Slashdot Mirror


Rockstar Investigated Over GTA - Vice City

Jubii writes "Seems the State of Florida is about to investigate Grand Theft Auto: Vice City for possibly violating state hate crime laws. This comes right after Rockstar and Take-Two issued an apology and a promise to remove offensive dialog found in the game. This could cause significant changes for 'mature' games in the future." Since Rockstar has already apologized and pledged to update the game, is it just me, or is the state of Florida only looking to line its pockets with some best-selling game profits? Update: 12/12 00:19 GMT by S : Haitian community leaders aren't satisfied either, saying "the manufacturer's pledge to change future editions did not solve the problem with games on store shelves now."

19 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. So frecking useless! by Txiasaeia · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Should car companies sue Rockstar because GTA and VC take well-known cars, give them a different game, then allow players to bash them up in the streets? Should gun makers sue Rockstar for giving them a bad image?

    When I played VC, I *never* once thought, "hey, those haitians, they're pretty bloodthursty!" And you wanna know why? Cuz it's a GAME, not a how-to guide or a travel brochure!

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:So frecking useless! by Draigon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Video games made me do shrooms and become a plumber. I can't be held responsible for my actions. This is America.

      --
      -Rabbit
  2. Hate crime by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought the whole premise of the hate crime laws was that the offender had to be doing something else illegal that was motivated by hate, and that was the only way it skirted the 1st amendment.

    I guess all the people that say "slippery slope" is an invalid argument don't know much about governments or laws.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Hate crime by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Inciting people to violence against a particular ethnic group would be a hate crime, but "KILL ALL THE HAITIANS!" is a fictional utterance by a fictional character in a dramatic work of fiction. It is clearly protected speech. Florida is smoking crack.

    2. Re:Hate crime by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      you know what? i wish more people just watched southpark and shutted the hell up. the hate crime episode in this case particular.

      it's not just about it being a funny show.. it's the social commentary that makes it great.

      anyways, how long has the game been on the shelves? hmm? a freakking long time perhaps hmm? somebody fishing for extra points somewhere hmm? being kyle's mum hmm?

      it's largely a parody of stereotypes anyways(the game).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Hate crime by cicatrix1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention that the phrase is displayed out of context, since in the game "The Hatians" are a gang. It is clearly not referring to Hatians as a nation, culture, race, or a people in general.

      --

      I know more than you drink.
  3. What games need... by HolyCoitus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is a strong arm militant group to bribe the government officials like the RIAA and MPAA. I can't even begin to think of all the racial, sexist, and otherwise hateful things I've heard in music or in movies and GTA gets hit on something completely stupid? I'm serious though. Video games are just as legitimate a form of expression and entertainment as movies and music. Why isn't it treated as such?

    --
    That's scary.
  4. What Problem? by Nasarius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That GTA:VC is a generally offensive game, yet they want Rockstar to remove one relatively innocent line? It's ridiculous, because it's a game. Rockstar isn't advocating killing Haitians. They aren't encouraging people to go on killing sprees to make their own criminal empire either. It's a freaking game, a work of fiction.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    1. Re:What Problem? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, it's amazing isn't it? They're not demanding they remove the violence or the killing. It's perfectly okay to run people over on the streets, or shoot them repeatedly. However, God (oops...can I say that?) forbid they should say something bad about Haitians. I mean, that's just unforgivable.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  5. Re:Dear Delray... by El · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember, if you advocate killing cops in a Rap song, that's protected free speech! But if you advocate killing a particular group of people in a videogame, that has to be against the law! (Of course, I'm sure these same people would probably like to make offensive songs and movies illegal too, but unfortunately the record and motion picture industries have more powerful lobbying groups.)

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  6. Re:Research.. by Naikrovek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Things like this make me doubt the future of the human race.

    the future is clear to me - in 20 years no one will be able to say anything for fear that it will offend someone.

    currently you can't do/say anything that will offend someone, but what about the countless people that are not offended by an action? should we lower our society to suit the most sensitive and most irrational people, or should the majority win?

    well the majority isn't winning anymore when it comes to things like this. the feelings of one person now override the feelings of millions of others, and even that is based on someone's word - they SAY they're feelings were hurt. its a good thing people don't lie for money ... because then even the basis that someone's feelings are hurt could be labelled as a frivelous (sp?) lawsuit.

    I agree that hateful and slanderous remarks should be removed from our collective conscience, but is attacking video games the way to do it? if the collective conscience of america wasn't already thinking of such things then they would have never made it into the game - the game is the symptom of racial slurs, not the cause, you fucking prats.

    outside of the USA everyone makes fun of us Americans. do I care? no. should i? no. if someone makes an anti-america game do i give a flying patootie? hell no - its just a damn game.

    so i say bring it on. hey foreigners, make lots of games that poke fun at americans: "hey, you gonna eat that untouched entire large super-supreme pizza," "now just wait a minizzle," "i'm 28 and i can't do long division anymore," "i've never voted, voting doesn't matter!!" and various other stupid (yet all too common) american sayings should be included. will we care? fuck no. we'll think its funny. I will anyway.

    Haiti: take it as the joke its meant to be, not as the money grubbing, attention-seeking opportunity you seem to think it is. If you get offended you are weak. why don't you get offended that Haitian language support was left entirely out of perl 5.8? oh wait, i know: no money to be won.

  7. should be protected by pretzel_logic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am not a lawyer, I am a programmer. That said IMHO, If I was the game manufacturer I would simply hide behind freedom of speech and freedom of press.

    It seems that our local governments have forgotten that freedom is the key. The judge should remind them of this and toss it out of court.

    If I want to make a product, and there is a market for the product, I should be able to sell it on the market. It should be up to the retailers to decide if they want to put it on the shelf.

    The leftist or rightist or whatevers will always be yelling about right and wrong, but thats their opinion and they are allowed to say it.

    The product is already listed as an adult game. For end users that are responsible enough to understand the game is fiction.

    "kill the Haitians" is simply a line in the plot of a fictional game. If they started a kill the Haitians advertising campaign available to the public eye, thats different.

    ..don't tread on me..

    --

    pretzel_logic
  8. Re:Dear Delray... by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yea, we should really kick Florida out of the union.

    The dead vote there, they can't hold a proper election, they don't seem to comprehend what free speech is... I mean the list goes on and on.

    We're watching you Florida, one more screw up, and your phallic landmass is out!

    --
    The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
  9. Rockstar's Mistake by setik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my opinion, I think the point at which Rockstar lost was the instant they decided to issue a statement apologizing to the Haitian community, they basically said "we are wrong, everyone feel free to sue us now, because we admit defeat".

    Rockstar should have done the right thing for all games everywhere and fought this out in court as a free speech issue, which it clearly is.

    Wont be long till we see other developers and publishers get sued, or worst of all banned or censored industry wide. If you though games were getting too many sequels and relying too much on franchise IP because publishers were not will to take risks, I can only imagine how much harder it will be to make original games with realistic content.

  10. Speaking of prejudice... by jermyjerm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a Miami Herald story about the issue:

    "American society is racist, even though there are antiracist laws," Lesly Voltaire, minister for Haitians living abroad, told The Herald. "It's based on a formerly slave-owning society, which has left its mark, and there are people who think they can make money on that racism."

    And it's not offensive and prejudicial when a government official from another country makes a judgement on an entire society based on a practice abolished over 100 years ago?

    The world makes me so mad, and this issue is just idiotic.

    --
    --- "Yeah, I'm a bit stressed out. I have a research paper due tomorrow and it has to be +5, Insightful."
  11. Two Words by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Free Speech.

    I know this will result in a discussion of "is it ok to make potentially racist material available to children?" but IMHO, that's where parenting comes in.

    --
    Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
  12. Manufacturers of Scrabble are next by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Giving low point scores to all the vowels is clearly racist" said Aiiiaoa Oaoaiuuii for the Hawaiian state prosecutor's office.

    World Scrabble champion Hzbrgzny Zgknyskqjz of Poland is rumoured to be a key witness for the defence at the trial.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Manufacturers of Scrabble are next by shadowcabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's not forget the Japanese delegates who were pissed that their proposed 4,000-tile kanji expansion was turned down.

      You can't make everybody happy. Deal with it.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  13. Replacement dialog? by Mister+Cookies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now that Rockstar has caved and announced that the dialog will be removed, what will it be replaced with? I mean, you can't just dump the player into a situation with no objective, that was the purpose of the phrase in question in the first place. In today's America, there is no proper solution. SOMEONE would find SOMETHING wrong with some little bit of something totally trivial, as they have here. Add in a bit of whining and complaining to some sympathetic politician, and nothing is safe.