Slashdot Mirror


The Expensive Hobby Of Kite Aerial Photography

GoneGaryT writes "The BBC is running a cool article - strapping your digital camera to a kite and doing D.I.Y. aerial photography. Examples of suitable kites can be found here. Anyone want to try this from the top of an apartment building in London or NY? A pretty accessible pastime, so long as you can afford to lose the lot in a sudden gust!" High-res digital cameras have come down somewhat in price since the last time we mentioned this.

156 comments

  1. I don't have a kite you insensitive clod! by galacticdruid · · Score: 2, Funny

    obligatory clod comment

    --
    we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively - bill hicks
    1. Re:I don't have a kite you insensitive clod! by davesplace1 · · Score: 1

      Lucky for me I do have a kite, so I'm going to go fly it. lol

    2. Re:I don't have a kite you insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think it could be improved upon with a simple point and shoot $3 disposable camera and a triggering mechanism that is somehow radio controlled or another method...

    3. Re:I don't have a kite you insensitive clod! by smallfeet · · Score: 1
      I used to do this years ago (pre digital days). I would trigger the shot with a line climber, which is a small winged device that hooks onto the kite line and gets blown up it.

      This type photograhy works a lot better with at least 2 people, especialy when its time to get the kite and camera down.

      A sled or cody kite gives a nice steady base to work from. Sleds are cheap and easy to make, but a bit difficult to rig an attachment point for the camera to. I do NOT recomend a flowform or paraform kite. They tend to collapse and drop to the ground.

      Ahh, nostalga.

  2. Dangling cash by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I mind as well dangle $100 dollars on the kite and let it fly around.

    Nowadays some 17-year old sniper will probably shoot down my kite cam for the fun of it.

    1. Re:Dangling cash by fastidious+edward · · Score: 1

      haha! when i was young we glued shards of glass onto the strings of our kites, then flew our kites under the paths of others cutting their strings!

      oh, back in the day!

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    2. Re:Dangling cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha! Now I know I'm your daddy!!!!11

    3. Re:Dangling cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 68 years old. Are you an 90+ year old or a time traveller?

    4. Re:Dangling cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nowadays some 17-year old sniper will probably shoot down my kite cam for the fun of it.

      I seriously doubt that.

      I mind as well dangle $100 dollars on the kite and let it fly around.

      It's called a hobby. Hobbies cost money and have risk (at least the fun ones). How much to you spend on your hobbies? If your a normal Slashdotter, it's tech stuff and far more than $100.

    5. Re:Dangling cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your vs you're.

      It's driving me nuts. Yes, that's my post. Yes, I know the difference. I saw it seconds after hitting "submit". You should have seen my grammer/spelling when I was 18! I still make some mistakes over and over and over. Dyslexia sucks. Thankfully, I'm not as bad off as some, my wife still spells "the" as "teh" way too often. Slashdot is where I practice writing (for now).

    6. Re:Dangling cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha! Yes.

    7. Re:Dangling cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reply is illogical.

    8. Re:Dangling cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha! Shut up Spock.

    9. Re:Dangling cash by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe a sniper older than 17, and probably not in England, but near White House, Washington, D.C. You might have heard they don't like being photographed. :)

      Waiting to see a ban on kites in that city...

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    10. Re:Dangling cash by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Nowadays some 17-year old sniper will probably shoot down my kite cam for the fun of it.

      That's probably the "xmas terrorist threat" that Blair and co have been talking about.

    11. Re:Dangling cash by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      I've dangled more than that $100 from a kite, I've dangled my body! Modern skydiving canopies are pretty much just large modern kites. They use a lot of the same design techniques and some canopy manufacturers make kites also.

      And yes it is better in person. Don't take a picture. Use your own eyes! JUMP OUT OF A PLANE!

  3. Hmmm... by 77Punker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WIth rocket cameras, helicopter cameras, and kite cameras, it's a wonder I haven't seen any model airplane cameras yet. Now that would be neat.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Been done, for years... I've (and many others) have flown both digital cameras and also x10 and the like wireless video cameras on planes and helis... take a look at http://www.ryankramer.com/planes/avistar.shtml (near the bottom I've got some arial pics)

    2. Re:Hmmm... by SYFer · · Score: 1

      Well then, you're obviously not an Afghan guerrilla.

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    3. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      check out this chat room:
      http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/forumdisplay .php?s= &forumid=128

    4. Re:Hmmm... by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I saw a show on TV once that had these guys (im thinking it was in the northern midwest states someplace, wisconsin rings a bell). They would take fairly large remote control planes (probably, 8ft wingspan it lookd like) and put a camera on board. They then would have to fly to a target and take the best picture. The pilot with the best picture won the contest. Pretty interesting I thought.

    5. Re:Hmmm... by PiratePTG · · Score: 1
      a wonder I haven't seen any model airplane cameras yet.

      I used to have an ATV (Amateur Radio TV) transmitter and camera in my unlimited-class glider. Got some great footage at the last competition I participated in... Camera the size of an ice cube, transmitter the size of a postage stamp... Both ran on a 9v battery... The battery was actually bigger than the transmitter was!

      --
      The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
  4. Kite photo gallery by linuxwrangler · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out Charles C. Benton's Site for collections from years of kite photography.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis
    1. Re:Kite photo gallery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should go fly a kite off of this aircraft carrier for sale on ebay!

    2. Re:Kite photo gallery by GoneGaryT · · Score: 1
      Check out Charles C. Benton's Site for collections from years of kite photography.

      Excellent site, thanks for the link. How did he get the stuff in the centre of Berkeley? That's admirable.

  5. on the other hand by Neophytus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Clever people will get a $50 wired video camera, run the wires down the teather and get some funky video capture software going

    1. Re:on the other hand by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what a great idea. Make sure you take video of the kite flyer on the ground, so we have a visual record of what happens when the kite string and wires comes in contact with power lines.

    2. Re:on the other hand by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      hmmm, I dunno what sort of wind you have around where you live, but most of my long line kite flying the string becomes a major weight component.

      you're already carrying a deadweight of camera and now you want to add kilo's of wire?

      Quite tricky tensioning to prevent the wire becoming load-bearing at any point I imagine as well.

      Wireless could be interesting, you should have quality LOS.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    3. Re:on the other hand by MBCook · · Score: 1
      I'm with you. There is no way you could just strap a camera on and run the wires down.

      What you'd need to do is get a tiny camera from somewhere (like this or this one). Then you'd attach it to a strong tini transmitter (like this one) and hook it all up to a battery. Instant spy kite. Not that a kite above a compeditor's company all day every day with no one flying it would ever look suspicous. Still might be too heavy though.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:on the other hand by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      What about using the wire directly as the tether? Two is all it takes for video. You'd need to insulate them if you wanted to do loops though!!

    5. Re:on the other hand by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      if you can find a wire with a 25lb breaking strength I suppose you could.

      cost of the wire might run to more than the wireless kit though.

      and it would still be much heavier with a worse breaking strain than dedicated kite string.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    6. Re:on the other hand by argent · · Score: 1

      802.11, man. Wireless.

    7. Re:on the other hand by freeweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Read the article, learn basic math, and buy yourself a scale.

      These guys are taking pictures at incredibly high altitudes for what you suggest. 100 metres is considered LOW. That's 300 feet, in case you're a yank. Ever pick up 300 feet of RCA cabling? These guys use 6 foot wide kites just to handle the weight of the camera, which is probably 1/5th of the weight of that much wiring, if that.

      Now just try it with 2, 3, or 400 metres of wire. Yup, that's sure clever.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    8. Re:on the other hand by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Even wireless is overkill. Most digital cameras have autotimers, just set it to take a pic every 60 seconds.

      Ok, everyone say it together now, "Doh!"

    9. Re:on the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's approximately 328 feet, whether you're a yank or not. Even Americans know metre > yard.

    10. Re:on the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can get some 36 gauge wiring or something. very thin, very light, and very cheap.

    11. Re:on the other hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the article, learn basic math, and buy yourself a scale.

      These guys are taking pictures at incredibly high altitudes for what you suggest. 100 metres is considered LOW. That's 300 feet, in case you're a yank. Ever pick up 300 feet of RCA cabling? These guys use 6 foot wide kites just to handle the weight of the camera, which is probably 1/5th of the weight of that much wiring, if that.

      Now just try it with 2, 3, or 400 metres of wire. Yup, that's sure clever.


      Add some lightning to the mix and you got some fun times for the lads!

    12. Re:on the other hand by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      My neighbor has one of those 8' wide parasail kites. When we goto the beach he starts off by driving a stake a couple of feet into the ground with a hand winch at the end of it. He then gets the kite airbourne and unwinches a couple hundred feet worth of super thin steel cable. The kite itself (material wise) wieghs probably 25lbs. I can't imagine another 1lb worth of weight is going to make a significant difference.

      Instead of a digital camera I'd rather use one of those X10 cameras and put a small antenna on the thing and use a modified pringles can to get the pics from it.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    13. Re:on the other hand by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      When we goto the beach

      And when you want to take pictures anywhere but the beach you won't have the kind of wind to support a 25lb kite with 200 feet of steel cable.

      on the other hand if you are using steel cable anyway (what the hell do you do if it starts to storm, cut the rig?) then shoot, run a signal down it.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    14. Re:on the other hand by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Um, loss anybody? Hello?

    15. Re:on the other hand by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      yeah cool, boosters all the way down the wire like ribbons on the tail of a proper kite...

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  6. Really . . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    A pretty accessible pastime, so long as you can afford to lose the lot in a sudden gust!

    Eerm, you know you CAN tie knots in said string . . . like for instance tying it to something heavy?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Really . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they MIGHT be talking about losing control of the kite and it flying head-first into the ground.

    2. Re:Really . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know, it's usually the string that snaps, not the person that's holding it..

    3. Re:Really . . . by ebuck · · Score: 1

      I think he't talking about the string breaking, or the structure of the kite collapsing causing your beloved camera to plunge a few houndred (or more) feet to the ground.

      I'll bet you that nobody who puts that much money on a kite would let go of the string.

  7. Do check the rules first by Tim+Ward · · Score: 1

    Like, don't fly one of these things on four hundred feet of string inside an ATZ?

    Please?

    I really wouldn't want to fly into one.

  8. what about strapping camera's to rc cars? by narkotix · · Score: 5, Funny

    we sometimes strap one of those x10 type wireless cams to rc cars...can be an interesting view especially when your chasing your dog/cat/annoying neighbourhood kid.

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    1. Re:what about strapping camera's to rc cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention rolling around pretty girl's feet with the camera turned skyward ;-)

    2. Re:what about strapping camera's to rc cars? by wolf- · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I attached one of the new x10s to the underside of my front scoop. Got some cool video for a video of the kids "Going to Grandmas"

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    3. Re:what about strapping camera's to rc cars? by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      I attached my Sony camcorder to the top of an RC car once. I got some cool video but after it rolled a couple times it stopped working very well. Probably should have figured that out before I had that brilliant idea. It actually rolled three times on the street in front of my house and still worked. Then about 1 month later it was dead. Probably not worth 10 minutes of video.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  9. a friend did do that by jeffy124 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a friend of mine during college did something like that for his senior engineering project. his team (composed of a few mech eng's, EE's, and some graphic design majors) basically hooked a camera to a kite and then did some processing on the images to generate some simple 3D imagery of the landscape.

    if i find links i'll post 'em, but it's going back several years and the webpages have probably been purged.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:a friend did do that by jeffy124 · · Score: 5, Informative

      found it! http://prism.mem.drexel.edu/projects/kite/index.ht ml

      IIRC, they had to develop a business case for the project (in other words, what engineers developed had to have a practical usage), and there was also some sort of entrpreneurial business plan competition sponsored by the business school going on at about the same time, so they also entered that contest using their kite project as a product and got an honorable mention. the page linked is what they submitted to that contest.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:a friend did do that by kfg · · Score: 1

      I got into college with a full scholarship for doing something like this, and I was only doing it for a hoot. I was just playing around with trains of kites in various formations to study how they could be used for lifting tasks. To have something to lift I used a camera rig and took photos of my neighborhood.

      Of course this was back in the day and I had to use this stuff called "film". Remember that stuff?

      Played around a bit with tissue paper hot air balloons too. Fun stuff.

      Makes me all nostalgic to see this story. I'll have to give it a go again . . .once the outside temperature rises above freeze your nuts off ( on the Oh Jesus! scale) again.

      KFG

    3. Re:a friend did do that by SyFryer · · Score: 1

      That looks interesting, reminds me of the flare or whatever it was in the 'Hunter' game, where you sent something up into the air, and got a 3d walkthrough.

  10. DO NOT DO THIS IN SOUTH KOREA NEAR THE DMZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The North Koreans will claim your a spy and probably shoot you. I know because I was shot at for doing this very same thing.

    1. Re:DO NOT DO THIS IN SOUTH KOREA NEAR THE DMZ by ebuck · · Score: 1

      Although you're probably joking, (and a good joke it is too), there's prior art on this one.

      Some old documents (verify them yourself) claim that the chinese actually built huge kites capable of carrying a human passenger (albeit I'd bet a light one) for spying purposes and even used them in wartime.

      Somebody out there knows if this is true, or if this is true but merly something that was planned and never done (like many of Michaelangelo's ideas) or if this is complete fabrication.

      If you know, please reply to this list; because, I'd like to know. Thank you.

  11. Or you could use a balloon by gotr00t · · Score: 3, Informative
    This was featured earlier on /. about creating a Linux powered balloon that had a camera on it. Quite an amazing feat, even though the pictures were a little low resolution.

    http://vpizza.org/~jmeehan/balloon/

    1. Re:Or you could use a balloon by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. How does Linux produce the heat to make the balloon rise? Remove the CPU fan or something?

    2. Re:Or you could use a balloon by herrvinny · · Score: 1


      Talking about this article?

      (Everyone repeat after me: Google is our friend, UNLIKE THE STUPID /. SEARCH THAT WON'T EVEN LOAD... Sorry, had to get that out of my systems...)

    3. Re:Or you could use a balloon by DOsinga · · Score: 1

      You don't need Linux for this. Have a look at my balloon movies to see what happens if you just attached a camera to a balloon.

    4. Re:Or you could use a balloon by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I don't understand. How does Linux produce the heat to make the balloon rise?

      It produces karma.

    5. Re:Or you could use a balloon by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I even had two dupes! When I saw the headline for this article I thought it was the third dupe! A Qupe!

  12. Rocket cameras are much cheaper and easier by weeble · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got a rocket camera for Christmas from my brother :-)

    estes rockets

    It uses a couple of explosive packs and takes a picture at its apex.

    --
    Slashdot Beta should die a painful death.
    1. Re:Rocket cameras are much cheaper and easier by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

      Sure, and those are cool, but you get only one picture, and you have no control over where the camera is pointed. The nifty think about kite aerial photography is that the photographer can aim the camera, and pictures are normally taken from relatively low altitude. With practice and some luck, you get great photos taken from a very different perspective from what you're used to.

  13. If you have an extra $1,000.... by herrvinny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...lying around, try getting the DraganFlyer IV ($750) and mount an EyeCam ($250) on it. The 'flyer looks interesting, as well as the camera. Although, if you don't want to pay out that much, the Super Aviator ($190) looks interesting as well.

  14. Huh? by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Flying a kite in a populated area like New York or London sounds like a nice way to get electrocuted or, failing that (like if you've got underground lines like most people in NYC) it sounds like a good way to cause some traffic accidents and pedestrian injuries... not to mention the cost of the camera.

    1. Re:Huh? by mlk · · Score: 1

      You could do it in Hyde Park safely.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:Huh? by GoneGaryT · · Score: 1
      I only suggest that because snaps of tiny dork surrounded by lots green park can be pretty dull. Rooftops and stuff are far more interesting. However, say having got the thing up to 1000 ft or so and it nosedives, yes you're right, it could cause injuries. But you just hand the string to the most vacant looking person nearby. And of course, in my neighbourhood, sacrifice your gear to opportunists.

      ;-)

  15. Price came down fast. by Shriek · · Score: 1, Funny
    High-res digital cameras have come down somewhat in price since the last time we mentioned this.


    When was the last time this was mentioned? Three days ago?
  16. An excellent way to spy by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Think about it, a kite, assuming you can get a favorable wind direction, makes for an excellent platform to snap spy photos or those n00die photos of Kathleen sunbathing.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  17. helium balloons by actiondan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We did some aerial shooting using a bunch of helium ballons to carry a cheap,light wireless camera.

    We then attached the receiever to a camcorder video in to record the results.

    You could just as well use a corded camera (we used the wireless one because we had it) but you would have to allwo for the weight of the wire with an extra balloon or two.

    The biggest problem is keeping the camera stable but when there isn't too much wind, the balloons provide a nice platform to hang the camera from.

  18. Barbra Streisand would love this ... by Art+Pollard · · Score: 1

    I feel the sudden urge to take up ariel kite photography and go photograph the coastline in and around Malibu. We could document how certain mansions are intruding on the coastline and ruining the view. One in particular seems to obstruct the view more than the others.

    Does anybody want to come along? This could be a lot of fun.

    -Art

    .sig what's that?

  19. TimeLapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not exactly the same, but look what SonicBoy did with his Sony Clie UX-50 and Fun Cam software.

  20. Don't loose the kite by Charles+Gaudette · · Score: 3, Informative

    The way to not loose the kite is to use a deep sea fishing reel. A good modern high-test deep sea fishing line will not break unless your out in weather that would break the kite first anyway.

  21. "Kathleen sunbathing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, if you want to see her 9 inch tranny-cock. Compared to Taco's 2" geekboycock, it's quite impressive by comparison.

  22. "from the where-do-you-get-6mp-for-cheap dept." by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


    How does $169 delivered sound?

    --
    - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    1. Re:"from the where-do-you-get-6mp-for-cheap dept." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      from http://www.evertek.com/viewpart.asp?auto=9889:
      ** Umax AstraPix 660 6.6 Megapixel ( interpolated - 3.3 Megapixel sensor) Digital Camera **

      Get high-quality digital images from a very small package with the UMAX AstraPix 660. The AstraPix 660 is a 3.3 MegaPixel digital camera (6.6 Megapixel with the built in hardware nterpolation) with 2x digital zoom! Its focus-free lens means great shots every time! This camera also features a built-in flash and 1.6-inch LCD color display!
      Stock up on this great camera today!
      I'm guessing the image quality probably isn't up to par with the Fuji S2 or the Canon 10D.
    2. Re:"from the where-do-you-get-6mp-for-cheap dept." by dmadole · · Score: 1

      How does $169 delivered sound?

      Sounds bogus. Regardless of the descripton, that's not a 6 megapixel camera, it's a 2 megapixel camera:

      UMAX AstraPix590 6.6 Megapixel Digital Camera

      Interpolation in the camera does nothing but burn up space on the flash card three times as fast. It certainly doesn't give 6 megapixel image quality. You'd be better off getting a 2 megapixel camera and doing the interpolation on your computer afterward.

    3. Re:"from the where-do-you-get-6mp-for-cheap dept." by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      EEK!
      Thanks for the heads-up!
      Sounds like false-advertisement to me.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
  23. There's a risk to this... by El · · Score: 1

    You're likely to get a photo of Ms. Streisand herself sunbathing nude, and gouge your own eyes out when you see it...

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:There's a risk to this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any pictures of her should be turned over to one of the wildlife federations. The giant sloth is an endangered species after all ....

    2. Re:There's a risk to this... by El · · Score: 1

      Endangered?!? The giant sloth went extinct in California 10,000 years ago. Anything you see today resembling a giant sloth is clearly a fossil.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  24. Ben Franklin reloaded by snot.dotted · · Score: 1

    Try taking a photo of being struck by lightning, however does require flying a kite a night in an electrical storm, well it could be the next adrenalin junkie fix to replace base jumping.

  25. Amateur Radio Groups Having Done This For Years by gpmidi256 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Loudoun Amateur Radio Group has been launhing balloons with both still and video camera's on them for years. Info and pics on all 8 of LARG's fights are avalible here here.

    --
    ~Paul
  26. Solution: Breakable Link and parachute by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Informative

    If one is worried about losing the kite and camera, then clever use of a weak link could help. Strong kite string would lead to the camera and weaker string would bind the camera to the kite. Excessive force from the wind would severe the link between the kite and camera, not the camera and owner. A parachute tied to a light tertiary line (a rip cord) would yank the camera's parachute when the kite breaks away. (An even better design would design a failure mode into the kite itself so that the kite loses its aerodynamic shape if the wind load becomes too high).

    Although there is still a chance of the camera being caught in a kite-eating tree, wind gusts and line breaks need not lead to loss of the camera.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Solution: Breakable Link and parachute by cfuse · · Score: 1
      If one is worried about losing the kite and camera, then clever use of a weak link could help. Strong kite string would lead to the camera and weaker string would bind the camera to the kite. Excessive force from the wind would severe the link between the kite and camera, not the camera and owner. A parachute tied to a light tertiary line (a rip cord) would yank the camera's parachute when the kite breaks away. (An even better design would design a failure mode into the kite itself so that the kite loses its aerodynamic shape if the wind load becomes too high).

      Although there is still a chance of the camera being caught in a kite-eating tree, wind gusts and line breaks need not lead to loss of the camera.

      Or:

      Me to boss: "Is it Ok for me to take the work camera for the weekend? I've got a 'conference' that I'm attending"

      Later at the stationery cupboard: "Hmmm, this 50 metre box of bubble wrap should come in handy"

    2. Re:Solution: Breakable Link and parachute by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      So your telling me that dropping a camera from 300foot or however high your going to fly it wouldnt end up with it in pieces?

      I would rather it floated off with at least a chance of chasing it than having it drop to earth like a stone.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Solution: Breakable Link and parachute by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      ooooops - I should engage brain before speaking :$ I'm sorry, i completely missed the parachute part.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Solution: Breakable Link and parachute by jred · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I don't read the subj lines, either. I thought the same thing until the end of the post.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  27. What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was doing kite photography 20 years ago with an SLR camera. And yes, I did break more than one camera in the process...

  28. When I was a lad... by CmdrWiggle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does anybody remember doing this with model rockets? There was one model that came with a Plexiglas payload and a specially fitted camera. The camera took 110 film (I think), and snapped a single shot at the moment when the engine's ejection charge blew off the nose cone.

    See, e.g., here.

    Inevitably, everyone I knew would pull out the camera and launch lizards (frogs, bugs, etc.) instead.

    1. Re:When I was a lad... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of the Estes Astrocam - which you can still buy. Product ID 1813

      Here's a link to the product info page.

    2. Re:When I was a lad... by CmdrWiggle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was looking for that. For some reason I can't resolve the address for http://www.estesrockets.com, so I didn't post it. Thanks.

  29. Re:Just strap an X-10 on it by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "Ouch. Wouldn't that inhibit whacking off? Besides, the rapidly swaying view would turn nauseating."

    NG was poking a little fun at the poor phrasing of the parent post, hardly a troll.

  30. The website is kaput - that's disconcerting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The website is kaput - that's disconcerting.

  31. cheap difital cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen digital cameras, vis USB for abt 30USD in some places. Catch them on sale!

  32. I've strapped cameras to airplanes.. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 4, Informative
    my two hobbies are aviation and photography. As a small airplane owner and a fairly experienced pilot, I have the luxury of being able to and knowing where I can safely attach a camera to the outside of the airplane to get some interesting shots. however, to date I've only attached a video camera (using duct tape--seriously) to the outside of the airplane and never a still camera. Why? because I don't have a digital camera that supports a remote shutter like i would like.

    I am desperately looking for recommendations for a digital camera that supports a remote shutter. A cable assembly is fine, as long as I can get a cable preferably longer than 10-15 feet, though a wireless setup would be ideal. even more ideal would be if this is available in Sony, as all my gear is Sony (in fact, my current digital camera is a well-worn DSC-S75 which is about at its retirement age).

    The one piece of advice that I can give for aerial photographers, be they of the kite, airplane, or helicopter variety is this: invest in a wide angle lens. I bought the most expensive and "best quality" wide angle lens for my dsc-s75 that I found on ebay - a .38 lens with adapter for about $70. It opens up a WORLD of possibiltiies for photos taken of the ground from the air. for example, I've taken photos from right above skyscrapers (well, the legal limit above) with the macro and I get some really superb shots that way.

    Remote-shutter digital camera recommendations really appreciated. Preferably of the "normal price range" of 500 +- a few hundred at the most.

    1. Re:I've strapped cameras to airplanes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what kind of plane do you own?

    2. Re:I've strapped cameras to airplanes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a remote control for my DSC S75 with power on/off, zoom, and shutter controls. The cable on it is only about a metre, so you'll have to try splicing it with a longer one. There's a little more information here

    3. Re:I've strapped cameras to airplanes.. by Mr.+Theorem · · Score: 1

      For remote shutter control (and time-lapse) of a huge number of digital cameras, check out Harbortronics. They have several (cabled) remote/time lapse controllers starting just above $100. Some models are compatible with an RF triggering system for wireless setup.

      --
      *** Work like a king, command like a slave, create like a dog.
    4. Re:I've strapped cameras to airplanes.. by kwalker · · Score: 1

      While not as good as a remote shutter, you might want to look into a timed shutter. My new digicam can take one picture every X minutes until it fills the card. If you set that to one minute, you should be able to anticipate where the plane will be when the shutter goes off (And make a couple of extra passes to make sure).

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    5. Re:I've strapped cameras to airplanes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've taken some photos from an R/C plane with a digital camera. To solve the shutter problem I had to solder two small wires parallell to to the shutter button. When the two wires are connected the camera takes a photograph. My camera now has an extra connector so 'normal use' is as easy as before. If you can not make the conversion yourself anyone familiar with electronics and soldering is propably able to do it. Warranty? Well, you have to break some eggs to make an omelet ;-)

    6. Re:I've strapped cameras to airplanes.. by mks113 · · Score: 1

      A bit of bodging should solve your problem. There are two solutions I can think of right off.

      1) The shutter release on the digicam is just a switch. Tear the camera apart and connect wires to the switch contacts.

      2) If you don't wan't to rip it apart, build a remotly operated finger. Find a solenoid somwhere with enough power to push the button. Build a holder for it out of wood/metal/hot glue/duct tape and run wires back to a battery in the cockpit. Push a button, energize the solenoid, press the shutter button.

  33. Re: Sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hate Dan Patrick.
    Me too. Fucking asshat.

  34. Nice shoots by dhuber · · Score: 1
    To be sure that you will get some nice pictures you could go up with the camera. I took this picture with my mobile phone at about 800m (2600 ft) above the ground while flying around with my paraglider.

    This will also solve the problem of losing the "kite". Well, if you lose it you will have a serious problem.
    --

    There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels - St IGNUcius

    1. Re:Nice shoots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took this picture with my mobile phone at about 800m (2600 ft) above the ground while flying around with my paraglider.

      Did you send it to someone while up there? For some reason, I think doing that would be awesomely cool. :]

  35. I strap them to garbage! by twitter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Really, garbage bags. Kite photography does not have to cost lots of money.

    You can make great kites from bamboo, garbage bags and duct tape. The cheap-o rogalo wings scale up just as well as they scaled down to begin with. A large garbage bag or two, with carefully placed duct tape reinforement makes a very large kite, 6 to 9 foot wingspan.

    A $100 camera can take good pictures. I've got a nasty old sipix with 1200x1600 resolution that works well. All you really need to worry about is protecting it from the inevitable fall and making a good trigger.

    My triggers have used christmas tree lights for a timer. They are light, rugged, cheap and easy. I've used them to fire a solenoid that drew music wire down on the button and to close a relay that did the same thing electronically. This eliminates the need for figuring out how to do things via USB and you get about one picture per second of flight. All you need to worry about is having lots of memory. A 64 MB CF card did well enough for me and a 256 MB would be excellent.

    The only thing I've really lacked is time when the wind is blowing. You can see some of this fun and the results here.

    When it's all said and done, chances are that you have everything you need to do this already. Go get it! It's lots of fun.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:I strap them to garbage! by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      Great pics. Thanks for posting the link to your page. Seth

  36. Or a blimp... by cirby · · Score: 1

    A guy I know does professional aerial photography with a helium-filled blimp. Anything from medium format film on down.

  37. 802.11 by argent · · Score: 1

    Finally, a use for those old PDAs: TRGPro + CF 802.11 card + Kodak PalmPix = cheap airborne wireless webcam.

  38. sub $50 kite + camera + trigger exists here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    See bill nelson's ice cube trigger here:

    http://arch.ced.berkeley.edu/kap/equip/ice.html

    Suggested items:
    1. kite
    2. DISPOSABLE camera
    3. Camera rigging for kite
    4. ice cubes

    The main advantage is that the whole thing can be made/bought for $50.00 and is no big loss if it is destroyed/lost.

  39. Lose an expensive camera? ... why ? by smoyer · · Score: 1

    I've got three Walgreen's Pure Digital camera's on their way to PA right now ... at $9.99 each. And the codeman has hacked a smart-media card into them. If we can get the USB port working, I'll be flying my parafoil with them in the spring.

  40. Gotta use those service plans for something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta use those service plans for something!

  41. Even better with stunt kites by frozenray · · Score: 1

    Our kiting club held a competition this year, and afterwards a guy from Germany showed us some neat videos he made by strapping a video camera to his Prophecy two-line stunt kite. The quality wasn't great (it was one of those cheap and lightweight battery-operated record-to-CF cams), but he managed to do some Axels, Snap Stalls and other neat tricks with it, and the video sequences were truly impressive.

    I'd like to try something like that with my Revo once, quad-liners give you better control over the kite - you can steer the kite towards the ground full tilt and get it into reverse flight just inches before it touches the ground. Another thing that would be worth trying is doing a team routine with two kites and installing the camera on the chasing kite.

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    1. Re:Even better with stunt kites by TheAmigo · · Score: 1

      I did this very thing yesterday!

      I have a Revolution that I bought from Into The Wind. (www.intothewind.com)

      I have a Sony DSCP7 with a 64 meg memory stick.

      I sewed a ziplock bag to the center of the kite, then placed the camera in it with a piece of duct tape acting as a spacer in order to keep the camera aimed at me when in flight. I used a bit more duct tape to back up my sewing.

      I put it on video mode, had a friend press the button before launch, and let it rip.

      The frame rate isn't wonderful, but the video is quite fun to watch(repeatedly).

      I've got a larger "big wing" from ITW that I've thought about attaching my DV camcorder to.

  42. Re:Just strap an X-10 on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sig: "All negative mods are now being metamodded as unfair. Think before you abuse."

    You're the one abusing the system by blindly metamoderating. If you have negative mods so much, browse at -1.

  43. Re:Just strap an X-10 on it by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "You're the one abusing the system by blindly metamoderating."

    Why are you so afraid to log in and post? Worried you'll be modded down? Hmmmm....

    Funny, the one guy that's annoyed with my irrational actions stand is the guy who should understand my point of view the most.

    Greetings Hal.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  44. Is this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... why the US is upgraded to a brand spanking orange alert?

  45. R/C Airplanes! by Mark+Imbriaco · · Score: 1
    For around $200 you can purchase everything you need to get an R/C airplane that is suitable for hauling up a lightweight digital camera ready to fly. Looking at the prices for these kites, it's not all that much of a premium for the extra controllability you'll have with the plane.

    The GWS Slow Stick is a very good choice for a beginner plane that is well suited for hauling aloft a little bit of extra weight. Check out the Aerial Photography forum at RC Groups for more info.

  46. Cheapskates by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Expensive Hobby Of Kite Aerial Photography

    Expensive ?? I had to buy a chopper to take pictures, you insensitive clods.

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
  47. Fountain? by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    Is the an aerial photo of the International Fountain in the Seattle Center, or is that a fountain in Kansas?

    If it's in Kansas, I think they stole our fountain, because they look identical...

  48. Stringing This One Along by strelitsa · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?

    --
    No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
  49. What about the Dakota Digital camera? by juebay · · Score: 1

    People are complaining about the expensiveness due to the risks of the camera just falling out of the sky. I think it was posted before on /. that this "disposable" camera can be cracked into so you can download the files and then purge. It is only 1.3 megapixels. But you can adjust the focus and rig the shutter button without having to worry about burning out the cicuits.

  50. This is frequently done with R/C aircraft by surfimp · · Score: 1

    The RCGroups Aerial Photography Forum has plenty of information about doing still photography and wireless video from Radio Control aircraft, including helicopters, powered planes, and gliders. There's plenty of sample in-flight photographs as well. The Aiptek pen cams seem to be favored and are easily modified to be actuated by a spare channel via direct plugin to the model's receiver. Very cool stuff, and you can fly where you want as opposed to being restricted by a string.

  51. Don't use a digital camera by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    ultra small TV cameras and transmitters are lighter and cheaper this mag is loaded with them
    http://www.nutsvolts.com/

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  52. Great job!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High-res digital cameras have come down somewhat in price since the last time we mentioned this.

    So the /.-editor do know the are reposting...

  53. conductive kite string=bad by Barbarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Conductive kite strings are bad....

  54. and ebay.. by orangesquid · · Score: 1

    does this explain all the digital cameras i keep seeing on ebay with scratched-up and broken cases and duct tape residue?

    just a thought.

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  55. Why so difficult and expensive? by lxs · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I feel that people nowadays are using complex technologies where simple solutions will suffice.

    When I was a kid (late'70s early '80s ), I've seen something similar done without expensive digital camera's. they just took a cheap 'chemical' toy camera (plastic lens, thumbwheel transport) which they let ride along the string (I believe the wind blows it along), and they rigged the shutter to go off when the camera reached the top of the string. All done with coathangers and wire. And if it crashed, you didn't lose hundreds of euro's/dollars/pounds.

    In this case, I see very little advantage in using a digital camera.

    Boy, I feel old.

  56. double french military by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    They actually used these kites (scaled up somewhat) to lift up military observers, so the civilian version should be good for even a video camera...

    They're a bitch to get up though, I'd recommend 20-30mph winds for a reliable experience. Also, strong arms: at least 100lb test line is necessary.

  57. cant find it by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    where's the estes rocket camera you're talking about?

  58. A little bit of a spin on kite photography.... by dcigary · · Score: 1

    ...is doing a Spherical panoramic picture from a kite, ala my friend and hero Philo.

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  59. Expensive? Hardly... by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

    With the advent of "disposable" digital cameras and protocols to read them, one can use a disposable for this.

    Of course, the company selling it would be upset at the modifications required... but if you never return it, they don't really need to know, do they?

    And remember, most of the cost of a digital camera is in the screen (followed closely by the battery)... What do you need a screen for if it's on a kite? That's how they get the cost of the disposables down, ditch the screen. And then battery consumption is way down too...

    --
    I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  60. Done with film cameras in 1917 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    This article in the Arizona Alumnus magazine (University of Arizona) talks about a 100 year old photographer who did this back when he was 14. Here's the relevant quote:

    About the time he was 14, he started taking aerial photographs. "I started taking aerial photographs before anyone ever thought of it," he contends.

    Bowers' aerial photos were taken not with a plane, mind you, but with a seven-foot kite and a Brownie camera. Other supplies included some string, a slow-burning fuse, and a rubber band. Bowers lighted the fuse, which burned through the string, which held the shutter release. Then, the rubber band snapped the picture! The entrepreneurial Bowers would drop the kite, advance the film, place the camera in a holster attached to the kite, and take it up for another shot.

    Ingenious

  61. Uses: countering censorship in DC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah the perfect tool to counter the over zealous censorship of aerial photography in Washington DC, as previously featured on /. and reported at http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM .20031224.gtblurdec24/BNStory/Technology

    Any /.er brave enough to fly a Kite Cam from the Mall in DC? I'd like to take odds on how long before you are hauled away and kept indefinately as an enemy combatant...

    On the bright side the weather in the brig in Charleston SC is probably a lot warmer than the weather in DC right now.

  62. I did this with a homemade harness and coolpix 885 by Liem+Bahneman · · Score: 1

    http://www.bahneman.com/liem/photos/other/SandSati ons/Aerial/

    Using a regular nylon delta kite and some hard drive
    packing foam I managed to get the coolpix up for some aerial photography at Long Beach, WA.

    The camera has a remote cord that can take pictures at a minimum 2 minute interval, so I activated it,
    packed it into the housing and sent it aloft. I didn't have any fancy RC PTZ controls like another fellow at the beach, but it seemed to work fairly well and with the luck of the wind, managed to get a few decent shots off. The maximum height I got was around 150ft.

    I was pretty excited to invest in a larger, loftier kite with more payload, but the urge went away and I'm happy with the early results.

    - liem

    --
    Remember, its called GNU/Linux, but pronounced "Linux".