Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Linux 2.6 Kernel Pool Results

Posted by michael on from the lowered-expectations dept.

jafo writes "Steve Ratcliffe, Master Software Project Estimator, has most correctly estimated the release of the Linux version 2.6 kernel. On January 6, 2001 (within 4 hours of when the 2.6 kernel pool was opened), he entered a guess which was accurate within 15 hours. Check the results for some interesting statistics and submit your guess for the 2.8 pool." See the original story if you like.

17 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Missing Pool Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Duke Nukem: Forever release.

  2. At least Linus didn't win ... by FelixCat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since then we would have had proof the competition was fixed!

  3. Well, made my guess... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I'm not saying what it was. Otherwise everyone will want to vote for 29 September 2005!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  4. How are we supposed to do it? by Storm · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...With no LOTR releases slated for 2005...

    Quick, somebody call Peter Jackson. Get him working on a Silmarillion release for December 2005...

    --
    --Storm
  5. Guess in the past by Piggymon · · Score: 5, Funny

    First guess submitted on 2001-01-06
    Most optimistic guess: 2001-01-05 by Bill Segall
    Bill, you're a GENIUS!

  6. Link for 2.8 guess is wrong by sparkes · · Score: 4, Informative

    This link adds a guess for the 2.6 release. Anyone getting this wrong after the event deserves to lose ;-)

    --
    blog and junk
    1. Re:Link for 2.8 guess is wrong by PieEye · · Score: 4, Informative

      It says that you're voting for 2.8, however the submission response page incorrectly states 2.6. You're voting for 2.8, and they'll correct the page eventually.

      --
      ... in bed.
  7. Interesting statistics... by cperciva · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you exclude the guesses which are obviously jokes (eg, 2038), then 96% of the guesses were optimistic. Obviously some elements of proprietary software development still hold true in OSS.

    Also amusing: The median guess was April 1, 2002.

    --
    Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
  8. Finally! by Guano_Jim · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for, one, have been waiting for a swimming pool that can run Linux.

    --
    3D Printing Tips and Tricks at Zheng3.com
    1. Re:Finally! by foobsr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here you have it ... http://truetex.com/poolcontrol.htm

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  9. SCO will tell us by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just ask McBride when he'll release the 2.8 kernel.

  10. Diebold Machines? by PincheGab · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lemme guess... The kernel pool thing was run on Diebold voting machines, right? Give himself a 15 hour discrepancy to not make it look suspicious yet still win... No paper trail... hmmmm...

  11. optimistic or stupid? by gosand · · Score: 4, Funny
    Most optimistic guess: 2001-01-05 19:36:18-07 by Bill Segall

    Considering that the pool started on 2001-01-06,
    "(First guess submitted on 2001-01-06 08:43:00 UTC by Ian Davis)"
    could this really be considered optimistic, or just plain stupid?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  12. Now this is an evil idea! by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine this, some hacker who takes part in kernel development submits a date, then sabotages the kernel, submits broken modules, introduces bugs, breaks stuff and keeps all the patches on his own harddisk. And finally, when kernel would be ready if not his own purposedly made bugs, he submits his patches one day before his "guessed date" and the kernel is released within next 24 hours, within 2h from his guess and four months later than it could've been released.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Now this is an evil idea! by mhesseltine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While this seems funny, I doubt it would work for one simple reason; if someone is submitting bad patches, breaking modules, etc., I would hope that Linus, Alan, Marcello, (insert maintainer here) would quit accepting this person's patches.

      After all, that's what the reputation game is all about. Those with talent are revered, those without are shunned until they can prove themselves worthy (probably through a stand-alone project).

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  13. What about the GNU/HURD Poll? by miracle69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone run a release poll on that?

    I wonder if Vegas has odds. If it does, I'd take the over.

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  14. Unfair advantage by kbielefe · · Score: 5, Funny
    Proprietary software managers have an unfair advantage in this pool. After all, for a living they make release schedules before anyone knows what the new software is actually going to do.

    The schedule says we need to finish this in 6 months, but your estimates add up to a year so you'll have to do some stuff in parallel.
    Uh, sir, it will still take just as long unless you hire some more staff. Even then, it will take some extra time for training.
    But you said these modules were completely independent. You should be able to do two independent tasks in the same amount of time as one. Look how easy it is to schedule it that way in Microsoft Project.
    Well, then why don't we all just do 12 at once so it will be done in a month instead of a year?
    Don't be silly, it doesn't work that way. The schedule says six months. Boy, for how good you engineers are at algebra and calculus, you sure don't understand the basic mathematics of business.
    --
    This space intentionally left blank.