Slashdot Mirror


Winamp 2 + Winamp 3 = Winamp 5!

An anonymous coward writes: Having been a loyal iTunes user for quite some time, after seeing the report on Ars Technica about the newly released Winamp 5 Final, I simply had to try it out. It's pretty amazing, rivaling iTunes in many ways on Windows (mainly, speed). Ripping, library, etc: They're all there. Plus it comes with a slew of of new scriptable features. Simply put, it's dead sexy. Get your copy now! Note, last link requires some other OS.

9 of 896 comments (clear)

  1. 2.0 by Da+Fokka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm still using 2.whatever because it's faster than the newer versions, which have no additional features worth the speed decrease.

  2. Yes CmdrTaco... by Nos. · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Note, last link requires some other OS.
    Imagine that a product called Winamp requires windows.

  3. No video support in winamp 2?! by ooby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been watching videos in winamp 2 for a while. It even runs better than Windows Media Player, though sometimes it's upside-down. I don't think the reviewer ever tried to run video in winamp.

    And another thing: 4MB?
    Winamp 2 is 1MB. No, thanks. I'll stick with my winamp 2.

  4. MP3 patent by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you can't do a lot of things [in Winamp] (like ripping to MP3) unless you pay for the Pro version.

    MP3 is patented, and the patent holder is not willing to license encoders on royalty-free terms.

    iTunes is free, right?

    The iTunes client is proprietary, and the no-charge version's MP3 encoder licensing fees are presumably subsidized by QuickTime Pro revenue and Macintosh hardware revenue.

  5. long time? by Down8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't iTunes for Windows only drop a month or two ago? How does one count a month as being a "long time" user?

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  6. Actually... by citizenc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, if you were to actually READ THE OPTIONS ON THE DOWNLOAD PAGE (link), instead of just blindly clicking "submit", you would see the following options:

    Download the free player
    Select your operating system:

    [ ] Mac OS X v10.2.5-10.2.8
    [ ] Mac OS 8.6/9
    [ ] Win 98/Me/2000/XP
    [*] QuickTime and iTunes for Windows 2000/XP

    Perhaps you should concider reading the entire page before bitching about it on Slashdot. It makes you look like a jackass. :P

  7. Ah Nullsoft... by phildog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The company that AOL wants you to forget they own... Nullsoft releases cool software called Waste, AOL pulls plug almost instantly. Nullsoft releases cool software called AIMazing, AOL pulls plug almost instantly.

    I still use WinAmp, but this company no longer whips the llama's ass.

    --
    slashsearch.org - slashdot search. powered by google.
  8. Re:Link Broken by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Seems to work well enough from here, but on a slightly offtopic note, should anyone actually honour the referer header anymore? It's a horrendous privacy flaw.

    Horrendous privacy flaw? The heck? The only potential privacy flaw is that some stupid web site might encode private data using a GET request (a Bad Idea), and you might move from there to another untrustworthy site. But in the vast majority of cases all the web site learns is where you came from. Is that such a terrible secret? Getting a general sense of where people are coming from can be quite helpful for improving your web pages, understanding your audience, and reacting to changing circumstances (Am I under a DDOS attack, or did Slashdot link to me?).

    On a related note, if you're concerned about it, feel free to switch it off. A few people doing so really isn't a big deal. And if everyone actively choses to do it, so be it, but I think the web will be worse for it. If you run into problems accessing some poorly designed sites, I'm willing to yield that perhaps you should automatically set the referrer to the page you're retreiving (but I'd suggest visiting less brain-dead sites). But please don't change the referrer to something arbitrary like "Field protected by Outpost (http://www.RETARD-SOFTWARE-VENDER-NAME-HERE.com/) " You're just making a nuisance for the guy examining the logs. Don't be rude. The standard makes the field optional, if it bothers you, just don't send it.

  9. Re:Will NullSoft honor... by NullPhi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately, no.

    NullSoft is being really stupid on this issues. They have stated you paid for "WinAmp" and that this new product is "WinAmp Pro". You still have the ability to receive "WinAmp" for free, but not "WinAmp Pro".

    This is quite a poor decision -- especially since it will only affect a handful of users (and would not really put a dent in their sales).

    Yay for being greedy!