Slashdot Mirror


Portable MP3 Hardware Sales Up

prostoalex writes "In December of 2002 only 12% of US music downloaders owned a digital music player, while for this year the number has increased to 17%. Jupiter Research expects the sales of the digital music players to double this year, while another research agency notes a remarkable shift towards paying for music. Even the music industry tends to agree that online music stores are a boon and expects the Web sales to really take off in 2004." (And the sales of Ogg-capable hardware are up, too, since there finally is some.)

65 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. MP3 CD? by aliens · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do CD players that can play MP3-CD's count too?

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
    1. Re:MP3 CD? by Davak · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or cellphones that play mp3s...
      Or PDAs that play mp3s...

      I am currently patenting a toilet roll dispenser that connects to a network via wi-fi to play songs while you enjoy your toilet time.

      All I want for Christmas is my Swiss-Army device: mp3/ogg player, PDA, cell phone, pager, and GPS.

      Davak

  2. perhaps more surprising by real_smiff · · Score: 5, Interesting

    is that >4/5 of music downloaders still only listen to that music on their computers - ? When MP3 playing portable cd players (whew, that's long), for example, hardly cost more than one's that don't..

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    1. Re:perhaps more surprising by GizmoToy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think its all that surprising, really. I'd have to believe the biggest reason most only listen to their music on their computer is because the entire library is available at any given time. You don't need to swap CDs. To most, that's a very attractive option.

    2. re: perhaps more surprising by ed.han · · Score: 3, Interesting

      wish i had mod points right now...

      me personally, i think part of the reason people were holding off on buying MP3 players is b/c they were hoping this mythical appliance convergence happened, they could get their mobile phone, e-mail app, PDA and MP3 player in a single package. while that's possible now w/ some of the units, very few of us want to shell out for an app of that size that costs as much as some desktops right now. i think what's happening is that people realize that it'll still be a while until those things come together in a single, happy package at a significantly lower price point.

      for my part i've given up and have finally decided to get myself a MP3 player just cuz i need something to dull the pain of my 1 hour train commute.

      ed

    3. Re:perhaps more surprising by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      is that >4/5 of music downloaders still only listen to that music on their computers

      Or in their cars (many cars have MP3 capable CD players now, and virtually all OEM head units are MP3 capable).

      I suppose I technically qualify in this survey -- I've downloaded a few things (which were available free from the artist), but most of our 80 GB collection (MP3, --alt-preset extreme) was ripped from our own CDs. And we have no portable MP3 players of any kind (I have a portable CD player/AM/FM tuner somewhere). We're content to use CDs in our cars for now (a Phatbox would be cool... but $750 ea is freaking expensive).

      Sure, an iPod or other HD based player would be nifty, but that's about it... they're very expensive and we don't have much use for a portable player -- we're both desk jockeys and could play music via headphone from our PC (me)/laptop (her). At home we have TiVo's with HMO and PCs to play the music from. In between we're basically in our cars (see above). And the flash based players just don't have the capacity to be attractive (at least not to me).

    4. Re:perhaps more surprising by Mancide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the biggest reason I'm trading in my MD player for an iPod. That, and now that I use iTMS, my purchased music is easily transferred to the iPod, I'd have to do some crafty work around to get it into the MD player.

      --
      "This amp is special, see all the knobs go up to 11, that means it is one louder than other amps"
    5. Re: perhaps more surprising by Ashran · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes but it would be great if you carry 1 storage device (let it be the phone) with you and then connect all kinds of bluetooth hw to it.

      Oh, today, lets see, I'll take the video and mp3 player module with me..

      --

      Before you email me, remember: "There is no god!"
    6. Re: perhaps more surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the Sony-Ericsson P900 seems to do all of this reasonably well, although yes, it is very expensive. /AC

    7. Re:perhaps more surprising by smilingirl · · Score: 2, Informative
      So, instead you are saying you carry your whole cd collection with you jogging? That would take more than a backsack. You missed the point.

      The point is, mp3 player's can HOLD your entire cd collection in a little box big enough to fit in your pocket. I just recently got mine for an early Christmas present... 20 GB. The only place I still use CD's is in my car. And I wouldn't if my car still had a tape player, because then I would buy an adapter for my mp3 player. But otherwise, I either listen off the computer or mp3 player, because they can hold EVERYTHING. CDs are obsolete in my opinion. Even if I did buy a CD, I just rip it and never take it out the case again. It's a waste.

      --
      The Present is the point at which time touches eternity. - C.S. Lewis
  3. 15 gram mp3 player by huhmz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just bought one of these. (page in swedish sorry) Very nifty, you hang it around your neck, it only weighs 15 grams. Great when you want to go running and 256 MB is more than enough for a jogging run.

    1. Re:15 gram mp3 player by uptownguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      it only weighs 15 grams

      Better be careful there! With the former head of the ATF now heading the RIAA, I wouldn't be shocked if possession of 15 grams becomes a felony soon...

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    2. Re:15 gram mp3 player by kinnell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, and 256 MB isn't nearly enough for a jogging run if your being chased by heavily armed RIAA enforcers.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  4. It will be interesting to see by mental_telepathy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If these number go up after the Pepsi million song giveaway with Itunes. Supposedley it will be on during the superbowl, so that would be a big target audience.

  5. But of course by cspenn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny how the music industry changes its tune as soon as the money starts rolling in.

    "Oh yeah, the Internet, it's the latest thing!" ...while the RIAA locks and loads the lawsuit cannon for yet another salvo.

    I wonder if customers will be as easily confused?

  6. Statistics by trystanu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let me get this straight:

    In 2002 only 12% of people downloading music owned MP3 players

    In 2003 17% of people downloading music owned MP3 players.

    So we're talking percents of percents here. 12% of however many people were downloading music (on that'd be less if we're talking people who've paid for their downloaded music). Has this number increased, decreased?

    Thankfully in the new 2003 Jupiter Research consumer survey, 6 percent of online adults said they would be buying a portable music device in the next 12 months. What's an online adult, am I an online adult?

    Uhuh? Anyone else confused? They seem like numbers just for the sake of numbers to me...

  7. My vote for the best of them... iRiver iHP-120 by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 2, Informative

    It shreds the iPod in every way. Plays WMA and OGG like the iPod doesn't. 20GB drive, records standard like the iPod doesn't, has built in radio as the iPod doesn't, mic input (yes it records standard) true SRS surround sound, USB2.0 like the iPod doesn't, digital and analog audio out, the sexiest case on a portable music player ever, and all for $370.

    go to http://www.outwardsound.com/products.php/7/278/ for a look.

    1. Re:My vote for the best of them... iRiver iHP-120 by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about the interface? Does it have an elegant easy to use interface like the iPod, or is it more like most MP3 players with some horrible hack job of an interface?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:My vote for the best of them... iRiver iHP-120 by MrMickS · · Score: 4, Informative
      From the Apple website:

      Connectivity FireWire 400 and USB 2.0 through dock connector

      If you are going to rant get the facts right first.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    3. Re:My vote for the best of them... iRiver iHP-120 by karmaflux · · Score: 2, Informative

      The iPod does USB 2.0.

      The rest of the feature set you list are things that I, and many others, find completely useless. I hate WMA only slightly less than I hate ogg vorbis -- and I bet that true SRS surround sound sounds great through your nine thousand dollar stereo system, but I want something portable.
      Your baby weighs in at 160 grams, sizing out at 60x19x105. This is negligibly different from the iPod -- but the iPod has a bit better feature set.
      The iRiver is, from its name on down, an iPod knockoff. Your opinion is your own, and you're welcome to it, but for some of us, the iPod is exactly what we're looking for: a small, well-rounded mp3 player that doesn't look like a tricorder.

      --

      REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

    4. Re:My vote for the best of them... iRiver iHP-120 by radish · · Score: 3, Funny

      And in an emergency can be used as a brick for repairing leaking dams. Man that thing's big...

      Karma all the way for me, fits in the palm of your hand.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:My vote for the best of them... iRiver iHP-120 by rufo · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it's not. There's no scroll wheel. I have 10GB of music on my iPod - I'd probably sooner commit suicide then trying to scroll all the way down to U2 or something low on the alphabet. (Yes, I realize there's probably a page-down feature. The scroll wheel still beats paging down by a mile.)

      Also, I must admit, the iPod's auto-sync is a killer feature that no other player that I've heard of does. Plug it in, copies music, leave it plugged in until you're ready to go and just grab it and leave. The iRiver player just shows up as a hard drive, and won't even show artist/album/genre info unless you run a special software program.

      Still, it does look fairly cool - if I were in the market for an MP3 player I would have to give it serious thought. One definite downside is that for all the vaunted MP3/WMA/Ogg support, there's no support for Audible.com, which the iPod does (and no other portable HD-based player has). Granted, not everybody wants to use such evil proprietary formats as Audible, but for some people it's kind of a turnoff.

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    6. Re:My vote for the best of them... iRiver iHP-120 by Deslock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It shreds the iPod in every way."

      Hogwash. The The iHP-120 has some nice features, but like all MP3 players, it suffers from some disadvantages, such as:

      - Mediocre button layout... no scroll wheel
      - Edges not as curved as other players; not as comfortable to hold or pocket
      - Mediocre menuing system
      - Long startup time if using the DB to organize instead of sorting by directories
      - Limited shuffling abilites (especially if organizing by directories)

      Additionally, the iPod supports replaygain while the iHP does not does. Also, the iHP doesn't do gapless playback, FLAC, or ethernet (the Karma has all those things, and the Karma will be getting replaygain soon).

  8. The RIAA must not like this. by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure the RIAA is quaking in their boots hearing this. I keep waiting for them to start to go after MP3 manufacturers because we all know if you use an MP3 player you steal music.

    Which had me really interested in the interview with Steve Jobs previously referenced here on slashdot was that music execs thought that 'ripping a CD' equated to theft, not to converting it to MP3s.

    To be that out of touch with consumers of your product just helps me feel that market pressures, not lawsuits or 'civil disobediance' of supporting Kazaa and other illegal methods of distribution will slowly convert the morons.

    That or we could all hope they die of old age because to not understand what Ripping is they have to be 100+ and never used a computer in their life. Hell my Grandpa new what the internet was and he was 91 when he joked about me finding him a girlfriend online after I met my wife that way. He drove road graters for a living, and never touched a computer.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  9. The Fight over Format by mr_lithic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Is this the Music Industry finally admitting that they no longer can inhibit digital music distribution and that need to grab their share of the pie?

    The music industry corporations made a bundle by changing the format of the media that they supply. There were millions made when the CD replaced the LP and millions of older releases were sold to people who already had the album.

    The shift to a portable digital format has been made outside of their control and now they are struggling to catch up.

    The lack of willingness by the younger population (12-17) in this study to purchase music points to the fact that they may have already missed the boat.

  10. Changing Tunes For $$$ by tds67 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Funny how the music industry changes its tune as soon as the money starts rolling in.

    Where have you been? Then money's been rolling in.

    There was that 12 year-old girl they sued and got some money out of, that 70-something year old man they sued, the college kids they sued, the housewife they're suing, etc., etc.

  11. Re:Ogg capable hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    there are some: VorbisHardware

    Damn Moronic Editors

  12. oops, knew i was missing something! by real_smiff · · Score: 2, Informative

    they could, of course (hopefully before someone else says it!) be making (ordinary red-book audio) CDs from those downloads... no portably mp3 player required, hehe. :)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  13. Re:what about films then? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm curious when they will start to sale videos in online stores?

    I'm assuming you mean downloadable videos that you can burn yourself. This will probably happen when your average person's bandwidth gets high enough that downloading an entire movie is no more of a hassle than downloading a CD worth of music is now. Why? Because at that point the online trading of videos will truly begin and the MPAA will have to start looking at a different business model, just as the RIAA is now. Personally, I think the whole of the RIAA are idiots because they really missed an incredible opportunity to drastically reduce their distribution costs. They seem to be just now coming to their senses, but because they waited so long they have to deal with lots of "middle men" and competition.

    Just wait and see. When you can download 2GB of data in about 2 hours, you'll start seeing the market open up. And before anybody jumps all over me, yes, I'm aware that there are already "stores" where you can watch streaming video or download and watch, but I don't think these are the same quality as what you would get on a DVD. Somebody correct me (and provide info) if I'm wrong.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  14. My vote for the best of them.iRiver iHP-120-JRDF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    " It shreds the iPod in every way. Plays WMA and OGG like the iPod doesn't. 20GB drive, records standard like the iPod doesn't, has built in radio as the iPod doesn't, mic input (yes it records standard) true SRS surround sound, USB2.0 like the iPod doesn't, digital and analog audio out, the sexiest case on a portable music player ever, and all for $370."

    Unfortunately it doesn't come with a Job's Reality Distortion Field (JRDF), so it's not as good.

  15. It has to be said... by troon · · Score: 3, Informative


    You mean "Vorbis", not "Ogg". As has been pointed out many times, Ogg is the "container", and Vorbis is the audio codec.
    </pedant>

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  16. iPods.... by jeffy124 · · Score: 3, Informative

    right now seems like a good chance for me to say thank you to all who provided useful comments and tips in the article posted earlier this week on the lack of discounts available for the Apple iPod.

    alas, I still have not been able to find a decent deal. Many have pointed to apple's refurb'd items store, but it's out of stock on ipods. the best thing I've got right now is that Target will give you a $15 gift card when you buy an ipod.

    my best hope is that some marketer at Apple will see the original post and the responses and perhaps have a change of heart in what seems to be their "no discounting" policy, and how the cheaper prices offered by their competitors might be beating them in the market.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:iPods.... by Animaether · · Score: 4, Insightful
      my best hope is that some marketer at Apple will see the original post and the responses and perhaps have a change of heart in what seems to be their "no discounting" policy

      Hop into business mode for a second and read what you wrote there.

      I see...
      - a person who really, really wants an iPod
      - a person who would want that iPod at a discount
      - a person who sees cheaper offerings from competitors
      - a person who does not intend to buy said other offerings because he is
      - a person who really, really wants an iPod

      Why lower the price ? Seems like in the end, if you can't find a cheaper deal, you'll cut your (monetary) losses and get an iPod anyway.

      And even if you do go and get a competitor's product- don't worry, there's plenty others who will still get an Ipod.
    2. Re:iPods.... by locker1776 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple Must be doing something right. Go to bestbuy.com and search for iPods. They are all sold out. Why does Apple need to lower the price? If they are selling out, economics says they should raise the price.

  17. Re:what about films then? by OS24Ever · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally even with my 1.5MB/s DSL I do not consider that a feature I'm looking for.

    Number of reasons

    A) The size of the file to get the quality of Video/Audio that I want. Basically I need a DVD worth of quality at a minimum, which is 5 - 10 GBs of space. I like the extras, trailers, etc. So to get this, I'd need to 'want to watch a movie' maybe a day after I decide to get the movie.

    B) I'm a collector of sorts. I've got about 700 DVDs that I've impulse bought since 1996 or so. Granted I've only purchased about 700 CDs and a few hundred songs via iTunes. With that many DVDs and the associated data on them, if I wanted to have them for 'instant gratification' I'd need roughly 4.2TBs of storage. That doesn't account for even more stuff coming out over the next x number of years.

    Granted newer encoding tech such as MPEG-4 vs. MPEG-2 might help with the storage requirements, but then I'd need to have the movie companies re-encode things like 'Better off Dead' or '*Batteries not included' which about 20 people probably would want, and then I'd need to re-spend money to get them that way.

    DVDs have introduced a new phenomenon to the movie industry. People willing to buy them.

    I bought 9 video tapes. The first six star trek movies & the original Star Wars trilogy (not that re-done versoin, the THX version)

    Just my $0.02.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  18. Need Search Without DL by Flamesplash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What the music services need to do now is provide a web based interface to their music library. I really hate it that itunes and napster require you to instll their software before seeing if a particular song/artist/album is avail. If I'm only looking for a particular song/artist/album then I don't want to install some random piece of software first. Granted most people are going to pick and use one service as their primary, ie iTunes for me, but I'm not adverse to using others if they carry music I can't get through my primary.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  19. I bought the Rio Karma 20gb... by kikensei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Works great! Contrary to a review linked on the last /. OGG/MP3 player article, the Java client works perfectly. I was able to use it to transfer and delete songs over ethernet from both my Linux desktop and my Powerbook laptop. The Win32 software and a USB2 connection seem to be required for firmware updates, but it works fine with factory firmware. It's not as elegant as the iPod in the layout of controls and the Interface, but no showstoppers. The addition of ethernet (only via a cradle) and a java client for mac/linux sealed the deal. I recommend it.

  20. Figures. by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I went in to Best Buy/Circuit City yesterday on my lunch hour, looking for a MP3 player to use in the car.

    They were out of almost every model. The only ones they had were the mega-expensive models, and the cheap junk low-end models. All the mid-range stuff was gone.

    I figured they were selling a ton of them.

    Even my dad said he wanted one for Christmas. I told him he didn't have a computer. "But you can put songs on it for me."

    Now that I think about it, it's probably eaiser than being 24/7 tech support for him if he got a PC.

  21. No connection between online sales and players by MrDingDong · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Most, if not all, of the online music stores sell music in some sort of proprietary, DRM-able format. MP3 is neither. So people who are buying MP3 players are probably not buying them to play music they've bought off an online music store. The major players - including Microsoft, Apple and RIAA - would like nothing better than to see MP3 disappear.

    It is great that MP3 player sales are up, but I don't think that there is necessarily any sort of relationship to online music sales.

    Now maybe there *is* a relationship to increased use of P2P services by the public...

    Correct me if I'm wrong....

    1. Re:No connection between online sales and players by CottonEyedJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Normally, I'd agree with you. And if you take Apple out of the equation I would agree. iTunes still defaults to ripping CD's to MP3, iPod's still play MP3's. You can rather easily convert protected AAC's (note: only iTMS AAC's are protected, not those you create) to MP3. You can say what you like about Apple and the RIAA being in bed together, but Apple has no problem with its customers playing MP3's on Macs and iPods.... "Rip, Mix, Burn".

  22. You are being ridiculous. by thepuma · · Score: 2, Insightful
    to not understand what Ripping is they have to be 100+ and never used a computer in their life.

    "Ripping" is a pretty specific term, and you have to have performed the task yourself and have some knowledge of what is going on. Most user-friendly software that converts CDs to MP3s do not call it "ripping".

    I don't think that most people over the age of 30 would be able to tell you what "ripping" means.

    And even a lot of those people that are computer literate are not necessary to the level where they know all of the "lingo".

    --

    Free your ecomony and enact the FairTax

  23. iRiver iHP-120 costs too much! by HardCase · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Neuros - Plays WMA, WAV, MP3, OGG. Interchangeable 20 GB drive or 128MB flash. Built in radio. Built in mic. Line in. Records MP3 and WAV. Unsexy, utilitarian case. Open firmware and software. All for $230 (that's $140 less than an iRiver) or $199 for 20GB only (that's $170 less than an iRiver). And the hardware is upgradeable. True, it's USB 1.0, but that hasn't been a big issue for me, once I loaded my OGG collection. Loading an album or two doesn't take very much time at all. USB 2.0 isn't worth $170.


    www.neurosaudio.com

  24. +5 yrs -- "Music industry has record year again!" by Isca · · Score: 5, Interesting
    How much do you want to bet that 5 years from now, the record industry will all love the internet because this year they finally figure out how to make money by selling music at a reasonable price?

    There's not one new music selling place that hasn't at least broke even at $0.99 a track? ow long before we see that special "mini Album" by (insert pop star here) for 4.99 for *6* songs?

    Of course, Jack Valenti will still be moaning, but the rest of the industry will be looking at him the same way they look at him when he talks about VCR's and rentals... I.e. "what were we thinking?" after having made more money per song by not having to pay hardly anything to distribute it.

    -Chris

  25. Re:Recording by Radon+Knight · · Score: 3, Informative

    The iPod can record with a Belkin add-on mic. It records right to disk, so you can record hundreds of hours of stuff.

  26. Re:perhaps more surprising - Ach, get a neuros! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dunno. I have an older car (1995) that only had a tape-deck/radio. Since I have a large collection of music ripped to MP3 format, I was growing more and more dissappointed that I could not listen to my music in my car. I started investigating replacing the in-dash radio with a CD player that would read MP3's. Still, this was an imperfect option for me, cause I would still have to deal with CDs which are a pain in the butt to keep from getting scratched, out of direct sunlight, away from extremes of hot and cold, etc... I had resigned myself to dealing with this, as it was certainly better than nothing...but having burned mp3 cd's in the past, I realized that 700megs of music (+/-) is but a fraction of my collection and at best, an mp3 cd player was but a fractional step in the right direction.

    So, I resigned myself to spending some cash and started researching players. Then I stumbled across this guy, and I got excited. For $229 bucks I could house 20gigs worth of music. It broadcasts audio on the FM dial, so all I had to do was tune my radio station to the Neuros broadcast station and viola, music instantly available. ...it beats the hell outta ripping apart my dash to play mp3 disks.

    What's even better is that at $229 it cost less than most of the in dash mp3/CD players I was looking at. So, I took the plunge...

    Haven't had a complaint yet. Works exactly as advertised. Support folk are excellent, price was great. It's not the sleekest, or sexiest player on the market, but the damn thing is cheap, versatile, and open source. Check it out if you want a solution to playing mp3's in your car. This little thing will let you play 'em anywhere. I'd take one of these over an iPod any day.

    http://www.neurosaudio.com

  27. An alternative by thefinite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As an alternative, how about getting over your distaste for Apple and just buy the iPod? It really is an amazing device for how simple it is. Plus, if you are in the habit of losing/breaking expensive things, maybe your alternative is some homeowner's/renter's insurance. (Alternatives to the iPod cost several hundred dollars themselves.) Just a thought. PS- A bluetooth player would take *ages* to transfer music to. BT might be cool for controlling the device, but not for sending music to it.

    --
    Boom Shanka
  28. Re:perhaps more surprising - Ach, get a neuros! by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No thanks. FM does really horrible things to audio quality. If you can't hear it, that's fine, but I can -- even on stock speakers. The most audible area is low bass -- FM radio only transmits 50 Hz-15 kHz.

    Note that this is broadcast FM, but AFAIK all of the local-area broadcast devices are subject to the same limitations. Most FM stations do more compression on the signal than this, so it should still sound better than they do.

  29. MP3 Feeding Frenzy by bossvader · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Have you actually been out there (I know a lot of /.ers don't actually go outside) but it's an MP3 player feeding frenzy out there.!

    Men, women, children, cats, dogs all shopping, buying, comparing MP3's. Professing the virtues of HD vs Flash vs CD vs personal/use profiles.

    Even Pops at the ripe young age of 74 was asking me if he could use one when golfing and how easy was it to "Rip" a CD. (I can't believe he even said that)

    Its all good...

  30. Re:perhaps more surprising - Ach, get a neuros! by Psychopundit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmm... Well, to each his own. I hadn't noticed this to be a problem. In my car I want good sound of course, but I think the bigger problems are attributed to the poor listening environment (engine noise, wind noise, driving distractions, etc...). Any limitations in FM transmission just has not been an issue for me in my car. But, I can see how that might be an annoyance for vehicle audiophiles. Good luck!

  31. OGG music for download? by onion_breath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I realise that this is a bit off topic, so my apologies.

    I've been sampling some ogg music, and I must say the quality is excellent. Mercifully, ogg files do not have the same high-pitched "hiss" that is in most mp3's. People say I'm crazy but I swear I can hear it!

    I have lately been compressing my music (CD) collection to ogg format. However, does anyone have a good resource/site that offers ogg encoded music? I have no problem paying a small fee for music, I just don't think iTunes offers ogg. Maybe I'm wrong.

    Also if anyone can recommend the best ogg capable portable player (bang for buck). Thanks in advance!

    --
    this is my sig, be amazed.
  32. Carefull if you plan to jog... by bossvader · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you plan to jog... becareful with choosing the HD models. We love our iPod but they don't do well when taking long runs. Last year's model will actually freeze and need to be rebooted. Done lots-o-research just a fact of iPod life. The new generation is supposed to be better but not garuanteed.

    So now we are going to be Bi-MP3 - Large HD (iPod) and Small Flash (Rio etc) kind of a pain in the arse...

    When is that 20G flash model going to arrive...

  33. Sound quality a factor? by base_chakra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how many people are turned off of personal digital audio players by the compromised sound quality of lossy codecs? The price per megabyte isn't nearly so attractive for those that prefer lossless quality.

    When MiniDisc was new (and expensive), manufacturers targeted audiophiles while the advertising emphasized custom mixes and sound quality (even though ATRAC is also lossy). With "MP3 players," the emphasis is usually on quantity, not quality. Being able to accomodate realtime filters like DFX might be a way to find some middle ground.

    I realize that most consumers either tolerate or are unaware of the fidelity loss, hence the continued dominance of the now inferior MP3 format. Still, I think that in order for this market to grow more quickly, it should educate consumers about the options available to them with these devices: CD quality if you want it, or OGG (etc.) if you want more tracks per MB.

    1. Re:Sound quality a factor? by freeweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I really wanted, I could carry roughly 100 CDs in my Lyra. It plays wav audio no problems. Hell of a lot nicer than carrying around 100 CDs every time I hit the road (never mind the fact that I'm on public transit :).

      However, the number of times I've had on high end headphones and been sitting in a perfectly quiet room listening to mp3s.. well, I can't even count it. Background noise does far more to interfere with audio quality, and mp3 players are generally used outside of sound-proofed rooms, with a $10 pair of headphones.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Sound quality a factor? by OutRigged · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most portable mp3 players also support wav as well as mp3. The Rio Karma supports FLAC, which is a lossless audio compressiona codec.

      --
      RaGe
      We're all just noise on the wires..
    3. Re:Sound quality a factor? by otprof · · Score: 2, Informative
      I agree with you about the sound-quality issue with lossy codecs. People say that 160 VBR is indistinguishable from the source file. Well, maybe, but like so many things in my life, I can't be bothered by the facts. :-)

      Seriously, I listen to a ton of live recordings (from etree.org), and I need a player that has good support for lossless codecs.

      Hence, when I buy later this month I am getting the Rio Karma, which supports FLAC. Much of the etree-seeded live music is coming in FLAC format these days, so using such a player will give me my crispy tunes on the go, no muss no fuss.

      I haven't seen anything about the iRiver or Neuros supporting FLAC, though that may be in the works.

      Bryan

  34. Redundant technology by WarriorX99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm surprised that with car stereos, we're still just seeing a lot of CD players that read MP3 CDs. I'd quite prefer to keep all my music in one place like an iPod (oh, how I wish I had one). I would actually like to see more car stereos with the audio-in so that I could use an MP3 player in my car too. I wonder why that hasn't caught on. It would sure double my incentive to buy an iPod (as if there weren't incentive enough).

    --
    Life today. Uncertainty tomorrow.
  35. Re:Get a PDA by jasonhamilton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had 4 HDD based mp3 players, about 5 flash players, and two PDA's specifically bought to play mp3 and watch videos with. I've also had 2 diff types of minidisc players. All in all, while the PDA's were able to play music (and no, I didn't use the included media player), ultimately they were too much hassle, and something like the Dell Axim costs about as much as the typical HDD based player. Also, even with the extended batt on the Axim, the batt life barely lasts a day while playing non stop at work, with the screen off, and the system in low cpu mode. My minidisc player on the other hand will go several days non stop without any problems. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the minidisc is the way to go -- in fact I hate it reconverting mp3's to atrac3 format, and the other hassles (software mostly), but I am saying that dedicated music players tend to do it well, and in the long run, are a better solution. I lasted 6 months with my last PDA before I gave up and went back to a dedicated solution.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  36. Re:what about films then?-Modeling markets. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Geeks and their sense of history.

    Anonymous Cowards and their severe lack of wits....

    First the "middle men" existed long before there was broadband.... Third do some research. You'll find that distribution costs isn't the biggest cost of producing music, so "broadband for everyone" isn't going to do more than shift costs around....

    Never did I state that middle men didn't exist before broadband. The opportunity the RIAA companies had was to eliminate the middleman that was already part of the legacy business model. At present, the retailer markup on a music CD is between 30 and 50 percent (yes, I did my research here). While that's actually a pretty low markup, online distribution would get rid of this cost and actually allow RIAA members to grab some of it for themselves. If you look at the per-song costs for something like iTunes, you can see that your typical "customized" CD exceeds the wholesale price of a CD. (Per-album costs seem to be only slightly above wholesale costs.) In addition, the cost of shipping CDs to warehouses and retailers goes away and is only partly replaced by the cost of maintaining the computing infrastructure necessary to house and sell online content. Furthermore, according to the RIAA, the biggest portion of the cost of a CD is marketing and promotion. While this cost could never go away, it can be somewhat reduced by providing online content and per-song pricing. If a customer can download a single tune for only 99 cents, they are far more likely to take a risk on new artists. After all, 99 cents isn't much to lose to determine that Boy Band X is just as bad as all the others. Finally, there is currently some experimentation going on by independent artists to reduce production costs by using more commoditized recording equipment and directly targeting the online format. If the recording, mixing and editing processes are all done digitally on a computer, the total cost of production goes down.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  37. The wrong reason for the increase by tif · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The referenced articles says "...the number of paying music downloaders doubled in the first half of 2003 -- coinciding with the [RIAA] announcement that they intended to begin prosecuting file-sharers ..." How ignorant. The RIAAs litigious behavior has nothing to do with it. Paying downloaders increased because sites offering to sell music increased.
    --tif

  38. Re:Get a PDA by freeweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weekend trips. If you can find me a PocketPC that holds a gig or 3 for under $300 USD, you might convince me.

    Now imagine a world where you can't predict to the song just what you're going to want to listen to days in advance.

    I find I listen to a LOT more variety in my music collection now, simply because I don't pre-select what I'm going to carry with me that day. Also because I don't have to re-load the damn thing every day just to hear something new. It's amazing to re-discover an album you haven't heard in a decade, all thanks to the wonders of "shuffle" :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  39. What I really want by Fjord · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'm looking for in MP3 playing is an in-dash unit (DIN5) that can read DVD-R filesystems and play the mp3s from there, basically giving days worth of music on a disc. For portable players, theres the Sony MPD-AP20U to do this, but what is a car player than can do this? I haven't been able to find one.

    --
    -no broken link
  40. Re: iPod? by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 2

    Which is exactly the reason I got a 20 gig iPod. My library is about 12 gigs right now which leaves me quite a bit of room to grow (I'm not going to say no one will ever use more than 20 gigs [read:640K] ).

    I'd have gone for the 40 gig but the 20 is thinner. Check out the difference before you buy.

  41. Re:what about films then? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A well-encoded divX file can be very high quality. Better picture than VHS, and while not quite the quality of a DVD it's still darn good.

    Most of the DivX stuff you see are theatre rips, or cheap/fast jobs done. They have artifacts, file errors, audio issues, etc.

    I have a DVD-Rip of "Orgazmo" (please, not jokes) which is of superb quality. Downloading it from Kazaa saved me the time of either ripping/re-encoding my own DVD, but with the price of drives being cheap I could probably have left my machine on whilst I was at work to get the job done as well.

    The nicest part of having the rip? My laptop - which doesn't play DVD's can run them, as can most friends' PC's... and I don't have to worry about my original being scratched when I drag it over to a party involving alcohol and amusing movies.

  42. Or just make them into audio CD's by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or in their cars (many cars have MP3 capable CD players now, and virtually all OEM head units are MP3 capable

    I would guess there are also a ton of people who simply download MP3'S and burn them to cd's as audio CD's. That's what I do, and I've been doing it for the last 5 years. Sure, CD's are bulky, but I can get them free after rebate any day of the week, and throw them out when I get tired of them - and they run in any cd player. I remeber back in '98 when I had to use WinAmp to convert them to WAV files before burning in EZ CD Creator 3, now Nero burns audio CD's straight from mp3's.

    The funny thing is I actually own an iPod, but still use cd's in my car. I bought a Transpodder, but it was a pain and not very clear, and it's easier to hit skip on a car cd player than an iPod. And less likely to get stolen.

  43. For the bargain-hunter.... by Trogre · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...the iRiver iMP-400 looks promising

    No uploading required. Just pop in your OGG/MP3 CD and you're away.

    Ogg Vorbis support is in the works (via afirmware update), and can happily co-exist with the other codecs in firmware.

    These guys seem pretty serious about vorbis. It's great to finally see a manufacturer taking this position.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife