Slashdot Mirror


Oldest Supported Software?

Dave Santek writes "In development since the early 1970s, the McIDAS [Man computer Interactive Data Access System] software celebrated its 30th anniversary in October 2003. McIDAS is used to integrate and visualize weather information. The software was originally run on a Datacraft /5 and has gone through 4 major hardware configuration changes over the last 30 years. It is a supported software package that remains in use at more than 100 locations worldwide. A history of the first 25 years (pdf) is available. A freeware version of the software is also available."

10 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. some xmas cheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    better !pout !cry
    better watchout
    lpr why
    santa claus town

    cat /etc/passwd > list
    ncheck list
    ncheck list
    cat list | grep naughty > nogiftlist
    cat list | grep nice > giftlist
    santa claus town

    who | grep sleeping
    who | grep awake
    who | grep bad || good
    for (goodness sake) {
    be good
    }

  2. Re:Here's another ancient one that DOES impact you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The Plain View displays (by Raytheon) in the early '70s had an anticipated lifetime of 1015 years; those in the centers today are now at least 10 years past this estimate.

    1015 years, wow

  3. Re:Here's another ancient one that DOES impact you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    With an anticipated lifetime of 1015 years I guess we have nothing to worry about!

  4. Re:Here's another ancient one that DOES impact you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    1015 years, wow

    They were working off an earlier estimate that there would only be a dozen or so computers in the world...

  5. Penny Lane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Is in my hears and in my eyes.

    27th Post!

  6. WARNING, SLASHDOT NOW TIES AC COMMENTS WITH USER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    WARNING, SLASHDOT NOW TIES AC COMMENTS WITH USER
    (Use a disposable account from a disposable IP before moderating this up. Editors generally watch and see who moderates controversial things like this up.)

    When you are logged in, /. ties your user account to any Anonymous Coward postings you make... Thus they know who posted it. To demonstrate this:
    1. Get mod points.
    2. Post an AC comment while logged in
    3. Change your dynamic ip, clear all cookies
    4. Log back in and try to moderate your AC comment... you can't!!!

    Please *log out* AND use another browser before making your AC comments.
    Your UID is being tracked, it's not Anonymous. Lots of people post lots of things to Slashdot as AC only because they believe it is really anonymous - it isn't. They hunt "trolls" (non-karma whores and non-group thinking bots) down.

    This is true. I used to be a bit more freestyle and witty AC and be a nice guy logged in [basically a karma whore]. After a short while, I could no longer moderate. Slashdot does brand AC posts with IP and then map them back to users. They lie about AC, AC doesn't exist if you re-use ip addresses.

    Big brother is watching. So while I might be a "troll" a lot of the AC things I said were to protect myself from Slash-bot groupthink. They punished me for voicing my opinion freestyle.

    They also revoke moderation FOREVER - $rtbl it is called, for any moderations of any post that have been secretly flagged annoying [Slashcode has hidden flags viewable by editors]. If you *EVER* mod up something an editor secretly marked annoying you NEVER moderate again, ever - ever even if your karma is capped.

    Also, Slashdot uses the friends system to track "trolls." Mark a troll you find funny as a friend *bang* $rtbl never to moderate ever again. My real account had many many good friends who had good karma, and a few funny trolls later, no more moderation for that account. Again, Slashdot is spying on its users to make the people who find certain things funny uneligible to moderate. You will never moderate again if you are a friend of a "foe or freak" of an editor.

    FACT: This is in Slashcode CVS

    Revision 1.7.2.5 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Thu Feb 8 13:12:32 2001 UTC (2 years, 9 months ago) by pudge
    Branch: bender
    CVS Tags: v1_1_3_0
    Changes since 1.7.2.4: +18 -7 lines
    Diff to previous 1.7.2.4 to branchpoint 1.7

    log more AC info


    So AC is a scam here. Hitler-Malda screws AC posts in the caboose. So now all you can do is go 100% AC, or , as they expect you to, KARMA WHORE. And it is so lame and unfair and probably illegal as they lie about anonymity.

    Also, sometimes when certain information becomes an active thread, they bitchslap the thread much later so that people think its "safe" to participate and the whole thing gets slapped.

    There is a presumption anonymous means something. They lie like rugs to the posting public by using the word anonymous. It is not. They brazenly lie though and the un-assuming poster is having everything he says correlated with him and stored in a computer just waiting to be subpoenaed by the people that Slashdot claims to hate but works for. They work for the fascist forces and components of the US government. I like the US and other Western governments but they have good and bad components - there are things you need to do to protect yourself from the bad components. Basically "covering your ass" so to speak. At Slashdot, in lying about AC, un-protects its posting public (seeding a de-anonymizing privacy stripping pandemic in their own "little" way). This makes Slashdot a very dangerous target for you the posters to have your "anonymous" information subpoenaed and you to be chased down and persecuted for speaking your mind. I think that it is a joke Slashdot editors post about SCO, MSFT, RIAA, MPAA, TIA, FBI, etc. They do the same fascist big-brotherly things that those companies do the

  7. Youngest Unsupported Software? by mod_parent_down · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I know it's off-topic, but anyone have a vote for the youngest unsupported software?

    And to avoid MS-bashing, I mean officially unsupported... not just crappy support like you get with Office 2003

  8. Shocking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    a) that is not my ass
    b) it's not huge, it's just four inches

    Glad to clarify things.

    1. Re:Shocking news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
  9. Re:Here's another ancient one that DOES impact you by TheBeardIsRed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The Plain View displays (by Raytheon) in the early '70s had an anticipated lifetime of 1015 years; those in the centers today are now at least 10 years past this estimate.

    I believe he meant 10-15 years. In that case 10 years past that would be 25 and thus correct.

    I realize that most of you caught that, but i'm sure others didn't.