with the Sony T610 for the same reason: Unlimited 56k internet over bluetooth for $20 a month. Only thing is my number has not been released by AT&T yet so I cannot try it out :-(

    14. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by gbrayut · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but is $80 a month worth the 70-120kb connection? I have T-mobile phone and internet serves, with plenty of talk time and unlimited internet (56kb) for only $50/month. If you do not want phone service the internet runs for $30/month unlimited.

    15. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      Does the UT in your name stand for UT Austin? This is part for my own curiousity and part to know your coverage area. T-Mobile's Austin coverage is great, though UT's building block the signal in some areas.

    16. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AT&T Wireless offers unlimited internet access for 74.99 per month. According to the web www.attws.com/business they are offering the sony erricson EDGE card for $150 with a contract for service. Using the Nokia 6200 with the DKU-5 data cable I average 110k.

    17. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I says right in the article that Sprint, Nextel, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon all have all-you-can-eat. It's a very good article, please read it.

    18. Re:T-Mobile is all you can eat by gbrayut · · Score: 1

      UT stands for Utah... I'm in Salt Lake City

  6. Wrong "K" by dirkdidit · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to clarify things, those speeds should be in Kilobits per second, not Kilobytes.

    1. Re:Wrong "K" by joto · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's the wrong k. But that doesn't mean anything for whether it's bits or bytes, although since we speak about networking, yes, they measure bits, and kilo is actually 1000 and not 1024 for once.

    2. Re:Wrong "K" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The convention is thus:

      We use a 'k' to denote 'kilobits'.

      We us a 'K' to denote 'kilo bytes' (the real ones, not those pretender 1000's...)

      That's the way it's been forever. That's going to be the way I'm going to use it in the future... Untill, at least, we start measuring things in qubits.

    3. Re:Wrong "K" by joto · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The convention is thus: We use a 'k' to denote 'kilobits'. We us a 'K' to denote 'kilo bytes' (the real ones, not those pretender 1000's...)

      No. We use a 'k' to denote the SI prefix 'kilo'. For historical and practical reasons, a kilo is either 1000 or 1024, depending on context, although (nonsuccessfull) efforts have been made to try to make people say kibi instead of kilo when they mean 1024.

      However, a 'b' designates 'bit's, and a 'B' designates 'byte's. So the distinction is not between 'k' and 'K', but between 'kb', and 'kB'. A large K in this context is always wrong.

      Saying 100-130K about network speed is as meaningless as saying you car has a max speed of 180K. What you are probably meaning, is 340kb/s and 180km/h. But most of us understand it even though it's wrong.

    4. Re:Wrong "K" by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      Of course you are right. Sorry about that. I corrected my web page about this. Thanks.

  7. Disclaimer by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "K" refers to kilobits, not kilobytes. Speed measured in optimal circumstances, not all users may achieve similar results. Figures may include sum of up/download speeds. Weather may impact throughput. Excess ozone or solar flare activity may impact throughput. Figures are provided for information purposes only and do not constitite a contractual obligation or guarantee of any kind. User equipment may impact network throughput. Compatible with all compatible equipment, non-compatible equipment may cause performance degredation. Not for use outdoors. Not for use by minors. Not end-user serviceable: any attempt to reverse-engineer software or hardware internals is contrary to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DCMA) of 1999, sections 2b and 3a. May cause fatal electrocution. Not for indoor use. May not be exported to the following countries: Afghanistan through Zimbabwe. Not for use in Canada.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Disclaimer by Woy · · Score: 1
      Not for use outdoors.

      ...

      Not for indoor use.

      I can sell a worldwide 10Gbps wireless internet access with NO HARDWARE REQUIRED for 1/year to anyone interested here on slashdot.

      (Same disclaimer applies to my service.)

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    2. Re:Disclaimer by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Actual speed may vary depending on phase of the moon and your astrological sign. May cause headache or loss of breath. Consult your doctor before using Edge services. In the event of a water landing, Edge-enabled products can be used as a floatation device. AT&T is not responsible for floatation mechanism malfunctions including failure to inflate or unexpected intrapocket inflation. Pregnant women should not use Edge. Slippery when wet. Caution: hot. Do not taunt Edge-enabled products.

    3. Re:Disclaimer by Shinglor · · Score: 1

      It should actually be written Kbps or Kb/s.
      The K is always written uppercase. A capital "B" stands for Bytes and a lowercase "b" stands for bits.

      Just writing "K" does not specify a unit. It just tells you that it's x thousand of something, in this case bits per second.

  8. PCS Lack of Vision by Maradine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My love affair with Vision ended about two weeks into the service. It's never been fast, its never worked reliably, and most important, I've never found it particularly useful.

    Like a lot of products I have an early-adoptor's love affair with, it solves a problem I don't have. About the most useful thing I ever did with it was write a wap frontend for the nessus batch commandline so I could really impress the ladies. Turns out most ladies don't even know what nessus is. In a college town, I tell you!

    For those of you that read Gartner, you'll note where Sprint falls on the fabled magic quadrent. Its a special quadrent reserved for those who had a great idea and then blew it. Can you guess which?

    --

    trustedworlds.net - gaming, security, and the gunk that lives in between

    1. Re:PCS Lack of Vision by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      For those of you that read Gartner, you'll note where Sprint falls on the fabled magic quadrent. Its a special quadrent reserved for those who had a great idea and then blew it. Can you guess which?

      The Delta Quadrant? ie: ST: Voyager?

    2. Re:PCS Lack of Vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I've never been impressed by Vision. I've only used it to send text messages, but it takes a ridiculous amount of time to download the form from their servers, their servers frequently timeout when sending messages, and it seems to automatically log you out after a certain time. It's very frustrating to spend 10 minutes writing an e-mail using a phone's keypad and having the server tell you that you need to log in again (especially since Sprint never told me my account's password).

      The phone also seems to go back and forth with Sprint's servers *way* too much. If you believe the little send/recv arrow display, the phone goes back and forth with the servers around 12 times to send a 100 character text message. It even needs to send data for several seconds before closing the browser. Why do you need to talk to a server to close a local application????

      I originally switched to Sprint because Verizon was terrible when installing my DSL; they have a monopoly on local service so I figured I'd switch my mobile to give them less money since I actually had a choice for wireless. I'm so going back as soon as my contract is up. I'm tempted to pay the fee and cancel my contract early. That's how much Sprint sucks. (Another irritating example: My phone often fails to ring if it's in my pocket. This is probably due to the phone, but Sprint is the company that sold it to me...)

      For the love of God, do NOT use Sprint!!!

    3. Re:PCS Lack of Vision by Wah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My love affair keeps expanding with PCS.

      I read google news on my cigarette breaks. check 7 email accounts contstantly, IM, yadda, yadda, yadda, pr0n...

      Of course, the device is a big part of this. The understand the love, you need a Treo and PDANet, for starters. I don't know what combinations other people use, but this one is the bee's knees.

      I dunno, maybe you are trying to use it instead of broadband, but for a near 95% traveler by myself, it is incredibly useful to get real internet service in pretty much any city in the US. (I know their coverage sucks in some places, but I have been extremely satisfied with the service.

      --
      +&x
    4. Re:PCS Lack of Vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPRINT's stuff worked great. It was the effing Fujitsu laptop that couldn't delllllllliver per
      spec on PCMCIA power requirements of the CDMA2000
      radio card.

      That and drive time in Atlanta leaves no space for data on their network, and the caching algorithm, seeminglg from cisco was brain dead (worked fine throgh my own proxy). Nail in coffin was them slowing the speed. Initially, I could rub streaming audio at 128kbps with no dropouts as long as it was not drive time or first few hours of 'free' PM/wkend allocation.

      So, if you need net access and can tolerate 70kbps or slower when SPRINT's net is busy, and use your own proxy, it's useful. I wanted to listen to a 'out of town' radio station, in my car. While it worked, it was great...

    5. Re:PCS Lack of Vision by cloudmaster · · Score: 1
      especially since Sprint never told me my account's password

      It's the last 4 digits of your SS#. Consider calling their support line - *2, which is a free call. Regarding failure to ring if the phone's in your pocket - that's likely a result of poor coverage, or you have a shitty phone. Verizon is the devil, please don't give them extra money. Pick any of the other cell providers - Cingular, AT&T, T-Mobile, Nextel, etc. Cingular's even got the cool thing that makes regular phones ring, maybe then you could completely drop Verizon. :)

    6. Re:PCS Lack of Vision by johndiii · · Score: 1

      We have the same problem with phones not ringing when they're in someone's pocket. Never been on any service but Sprint, though, so I have nothing to compare with.

      --
      Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
  9. Oooooooooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have a large nerd penis.

  10. Aggregate vs Burst throughput by Sassan+Sanei · · Score: 1

    If they give you 4 time slots, and there are a total of 8 time slots per channel, what happens when you have more than 2 users in the same area trying to download a large file simultaneously? Sassan

    1. Re:Aggregate vs Burst throughput by blacksmith · · Score: 1

      Well, that's 8 time slots per frequency. A base station in a busy area will normally have multiple radios in, so it can work on multiple frequencies. It's obviously up to the network operator to install enough base stations with enough radios to support a reasonable data rate.

      Being cynical, it's not in the operator's interest to make EDGE too good, at least in Europe, since most of them paid a fortune for W-CDMA (3G) licenses.

  11. Recent report AT&T troubles. by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps this report may be of interest. Certainly worth considering before plunging into AT&T's more expensive services.

    1. Re:Recent report AT&T troubles. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article isnt correct, there was a problem, its fixed now.
      For details check Forbes.com Siebel is the largest activations provider in the USA. Dell and others use the same software. The CEO of Siebel is stepping down Jan 1 due to these types of issues.

      before plunging into AT&T's more expensive services.

      Unlimited Verizon is 199 a month, Unlimited ATTWS is 149. Really, a quick google search will show price plans. Check out Inphonic click check rate plans. Some good information on coverage and prices. Zipcode search will tell which Telco covers your area. Theres a reason most public safety departments go with ATTWS, they need a network thats fast and stable.

      Whats funny, is 40% of most customers think thier wireless telco sucks, and switching will resolve the issue. The problem is you might not be with the best telco for your area. Most people will just buy a phone and expect it to work everywhere. Everyone is about 2 years away from total network coverage for telcos, and in 2 years 2mbit+ data speeds will be normal. Now with customers able to switch (After contract is up) the best companies will start to show with better coverage and services. I also expect to see more CDMA/TDMA telcos merge together. (Sprint/Verizon) or (ATTWS/Cingular/Tmobile)

      Its only going to get faster, better coverage and more offered services. Edge is the leader now, UMTS will take the market next.

    2. Re:Recent report AT&T troubles. by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Unlimited t-mobile is $19.99/mo

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  12. hHHAhHahhA LOlZ U MAdE A fuNNE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OmG You ROCk
    FiGHt M$
    LOL^!%

  13. "I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this surprising? Have you EVER gotten the advertised specs from your high tech products? Have you ever gotten 56K from a 56K modem? Have you ever gotten 2Mbps from a DSL provider? Have you ever gotten 17" viewable from your 17" monitor? Have you ever gotten 20GB from your 20GB hard drive?

    The advertised specs are almost always inflated and unattainable. But, the sad thing is that consumers continue to allow the vendors to get away with it.

    1. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You got to read closer. For as long as I can remember monitors always advertised the viewable area and dot pitch. If you buy monitors from Kanka or something than that's your problem.

      As for 20GB disks to be fair there is space "wasted" by sector encodings and other data [ecc]. So really you do have 20GB [or more] of data on disk, just not 20GB usable by the FS.

      As for the modems, again same thing. Sure it's called 56K but they've put "the 53.3K cap" on the boxes forever now. Why they don't just call them 53K modems? Not as catchy.

      In general I do agree that advertising is almost always misleading which leads to the "once burned twice shy" syndrome most people encounter...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by in7ane · · Score: 1

      "As for 20GB disks to be fair there is space "wasted" by sector encodings and other data [ecc]. So really you do have 20GB [or more] of data on disk, just not 20GB usable by the FS. "

      Well, partially, I think it's more along the lines that 1000MB = 1GB = 1GiB = 1024MB since marketing is hardly going to use GiB...

      I know the sector encoding, etc took up a lot of space on a 2MB floppy, but somehow I don't think it's taking up around 10GB on a 160GB drive.

      In how this is relevant to anything to do with mobile internet access - just a chance for me to tag on a complaint about the lack of 3G broadband speed unlimited wireless data service here in the UK.

    3. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      Yes, why yes I have. When downloading from sites like yahoo or akamai hosted things, I usually get the best speeds.

      And I do get 20GB hd's.

      It's not the advertising spec's that are wrong. It's the wording of the specs that are fooked.

      What ISP's don't tell you is, you get high speeds TO the isp. Not to what the ISP connects to, so if the backbone is bad, so is your connection. That is usually the case.

      HD manufacturererers, don't usually tell you that there is a conversion error from 1billion bytes to 2^9 bytes. They do tell you it's based off of 1 billion bytes, but most good programs will use the base 2 thing.

      Otherwise, we'd see a lot more court cases about this stuff and false advertising. I'mm sure there were a few.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    4. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Have you ever gotten 2Mbps from a DSL provider?

      I get 1.5Mbps from my cable provider all the time depending on how fast the server I'm downloading from is. It's not a rare occurrance, either.

    5. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by EvilJohn · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I DO get advertised speeds on my Time Warner Cablemodem.

      I feel so dirty saying that.

      --

      Less Talk, More Beer.
    6. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are correct in that the main source of "misrepresentation" is GiB vs GB, but there is still a large amount of space taken up by internal hard disk functions.

      There's telemetry data, to tell the heads where they are at any given time, and there also spare sectors for when some live ones go bad. Modern hard disks can tolerate a number of bad sectors without the user ever seeing it, by moving the data that's getting hard to read to these spare sectors.

      That's generally the reason why when the user actually sees a bad sector, it's pretty far gone, because if it was just a limited flaw in the media, it could have compensated by using sector sparing.

      I don't know exact numbers for all this in modern disks, but 10GB out of 160 doesn't sound unreasonable.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by dattaway · · Score: 4, Funny

      Time Warner promised me 2Mb/sec. Well, they changed it to 3Mb/sec without telling me. And it gets worse: I get 4Mb/sec with no end in sight.

      I'm watching them very closely. One of these days, they might force me to upgrade my ethernet adaptor.

    8. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2^9 is nowhere near 1bil. maybe you meant 2^30?

    9. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this surprising? Have you EVER gotten the advertised specs from your high tech products? Have you ever gotten 56K from a 56K modem? Have you ever gotten 2Mbps from a DSL provider? Have you ever gotten 17" viewable from your 17" monitor? Have you ever gotten 20GB from your 20GB hard drive?

      The advertised specs are almost always inflated and unattainable. But, the sad thing is that consumers continue to allow the vendors to get away with it.


      I have a 1.5mbps down / 384kbps up line through PacBell (SBC) and I get my exact advertised speed ALL THE TIME. Not sure if it is different with other ISPs, but SBC always gives the advertised rate. Of course I do have the enhanced DSL package, but it is no different with friends of mine in the area who have the basic package (1.5mbps down / 128kbps up) - they get what they pay for.

    10. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      I have a cell phone with unlimited calling. I never get a bill. It seems to have complete functionality... I wonder if I am getting as much as they owe me? Hmm time to call some more 900 numbers.

    11. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Have you EVER gotten the advertised specs from your high tech products?

      eh, yeah.

      My SBC/Pacific Bell DSL line is advertised as 384/128, down/up speeds. I routinely see something more like 1500/320.

      I'm right now downloading Fedora Core 1 at > 1 Mbit.

      -Ben

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    12. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      Oops :)

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    13. Re:"I rarely get the advertised faster speeds" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. And it's now 50% faster than when I first signed on.

  14. Mucho expensive by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm paying $8/mo for 1MB of GMRS data transfer. That's barely a few web pages these days. Each extra KILOBYTE is something like EIGHT cents.

    Frankly, GMRS is plenty fast enough for me; it's just way, way, WAY too expensive. It's stupid, because the data rates pale in comparison to a voice call, and they're come+go...you'd think much cheaper for them to handle.

    Of course, this is all because AT&T and every other provider seems obsessed with cameraphones. I don't know a single person in my office who has a cameraphone, nor a single person that wants one. They're useless toys, but because the wireless companies are fixated on 'em, and they're giving 'em away, they've jacked up the costs on data transfer to the point that anyone trying to actually use the phone for real work can't afford it unless they're a billionaire.

    When I talk with friends, they don't say "oh, i want a phone with a camera!" They say things like: a)better reception b)fits in pocket(the camera phones are pretty damn big) c)easy to hold+use d)good battery life(and a battery that will NOT be gone within a year), and so on. Bluetooth is getting up there among my coworkers. Anyone at the phone companies listening?

    1. Re:Mucho expensive by jmcneill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny you should bring this up -- I just got my cell phone bill in the mail this morning, and on my $20 CDN/month GPRS plan (1.5MB) through Rogers/AT&T, I had a $16 roaming charge for doing 560KB worth of transfers in the US.

      I'm left with no choice but to cancel my GPRS service -- the only time it's ever useful is when I'm out of town, but the roaming charges are too high for me to think about doing the roaming GPRS thing again.

    2. Re:Mucho expensive by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      gmrs? are you sure you don't mean gprs?

      for gprs the standard price here (in finland) seems to be around 20 for 100mb which is plenty for irc/email/whatnot for regular user(i don't know if unlimited is still available for ~50). 100mb has proved to be plenty for me for my 3650(mainly irc and web browsing, slashdot for one also great for checking the non-nerd news while i walk to see some stupid lecture and also great diversion while i sit in the lecture, granted a wlan laptop would be even better but i wouldn't bother lugging it around).

      **: a)better reception b)fits in pocket(the camera phones are pretty damn big) c)easy to hold+use d)good battery life(and a battery that will NOT be gone within a year), and so on. Bluetooth is getting up there among my coworkers. Anyone at the phone companies listening?**

      reception problem is your service providers problem(at&t or whatnot, they just don't think that they should make the network proper since they can just get customers locked in by giving them 'free' phoens, such lock-in is illeagal here), as if the network is a proper one the phones pretty damn well work perfectly. the battery is an issue but it's more of an issue of the batteries going bad over time and use(in a year or two) all the phones available(here in finland) have pretty good battery life if you use them just as phones. you can buy ridiculously small phones too, the reason they don't do them much is that it interferes greatly with being easy to use and hold(a little over zippo sized phones have been available for _years_).

      now if all you take all the other things for granted(reception is great on every new phone in a PROPER NETWORK, one that covers whole of finland and europe for example) and consider between a phone that has camera and one that does not(and they cost almost the same) it's not that much of decision to go with the camera model(it's cool for 5mins anyways).

      the basic basic basic models are already just cripled versions(at just slightly reduced price) of the better featured ones(most of nokias series40 phones, with 128*128 display, are already basically the same phone in different outfit).

      however, the reason why the camera phones are 'toys' is because the camera on them just sucks so much, though it sucks so much that it probably just costs them extra 10 per phone to add it. it's been getting better though, 3650 has better than 7650, 6600 has even better. however the reason to go with these isn't the camera(3rd party symbian programs are the reason to go with them).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Mucho expensive by Cyph · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I really can't understand the obsession with camera phones. I recently decided to purchase a cell phone, and pretty much *every* decent phone AT&T had included a camera, which definitely added extra bulk. I ended up purchasing a Nokia 3650 (it has Bluetooth), and not once have I used the built-in camera. There's just no point to it. Cameras and cell phones should be kept separate.

      T-Mobile, however, does have the right idea with their Sidekick phone. The Sidekick by default does not include a camera, however, the 10-20 people who actually want a camera in their phone can purchase the separately sold camera attachment for the Sidekick.

    4. Re:Mucho expensive by Oopsz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, using GPRS on microcell when in the states doesn't incur any additional roaming charges.. 3 cents a kb, or flat rates for x megs of transfer, or unlimited use for $50, anywhere in north america. and voice roaming in the states is only 20 cents a minute. If you travel a lot you might want to switch, the international roaming is amazingly cheap

      (I used to have a cingular line just for use in the US, because telus roaming was so high. Not anymore.)

    5. Re:Mucho expensive by jmcneill · · Score: 1

      Was just looking at Fido's coverage -- doesn't look like they have any digital coverage in Atlantic Canada. Furthermore, my GSM Palm Tungsten/W won't work on their network. Looks like I'm stuck with Rogers/AT&T for now :(

    6. Re:Mucho expensive by BaldGhoti · · Score: 1

      I'm actually working seasonal part time at a Radio Shack, where we sell the Sprint PCS Vision phones. While you can't get a free cameraphone, they're way down in price--the basic VGA-quality phone is $79.99.

      I personally have the $99.99 Sanyo 8100, which does occasionally get me the advertised 50k/sec rate. The camera's really basic, the phone is tiny, and the battery life is just fine. A few days ago, I picked up the data link cable and software, and this morning I installed it, no sweat. It's definitely faster than my dialup access.

      As far as the "phone doesn't need a camera" argument: no, it doesn't need a camera. It also doesn't need a calendar or an alarm clock or customizable ringers or wallpapers or any of the things that make cellphones sweet pieces of tech. The same can be said for a computer. If all you want is a basic phone, get the free phone they give you to sign the contract. If you want something with bells and whistles and wireless web access and a friggin' pony, then spend the extra $99 and get one with a camera in it too. No one's making you use it.

      Cellphones don't NEED a camera, but cameras have gotten to the price where they can be included for nearly negligible prices, so they're being included. In five years, they're all going to have cameras, the same way they all have color screens and customizable ringtones, etc.

      I just downloaded an application called MobiTV that lets me watch twenty-some-odd different channels on my cellphone. Is that necessary? No.

      But--and this is the important thing--it's pretty effin' cool. I've had mine for three months (since before I started working for the Shack) and I'm still finding neat little apps and stuff. My cellphone can login to remote servers via SSH, control my copy of WinAmp on my home computer, even stream internet radio. I've never done those things. But if I feel the urge to, I can. I probably will, too, eventually.

      The one thing I have yet to see as a plugin for these phones is VoIP. As soon as I find that... bwahaha...

      --
      [insert witty sig here]
    7. Re:Mucho expensive by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      I just got back from Germany where I was using my moms GSM phone. I have a AT&T GSM phone here in the states, I must say that I agree with you. GSM in the states is like a tin can on a string. It works sometimes and other times you can forget about it. While in Germany I was doing some hiking in the Apls and had very good reception all the time.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    8. Re:Mucho expensive by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I love the idea of a camera phone. I rarely want a camera, but once in a while it is nice to have a functional camera. Then I got one, which would be nice, but it is a seperate attachment. So I lose in that it isn't always with me, and it when I do think to carry it, it is always times when I would want a better camera. The camera in my phone is for times when a camera would be nice, but I didn't expect to need it so I didn't have the big camera. Bluetooth seems like a better idea now. Of course that would be if the phone connection is fast enough to make sending pictures worthwhile, it really isn't.

    9. Re:Mucho expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My feelings are about the same as blueGill's. I have a T610, and don't really care much about the camera portion (although it comes in handy sometimes).

      T-Mobile has an unlimited GPRS plan for WAP/picture messaging for $9.99 US ($2.99 for 1MB)--the $8 seems very high (I'm assuming it might be Canadian currency, but still). They also have a $19.99 plan where which allows access to the Internet beyond their WAP gateway. I currently have the $19.99 plan and use it frequently with my T3 (email/web/ssh/etc), and less frequently with my laptop.

  15. Re:{T-Mobile,Sprint} is all you can eat by conan_albrecht · · Score: 4, Informative

    I pay an extra $10 for unlimited data services through my cell phone on Sprint. It's called "Vision" and it has been around for several years. The data minutes don't count against your regular cell minutes.

    Overall, it works really well. It's not as slick as the PCMCIA card Sprint offers, but it works just as well, uses the exact same network & speeds, and even turns heads when they seem me surfing my laptop over my cell phone.

  16. The realities of mobile (cell) data rates by Nosher · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wireless data rates are not unlike modem data rates, in that you're fairly unlikely to get the maximum speed unless conditions are optimal. In the case of a modem with, say, a maximum potential speed of 56k, that normally means being within a mile of your exchange on a good line (most of the time I get connect rates of 40-48kbps). In the case of packet data on a mobile network, your base station provides a fixed number of data "slots". Your phone can negotiate for up to the maximum number of slots it can handle at once (for example, in GPRS the Nokia 7650 handles 4 "down" slots and 1 "up" (or maybe 3/1). If your cell is busy, you may only get 3, 2 or even 1 "down" slot (this direction is the one which sends data to you, and so directly influences your experience of network "speed"). Also, data rates fall off as a reciprocal of the distance to the base-station. Combine these two factors and it's easy to see that you're fairly unlikely to achieve the maximum theoretical rate, no matter what the operator tells you :-) EDGE may work slightly differently (the previous relates to GPRS) but I suspect that the principal's the same.

    --
    It's too late for me to die young
    1. Re:The realities of mobile (cell) data rates by umrk · · Score: 1

      In GPRS and EGPRS (the GPRS extension in EDGE), you almost never get the slots exclusively. I.e., you may get 4 slots on the downlink, but you share them with other connections, so called TPFs or temporary block flows. Thus, the maximum throughput not only depends on your CIR (carrier to interference ratio, which determines the modulation and coding scheme (MCS) used and sets your maximum data rate on the air interface) and the number of PDCHs ('slots') you get allocated, but also on how many others in the cell multiplex on these PDCHs together with you.

      Besides, in MCS-9, the fastest MCS, you have no coding really, which means that your data stream goes unprotected over the air interface, and you need retransmissions if there's an error with that.

  17. Sprint for free... by burtonator · · Score: 1

    I blogged about this a few weeks ago...

    http://www.peerfear.org/rss/permalink/2003/09/23 /S printPCSDataServices/

    It turns out that most Sprint PCS Vision phones support wireless over USB... that and it works just fine over Linux.

    All and all this means you can get wireless on your Linux box for only a few bucks a month (if you have an existing sprint phone and account).

    Edge might amazing but it's hard to beat this price...

  18. perhaps of interest by linuxpng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Verizon offers low bandwidth (14.4) service for free. (just ticks away from your plan's minutes). It's suprisingly fast for websites although you don't want to download anything.

    1. Re:perhaps of interest by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      Verizon offers low bandwidth (14.4) service for free. (just ticks away from your plan's minutes).
      Verizon also offers Express Network (their name for 1X-RTT) service for free with America's Choice plans that's also MOU (minutes of use). They don't really advertize this fact at all and a lot of their CS reps are clueless about it, but, when I called to get Express Network added to my plan, they did it.

      I don't have a need to use it much except, say, when I visit my parents who have nothing but a land phone line. I don't get anywhere near the advertized maximum of 144Kbps: I get around 60Kbps, but that's still better than getting around 48Kbps via a land-line modem.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:perhaps of interest by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Hmm, according to this thread it seems that it's accidental, and you might even get charged for it. In any case, do you need a special phone to use it? I have the serial cable adapter, but it only seems to work at 14.4 when I connect. Is there a different number you need to dial? I use #777, I think.

    3. Re:perhaps of interest by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      In any case, do you need a special phone to use it?
      You need a phone that can do 1X-RTT (obviously).
      I have the serial cable adapter, but it only seems to work at 14.4 when I connect. Is there a different number you need to dial? I use #777, I think.
      Not a different number, but a different account name: your-mobile-number @vzw3g.com.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    4. Re:perhaps of interest by aclarke · · Score: 1

      If you have a Kyocera 7135, you can subscribe to their all-you-can-eat 1xRTT data plan for $40/month instead of the $80 they charge you with a PCMCIA card. This plan doesn't come off your minutes, so I guess it depends on what phone you have, and how often you need it.

    5. Re:perhaps of interest by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      I have a Kyocera 7135, but that's irrelevant: any 1X-RTT phone will do. I don't need to sign up for anything: I never said I use a PCMCIA card. Methinks you don't know how to quote the right person properly.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    6. Re:perhaps of interest by chotahead · · Score: 1
      Verizon offers low bandwidth (14.4) service for free. (just ticks away from your plan's minutes)

      Ummm. This isn't "free" ... you paid for those minutes, and they're getting used faster while you waste your time with a 14.4 connection.

      --
      .sig == "opinions are like @ss holes ... everybody has at least one"
  19. What EDGE is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EDGE is basically GPRS with a re-worked radio interface and some other sensible tweaks that should take it up to better bandwidth.

    One of the most important things though is not the constraints that GPRS has in an ideal world but that it suffers really badly from congestion when loads of people are using it. This is particularly evident at the moment in places where LOTS of people are using GPRS (I live in London...). EDGE should be more resiliant to this kind of capacity constraing at the air-interface. Of course things like EV-DO compete with this on CDMA networks - and 3G should be good at this if they can sort that all out.

  20. Use Sprint Vision with PCS phone and save by hrath · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can also just sign up for the regular Vision service on your Sprint PCS phone for $10-$15. Then get a USB-datacable (I bought the one for my Sanyo 4900 directly from Sanyo as Sprint doesn't sell them anymore (http://www.sanyo.com/wireless/)). The next thing is to setup a PPP-connection and you'll have everything you need to connect your Linux (or Windoze) box to the Internet.

    Be warned though Sprint may frown upon too heavy use of Vision with an attached computer to the PCS phone. They intended the service to only be used with the builtin browser in the phone. If you use it too much they may contact you.

    On the other hand I've been using this service occassionally when travelling to log into my VPN or access websites/ssh and it has worked very well. I typically see speeds between 28-110 Kbps and it definitely is useable.

    regards,

    Heiko

  21. AT&T Will Pay by Bruha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Facts:

    AT&T 100-130 Max 200 Kbps avail to 215 Million Customers.

    Sprint 50-70 Max 144 Kbps avail to 230 Million Customers.

    Verizon Wireless 60-80 Max 144 avail to 230 Million Customers.

    Verizon Wireless' NationalAccess has average speeds of 60 - 80 kbps, peaks at 144 kbps and is available to nearly 230 million. BroadbandAccess,

    Verizon Wireless's faster EVDO service at 300 - 500 kbps on average (2 Mb peak), is offered in the San Diego and Washington D.C. markets.

    EDGE makes its debut after nearly two years' delay due to technology issues. With no evolution path, EDGE is seen as a stop gap before AT&T has to invest in yet another technology like WCDMA. In addition, EDGE does not improve voice capacity and due to deteriorating data speeds over great distances from the base station, requires greater base station density thus adding to AT&T network costs.

    Neither Sprint or At&T wireless is in position to provide any broadband services past their initial offerings. Vzw will be expanding the market for EVDO in 2004 to other major cities (I hope Dallas) Also sprint and verizon's speeds are slower due to technology limits with the initial offerings but compared to CDPD which was most times at best 14.4 speeds it's a leap ahead. I would expect to see 10-100Mbit wireless within the next 5 years in larger cities to compete with landline DSL and Cable which both have limits well under 40Mbit.

    1. Re:AT&T Will Pay by blacksmith · · Score: 1

      EDGE does not improve voice capacity...

      There's a standard on the way for quarter rate speech over EDGE. This should allow networks to carry close to twice the number of voice calls compared to the (currently popular) half rate.

      ...requires greater base station density...

      WCDMA will need that anyway, so an increase in base station numbers will just happen sooner with EDGE.

    2. Re:AT&T Will Pay by Bruha · · Score: 1

      Base station density increases will cost them billions in network expansion costs.. Most Lucent upgrades just require a few changes to a base station which saves companies money.

      WCDMA you'll have to have the extra base stations but at the same time you'll be using several base stations to maintain a acceptable signal therefore increasing bandwidth costs on each of those basestations. Nobody's piping DS3's to cell towers yet so you're really using more resources per cell than if you developed something that would work with the current system.

    3. Re:AT&T Will Pay by jcostom · · Score: 0
      While CDMA2000 offers slightly faster data rates than EDGE, don't forget that EDGE has an "edge" in that while you're on a data call with EDGE, you can be interrupted with a voice call, have your data session suspended, take the call, hang up and go right back to the data session.

      Until 1xEVDV, you won't be able to do that with CDMA. With current CDMA solutions, your voice calls will go to voice mail directly until you conclude your data session.

      --

      The unsig!
    4. Re:AT&T Will Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are incorrect. The CDMA2000 1xEV-DO networks deployed by the South Korea operators and by Verizon support this already. There is no need to wait for CDMA2000 1xEV-DV.

    5. Re:AT&T Will Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean Sprint isn't in position to provide any further broadband services? They can offer EVDO just like Verizon - but they have said they'll jump straight to EVDV instead.

  22. No Blackberry attachments... by mellonhead · · Score: 1

    If a client sends me a Microsoft Word file and I need to read it to do my work, the Blackberry can't read it, nor can a cell phone, no matter how spiffy it is.

    From the Blackberry website:

    In addition to your email, corporate data and calendar events, you require access to email attachments when you're away from your computer. BlackBerry provides an attachment service that lets you open and view email attachments on your BlackBerry handheld.

    Microsoft Word
    Microsoft Excel
    Microsoft PowerPoint(R)
    Corel(R) WordPerfect(R)
    Adobe(R) PDF
    ASCII documents
    HTML attachments
    File types listed above archived in .zip format

    Control how much information you receive
    Request the table of contents of a document and go directly to the section you're interested in
    Or view the full content of the document
    Optimized for wireless delivery
    Formatting and font information is preserved where possible
    Documents are compressed for quicker delivery times
    End-to-end security
    Integrates with the BlackBerry Enterprise Server using the same encryption you receive with email and corporate data access so you can feel confident sending and receiving documents

    Read the Attachment Service White Paper - PDF

    *Check with your service provider for availability

    1. Re:No Blackberry attachments... by RickAfterburner · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can read, and even edit office files from your phone. That is, if you get a Palm based handheld and set up SnapperMail (http://www.snappermail.com) and Quickoffice. I use the first, but am too cheap to buy the second, so I can only open zip and jpeg files on my Treo 300, but if I ever felt like spending the $.

      There are other email clients that support attachments for the Palm - I just chose this one.

      Of course, you could always get a PocketPC based phone.

  23. wireless internet: watch for nextel services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rumor has it that another national wireless service is going to be releasing something in this arena real soon now....bursts to 3Mb....sustained 1.5 Mb with good signal strength....starts with N and rhymes with "tel" we shall see...

  24. Dead site, doesn't look slashdotted by GlassUser · · Score: 1

    I'd be a lot less uninclined to use their service if the web site worked. I'm sticking with t-mobile as my choice for the switch.

    1. Re:Dead site, doesn't look slashdotted by dloflin · · Score: 1

      Naahh, it's not slashdotted, it's just "ALL FLASH ALL THE TIME" with no link to a no-flash version. If you don't have Flash installed, you get a blank page. So I haven't read it yet either.

  25. Standard PCS Vision and the Treo 600 by smd4985 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a little confused by the article - I just got the Treo 600 with the $15 a month PCS Vision service and I love it. The Treo is amazing (as has been described). The blazer web browser renders webpages great (I was /.'ing on it the other day) and at VERY acceptable transfer speeds. AIM is already enabled and SMS/POP3 service is forthcoming.

    --
    smd4985
    1. Re:Standard PCS Vision and the Treo 600 by ezraekman · · Score: 1

      This article isn't about data services on the phone, it's about data services usable on a laptop or other device, utilizing the provider's network. As an example, a $20 USB Hotsync cable plus some $30-$40 software (WirelessModem, etc.) will allow you to use your Treo 600 as a wireless modem for your laptop, so long as you have Vision services enabled on your account.

  26. SOme technical details not quite right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The person mentions a few technical details that aren't quite correct. From the article, "The Edge service works by giving up to four time slots of GPRS service to a single user. The four time slots, each good for about 30K of bandwidth, thus can add up to around 120K or so."

    This isn't quite accurate. GPRS itself ranges from using 2-8 timeslots based on the class of the device. Classes 10-12 typically have 4 timeslots for download which gives you about 32-48Kbps (you can effectively get 8-12Kpbs per timeslot with GPRS). See here for some specifics.

    EDGE is, more or less, an upgrade to GPRS just to push more bits of data through. A quote from Ericsson's info page about EDGE: "EDGE uses the same TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) frame structure, logic channel and 200kHz carrier bandwidth as today's GSM networks, which allows existing cell plans to remain intact." Of course, there is a white paper linked off of that page that gives more technical details for eany who are interested. Note: It's not about using any more time slots than GPRS.

    For carriers choosing the GSM route, the upgrade path is GSM -> Add GPRS -> Upgrade to EDGE -> Upgrade to WCDMA (aka UMTS). It is a little ironic that the eventual 3G network of GSM carriers will be a CDMA type technology (though with a massively huge spectrum requirement compared to CDMA2000). Only time will tell which turns out to be the better technology, though the CDMA carriers seem to be jumping ahead of the GSM ones. Of course, some might argue that almost the rest of the world uses GSM so it should be the logical choice. But then again, most /.ers should know that everyone is not always right. ^_-

    1. Re:SOme technical details not quite right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GSM is more established so terminals and infrastructure is cheaper. CDMA the expensive one (as Microsoft) is lagging because of this.
      I'm an European Electrical Engineer and prefer CDMA for technical reasons but GSM is better established and more featurefull.

  27. To be continued by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

    Please read all instructions and warnings before use. Must be 18 years of age or older to proceed further. Enter at your own risk. Do not enter. Speed limit - 28.8 or higher. Stop here on red. Hostess will seat you. Trucks over 4 tons excluded. Void where prohibited by law. Some assembly required. This is a test of the emergency broadcast system - this is ONLY A TEST! List each check separately by bank number. Batteries not included. Contents may settle during shipment. Any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental. Use only as directed. For indoor or outdoor use only. Wearing of this garment does not enable you to fly. We make no other warranties, expressed or implied. Do not use while operating a motor vehicle or heavy equipment. Postage will be paid by addressee. Postal service will not deliver mail without postage. No postage necessary if mailed in the United States. Subject to CAB approval. This is not an offer to sell securities. May be too intense for some viewers. See other side for additional listings. This product is meant for educational purposes only. For recreational use only. For office use only. For entertainment purposes only. Only 1 winner per household. Do not disturb. All models are over 18 years of age. Apply only to infected areas. If condition persists, consult your physician. Take two of these and call me in the morning. An apple a day keeps the doctor away. Now with new plastic applicator. High altitude directions-increase cook time by 10 minutes. This is not an attorney advertisement or referal service. No user-serviceable parts inside. Website contains small parts and is not intended for use by children under the age of eighteen. This compact disc was originally recorded on analog equipment. Freshest if eaten before date on carton. Times are approximate. Do not disturb. Simulated picture. Please remain seated until the ride comes to a complete stop. Return your seatback and tray table to their normal upright position. Your seat cushion can be used as a flotation device. In the event of decreased air pressure, oxygen masks will pop out of the top of your monitor. The call you have made requires a 20 cent deposit. Breaking seal constitutes acceptance of agreement. For off-road use only. Do not block intersection. No tresspassing. No stopping or standing. Don't even think about parking here. No parking when road is snow covered. As seen on TV. One size fits all. Product will be hot after heating. Do not iron clothes on body. Remove clothing before distributing in washing machine. Do not use while sleeping. Do not use on food. Many suitcases look alike. Contains a substantial amount of non-Tobacco ingredients. Colors may fade. Insert this end first. We have sent the forms which seem right for you. This page made from 100% recycled electrons. Slippery when wet. No substitutions allowed. For a limited time only. Void where prohibited, taxed, or otherwise restricted. Caveat emptor. Provided "as-is" without warranty. Reader assumes full responsibility. We are an equal opportunity employer. No shoes, no shirt, no service. Quantities are limited while supplies last. If any defects are discovered, do not attempt to fix them yourself, but return to an authorized service center. Read at your own risk. Parental advisory - explicit lyrics. Text may contain explicit materials some readers may find objectionable, parental guidance is advised. Keep away from sunlight. Keep away from pets and small children. Limit one per family please. No money down. No purchase necessary. Not affiliated with the American Red Cross. Drop in any mailbox. Edited for television. Keep cool. Process promptly. Return to sender, no forwarding order on file, unable to forward. Not responsible for direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages resulting from any defect, error or failure to perform. Webmaster is also not responsible for items left, lost or stolen. At participating locations only. Sold by weight, not by volume. Penalty for private use. See label for sequence. This web site rated 'R' for Mature audi

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  28. Online on Amtrak train from DC to NYC right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am using my Verizon phone (LG VX6000) connected to my ThinkPad moving at 85 MPH on the train from DC to NYC. I have a nice 115.2 kbps connection and I am checking my email and browsing at a decent speed. It uses a Fourelle Venturi compression system for the images which speeds things up a bit more. All in all I am very happy with it. And minutes are deducted from my pool- so nights and weekends it is free. Thanksgiving counts as nights and weekends so I am enjoying an IP connection the whole ride up!

  29. The 5 categories of lies: by El · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Lies, damn lies, statistics, ISP bandwidth claims, and SCO legal arguments.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  30. I have Sprint PCS Vision by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    I have a Handspring Treo 300 with Sprint PCS Vision service. When I connect to my laptop with the USB cable I consistently get 140kbps. I'm not sure why AT&T is spreading lies about the service, but I have no problem opening up Shoutcast and listening to 128kbps MP3 radio streams over my cellphone. It works great and never stutters unless I try to browse the web at the same time.

    The latency, however, is pretty bad. It's about 500 ms. latency, but you can't get everything perfect. I'm just amazed that I can be on the freeway travelling 70 mph and get faster than ISDN speeds to my laptop.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    1. Re:I have Sprint PCS Vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's scarier for me is that you are riding the freeway at 70mph surfing the web.

      Why not just read the newspaper while you are at it?

  31. Handsprint Treo 600 by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

    I use Sprint's unlimited vision plan (professional pack) fopr $15 extra in addition to calling plan. It works great, I have used VPN software to connect to the PPTP VPN at work, even access the server using terminal emulation software and of course, in the included Sprint's business connection software, I can real my work emails, documents on my PC at work etc... and speed is fairly good.

    1. Re:Handsprint Treo 600 by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

      Corrections:

      Replace "fopr" with "for", "real" with "read" etc..

  32. Higher data rate: external antenna or booster by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why not use a booster to ensure the best data rate.? An number of vendors offer a range of fixed directional antennas and repeaters and phone booster antennas.

    Unless you are driving in a car or reading email as you walk, "mobile" users are stationary during actual use (a car-top cellphone antenna might be the answer for truly mobile use). For semi-mobile use, a little stand and a Yagi antenna would help improve transmission/reception to the local cell tower. A simple signal strength app would help you point the antenna (for extra credit it could even help you find a tower in an adjacent, less used cell for access to more slots). For boosted use in a hotel room, cafe, or client office, a directional antenna or repeater would be quite useful.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Higher data rate: external antenna or booster by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

      It is now always easy to find a cell phone that allows external antenna + power + data cable all at once. Kyocera has some nice car kits that include rs232 serial (Verizon). Motorola sometimes has right combination of adapters. Others...?

      Mailign List InternetByCellPhone is a good resource to ask other owners...

    2. Re:Higher data rate: external antenna or booster by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      The Edge communications manager has a signal strength display and the crummy throughputs often happen when the signal strength is at or near the top of the display.

  33. Mailing list with much more info - InternetByCell by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

    I am a full time RVer and we have found Verizon is way better than Sprint. They let you use phones with real antennas instead of Sprint's limit of using cards. And Verizon coverage is now better than sprint on 1X data (not the case until recently).

    Yahoo Groups: InternetByCellPhone

  34. If you want to use Sprint PCS Vision w/ Linux/Mac by NitroWolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's easy... and sort of touched on in the article itself.

    Instead of installing the Connection Manager from Sprint, call you need to do in is make a new PPP connection, and for the phone number, put in the #777.

    This directs the base station at the cell site to direct the call to the PDSN and make a data connection. Then your phone acts just like a 70k modem. This will work in any OS that can make a PPP connection, no proprietary software needed.

  35. Pl leave most important questions unanswered by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

    It's frustrating to read this article, for one, there is just one measure of performance - 'k'. This 'k' is what, kB, kb? OK, let's assume it's the same 'k' as in a 56k modem, what's the latency then? Can I expect to work as if I was on a slow landline modem, or is it going to remind me of the 'world wide wait' days? I expect the latency to be pretty high, the link latency plus that of the internet. The most efficient strategy is still probably to search for a Starbucks.

    1. Re:Pl leave most important questions unanswered by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing it out. I went back to my web page and changed the "K" to "k".

  36. Dirt Cheap Wireless Internet by phoxix · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're the type that doesn't care for speed, and only cares for such things as SSH, mail, etc. then you definately want to look into Sprint's older Wireless Web.

    Its pretty slow, actually its pretty damn slow, its about 19.2kbps. BUT .... its also only 5 dollars a month. AND, you do not get charged for how much data you transfer. Your wireless internet time comes out of your normal cell phone plan. So you can use it during the night and weekend for free. (NOTE: you need a standard dialup company to dial into). Also Sprint has some phones that act as standard AT modems (a whole bunch actually), so linux users need to worry about such.

    Verizon also has a great offer. They have Mobile Office which is pretty much the same as Sprint's service. However verizon provides you with a virtual ISP to dial up into. (*No extra* cost to anyone either)

    For a little more info, take a gander at this tread

    Sunny Dubey

  37. Goatse download times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    One of the most important test is the Goatse.cx download time.

    If the "Lawyer" warning about Goatse shows up before the image, it's no good. The best part about a high speed connection is that nobody realizes they've hit the Goatse site because both the warning and image load up at the same time.

  38. T-mobile by weave · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm a bit confused about the T-mobile claims. I have unlimited internet access (GPRS) through t-mobile for an extra $20/month -- unlimited access. At least that is what it is in the U.S. It's $30/month if you don't have a voice plan with them.

    It's not the fastest in the world, but it works fairly well and I usually use it while moving (bus, train, passenger in a car).

    Fortunately for me, the mail.app client on OS X works fairly well with net connections going up and down.

    1. Re:T-mobile by bogasity · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile now offers free unlimited WAP over GPRS with all their calling plans. It does not use your plan minutes. The only restriction is that only ports 80, 110, and 25 are open., o no secure web sites can be accessed. I can connect my Powerbook through my cellphone using bluetooth, and get free web surfing and mail.

    2. Re:T-mobile by gbrayut · · Score: 1

      How? Just changed to t-mobile for the $20 internet service add on, how do you us it without the additional service?

    3. Re:T-mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The unlimited internet data plan meant for PDA/Laptops is the $20/month plan. I am looking to change my cell plan and ad these feature on in the next few weeks. Going to then hook the t610 phone up via bluetooth to my ibook for internet access.

    4. Re:T-mobile by weave · · Score: 1

      ask for vpn access, it's no extra charge. You get a real IP (not NATed) and ports like ssh are not blocked. The "APN" is internet3.voicestream.net when you configure your settings. (internet2 is NAT)

    5. Re:T-mobile by bogasity · · Score: 1

      It works the same way as the $20 service, but you use the APN wap.voicestream.com. The real intent is to support WAP and email on phones, but it can also be used to connect your laptop.

  39. UR 2k00L by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG!

    LOLz

  40. Local wireless gets hacked... again! by jptechnical · · Score: 1

    We have a local wireless company Skynet Broadband in NW washington that has been hacked twice in what seems like less than that 60 days. As a result its subscribers are out of internet for 3-4 days while they rebuild everything.

    I'm willing to give them a chance though I'm not entirely confident in their services.

    --

    Boredom's not a burden anyone should bear.
  41. Re:{T-Mobile,Sprint} is all you can eat by macmouse · · Score: 1

    Well... yes and no.

    BEWARE - Some of those plans (presumably the cheaper one's) are meant for use only inside the phone itself (Camera phone/Cell Phone "Web"). *not* for driving an laptop or whatever. An number of people have gotten burned because they have done this and used an "large" amount of bandwidth, to make themselves show up to their radar.

    If your quiet enough, you can probably get away with it.

  42. Ricochet by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 1

    What you want is Ricochet. I used it for about 6 months to "telecommute" from my patio, the park, or any other place I felt like. I used VPN and it was reasonably fast.

  43. Odd... by fo0bar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sprint's specs list a maximum of 128kbps on the Vision service, and I get very close to that. But you must remember that speed and latency are completely different. I've seen an average or 300-800ms latency on Vision. If you start a large download, I'll see close to the the full 128kbps. However, the latency makes the average web surfing or ssh session (send a little, receive a little, repeat) feels as slow as a 28.8k modem.

    If AT&T can decrease the latency rather than increase the speed, I'm there!

    1. Re:Odd... by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      As you may see in my writeup, I have measured ping times on the Vision service around 400 ms. On AT&T I have never seen less than 600 ms.

  44. Sprint Vision worked for me. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    I dumped Sprint because of billing disputes, but it was a tough choice, because I had become addicted to the Vision service. (I switched to Qwest, who is about to switch from their own network to Sprint's, so I figure I'll be back on Sprint's 3G network soon enough, only with someone else doing the billing.)

    I hooked up my PowerBook to my Sanyo 4900, and it was very simple. Just plug it in, OS X showed it as a 'SANYO USB PHONE' modem, and I had it dial #777 (as has been mentioned elsewhere.) Instant 70-120kb/s connection. The connection was fast enough to use Apple's iChatAV over it! (Albeit with some heavy latency, 500-800ms makes video conferencing very disorienting.)

    If AT&T's new service really is that fast, and if it has an unlimited data plan, I may get it as a second plan to go with my Qwest voice service.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  45. hopefully, there are still 8 bits in a byte by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    so we are probably meaning 800-1040kb/s when we are talking about 100-130 kB/s wireless.

    1. Re:hopefully, there are still 8 bits in a byte by pantherace · · Score: 1

      Nope, They don't mean 800Kilobits/second (100KiloBytes), they mean 100Kilobits/second (or about 12Kilobytes/second)

      A Sanyo phone (I have looked at a 4900 and a 8100) both have have an upper limit of 230Kbit max (burst, 144Kbit normally)

      When I was looking at cingular's edge stuff it was the same Kbits/sec though theoreticly rated faster.

      It's still faster than dialup, portable... and more expensive

  46. Re:If you want to use Sprint PCS Vision w/ Linux/M by Luckster7 · · Score: 1

    Konppix has a sprint pppd scripts (/etc/ppp/peers/sprint and /etc/chatscripts/sprint) ready to go. I use the following login script:

    /#!bin/bash
    /bin/setserial /dev/modem baud_base 460800
    /usr/sbin/pppd call sprint
    /usr/bin/tail -f /var/log/messages

    The uploads on Sprint go faster than the downloads. I can get 20KB which is actually above their 140Kbit speed claims. Downloads range in the 12 to 14KB range. When I lived in Silicon Valley (Redwood City) I couldn't get DSL/cable so Sprint wound up being my primary ISP.

    --
    Deuteronomy 13:06-9
  47. PCMCIA Cards are not required for ATT Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is possible to use certain phones to gain EDGE Service. Just wanted to clarify that a separate card is not required if the subscriber has the correct phone.

    1. Re:PCMCIA Cards are not required for ATT Service by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      The Edge web page lists only one phone, the Nokia 6200. I gather it can use a USB cable to connect to the computer. It would be great if somebody would make an Edge-compatible phone with a Bluetooth port for connecting to a computer.

  48. Cingular's wireless internet by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    I have had wireless internet service from Cingular for nearly a year. Two things you should know before you buy this:

    1) It's about 9 kbaud. Barely acceptable for checking a low-volume email account.
    2) I have had consistent billing problems with this service for the past 3 months. Seems they think each connect is a "directory assistance" call, for which they want to charge an extra $2 a pop. I have had to call them up to get these charges deleted each of the last 3 months (one month, it was over $150 for this alone).

    In addition to these problems, I found that the setup was not straightforward, and the Cingular helpdesk was thoroughly clueless. I currently have what might be a hardware problem -- I can connect via IR port, but not with the cable. Again, getting any help from Cingular has been an exercise in futility.

    I am obligated to keep Cingular for another 9 months on my current contract, at which time I may take advantage of WLNP -- and by which time the current shakeout due to WLNP should be settling down. I'll be looking first and formost for whichever mobile service has the best deal on wireless internet.

  49. Re:If you want to use Sprint PCS Vision w/ Linux/M by menn0nite · · Score: 1

    there's a couple other things that might be nessissary (for sprint/verizon) depending on your situation... easiest way would be to get serial cable and setup your phone as an external modem... you can easily set this us with a usb cable, just make sure you've got all the proper modules compiled in (most usb cables from sprint/verizon are all usb->serial converters). after setting up you phone, be sure to include the following settings per connection: qnc (14.4) username: qnc password: qnc init string: at$qcmdr=2; at$qcqnc=1 number: #777 1x-rtt (peak 144k, realistic 40-60k) username: MND@vzw3g.com (where MND is your mobile number, (not your MIN, in cases of LNP) don't know username for sprint) password: vzw (ditto) init string: at$qcmdr=3; at$qcqnc=0 in cases where you want to buy a card instead of using your cell phone, sierrawireless (http://www.sierrawireless.com) has walkthrough for setting up their cards for use under linux. these walkthroughs apply to all of there cdpd, is-95 and 1x-rtt cards. unfortunatly the only 1x-evdo cards we have right now (airprime) are really buggy and have no real way (currently) of opperating under linux.

  50. That's Not AT&T, it's AT&T Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A common mistake: the article is referring to AT&T Wireless, NOT AT&T: the two are separate companies, with separate employees, separate board of directors, etc. AT&T spun-off the Wireless division into its own company.

    AT&T Wireless just happens to be allowed to use the AT&T name and logo. But it is a separate company.

  51. PCS Vision + Treo + PdaNet by fisternipply · · Score: 0

    PdaNet software was what made PCS Vision into something I can use. Just plug the Treo into hotsync cable and bingo, you have a mobile modem that's fast enough to be liveable. No bullsht with special wireless modem cards or any of that. Speed and latency is as described in the article, and this is actually my only connection at home, since I don't have a land line or broadband. It works damn fine on the road, too, no more Wayport charges for in-room net connection.

    -fister

  52. Using Linux and Sprint Vision Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site has ppp options and stuff.
    https://schizo.psychosis.com/~dcinege/sprintvision .shtml

  53. Unlimited Sprint for $10/month with plan. by OhioJoe · · Score: 1

    I use Sprint PCS for my cell service and have the 2000 minute plan, which gives me their 'vision' for free, unlimited*. Using a third party data cable, I get unlimited wireless access (where ever I can get a Sprint signal)to my laptop. I am posting from my laptop now in a remote part of N. Carolina, having traveled here from Columbus, Ohio. With a full signal, I get a transfer rate of about 25KB/sec, about 5 times faster than 56k.

    OhioJoe

    *"unlimited" is not completely true. If I were to use this to download files 24/7, it'd catch Sprints attention, and I've heard stories that they will shut off the service. But, since I don't use this so heavily, I am not using as much bandwidth as someone who contantly checks sports scores on their cell phone.

    --
    "Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity."
  54. A long overdue review by a mac user by KrazzeeKooter · · Score: 1
    OK, I have been using the Sprint Vision on my mac since the week it came out. That's been about a year and a few months. Somewhere around there. It was initially not supported on the mac. I went and bought the Merlin card and signed up for a data plan. The first thing that they did was shut off my regular cell phone within 3 hours. This is typical Sprint crap. I hate their customer service, it just sucks and always has. Something about "well the purchase of the new plan and hardware was first "credited" on your account before your credit card was processed and it put you over your theoretical credit limit with us, so the system turned off your service." In other words "It's not our fault that's the way our system works", their typical response. To which I get to respond, "Well you created your own system and it's fucking broken, I don't claim my car ran you over not me, so fix the damn thing." Anyway, it's a hell of a way to treat a customer who just dropped $300+. There customer service has always sucked I try to deal with them as little as possible.

    So, enough rhetoric (to much rhetoric, just want to like service, just can't avoid company, arrr.), the tech stuff... I played with it for 2-3 days with no success, had to create my own modem script by dinking around modifying other scripts. I had an idea it would work it was just a matter of time, but I really didn't want two plans and two devices and I knew at this point it wasn't something that was going to be worth it for the occasional use, among other things... so, I just returned it and got a Sanyo 4900 to do voice and data and went to Radio shack and bought the USB cable to plug it into my Mac. Sprint was originally planning on supporting this but killed it after realizing they couldn't track data usage on voice/data plans. After dinking around with it for a couple more days. I had a working solution. Yeah!

    My initial report over a year ago (I don't believe it's online anywhere now, but will repost to my journal if requested) is that I was getting about 8k a second of real world download, an average ping of 400ms, but rather erratic. One time a web page would load in a couple seconds, the next not at all for 30 minutes or until I restarted the connection. Anyway, it worked for me in a pinch, if I needed to check mail, or needed to pull up map-quest while traveling or just dink around at an airport.

    So, I've used it in Phoenix, Chicago, Mich, San Diego, and numerous places near and far with a very high success rate and without to much frustration. My first time connection rate was nearly 90%. I was pleased. Oh, btw, I did notice when using it with Windows I was able to get about 16k/sec in real download situations. About twice as fast. I always assumed it was my crappy hack modem script. I'm sure several others could have been found online in the last 9 months if you really dug, but I never really bothered to check.

    So!! Here is the great news. I installed 10.3 a couple months ago and I don't know if sprint supports it or what, (as mentioned I find it best to have as little interaction with them as possible to reduce frustration) but the pcs vision modem script is included in 10.3! Yeah. Upon my first trial I found it was incredibly improved. In fact it was just not the mac support, but I should mention I have noticed improvements in Sprint's systems as they updated their networks and in my phone when I upgraded the phone software. Anyway, it is now very reliable over the last few weeks and I've been using it much more. Getting an average of 16k/sec in realtime situations although still the 400ms ping times. My first time online with it in OS 10.3 i went over and downloaded the newest alpha of Mitch Kapor's and the OSAF's Chandler (about 20mb) in less than 30 minutes. Of course the latency goes completely to hell when you're maxing out the pipe on a large download and you can barely load a web page, but even being able to download a 20mb file at 16k a second is way better than expected.

    Anyway, my recommendations are th

    --
    I am a monkey. This is slashdot.
  55. Re:{T-Mobile,Sprint} is all you can eat by KrazzeeKooter · · Score: 1

    Really!? Can you substatiate that with online documentation references? If they crack down on me I'l just leave them. I'm late to these threads, but I just made a large review post of exactly this sprint voice/data solution. The url follows. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=87287&threshol d=4&commentsort=3&tid=137&tid=193&mode=nested&cid= 7580470

    --
    I am a monkey. This is slashdot.
  56. EDGE doesn't add timeslots, it changes the coding by Petteri+Kangaslampi · · Score: 1

    One point might help understand why EDGE doesn't always mean higher bitrates: EDGE (Enhanced Data rates for Gsm Evolution) adds new channel coding schemes that allow you to push more data through per timeslot. As usual, TANSTAAFL, and the downside is that the new coding schemes have less robust error protection. The end result is, that to get the higher EDGE-enabled data rates, you'll need to have a good connection to the base station. If there are a lot of errors in the air interface, the system will drop to more robust coding schemes and you'll get lower bandwidth, even though the number of timeslots stays the same.

    It's of course also possible that not every base station has EDGE support yet, even if the operator claims they have an EDGE-capable network. Then your bandwidth may vary depending on the base station you happen to use. And, finally, (E)GPRS currently doesn't give you bandwidth guarantees, so depending on the amount of traffic your bandwidth may vary even under ideal radio conditions.

  57. Re:If you want to use Sprint PCS Vision w/ Linux/M by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    The username/password of qnc only applies to 2G data calls (14.4k).

    Just wanted to clarify that. If you want "Vision" or the 3G data calls, you need to use your own 3G login/password.

    Unless something is broken with Sprint, and they are allowing QNC calls to connect via the 3G path. If that's the case, that opens some interesting possibilities.

  58. Ricochet Did... by jriskin · · Score: 1

    They advertised 128Kbits and I often got more than double that. I remember being in a hotel room in San Francisco and was able to get bother 32KBytes (256kbits) in BOTH directions UP and DOWN.

    I call that delivering on their promise. Too bad they've had so many business related issues.

    Man this comment feels like a Beowolf cluster.