Slashdot Mirror


DeCSS: Jon Johansen Retrial Begins

JPMH writes "Jon Johansen is back on trial for DeCSS. Despite the acquittal back in January, the Norwegian Economic Crime Unit (OKOKRIM) is allowed to bring his case back before an enlarged panel of judges. The retrial begins today."

9 of 559 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Pay the piper. by PowerBert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it wasn't for Jon, I wouldn't have 60+ DVDs at home and the movie industry wouldn't have 900 of my hard earned cash.

    I don't have a DVD player, I dont run windows. If it wasn't for Jon and the fine guys at Ogle, Mplayer, Xine, etc I wouldn't buy DVDs.

    The movie industry needs locking up in a cell with a 7 foot guy called Buba wearing a dress. Pricks!

  2. Double-jeopardy etc etc. by grazzy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before we all get all tear-eyed with nationalistic ideals etc etc, we should remember where RIAA and MPAA comes from.

  3. Re:What is this about ? by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Why should it be that a prosecutor could not appeal?"

    Because there have been numerous cases in history of people being harassed by governments until they went bankrupt or were finally found guilty on a bogus charge. If the government doesn't have the evidence to convict, then it shouldn't be bringing a case... and if that evidence doesn't convict the jury, then they have no grounds for trying a second time.

    That you can even consider this a good thing for one second is a clear example of why Europe and the Anglo nations (all of which, I believe, ban such retrials) will never get along. We've never trusted our governments, and for good reason.

  4. Thanks to Jon and his lawyer... by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...for fighting the good fight.

    He's a bright kid (in the computer sense), and yet - apparently - stupid enough to pick on a 600 pound gorilla (RIAA/MPAA). I suppose the only thing to say is, "Thank you." Even US corporations with fat legal warchests aren't willing to take such a chance. Every revolution must start somewhere, and most truly successful ones start at the bottom.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  5. bloody rediculous by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing like companies/industries not wanting their products to be sold.

    It makes absolutely no sense why the RIAA would give a damn about DeCSS - it enables people to watch their over-priced DVDs in foreign countries. This requires at least some purchase. What's the deal?

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  6. Re:Most worrying bit:: by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Oh my $DEITY..... they're trying to make fast-forwarding past advertisements illegal?!? "

    It is already illegal in the U.S. The ads autoplay, and you cannot stop them. Unless, of course, you reverse engineer a DVD player that lets you control whatever you like -- which is illegal under the DMCA. It is illegal to attempt to bypass an encrypted system, however they care to define it. it Even ROT13 qualifies as encryption, so the vendors don't even have to try very hard.

  7. This has gone way too far. by dtfinch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was like 14 or 15 when he released DeCSS and it wasn't even illegal in his country at the time.

  8. It is like the time... by nonameisgood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...I got locked out of my house and was arrested for breaking into my own home.

    Until DMCA and it's counterparts elsewhere go away, we are all at the mercy of the **AA overlords and lackeys.

    --
    Free beer is nice, but I can speak more freely if I buy the beer.

    --
    Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component of spiritual devotion. Jon Krakauer
  9. Re:What is this about ? by IdleTime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Basically because in Norway, an appeal will not set youy back several millions. In fact, if you can't pay, you can still hire a top notch lawyer and the bill will be footed by the state.

    It's only in USA (where I currently live) that you have to be extremly rich in order to endure a long judical process. Btw, USA have politically elected judges and DA's, that makes me sick to my stomach to think about. A political justice system is on the same line as the old Soviet Union. Poltics before justice!

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!