Slashdot Mirror


GNOME Foundation Board Election Results

Anonymous BillyGoat writes "The results of the 2003 GNOME Foundation Elections have been announced. These are preliminary results, and will stand unless someone decides to challenge them. A notable exclusion from this year's list is Miguel De Icaza, whose candidacy application was rejected as it missed the deadline. In related news, barely a few weeks after the news of the death of GNOME hacker Chema Celorio in a sky diving accident, the GNOME community was shocked by the news of the sudden death of Evolution hacker Ettore Perazzoli."

16 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Excluded? by tds67 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Just makes the Gnome Foundation seem like a joke if they leave the founding member out.

    Considering the high mortality rate associated with being part of GNOME, it's probably a good thing.

  2. don't trust it by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't trust these results. They used Diebold machines.

  3. Re:Who gets to vote? by haystor · · Score: 5, Funny

    gnomes

    --
    t
  4. Re:Who gets to vote? by zomper514 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lawn Ornaments vote?

  5. SCO is to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    In related news, barely a few weeks after the news of the death of GNOME hacker Chema Celorio in a sky diving accident, the GNOME community was shocked by the news of the sudden death of Evolution hacker Ettore Perazzoli

    SCO is taking us out... one by one...

    I must post anon to protect myself from their "enforcers"

  6. Gnome by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aren't Gnomes and Trolls Related?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Gnome by strictnein · · Score: 4, Funny

      No no no...

      Gnomes steal your underwear.
      Trolls smell like your underwear.

      It's very easy to get the two confused...

      Although, now I'm confused. My definition directly relates them. They are connected through.... my underwear. Hmmm... must do more research on the subject.

  7. Re:Excluded? by The+Snowman · · Score: 3, Funny

    That was crude and tasteless, even by my standards -- and that's saying a lot.

    --
    24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  8. It is an official conspiracy now by segment · · Score: 3, Funny

    Two election based articles...One day? I think Slashdot is now trying to sway the vote.

    Vote No to proposal #4839562358096-2385178934569384560345934(a(b)(d)) titled "More Electoral Based Articles on Slashdot"

  9. Conspiracy theory by daserver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone seen Antitrust?

  10. Re:Who gets to vote? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1, Funny

    (1) Elections
    (2) ???
    (3) Profit!

  11. Myth #11 about open source by afternoon_nap · · Score: 4, Funny
    It will withstand the /. effect:

    Warning: Too many connections in /var/www/html/fast.php on line 4

    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in /var/www/html/fast.php on line 4 Unable to select database

    1. Re:Myth #11 about open source by pclminion · · Score: 2, Funny
      Warning: Too many connections in /var/www/html/fast.php on line 4

      Ahhh, shit, I knew I should have committed that faster.php I finished coding last night...

  12. Re:Excluded? by Lussarn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, like David Wexelblat of XFree. He is in the core team without even using XFree because he is a windows user now. Sounds smart.

  13. MOD PARENT DOWN!!!! by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 4, Funny

    > This is proof that moderation is broken

    Quick, he's on to us. Get this off the front page

  14. SCO's point of view by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 2, Funny
    An Open[*] letter by Darl McBride

    Dear Reuters,

    As of late many Linux-communists have complained of our efforts here at SCO (the owner of the UNIX operating system) to bring fairness and equality to the management of our Intellectual Property[**]. The Linux collective launched a denial of service attack on our web site earlier this week, and in doing so forced us into reciprocating with a return denial of service attack of our own. It is unfortunate that it has come to this, but we must take measures to protect our Intellectual Property[**] - it is not a choice we have made, but a course of action that we have been forced into. Our enforcers, Vinny and Spike, will continue to administer these denial of service attacks against Linux-terrorists in a freedom fighting effort for the good of all Intellectual Property ? our Intellectual Property[**] as well as the intellectual property of others[***].

    For a totally unbiased explanation of why our policy of DOS reciprocity is pro-America and good for everybody, please refer to the completely independent report by the Yankee Group's Laura Didio, who has not connection to SCO whatsoever and doesn't know anybody here and has never worked with any of us and is totally unbiased. Please quote her repeatedly as she is totally unbiased and doesn't even know us.

    Love,
    Darl McBride

    [*] This letter may be reprinted until January 1, 2004, for the nominal price of $699 provided that you can actually track down a SCO sales person that will actually sell you a license. After January 1, 2004, the price will return to the regular $1399, except that it actually won't.

    [**] I.e., all software composed of a sequence of zeros and/or ones.

    [***] I.e., all software not composed of a sequence and/or zeros or ones.