Slashdot Mirror


The Year In Ideas

popo writes "The New York Times Magazine has a review of the year's most original and interesting ideas. They include "The Tornado in a Can" ("A contained cyclone, it turns out, is very useful for pulverizing things") and David Stevenson's real-life proposal to dig to the center of the Earth. by sinking heavy iron through the Earth's mantle."

17 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Discover has almost the same article by meltoast · · Score: 4, Informative

    Discover Magazine has the "top 100 scientific achievements of '03". It also has the most convuluted index possible for said achievements!

    --
    if you don't feel better tomorrow, we'll just cut your legs off about here. - Theodoric of York
  2. there already is a slashdot story... by iamplupp · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...on the tornado in a can

  3. Re:Ahem by KrispyKringle · · Score: 4, Informative
    Probably because it wouldn't work as well. The idea behind the iron thing is apparently that once you get the initial crack going and fill it with molten iron, gravity just takes care of the rest. With a laser, you'd have togo farther and farther down with the crack, which could present an issue to your equipment when the temperature rises to 4000C. And if you don't, you lose power the farther you get from the drilling point.

    Plus, even if the laser heats the earth, it doesn't exert any force on it; the molten iron heats and then presses down on the crust to allow it to break through.

    I'm also not sure what a laser would accomplish once you break through the crust. Since at that point the temperature is already really hot, and the earth is, if I remember right, molten, the issue is presumably the pressure to get your probes down farther (which the iron accomplishes), not the ability to break through the earth itself.

  4. Picture/Mockup of actual Windhexe machine by bogie · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  5. The correct link by danila · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a more helpful link to the table of contents, not to the introduction.

    http://www.nytimes.com/pages/magazine/

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  6. Air Pollution? by Politburo · · Score: 4, Informative

    One thing I did not see in the comments on the original Tornado in a Can story is this:

    A garbage-processing plant in Pennsylvania will go online with its Windhexe next month; the machine can turn two tons of trash into one ton of sterile powder.

    Guess what. That other ton of material isn't getting destroyed. That doesn't happen. It's probably going into the air as (very tiny) solid particles. Now, since these particles are created from the very beginning of the process, are they also sterile? I would think not. I'm not saying this process is environmentally bad. I'm only saying that waste disposal never has a simple, clean solution.

    1. Re:Air Pollution? by chivo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually no. The other ton of "material" is probably just the water being evaporated during the breakdown process. It appears to be a closed system, so nothing is magically disappearing. On the other hand, I've only seen a couple of pictures so magical disappearances could be possible

      --
      Sometimes I feel like a nut... Ok so it's most of the time
    2. Re:Air Pollution? by random735 · · Score: 2, Informative

      it says the system removes moisture..any chance they're removing a ton (literally) of moisture from two tons of trash? doesn't seem impossible to me...water weighs alot.

  7. Re:Yeah, like we haven't fucked up the planet enou by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 5, Informative

    That article you posted says that fuck can only be used as an adjective, which u clearly did not do. I fail to see why you would bother citing evidence that doesnt even support your position.

    --
    -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
  8. Re:Breaking the laws of physics by Politburo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi. If you're serious, please see this thread.

  9. Re:Journey to the center of the earth by Absurd+Being · · Score: 3, Informative

    Using the Leidenfrost effect. The temperature of the iron will hold steady at whatever the melting point of iron is. Another blob of metal at the center of the iron will hold at its melting point. Continue with a couple more layers of shielding of this type, and your sensor pack can be held at an operable temperature for long enough to reach the center of the earth.

    --
    Karma: Excellent^(-t/Tau), Tau=Wittiness/Trollishness
  10. Tornado in a Can, industrial version by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    There's an industrial version installed at a University of Maryland agricultural test facility.

    This is basically a high-powered cyclone dryer. Cyclone dryers have been around for decades, but they're not usually run at power levels high enough to get grinding effects.

  11. one equals two for small values of two.... by jefu · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'd assume, given what else was said in the article that the other ton is mostly water (with traces of other volatile compounds).

    But somehow the powdered brocoli just doesn't seem right. "I say it's spinach and I say the hell with it."

    If it works as claimed though, I can think of lots and lots of uses for it. Like maybe you could build something like a rototiller out of it (though you probably would have to mix in some larger bits to keep the powder from turning into cement when it gets wet).

  12. real details here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.vortexdehydration.com/id28.htm

  13. Re:Breaking the laws of physics by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Informative
    We have a device that can turn several tons of various materials into zero tons of the same types of materials! It's called a space shuttle.

    Nobody said anything about conservation of weight....

  14. Re:billboards that watch you... rf noise? by jaoswald · · Score: 3, Informative

    The signal that is being picked up is not "noise" in the sense of "random noise" but rather "noise" in the sense of "unintentional emission."

    The signal that is being picked up is the "local oscillator" of the receiver in the car radio. Essentially, almost every radio receiver uses a heterodyne receiving technique. The incoming radio waves from all sources are "mixed" in a non-linear circuit with a "local oscillator" signal produce within the receiver. The non-linear nature of the mixing circuit means that signals appear at the frequencies which are the difference between the incoming radio waves and the LO frequency.

    For example, if you are tuning to FM frequency 104.1 MHz, the LO is tuned to a frequency of 114.8 MHz, creating a "copy" of the FM stations' signal at 10.7 MHz. This 10.7 MHz is called the "intermedicate frequency". Then, the actual circuitry to decode the radio modulation and create sound is designed to work off of the 10.7 MHz IF signal.

    That way, the actual tuning of the radio is done by changing the LO frequency over a range of about 90 MHz to 120 MHz, using digital synthesis techniques. The LO is a sine wave, so it is easy to generate. Whatever gets mixed to the 10.7 MHz gets turned into sound coming from your speakers.

    The way Mobiltrak appears to work is that most radios are not that well shielded, so the 114.8 MHz LO signal leaks out and can be detected by the Mobiltrak receiver. That LO signal contains no information, so it can't really tell if you are listening, but most people don't emit MHz signals from their car for any other reason.

  15. Re:Breaking the laws of physics by gooball · · Score: 2, Informative
    Wow, it's a device that violates conservation of mass!

    Mass isn't conserved, mass-energy is. See nuclear bombs. However one ton of mass becomes rather a lot of energy.