Slashdot Mirror


The Matrix Trailers, Reloaded and Re-Encoded

dark_lotus writes "The fine folks at The Matrix website, have re-encoded all 9 trailers from the original Matrix, bumped up the resolution and uploaded them for us to enjoy, including a never before released trailer. Also included, all the missing Reloaded and Revolutions Trailers and TV Spots - all now available to download."

54 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I did that last night to the actual movies, which are now availiable (sic) to download from a P2P client near you.

    *Spoiler warning*
    The second and third movies are shit.

    1. Re:That's nothing by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I did that last night to the actual movies, which are now availiable (sic) to download from a P2P client near you.

      *Spoiler warning*
      The second and third movies are shit.


      Moderated -1, Troll?! Who was the humorless geek who moderated this down? It's funny, dammit... even the second bit.

      More importantly, it seems every post in this thread that dares criticise the Matrix sequels is getting marked down, troll or not.

      The third Matrix movie sucked (not the second IMHO)- you're entitled to disagree, but it's what a lot of people honestly think, like it or not.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:That's nothing by nehril · · Score: 4, Insightful

      2 and 3 were actually good stories told poorly. They were pretty deep and all the nonsense dialog actually DOES make sense once you see all three and spend some time thinking about it.

      there are some quite brilliant concepts in there that are unfortunately told by the worst possible storytelling (in stark contrast to the first, where the storytelling was so excellent that everything is understood right away).

      you have to really think about what is happening, have a little bit of grounding in physics/philosophy, AND keep in mind that there are no truly wasted scenes (yes, the train station scene was NOT wasted. think about what you learned in it.)

    3. Re:That's nothing by fbg111 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      people who don't normally read these kinds of things get sucked in, and the leave having discovered an entire new world. Unfortunately, they think that because the world is new to them, it must be new to everybody.

      If it achieved exactly that and nothing more, then it accomplished a worthy mission. Do you have any idea how many Americans (at least) there are that read and have an understanding of philosophy, even as presented in the Matrix? That's right, about a relative handful. If this movie did anything to improve that number, then I say bravo!

      On a side note, it seems a lot of people criticize these movies for being redundant in their investigation of our perception of reality. Yes, perhaps it has been done before, but I think the Wachowski's deserve credit for their chosen method of doing so. The concept of the Matrix turned out to be a perfect way of showing (not telling, as my high-school lit teacher admonished us) that our "interface" with reality consists of a nervous system based on electrical impulses, and can conceivably be manipulated, or hacked if you will.

      Further, what was more interesting to me was the conflict of determinism vs. choice, or materialism vs. idealism. That also happened to be the underlying conflict of the Cold War, for anyone who knows anything about Marxism, Soviet Communism, and the Enlightenment ideals of America and the West. I found it most enjoyable to see that conflict played out in the setting of the Matrix: man vs. machine; absolute determinism vs. absolute free will. Since Reloaded and Revolutions dealt more with that conflict, while The Matrix dealt mostly with the nature of reality, I enjoyed the second two movies just as much, and more in Reloaded's case, than the first.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    4. Re:That's nothing by Slarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's kinda funny, I thought had become pretty accepted now that the original rocked and the sequels sucked. Although you're right, Revolutions was (aside from a few cool sequences) much more of a let-down than Reloaded was. And Reloaded was... well, it wasn't a bad movie, but it was so vastly far outside the scope of the original movie that I think people were a bit shocked. It's kind of like comparing LOTR to The Hobbit... same world, waaaaaaay larger scope. Although LOTR worked, Revolutions mostly didn't.

      Anyway... is anyone else noticing that the newly re-encoded trailers are a bit disappointing in terms of quality? I've watched a couple of the quicktime ones, and the quality is more like decently captured NTSC than anything else. When I saw "bumped up resolution" I was hoping for the 1000x540 pixels that the Reloaded trailer was released in, with the same frickin' amazing quality. Now THAT was a trailer. Anyone got that lying around? (trailer_final_1000_dl.zip) I don't anymore, and I'd love to have a copy!

      --
      Hi... I'm Larry... the shivering chipmunk... brrrrr!... I'm cold... I need a sweater...
  2. Little late... by (trb001) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't this lose a little meaning when not only have the movies come out, but 2/3 of them are on DVD?

    --trb

    1. Re:Little late... by big_groo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seems to me that a box set is on the way...

    2. Re:Little late... by gustgr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of people like to collect good encoded videos on their PC [I am one of them]. It is nice to collect and it is cheaper than buying DVDs, at least in contries under development like mine [Brazil] where DVDs [Region 4] takes several months to get on retail and are very expensives.

  3. Won't last for long by dicepackage · · Score: 3, Funny

    This site is about to be brought to its knees

    1. Re:Won't last for long by Pingular · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This site is about to be brought to its knees
      No. Even when the superbowl trailer was released the site didn't even slow down. I downloaded the whole trailer at 200kb/s.
      They're on the AOL pipes

      --

      When anger rises, think of the consequences.
      Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    2. Re:Won't last for long by ejito · · Score: 4, Funny
      No. Even when the superbowl trailer was released the site didn't even slow down. I downloaded the whole trailer at 200kb/s. They're on the AOL pipes
      Ah, mentioning AOL doesn't help your argument ;/
  4. Whoever did it by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Whoever hit them with the clue-bat, THANK YOU! Even though they're not making money (directly) off the release of these high quality trailers, it is at least a generous offer to fans/collectors. I can't count how many companies have stuff like this sitting around and decide "oh hey, if we put it on a a Super Extended Platinum Edition dvd, they'll buy the whole thing over again!"

    Thank you for actually doing something nice for fans for once Hollywood.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Whoever did it by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's an excellent point - at first, I didn't see this as a big deal, but you're right that this sort of material usually ends up as DVD filler anyway. You're starting to see studios take a more enlightened attitude towards using the internet as a medium for engaging fans (i.e. the LotR films' cooperation with fan sites), which is a very good thing...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  5. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why would you download all of the trailers, when you can simply purchase the movies, barring the latest? Is this a recent fad, hoarding "previews"?

    1. Re:Why? by Morgahastu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because the trailers were better than the actual movie.

    2. Re:Why? by musikit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because "TRAILER" means after the movie.

      ohh how i wish this were true. then maybe when it says the movie starts at 5:30 i know i should actually try to get there on time. in my theater they started RotK 20 minutes late with more commercials and trailers then ever. actually let me restate that. the listed time was 5:30. previews/trailers/commercials all started at 5:50. if i wanted commercials i'd watch TV.

    3. Re:Why? by Chibi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why would you download all of the trailers, when you can simply purchase the movies, barring the latest? Is this a recent fad, hoarding "previews"?


      Well, I keep a few trailers on my computer at work. Just to play when I'm bored or going out of my mind because of work (did I just repeat myself there? ;).

      My work computer doesn't have a DVD-ROM drive, and I don't have a portable player. Not to mention, I'd rather not carry my DVDs all over the place, lest they get damaged or stolen.

      Yeah, it's not a huge deal, but, then again, we're talking about movie trailers, so none of this topic is really a big deal. :)

      --
      If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
  6. Hmmmm.... Nice. by ejito · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, that never released trailer is quite stylish. Wonder why it wasn't released? Well, I guess it does seem to give away a lot of the action. The final trailers for Revolutions pretty much gave away everything, though. So, meh.

  7. What's the point ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have I missed something ?

    I mean, what's the bloody point of creating a new trailer for a film that's long been released ?

    Surely the point of a trailer is to advertise the film ?

    What a complete waste of time. Of course, there will still be some sad geeks that just have to download it and go 'oooo' and 'wow !!', and 'look at that !' for reasons best known to them and their damp tissues.

    1. Re:What's the point ? by The+Dobber · · Score: 5, Funny

      I mean, what's the bloody point of creating a new trailer for a film that's long been released ?


      Some people believe that if you beat it long enough, the dead horse will respond.

  8. Theatrical Trailer/Broken Link by Veovis · · Score: 5, Informative
    The "Theatrical Trailer" download links to the Superbowl trailer, to get the CORRECT file for Theatrical Trailer the link is

    http://progressive.warnerbros.com/thematrix/us/med /matrix_tr_theatrical_640_dl.zip

  9. Sure, they make pretty good trailers by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if only those people would learn how to make a good movie!

  10. unreleased trailer by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Funny
    I hear in the unreleased trailer, Triniti's nipple pops out while she's in bullet time!

    ............crap....why did my download just die?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:unreleased trailer by Chapium · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, the inspiration for a Matrix themed porno begins...

  11. Just makes me think by OgreChow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After watching the trailers for the original, having not seen the first movie for a couple of years now, it set me to thinking. Imagine how much cooler the final two movies would have been if Neo had started the revolution of the Matrix from the inside, instead of from the outside.

    Converting people on the inside, gaining an army of followers battling the system.

    1. Re:Just makes me think by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Technically, Neo didn't start the revolution from the outside... He didn't start any revolution. To most people in the film, he was just a guy with nifty powers, who didn't show up for the final act. Seeing as how he died before he could tell anyone what he was doing, they probably thought he was full of hot air. Maybe Morpheous' prophecy of the joining of humans and machines will convince people that Neo is responsible. Maybe not.

      Personally, I wanted to watch the machines destroy the giant matrix server in order to get rid of Neo, with Neo flipping through subsystems trying to avoid the path of destruction. Of course, I also wanted the producers to ignore the whole flying at the end of the first movie thing, claiming metaphoric license, and I wanted the second movie to, you know, advance the plot.

      I guess like the unofficial Star Wars prequels, a fan's work is never done.

    2. Re:Just makes me think by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 4, Interesting

      had started the revolution of the Matrix from the inside, instead of from the outside.

      Converting people on the inside, gaining an army of followers battling the system.


      Which is exactly what Smith did. Makes you think about the convo between Neo and the Oracle:

      Neo: What is he?
      Oracle: He's you.

      I think once all three are out, and can be watched back to back, there will be a better appreciation for the series. I recently re-watched Revolutions (in IMAX! Woo hoo!) and picked up on a lot of things that I missed the first time. Same goes with repeat viewings of Reloaded.

      I think people just wanted a slam-bang action movie with guns and martial arts and cool effects (like the first). Though, knowing the /. crowd, had it been that all we'd be talking about is how 'trite' it was and how they 'basically remade the first movie' and blah blah blah.

  12. Re:WARNING! LINK REDIRECTS TO GOASTE.CX! MOD DOWN! by Veovis · · Score: 5, Funny
    *sigh*

    considering the post shows the actual domain in [brackets.com], you'll see there is no goaste.cx or whatever the site is

  13. Are you kidding? by *weasel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they're in CYA mode trying to 'reload' any interest in their franchise while they try to cobble together the Revolutions dvd.

    the interest in their films fell way off, and so they're trying to generate some positive press and keep the core fanbase interested.

    This is anything but selfless. They still have a dvd to sell that, judging by the attendance, not so many people care to buy at the moment.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:Are you kidding? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "they're in CYA mode trying to 'reload' any interest in their franchise while they try to cobble together the Revolutions dvd. the interest in their films fell way off, and so they're trying to generate some positive press and keep the core fanbase interested. This is anything but selfless. They still have a dvd to sell that, judging by the attendance, not so many people care to buy at the moment."

      This is a very valid point, but realize that this kind of stuff would normally end up as Extras on the upcoming DVD. I never doubted that this is advertising and a blatant attempt to build up some hype, but I credit them with the fact that they are giving it away for free as opposed to having the balls to try to charge for it like everybody else has been doing.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  14. Torrents? by Seek_1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If anyone is able to grab them and start a Torrent, I'd be more than happy to join up..

  15. Just Watch the Trailers by superdan2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can get the entire plot of the movie with all the deep thoughts and ambiguity by watching the short trailers as opposed to sitting through the whole movie where everything gets ruined by the script.

    And suckage is easier to deal with in small doses.

    --
    blog |
  16. Peter Jackson - learn from this by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Come on, put the "extended" stuff from RoTK up for download when the cinematic DVD comes out. You can include a special password with the cinematic DVD if you like.

    People will still buy your extended DVD if they want it all on one disc (not forgetting the high quality plastic Denethor figurine in the Collectors' Edition), but they won't be forced to pay $$$ for something they only want to see half an hour of.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  17. Bandwidth by NiTr|c · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is everyone still asleep? For some reason I'm actually able to see the page and download the trailer at higher than 500 bytes per second. Something is wrong, very very wrong.

    --
    Try actually thinking for yourself. It's quite refreshing.
  18. Matrix Revolutions according to Jon Stewart by Isca · · Score: 2, Funny
    It Bloooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwsssss

    I swear, the slamming he gave it the day after Revolutions came out has to be one of the funniest daily shows lines this year. He kept harping on it for the rest of that week. Everytime me or my wife hear someone mention the matrix, we both end up looking at each other and saying "It Bloooooooowwws" for giggles.

    -chris

  19. Doesn't work by TrekkieGod · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You can't "convert" people on the inside. Until they are freed, agents are able to take over their body. It's why, in the first movie, Switch holds a gun to Neo during the entire time they're driving to see Morpheus. It's the reason for the "lady in red" training. It's the reason why, when Neo was running from Smith at the end of the first movie, and he ran into this really crowded place, he uttered "shit".

    Now, sure...you can free a whole bunch of people (which Neo did...Morpheus mentions in reloaded more people had been freed in the past 6 months then had been in the past 6 years). Then you could send them all into the matrix to fight...what? The rest of the humans still plugged in? The very people you're trying to save? Heck, you'd need way too many hovercrafts to get these people up to broadcast depth, all to do something Neo can do on his own. Inside the matrix, he rules. If he can't handle something, no amount of "normal" people can. The only thing Neo was incapable of handling on a pure fight was Smith, and Smith has shown his ability to copy himself even into people that have been freed from the matrix (ie, Bane).

    But yeah...I know what you mean. It would be much cooler to have a whole bunch of really good fight scenes inside the matrix than the whole boring Zion fight. Then again, I know a whole bunch of other people who think the exact opposite, were really tired of the wire-fu, and really liked the Zion battle.

    I could live either way. All I needed was an explanation of what the heck happened. In an all-fantasy story like Lord of the Rings, anything goes...it's fantasy. With the matrix, the first matrix set the boundaries--the reason Neo can do all those things is because he's inside a computer program, and he can change the program somehow. Then, with Revolutions they pulled the whole "the power of the one extends beyond this world" thing. Why? The power of the one was changing the code of the matrix, what other power does he have that allows him to do things outside the matrix? Really, I wouldn't care how they approached the revolution, I just wanted a coherent storyline.

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  20. Here's the Torrent - http://www.filerush.com/torre by AIX-Hood · · Score: 5, Informative
  21. uh.... by caomania · · Score: 2, Funny

    slow news day

  22. Of Serials: Matrix, ROTK, and Harry Potter by Effugas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So it's kind of interesting.

    As of late, there's been a resurgence in so-called "franchise" movies, where the funding for and expectation of a sequel is a foregone conclusion during the production process. Recently, we've seen three variants of this:

    A) Lord Of The Rings, which filmed all three episodes in one monster shoot, then spent a year between each tweaking for maximum quality.

    B) The Matrix Trilogy, which filmed the second and third episode in a less-monstrous shoot, and originally planned to unveil the conclusion a mere three months after the return. Tweaking was not originally planned for.

    C) Harry Potter, which does not appear to begin production of the next chapter until the previous movie has finished its theatrical run.

    Given these three case studies, it's worth noting that two of them (LOTR and HP) have their plotlines and characters fully fleshed out from day one, far in advance of movie production. Meanwhile, The Matrix sequels were written in response to the success of the original, meaning the third one got a screenplay before the second saw any public scrutiny.

    I think this was the problem.

    Unlike LOTR and HP, which had a healthy community of readers who could be tapped to determine which parts were most interesting and which parts could be sacrificed to the cutting room floor, the Wachowski's flew blind when concluding their series. They tried to show everything they could do, rather than explore the dimensions people were most interested in. When they realized their conclusion answered none of the new questions people couldn't help but ask -- they had no opportunity to recover their loss, save to push a worldwide release.

    It's sad, too. Matrix Revolutions should have been a revolution inside the Matrix; the humans taking over their own virtual world, perhaps saving their own, perhaps abandoning it to the machines. Fundamentally, it should have been about the many within, not the grungy escapees. And so many interesting opportunities were abandoned...the spoon from the Matrix showing up in Zion, for instance. E

    I don't know what happened. But I do know -- the serial format has brought some astonishing successes, and alot of money -- but when it fails, it seems to fail big.

    Yours Truly,

    Dan Kaminsky
    DoxPara Research
    http://www.doxpara.com

  23. Re:Of Serials: Matrix, ROTK, and Harry Potter by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 3, Informative
    The HP schedule is in trouble...film 3 isn't going to be out until June 2004 (the first two were released in Nov 2001 and Nov 2002) and the cast are ageing at a speed only schoolkids can. It's unlikely that film 7, if it's ever made, will be able to use the same Harry, Hermione and Ron unless they're *very* baby-faced twentysomethings.

    Besides, can you think of *any* film franchise that has gone beyond 3 without sucking a very large one? Please, no-one say Police Academy.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  24. Re:Of Serials: Matrix, ROTK, and Harry Potter by Carbonite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Besides, can you think of *any* film franchise that has gone beyond 3 without sucking a very large one?

    James Bond. The 21st film is planned for release in 2005.

    --
    ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
  25. Re:Of Serials: Matrix, ROTK, and Harry Potter by faxe · · Score: 3, Informative

    maybe i get you wrong, but if you knew the books you would know that one book=one year, so one movie a year (more or less) would exactly display the right ageing with the actors.

    --
    fx! kicking and screaming
  26. Re:Whatever happened to Revolutions? by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's because it flopped. It was horrible, why would they spend money advertising something that failed so horribly.

    Yeah, if only I could have such a failure.

    Reloaded
    Revolutions

    And let me stop you before you go nattering on about how it doesn't matter how much money it made, it was still a flopped and it sucked and I hated it and people that liked it are dumb. That's an opinion, and you're entitled to it. The movie was a financial success, if not a critical one, and my opinion has always been that critical review is flaky and insubstantial anyway. Critics hated the Wizard of Oz when it came out.

    Kind of like /., where we hate everything. :)

    Bottom line, I liked it, a lot of people didn't which is understandable. I'll be buying the boxed set when it comes out and keeping 'GLMatrix' as my screensaver and sporting my "I took the red pill" shirt proudly.

  27. Re:cool by daquake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Never before released? The Mirage Trailer was the ONLY trailer I saw for the original MAtrix and I have a copy of it in my movies folder, what are the Wachowski's smoking now.. sheesh.

    --
    Be True, Unbeliever
  28. Trailers done by slashdotters? by WalterSobchak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did anyone else think, in the "missing trailer", when they showed the text 'In 1999 The Matrix Has You'

    "Shouldn't that be 'In Soviet Russia'?"

    Could not resist, sorry.

    Alex

    --
    Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder
  29. That's not what we're looking for. by biendamon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're looking for a cohesive plot, believable characters, and (on the geeky side) well-integrated special effects that don't distract us from the story, not an excuse for the movie-makers to bludgeon us over the heads with their cleverness.

    I see in the Reloaded and Revolutions the same problems I see in Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones: A big idea, executed poorly.

    In the first Matrix, parallels with mythical/historical figures were obvious. Neo was a Christ-like figure, Morpheus a prophet, and Cypher a Judas. But Neo was also a conflicted hacker, Morpheus had a personality containing something besides bombast, and Cypher was an interesting villain in his own right. In other words, the characters were certainly analogues for other characters, but they were also themselves. They had senses of humour, they could love and hate, they had weaknesses and strengths, and were, for lack of a better word, human.

    Then came Reloaded, and all of that was lost. The parallels between the characters and figures went from subtle to painfully transparent, and the characters stopped being themselves. They were cardboard representations of the archetypes they were meant to represent.

    What made the first Matrix so compelling was the human element, which was lost in the sequels. Instead, we got Link and his wife as sort of an afterthought, and they are utterly forgettable. We have the guy I can only think of as "Spoon-boy," whose dialogue was so painful to watch I almost asked for my money back. We have Morpheus going from desperate searcher to religious zealot, while the commander who doesn't believe him (the only person in Zion with an ounce of common sense) portrayed as a one-dimensional obstacle to truth and light and all that crap.

    These movies were bad. I mean BAD. But the worst thing about them was that the story concept was still good.

    My suspicion is that the Wachowski brothers suffer from the same problem George Lucas does now. No one will tell them "uhh, guys, this dialogue sucks!" Or better yet "why don't you guys stick to directing and coming up with plotline, and let other people do the writing." Or even "for the love of god, guys, let an editor have a crack at this tripe!"

  30. ***HUGE SPOILER ALERT*** by nehril · · Score: 5, Informative

    Major Matrix 3 Spoiler alert: you have been warned.

    what did we learn in the train station scene?
    1. there is an outer computer world that is much like the matrix, where the machine programs live.

    2. they combine to produce new mental "offspring," the mother and dad figures. they do NOT reproduce via cloning, like agent smith does. Societies of perfect (agent smith-like) clones can fail to a single infection/problem (see Ghost in the Shell for more on this, pretty sure the comics-crazy watchowski brothers did). that's why agent smith is a fundamental threat against the machines. Smith gains the ability to break the rules and ignore "kill" and "do not clone" signals, which is exactly what Neo learned in #1 in order to become The One.

    3. there is a link between the outer world and the Matrix human playpen/pigsty that is tightly controlled but also subject to a black market (the frenchman likes his kicks, and sells them to others)

    4. program offspring in the outer matrix must already have a reason to exist, otherwise they are terminated. the matrix is a bit of a legal backwater where unneeded programs can live and perhaps FIND a purpose ("what good is a newborn babe?")

    5. misc. other: the "eyes of the oracle", why are the so important? the oracle is one of the two designers of the matrix. she knows the state of everything in it (omniscient in a way that is not possible in the real world due to heisenberg). She also has a deep understanding of humans, and can usually predict what they will do. this is the nature of her "fortune telling." it is not perfect, human choices sometimes are unpredictable (this is the fundamental flaw in the matrix according to the Architect). She also "cannot see past the choices we don't understand." If she doesn't understand a decision fully, she cannot predict it's outcome.

    This plays back to the Frenchman's longwinded speech in 2: action-reaction. He believes that if you poke a human a certain way, you can predict the response. we have no free will, we are just deterministic biological computers (he demonstrates this with the chocolate cake.) so he seeks knowlege, and ultimately control via gaining the "eyes of the oracle," which must allow the owner to see all of the matrix from a "programmer with debugger tool" perspective.

    however, the oracle knows that perfect knowlege of the world and it's history DOES NOT give one perfect prescience. whatever drives human free will (choice) is sometimes unpredictable. we are NOT deterministic creatures.

    And for the final mega spoiler theory: smith and neo cannot kill each other at the end of #3. they both know it, they can both ignore kill signals. smith infects neo, then Neo *chooses to die*!!! smith cannot avoid this internal kill signal. all his clones fall prey to the same signal. they *all* die. smith even with the oracle's powers can not have known that trinity had died in the real world and that neo would choose follow her in death. so he could not forsee beyond that choice he did not understand. (if trinity were alive, neo probably would not have made that choice).

    End of Class.

  31. Re:Of Serials: Matrix, ROTK, and Harry Potter by glwtta · · Score: 2, Informative
    James Bond. The 21st film is planned for release in 2005.

    I'll agree that it's gone beyond 3 without sucking, but the last few really leave a lot to be desired.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  32. Matrix Revolutions Plot Summary by mac+os+ken · · Score: 5, Funny
    Morpheus: **its going to hit the fan. The fan an obvious metaphor for Zion.

    Neo: Woah.

    Morpheus: But we've known that since the first movie.

    ...a few minutes later...

    Zion is being attacked. The next hour and a half consists of:
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting the wall.
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting robots.
    "Accidental Friendly Fire." (The guy owed me a few bucks.)
    Shooting robots.
    Shooting bigger robots.

    Neo: I know how to save Zion. I have to login to the kernal and see if he'll grant me root/admin privileges.

    LOGIN: Neo
    PASSWORD: trinitywaseasy

    (Neo clicks Apple > Restart.)
    The End!
    Honestly I don't care about "High Resolution" trailers and other propoganda if the actual content is crap.

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  33. This is what Hollywood is good at... by zosa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...creating trailers. They have become masters of great-looking, action-packed 30 to 60-second spots for movies that are generally pretty poor.

  34. Harry Potter at 50 by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to see them keep using the same actors. I want to see Hermione dealing with menopause ("Alanda heat flashus!"), Ron in rehab, and Harry struggling with 2 failed marriages and a soul crushing job as head school custodian.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  35. The Asstrix by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see it now, "The Asstrix - How deep does the butthole go?". Starring Ron Jeremy as Morpheus.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  36. That's what we all wanted by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You pretty much described the sequels we were all expecting, particularly after the phone conversation at the end of the first film.

    We were all looking forward to an incredible sequel involving Neo freeing the people Matrix world as the Agents and whatever else tried desperately to stop him, and then the entire freed world tackling the machines in the third film and destroying their captors in ultimate victory. Neo was supposed to be the superhero to end all superheroes.

    However, the sequels decided to obssess about the destruction of Zion and treat the Matrix and its people as just another environment and not the objective, like in the first film. Not only is this surprising and boring, but it completely removed the resonance the first movie had. We connected with the message of the first movie because we feel like we're in a controlled Matrix, and on some level, we question that reality. The Matrix inhabitants were us.

    We don't feel like we're in a cave underground dancing in the mud as people tell us the machines are coming. I never gave a shit about Zion, not even in the first movie, in which it's just a plot point to explain the existence of rebels and why Morpheus is captured.

    Along with that, they removed the machines as the main enemy and out of nowhere replaced it with Smith clones. Matrix Revolutions felt like it had no payoff.

    Meanwhile, ROTK spends an extra 20 minutes making sure you felt like it was worth it sticking through all three long movies, and I adored all the resolutions it gave us. No deeper message about the flaws of humanity, no innumerable layers of philosophical and religious context to dig through to understand the story...just themes of courage and friendship and the pain of war, and the battle of good and evil. Matrix Revolutions feels so cold and dreary and hollow now.

    It's so sad that various fan-fictions depicted better sequels than what we got.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  37. Re:The Oracle's last line in Matrix Revolutions by wrt2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although I've got strong opinions of these movies -- I love them, and am happy for the temporary corporate insanity which allowed them to be produced -- I've not said much about them online. At the end of Revolutions, the Oracle is responding to Seraph's question, "Did you always know?" Spelling that question out fully, what Seraph is asking is did you know that Neo, rather than Smith, would end the war? The answer to that question is no. The Oracle made the choice to help Neo, but it was a choice she did not understand -- she couldn't see past it. She told Neo that "one way or another, this war is going to end," but she did not know which way. When the Architect tells the Oracle that "you've played a dangerous game," it is to acknowledge the fact that had her belief in Neo been misplaced, the Oracle's choice would have ended all sentient life on Earth.

    I believe that Reloaded and Revolutions would probably work best shown back-to-back with a 15-minute intermission between. They tell a complex story involving a large cast of characters, all of whom are involved in a fight for survival and many of whom have to deal with one or more invalidations of their worldview, most significantly Morpheus and Neo. That this story is told in a hair over four hours screen time is amazing. Since there is no preexisting text to draw on (LoTR), and no novelization either (2001), the understanding of what it is you're seeing -- what's real and not real -- has to come from you "making up your own damn mind." I love that.

    "You've played a dangerous game."
    "Change always is."

    --
    -- "Why, Mr. Anderson, why? Why do you do it? Why get up? Why keep voting? Do you think you're voting for something?"