Slashdot Mirror


AOL Lays Off 450 In California

bmarklein writes "AOL has laid off 450 in California. The former Netscape campus is going from 675 employees to 300. The San Francisco office, which they obtained when they acquired Spinner (now Radio@AOL), and which housed Nullsoft after their acquisition by AOL, is being closed along with an office in San Diego. 100 employees have been offered jobs in Virginia or New York. No word on how this affects products like WinAmp. Justin, are you out there?"

29 of 389 comments (clear)

  1. Woah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That has to be a good .03% of their workforce.

    Slow day already?

    1. Re:Woah! by fuzzix · · Score: 5, Funny

      "OMG d00d LOL!! ur fird!!!11"

      2% of their workforce got this over AIM...

  2. surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hardly a surprise given their sudden lack of enthusiam for non-microsoft products, now they've kissed and made up with Redmond.

    Anyone would wonder if Winamp and Netscape were just tools to help them get their way.

    Go mozilla...

    1. Re:surprised? by wawannem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but the real change came when the TW people found out that they got screwed in the merger

      Why is it that every time someone uses a phrase similar to this one, they get modded up insightful? I am voiding my mod points right now to respond to this uninsightful BS.

      TW was not a clear 'victim' in the merger... So the stock fell... Is that AOL's fault? Everyone's stock has fallen since the late 90s. If you think that the entertainment industry wasn't hit, take a look at the following graphs:
      Disney
      Viacom

      So, just because the stock tumbles, it is AOL's fault? It looks to me that TW stock probably would have fallen just as well... Has anyone ever thought for just a second that maybe AOL was the victim? I mean, didn't TW accept the terms of the merger because they were in debt up to their neck? In fact IIUC, a great deal of AOLTW's current debt is left over from TW pre-merger. So the bubble burst before AOL could pay it down for them, does that make TW a victim (or a bunch of whiners)?

      I have a vested interest in TW, but I don't think AOL bashing does any good. It also seems like this is just another case of people letting the press think for them, and not doing any research on their own.

      One note I will make though, is that the AOL management was inexperienced compared to the TW management, and the company is in good hands now with the previous TW management in charge (Dick Parsons, et al.). But that doesn't mean it was a fight to push AOL mgmt out because AOL screwed TW, I think that the board just saw the value of TW mgmt experience and moved them up the ladder.

    2. Re:surprised? by Malcontent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "From that viewpoint going with Microsoft sounds like the smart thing to do. "

      An alliance with Microsoft always looks good on paper. It's probably pretty good financially too until the day MS stabs you in the back and takes off with you technology or customers.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  3. kinda reminds me by BillFarber · · Score: 4, Funny
    of the old joke...

    Q: What do you call 450 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?

    A: A good start.

  4. Hmm... by hookedup · · Score: 5, Funny


    "What we're doing is actually moving some of our projects into teams in other facilities."

    Sounds to me like winamp will have a distinct bangladesh feel to it next version :)

    1. Re:Hmm... by Digital+Mage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Winamp!....It really whips the elephant's ass!

  5. New math? by withak53 · · Score: 5, Funny

    675 - 450 = 300?

  6. Does affect Nullsoft by RussGarrett · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two Nullsoft employees (Brennan and Aus) were yesterday. Winamp will continue though.

  7. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by Hangtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Somehow even if AOL was stupid enough to lay him off, I am sure the creator and lead for WinAmp would have NO problem finding employment. In fact, I bet a certain company in Redmond, WA wouldn't have any problem in picking him up.

  8. Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by ThomasFlip · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AOL started out in the dial up industry which from what I can tell has gone right down the shitter for them, however they still managed to merger with Time-Warner before they figured out. Now what have they got? Certainly dial up won't get them anywhere, and the broadband service they offer is just a piece of seemingly annoying proprietary software. Where can they go from here ?

    --
    If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    1. Re:Does AOL have a real buisness model anymore ? by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 4, Funny

      and the broadband service they offer is just a piece of seemingly annoying proprietary software.

      If you didn't notice, AOL is the leading provider of seemingly annoying proprietary software, along with Microsoft and SCO...

  9. Reduction in force... by _Pinky_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    So does this mean I can expect a reduction of AOL cds in my mail?

  10. What These People Heard On Logging In by Spencerian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello!
    You got laid off!
    Goodbye.
    %$##@!

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  11. Re:AOL Winamp by mccalli · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I remember the glory days of NS, back before IE was even a player on the market.

    So do I. I remember people talking about them being "the next Microsoft", and not in a flattering sense. I remember the incompatible tags they introduced. I remember the appalling mess of Netscape 4 and CSS.

    And then there was the <blink> tag...

    I can remember distinctly when I switched to IE, and at the time it was because IE was better, not because Microsoft forced me to. I can also remember switching back to Mozilla (and then Firebird), again because the browser was better.

    I would argue that the glory days of Netscape stopped at Netscpe 3, took a break and restarted in the present time due to Mozilla. I'm not certain now what percentage of Mozilla developers are ex-Netscape, but I imagine it's still high enough to be called Netscape-in-another-form.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  12. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by SuperMo0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In fact, I bet a certain company in Redmond, WA wouldn't have any problem in picking him up.

    NINTENDO OF AMERICA'S GOING TO BUY WINAMP? GASP!

  13. Welcome! by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've got a pink slip!

    --
    Goo goo g'joob.
  14. ho, ho, ho by twitter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Merry Christmas!

    Oh well, it can be worse. You could get ranked and yanked, like I did. When that happens, they paper your file, rake you over the coals for a few months and fire you individually. It looks great. In my case, my supervisor made sure he nailed me on my birthday. Another great and integral part of rank and yank is bonus incentives for those not fired. The company was talking about bonuses as high as 15%, knowing they could split the salaries of the people they planned to fire. It's strange how no one but supervisors were excited about that.

    Look forward to getting the usual communist propaganda from the company by mail for a while. The idiots in HR sent me a big fat glossy book, personalized with my own numbers, about what great benefits the company has for it's employees. The only thing they missed in the personalization was the fact that I was fired. How sofisticated, the company really loves me.

    My company was big, but Time/Warner is much bigger. I wonder if the Netscape people are going to have it that much worse than I did. Nah, it's hard to get worse than fired, no matter how the jack-asses dress it up.

    Welcome to the great suck that is the "recovery". I've been out of real work for more than a year. I'm not really happy to have lots of company.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  15. Re:AOL Winamp/Netscape by eibhear · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I remember the glory days of NS, back before IE was even a player on the market.

    So do I. Though only as an event in history. Netscape Communicator is gone. Dead. Arising from its ashes, however, is a top class browser that leaves netscape communicator and internet explorer coughing in its dust. Let go of netscape. AOL had no problem doing so.

    ibhear

  16. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by ActiveSX · · Score: 4, Informative

    If I remember correctly, Justin quit Nullsoft a while back. Ah, here's the link.

  17. Re:Hope Justin is still employed by RussGarrett · · Score: 4, Informative

    Both NYTimes and slashdot jumped the gun there, he certainly does still work for AOL. Read his .plan.

  18. Winamp 3 shelved by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Informative
    Interesting quote from Russ on the winamp forum:
    How about "never". The official line is that Winamp3 development is now stopped. Shelved. At least temporarily. And here I am sitting here trying to look optimistic. It's not "soon" any more, it's "maybe".

    The golden rule of customer service is: Give the customer what they want. The customer didn't want Winamp3, that much is clear. The customer didn't care about the most powerful API this side of, well, anything. They didn't care about platform independence. The average Winamp user is only vaguely aware of what Linux is, let alone how to use it. Much less than 1% of Winamp users want Linux support.

    Find it here.

    Personally I don't want Winamp 3 because every version I tried was horribly unstable and I had to end up uninstalling it. The only really cool thing about it was the media library and that ended up in 2.x. So, I never saw any need to migrate.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by RussGarrett · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmm, that'd be me. Being rather melodramatic.

      I was rather more optimistic about things until yesterday. Most of Winamp3 is now open-sourced (except the skinning and scripting engine), and there are people working on a fully open-source version of Winamp3, now known as wasabi.player (and much improved since the old, old release which is still on the winamp.com frontpage).

    2. Re:Winamp 3 shelved by lennart78 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the past I've seen some pretty neat things that could be done within winamp(2) visualisation. Somebody even managed to program a 3d-rendered asteroids game in it. It's not really usefull, but it warms my geek-heart to see a product with such versatility.

      However: the bottom line is: I've always regarded winamp as a software mp3-player. And when I double-click an mp3, I want to hear it instantly, and not wait around for something like 10 seconds on a PC with recent hard and software for the music to start.

      It's cool if it's got lot's of features, but it should at least do that for which it was designed/intended. Winamp3 failed it, so I switched to an alternative, and many more with me for as far as I know. Complies with the qoute above it seems...
      Too bad for winamp. Really liked it so far...

  19. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The napkin makers got over it. So should you.

    The problem with your analogy is that the napkin makers still get paid. McDonald's pays napkin makers so that a McDonald's customers can have free napkins. And more likely then compared to textiles and gasoline, napkins are probably made in America, which puts money back into Americans pockets.

    The main issue with more and more industries going overseas for workers is that less money is being given to the American public, yet people are still in the constant-consuming mindset. And they are going into debt over it, so that they can have that nice car and the big projection TV and the cell phone. Just like all the commercials tell them they deserve.

    Although the tech industry has really brought this upon themselves during the boom. I recently read an article (saw the link on Fark, too lazy to look it up) about a guy who started a consultant company. While looking for workers he decided to try something novel (to him and most tech workers it seems, but not to someone like me who's lived this). He decided to offer positions for the same wages that Indian programmers are offered: $45,000 a year. Being a Canadian who hasn't bothered with looking for work in the US, I was personally shocked by this. If the only reason US tech workers aren't finding jobs is because no one is willing to offer a good wage (not extraordinary, buy-me-a-Lexus-and-an-SUV kind of wages, but good enough to live modestly), then I feel no pity for companies at all. The guy who offered those wages was flooded with resumes. People are obviously willing to work, despite not having the huge paychecks. But they have to be given the chance. Companies have to realise the value of hiring locally at fair wages.

    Now as for textiles...everyone but the main "Promotional" companies (i.e. Nike, etc) is getting screwed on that deal. People really should be upset over that entire industry...

  20. Re:shit head. by kiwimate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh grow up. You're putting words into my mouth that are utterly without basis from what I posted. I think any job loss is bad news, and 450 is really distressing. I've been in situations where I've put my shirt on the line for a company I believed in and, in some cases, just wriggled through, and, in other cases, paid the price with my job. And, hey, guess what? In one of those cases I was the sole programmer at a company that ended up struggling and decided to cut me loose first.

    If you read my direct quotation of the 2% figure as being somehow trivializing, then you're deliberately trying to spin it. 2% of a company's workforce is, to me, fairly substantial. Getting rid of innovative people such as the undisputedly talented programmers under discussion here is a very real and serious action.

    Looking at your other post on this topic, it looks like you've got a chip on your shoulder, but it's certainly justifiable. Unlike you, I'm not going to wish you ill or gloat, because I've been there and know how much it sucks, and it's just not worth it to spread the bitterness. I really do hope you find a job soon.

  21. Ah, sensative HR departments by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The idiots in HR sent me a big fat glossy book, personalized with my own numbers, about what great benefits the company has for it's employees. The only thing they missed in the personalization was the fact that I was fired. How sofisticated, the company really loves me.

    That sounds sadly typical of the people who work in HR departments. A few years ago, my mom was laid off from an insurance company after they decided to close the office she worked at. Several days later, they called her at home to do an exit interview, and one of the questions they asked was "why did you leave this position?" - which made her start crying.

    Come to think of it, this was just after Christmas - I was home at the time on Christmas break from college. The timing may have been more a fiscal calender that conincided with the calender year, but it still seemed kind of harsh.

  22. Re:America Online - Moving to India.. no F'n way by los+furtive · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You got it right on the nose! "Buy American" crap is just racist protectionism. When a job goes to India, it still goes to a human being, and one who currently doesn't get to live the bloated American lifestyle. If Americans (in general) didn't have the need to lead such bloated lifestyles, they could get by on a lower salary, which would allow the company to keep its employees in its own country.

    Jobs going overseas allows other people a chance to own houses, computers, cars and televisions, but more importantly allows more tax money to go back into their own economy, which is then reinvested so that water can be treated and delivered to where it is needed, infrastructure put in place for better markets, better medical aid, better roads. "Buy American" is a great ideal, but it's far far from the trade deficite truth Americans live in. unless Americans are willing to do the same work for a lot less, it's not going to change, and that won't happen until Americans curb their appetites for just about everything. Mark my words, unless there is some incredible breakthrough in technology, the excess we currently live in wont last much longer, or will become available to fewer and fewer people, as the dichotomy of classes increase.

    As a side note to my second paragraph, I wonder if its accidental that the US arms race, as well as its pressure on other countries to increase their military might, is not just to make sure that less money goes into infrastructure that would make those countries a better place. But thats a whole other ball of wax.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.