Slashdot Mirror


Nuclear Powered Mission to Jovian Moons

Skyshadow writes "The San Francisco Chronicle has an article about NASA's new project, the JIMO (Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter). The probe is designed specifically to search for liquid water and signs of life on Europa, as well as making detailed observations of Callisto and Ganymede. Planned for a 2010 liftoff, this new probe makes all previous interplanetary probes look wussy: it'll be 300 feet long and powered by a next-gen fission reactor (as opposed to nuclear batteries). Sure beats blowing money circling the earth over and over again..."

33 of 378 comments (clear)

  1. Attempt no landing there by corebreech · · Score: 4, Funny

    Had to be said, what with a 2010 liftoff date (actually 2011 if you read the article.)

    The ship even looks quite a bit like Discovery.

    And I bet the NSA lies to this onboard computer too.

    1. Re:Attempt no landing there by BackwardEngineer · · Score: 3, Funny

      HAL-9000: What is going to happen? Dave: Something wonderful. HAL-9000: I'm afraid. Dave: Don't be. We'll be together. HAL-9000: Where will we be? Dave: Where I am now.

    2. Re:Attempt no landing there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      except that discovery was launched before 2001 in 2001: A Space Odyssey and the second mission got there in 2010.


      It had to be said.

    3. Re:Attempt no landing there by STrinity · · Score: 4, Funny

      HAL-9000: What are you doing Dave?
      Dave: Something wonderful.
      HAL-9000: Dave, you're making me uncomfortable.
      Dave: We'll be together.
      HAL-9000: Dave, stop it. Stop it Dave. Don't touch me there.

      --2069: The Lost Odyssey

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  2. in related news... by eegad · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA will also launch a satellite to search for liquid water and signs of life over Arizona sometime late next year.

    1. Re:in related news... by eegad · · Score: 2, Funny

      that's not flame-bait, people... it's just dry humor... get it? dry? arizona?

  3. oohh... i bags naming rights by urban_gorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    can we call it GZK? to any who have not read Arthur C Clark's and IBM's "discussion" about the naming of HAL ignore this. actually just ignore it anyway :)

    --
    "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah." - Lennon, McCartney
  4. oops by adamruck · · Score: 4, Funny

    did anyone else read that big long link in the title as "looking for signs of life in europe"?

    --
    Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    1. Re:oops by monkeyfinger · · Score: 4, Funny
      Best place to look. We also have culture and history.

      :-)

    2. Re:oops by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Though not, judging by the grandparent's moderation, a sense of humour...

    3. Re:oops by ThaReetLad · · Score: 2, Funny

      well there certainly seems to be a better chance of finding it there than wherever you were posting from. At least we are able to maintain our concentration from the start of a sentence until the end of it.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  5. haha by VAXGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all know the REAL reason we're going there.

    TO NUKE THE MONOLITH IN 2010.

    --
    this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
  6. Not Nice by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Funny

    to try and slashdot Boeing . . they might try and return the favor . . B-52 carpet bombing style :)

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  7. Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    One step close to living out all my Cowboy Bebop fantasies!

  8. Tempting Fate by tintruder · · Score: 4, Funny
    All These Worlds Are Yours, Except Europa. Attempt No Landing There.

    Wonder what the monday-morning-quarterbacking will be like when something bad happens?

    1. Re:Tempting Fate by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny

      That 2010 message was actually sent by the Germans, who laid out their beach towels there in 2009 ;-)

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  9. Not If They Plan Ahead by Vagary · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's because NASA didn't bother to sterilize Galileo either because it wasn't practice at the time or because its mission suggested that such extra cost was unnecessary (you'll get one of those two reasons depending on which news report you read). Space agencies are of the opinion that they are now capable of producing probes with a reasonably low risk of contamination (the Beagle 2 is being manufacturered in a clean room).

    I just hope they're happy when sentient organisms evolved from prions send their ships to invade Earth...

  10. Re:Nuclear Powered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    When it launches, they hang a sign on the pad: Gone fission...

  11. Re:It gets worse... by CrowScape · · Score: 5, Funny

    People said that I was daft to send a fission reactor to Europa, but I did it just the same! Sank into the ocean. So I sent a second one! That sank into the ocean. I built a third one! That one burned up, melted the ice and then sank into the ocean! But the forth one stayed up, and that's what you're gonna get lad!

    --
    common sense: noun
    What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
  12. Re:It gets worse... by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or alternatively that nuclear material could be the neccesary kick that life there needs.

    A far more likely outcome would be that the lifeforms of Europa would see a nuclear probe crashing into their planet as some sort of terrorist attack, or overt military action. It would only be a matter of time before their scientists developed rockets of their own to answer the threat posed by the strange creatures living within the the dangerous inner planet ring of the Sun. We would all be doomed, doomed I say!

    Of course this is preposterous, but no more so than thinking a nuclear reactor would kick start life on a planet covered by ice sheets hundreds of miles thick. The probe would never even reach the liquid water in the first place, let alone interact with any amino acids floating in it.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  13. Re:The just *can't* send this without a lander... by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unless I'm mistaken, landing on Europa could be a very bad thing

    You're right. All those worlds are ours, except Europa. We should attempt no landings there.

  14. Re:The just *can't* send this without a lander... by corbettw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wasn't there some agreement/policy about not landing/crashing shit into Europa and possibly contaminating it with Earth bacteria (or nuclear fuel/waste as the case may be)?

    Yes, I believe the full text of the treaty was something like: All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landings there.

    Though I could be wrong.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  15. Re:It gets worse... by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Didn't I read that the reactor's dimensions are 1x4x9?

    It measures 16 in the fourth dimension.

  16. Re:It gets worse... by t0qer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course this is preposterous, but no more so than thinking a nuclear reactor would kick start life on a planet covered by ice sheets hundreds of miles thick.

    Unless of course that reactor melted enough ice too allow stuff to live there. Maybe if it did a core meltdown, the resulting steam would create a thermal vent to the surface as it melted its way down?

    I cite the machine at the end of total recall for creating an atmosphere. Couldn't a fission reactor melting through the ice do the same? Maybe not enough to cover the whole planet, but enough to sustain life in that little pocket.

  17. Re:It gets worse... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 5, Funny

    I cite the machine at the end of total recall for creating an atmosphere.

    I can't believe you cited Total Recall as a reliable source of science. I just. Wow. I'm flabbergasted. I had to read your post twice! I just, I, well, I really don't know what to say...

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  18. Size by SilverCanary · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...makes all previous interplanetary probes look wussy: it'll be 300 feet long...

    Tsk, tsk. It's not size that matters. It's how you use it.

  19. Re:It gets worse... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1, Funny

    If the craft were to hit the surface of any Europa

    At this point, I don't think there'd be any ill effects of dropping nuclear devices...

    wait, you didn't...

    Hm. You said Europa. My bad. NEver mind.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  20. I heard US people we self centric by agi · · Score: 2, Funny
    But this is ridiculous!
    > designed specifically to search for liquid water and signs of life on Europa
    We are here! There's life in France, Italy, Spain, UK..... well maybe not there.. ;)
    Sending a 'space' mission to search for us... Oh! you said nuclear powered? So they call 'them' space missions now.
    --
    EOF
  21. Re:It gets worse... by schnitzi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Er, no.

    Lots of meteors and such have already penetrated the surface. Once you hit the ocean, all you're going to encounter is 1) geysering and 2) refreezing. And since Europa has (great food but) no atmosphere, any liquid that's exposed sublimates instantly to steam.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  22. Who cares about water? by Phantasmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why doesn't NASA just give up and announce that they've discovered large oil reserves on Europa?

    We'll have humans there in two years!

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  23. Re:Nuclear Powered? by tigersha · · Score: 1, Funny

    Actually, I would not give a flying f*ck if China, Russia, India, Iran or for that matter Osama bin LAden's space agence puts a fission reactor into orbit. Space does not belong to the US of A, or anyone else.

    The fundamental problem is if Osama 's Space agency puts the fissionable things into a SUB orbital trajectory! But then, The US can and does maintain hordes of rockets for exacylt that purpose. So who are they to moan?

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  24. Re:Contradiction by freeweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn, and here I thought 'organic' meant any over-priced, feel-good, no-pandas-harmed food.

    Stupid hippies *grumble*

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  25. Re:It gets worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now if we could just get those three-breasted women...

    Seriously though, I always thought the "instant atmosphere" was a pretty lame bit in the movie, but at least it was justified by the idea that the whole thing was probably just a part of his virtual adventure. For someone to think that we are even *close* to being able to pump that amount of energy into a planet is just.... yeah.