Slashdot Mirror


UbiSoft Goof Lets Porn URL Into Rainbow Six

Thanks to CNN Money for their article revealing that an enterprising webmaster has purchased a URL featured in UbiSoft's tactical action Xbox title Rainbow Six 3, and constructed a pornographic website hub around it. According to the story, a "level set in a garage with posters adorning the wall" features a specific website address, and "Texan Tony Ashcraft was one of the early buyers of the game and noted the URL as he played. Thinking the link might feature ancillary information on the game, he told me he typed it into his browser, only to find no one owned the domain. On Nov. 22, he bought it and immediately filled it with porn links." Ashcraft, interviewed for the piece, says: "My intentions were to try to build up traffic and then sell the domain... If they ask me just to change it... they would have to have a pretty compelling reason. If they were interested in buying the domain, then we could talk."

83 comments

  1. Wee... by burntpsilocybin · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Wee... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      I imagine the game linked to a different URL, and this guy has made that URL link to an affilate URL with the link you posted.

      What a sleazebag. :-/

    2. Re:Wee... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Why's this a troll? It's informative... and its the right link.

      Mod up for truthfullness.

      --
    3. Re:Wee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, it's not. According to the FA, url in the game should be registered on Nov/22/2003, but...

      Server used for this query: [ whois.nic.nu ]

      interracialporno.nu is [ 207.246.139.149 ] .NU Domain Ltd Whois service
      Domain Name (ASCII): interracialporno.nu
      Record ID: 32087
      Record last updated on 09-Jan-2003.
      Record expires on 06-Feb-2005.
      Record created on 06-Feb-1999.
      Record status: Active.
      Domain servers in listed order:
      Ns1.hosting.flyingcroc.net
      Ns2.hosting.flyingcroc.net
      Copyright by .NU Domain Ltd - http://www.nunames.nu

      Database last updated: Mon Jan 5 22: 41: 43 2004

  2. url please? by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would it be asking too much for you to link to the 'offending' url? Especially for me. I can't seem to find any porn on the internet.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  3. Utterly misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They didn't let an existing porn URL into the game, which is what I inferred from the article title; they just made the mistake of including an unclaimed viable URL address.

    1. Re:Utterly misleading by itwerx · · Score: 2

      Not misleading at all. RTFA! :)
      However, I would be curious to see the poster in question. Anybody have a link to a screen shot?

    2. Re:Utterly misleading by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      You'd think that they'd adopt something similar to 555-xxxx, and make the URLs something that had no meaning whatsoever, but they DID OWN THEM.

  4. Cybersquatting? by Mighty+Eris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would this count as squatting? Obviously, Ubi Soft wasn't planning on doing anything with this, but they'll probably want to not advertise porn in their games. Seems like a slightly less sleazy variant on the usual squatting extortion scheme.

    1. Re:Cybersquatting? by \\ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would it be cybersquatting? He's obviously doing something with the domain, and he's willing to sell it to whoever will pay his price.

      UbiSoft was stupid for not registering and controlling the domain in the first place, in this day and age they should've known better.

      I find it really sad that anyone can accuse this guy of cybersquatting when he's just being an entrepreneur, no matter how sleazy.

    2. Re:Cybersquatting? by Ieshan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason UbiSoft has a good argument is pretty clear. Suppose JK Rowling's book became an overnight success and one of the first readers went out and bought hogwarts.com.

      Then, being an "entrepeneur", he turned it into a porn site.

      It's no different. The only reason why the URL was purchased is because of someone making cash off of someone else's work.

    3. Re:Cybersquatting? by El · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If UbiSoft can yank this domain away from the registered owner just because it was published in one of their games, then what's to stop them from publishing 10,000 URLs in their next game and claiming ownership of any of those that somebody tries to register? There is only one way to reserve a domain name: register it! Register it before anybody else does!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    4. Re:Cybersquatting? by phraktyl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not the same.

      The game advertised a URL, at that time not owned by anyone, in the game. As internet-oriented as we are today, this seems very irresponsible on their part, and I think got what was coming to them.

      If JK Rowling had said, `Get your class schedule on hogwarts.com' in a book, and then fail to register hogwarts.com, *that* would be closer.

      Reminds me of a King of the Hill episode where someone was making videos of Peggy's feet for a fetish site, and they mentioned peggysfeet.com (which is not owned by fox anymore, by the looks of it). But at the time of the episode, fox had an entire website up for Peggy's feet.

      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    5. Re:Cybersquatting? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1
      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    6. Re:Cybersquatting? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      I bet you do the same (make cash off of others work). Welcome to capitalistic society my friend.

    7. Re:Cybersquatting? by Luke+the+Obscure · · Score: 5, Informative
      Really? Only one way? Tell that to the old owners of usatriathalon.com, Pokemon-Trader.com, or vw.net.

      Try Googling "Domain Name Lawsuit" and then tell me there's only one way to get a domain name.

      You may also want to read the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.

    8. Re:Cybersquatting? by Ieshan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes, but I don't take things out of other people's published work and publish wihout permission them myself for the purpose of making profit, which is illegal.

      Welcome to a regulated market, my friend.

    9. Re:Cybersquatting? by Ieshan · · Score: 1


      Not sure how the "them myself" got in there, oh well. Here it is again.

      Yes, but I don't take things out of other people's published work and publish without permission for the purpose of making profit, which is illegal.

      Welcome to a regulated market, my friend.

    10. Re:Cybersquatting? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once on the Simpsons, Homer mentioned his AOL screenname - and people who e-mailed that address got replies...

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    11. Re:Cybersquatting? by borg1238 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I don't take things out of other people's published work and publish without permission for the purpose of making profit, which is illegal.

      I don't think that applies here. If someone took copyrighted material from the game, something like the story or characters, then I think your argument would apply. But I don't think a domain name counts. Well, unless it contains a copyrighted name, but even that's iffy (ex: walmartsucks.com).

      But I don't think this case would fall under the definition of copyright infringement, or anything similar. More like a simple mistake that came back to bite Ubisoft in the ass.

    12. Re:Cybersquatting? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I really fail to see your argument. First I fail to see anything wrong with purchasing hogwarts.com.

      If instead of a porn site, it were instead made into a fan club site, would you see a problem with it?

      of course not, there are tons of fan sites like this out there and nothing wrong with them. There is no reason that one couldn't buy the domain and do whatever one wished with it. Including HP parady porn or something which has nothing to with the books at all, such as site on warts, hogs, or a porn site.

      By your logic, I should be able to self publish a book and include in it a list of 1000 made up domains that aren't registered and magically upon publication (whether the book is popular or not is irrelevant) all those domains should be reserved for my exclusive use. That's pretty fsck'd up. The only way you should be able to reserve a domain is BY PAYING FOR IT.

    13. Re:Cybersquatting? by Scaba · · Score: 1
      Well, unless it contains a copyrighted name, but even that's iffy (ex: walmartsucks.com).

      That'll never be an issue, since you can't copyright a name (in the USofA, anyway). Names are protected by trademarks.

    14. Re:Cybersquatting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A porn site called hogwarts.com--ewwww.

    15. Re:Cybersquatting? by mykdavies · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It still amuses me that Fox thought this one through a few years ago when Lisa Simpson visited http://www.whatbadgerseat.com/ .

      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
    16. Re:Cybersquatting? by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1
      Yes, they were incredibly stupid to put ANY URL in ANY game without checking it and making sure they own it.

      However, what this guy did was not "just being an entrepreneur" (although I agree it was sleazy).

      You can't call it cybersquatting, however, since he didn't register it in hopes that someone would want it. He KNEW they would not only want this URL, but that they would HAVE to have it once he turned it into something that would damage their brand.

      My guess is that he will win and they will pay him off. That will be the simplest, easiest path for them. I doubt there is any law being violated, but he is basically blackmailing them (in the ethical sense of the word, not the strict LEGAL sense). They cannot allow this URL to be associated with their game, so they will be forced to act. As long as he doesn't demand stupid amounts of money, they'll know they are better off just paying him.

      Hollywood has for decades used 555 phone numbers because they do not exist. If you place a phone number in a movie or TV show or song, then bunches of people with more curiosity than activities to occupy their time are going to call it. And call it. And call it.

      If I were going to place a URL in a game, book, movie, song, etc. I would either pre-pay registration on that name for at LEAST 10 years, or use a domain that isn't legal (like www.ratmeat.pdz).

      Of course they are REALLY stupid for missing a DEAD simple tie in to their game. They SHOULD have made a website that would reward the curious game player with additional info, entertainment, levels packs, etc. What a missed opportunity.

    17. Re:Cybersquatting? by borg1238 · · Score: 1

      That'll never be an issue, since you can't copyright a name (in the USofA, anyway). Names are protected by trademarks.

      Sigh... yes, I mis-typed. I used the word "copyright" in place of "trademark." Thanks for taking the time to point that out... it changes entire meaning of my original post.

  5. What an asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Period.

  6. Ok Everyone! Repeat after me like Homer Simpson! by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mmmmmmm Quality Control".

    Dolemite
    __________________

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  7. All right boys and girls ... by Kleedrac2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... the word of the article is ... Capitolism. There is nothing wrong with this. I'm not saying I condone this guy's right to make a high-traffic pr0n portal, but I would say the fault lies with Ubisoft. And the moral of the story, always check your links before you release them to the general public!
    Kleedrac

    --
    Sure we wang, can.
    1. Re:All right boys and girls ... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " There is nothing wrong with this. I'm not saying I condone this guy's right to make a high-traffic pr0n portal, but I would say the fault lies with Ubisoft."

      The guy who said "oo a game is blasting this URL, I'm going to immorally take advantage of it" is the guy at fault. Ubisoft could maybe have just registerred the domain, but they are not responsible for his actions. Lesson learned I guess.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:All right boys and girls ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's saying "if they want to buy it, I'm willing to talk." I believe this is called "extortion."

    3. Re:All right boys and girls ... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      Ubisoft is under no obligation to do anything at all with that URL, he's just open to selling the domain. He could easily refuse to sell.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    4. Re:All right boys and girls ... by culain · · Score: 1

      The fault here lies with Ubisoft. They were stupid. Merely producing material which mentions a non-existing website does not constitute any ownership of that domain at all. What this guy did was take advantage of Ubisoft's mistake. and offering to sell them something that he owns is not extortion.

  8. And that's why... by lightspawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you're going to post a URL in your game/movie/etc, make sure it exists (like CSI did with http://ladyheather.com/ ) or that it can't exist (nonexistant TLD, illegal characters etc).

    It's like making sure your characters' phone numbers start with 555.

    1. Re:And that's why... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      another example is Pets Overniht and Love Media from GTA3, as well some more I can't recall.

    2. Re:And that's why... by Seth+Finklestein · · Score: 1

      Nah, just pretend like it's available. It worked for Katie.com and Fear.com!

      Sincerely,
      Seth Finklestein
      Domain Consultant Extraordinaire

      --
      I'm not Seth Finkelstein. I still speak the truth.
    3. Re:And that's why... by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      It's like in the original "Santa Clause" movie, the 1-800 number on the back of Santa's card was a sex-hotline.

    4. Re:And that's why... by UconnGuy · · Score: 1

      They didn't do that in Bruce Almighty....one of the times Jim Carrey was beeped contained a real phone number. A person in England was also bombarded with calls.

  9. happened to me once by ketan · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of my previous jobs had a link to Q&A site Experts Exchange in some sample content. The current link for that site is http://experts-exchange.com/, but they also had a nearly identical URL which was what was used in our product: http://expertsexchange.com/. At some point, its registration lapsed and it got acquired by a domain squatter who was using it as a similar porn portal. If you're not getting it, read the URL again: http://expertsexchange.com/

    --
    You have a choice: tax and spend Democrats, or borrow and spend Republicans. Choose wisely.
    1. Re:happened to me once by caesar79 · · Score: 1

      Three feet. Not two.

      Two hands and Three feet.

  10. GTA by tprime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the Grand Theft Auto III and VC games, many "fictional" web sites are advertised on the radio stations (pogo the monkey, etc.) All of these URLs were purchased, by TakeTwo, prior to the games being released and were realistically filled with content that corresponded to the in game advertisements. It kind of added another aspect of realism to the game, while at the same time kept anyone else from registering the web sites and using them for their own agenda.

    The Ubisoft was simply careless in their production of the game and the gamer had every right to take advantage of that mistake. This is not cybersqatting because it does not infringe upon the copyright of Ubisoft nor does it violate any fair-use guidelines.

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com
    1. Re:GTA by Imperator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about GTA3 but in VC there are (at least) five phone numbers advertised in radio ads. I first thought to try calling one because it was an 866 number, and a game so faithful to the 80's would have used 800 numbers if they weren't meant to be called. (For non-US people: 800 was the area code for toll-free (callee-pays) calls for the longest time. They ran out of 800 numbers in the 90s and started handing out toll-free numbers in area codes like 888 and 866. Thus RockStar ended up with 866 numbers because 800 numbers were too scarce and expensive.)

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  11. Ubi soft should.... by culain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In their first patch modify the texture so it refers to a different website. And make sure they register that site this time. From memory XBOX Live forces people to patch straight away, right, so that should completely skirt the problem, and annoy the hell out of the guy who bought the domain :)

    1. Re:Ubi soft should.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm sure this method would work great for owners of the PC version or people who don't have Xbox Live.

    2. Re:Ubi soft should.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would guess it would work fine for the pc version. Not everyone would keep up with the latest patches, but certainly the people who are into the game enough to notice the url and actually point their browsers to it would be the type of person to patch their games.

  12. Your friendly spell-checking AC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, you misspelled capitalism.

  13. I still have faith in the system by jlechem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Long Live Capitalism

    --
    Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
  14. Similar experience from friend by Masem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a friend that , while sick at home one day, caught a fake URL on Sesame Street (or some other children's program), and went and registered it, then put on the front page where the URL came from and that if the compare that owned the show wanted the domain, he'd gladly give it to them for free, and was only grabbing the domain as to prevent the case in this article from happening. I think he also fired an email to the company as well. I believe that the company did ask for the domain, but thanked him for his observation. Of course, some others were prepared. The episode of Aqua Teen Hunger Force, called 'Inter-fection', featured a URL, but Cartoon Network was ready, as the site (still active last I checked) was a perfect addendum to the episode. Hint: if you are going to post a fake domain as part of a show, make sure you actually own it before airing.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Similar experience from friend by waffle+zero · · Score: 1
      The episode of Aqua Teen Hunger Force, called 'Inter-fection', featured a URL, but Cartoon Network was ready, as the site (still active last I checked) was a perfect addendum to the episode.

      Enter the Internet! Be warned that this site spawns quite a few popup windows. That's a little bit surprising because it uses javascript and I still see them using Mozilla with unrequested popups turned off. Maybe someone can post it to bugzilla and they can figure out why it still works.

    2. Re:Similar experience from friend by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

      The popup ads are kinda the point of the site... if you recall, the character that shows up on that website is the source of all the popup ads.

      Another Adult Swim example, an episode of Home Movies had the soccer coach register the domain 'fentonsnakedmom.com' in the end credits; the website used to just be a picture of the characters and said "umm, what are you doing here".

  15. All I got to say is... by JExtine · · Score: 1

    Owned!

  16. URL by Luigi30 · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least the URL wasn't goatse.cx...

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    1. Re:URL by shaitand · · Score: 1

      well he could make it a mirror or a redirect...

    2. Re:URL by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      I think if it was goatse.cx, then that would be an indicator of the quality of said game, or at least what it would do to my pocket..

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
    3. Re:URL by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      ...or at least what it would do to my pocket.

      "bulge"?

      :-)

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    4. Re:URL by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      uhh.... just because my name is female, doesn't mean I am. this is slashdot after all, and I'm still scarred from the evil horrid cgi script running trolls around here who use them to redirect from harmless sites to goatse.cx *shudder*

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
    5. Re:URL by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      uh.... I don't know of any females capable of having a bulge in their pocket (okay, so it's been a few years since I left San Francisco.)

      So, is that a goatse.cx in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    6. Re:URL by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      the implication here was that my pocket would wind up in the same state as my psyche... a poor shriveled shell of it's former self.

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
  17. Is it really that horrible? by maihadi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I haven't seen the site but I have to wonder why it would be so bad. We have so many games that showcase extreme violence that even a kid's parents will let them play but oh no...not nudity or sex! Not that violence and sex should be associated with each other. We can see someone getting blown to pieces in a game but any nudity would be horrific. Is sex worse than violence? Oh, and I'm not trying to denounce gaming or anything because I do play them.

    1. Re:Is it really that horrible? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
      I don't know who has called it "bad" really but I'll try to answer the issues you raise all the same. I have not played Rainbow Six 3 but am familiar with the earlier games in their PC incarnation. The depictions of violence are relatively tame - well, as tame as head shots can be - and especially in comparison to the graphic depictions of violence that, say, Manhunt has. I don't think the story is really saying this is an awful thing that needs to be fixed right away BUT there is a difference between a video game that should be in the PG13 to R range if it were a movie and a website that's pushing NC17 material. Right or wrong, in the U.S., violence is more widely viewed as acceptable for public consumption than hardcore anal penetration and the like. That being said, I think it's just a kind of funny fluff piece about how people at Ubisoft didn't consider the ramifications of putting a URL out there and not snatching it up.

      This is similar to the story about a phone number for God being left in the film Bruce Almighty that did not begin with 555. The producers of the movie wouldn't expect anyone to call the number but, of course, you get knuckleheads who do call. They fixed it in the DVD release.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    2. Re:Is it really that horrible? by maihadi · · Score: 0

      Good points...

  18. Wee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was probably itching to start an interracial porn site anyways, so I guess he found his URL. I dont think anyones going to confuse Rainbow Six 3 and this. In fact, Im surprise anyone actually cares. The guy that owns it probably told some news sites hoping to get free publicity for his PorN.

  19. Who is liable for children seeing this URL? by FauxReal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm just wondering... is it the parents' fault for allowing children to play a ESRB mature rated game? Is it UbiSoft's faulf for being asleep at the wheel? Or is it the guy who set up the porno portal? He did knowingly buy a domain that minors will see a reference to in a video game and then set it up with porn links.

    I suppose it doesn't matter since it is rated mature by the ESRB and any responsible *cough* game retailer wouldn't sell it to a kid anyway.

    Hmmmm... naybe when it comes down to it, the issue is between this guy and UbiSoft's pocketbooks.

  20. No shit pal, have you got sigs turned off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At what point does what someone has to say become less important than who they claim to be when saying it?

    Parent is right, consoles needed no patches prior to x-box...I guess this particular brand of imperfection is a Microsoft innovation.

    1. Re:No shit pal, have you got sigs turned off? by Recoil_42 · · Score: 1

      parent is ignorant --- not only does XBOX LIVE not patch single player games... but you should know by now that all multiplayer games need patches. just look at SOCOM for an example of a game without patches.. you cant patch a game with an 8-meg video card, so SOCOM is now plagued with cheaters. LIVE, on the other hand, has so far patched almost every game out there, and cheating is nonexistant. patching multiplayer games is a REQUIREMENT. cheating is fine when in single player -- we all like to take advantage of glitches, but no one likes a cheater in multiplayer. as for my second point, the Garage map is actually downloadable content --- it was a 'patch' in the first place, so theres no harm in patching it again. it didint come with the game.

      --


      Newsie, Moderator, www.tauniverse.com
    2. Re:No shit pal, have you got sigs turned off? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Troll
      "you cant patch a game with an 8-meg video card"
      What does the video card have to do with any of this? :P

      And furthermore, isn't the PS2 memory card 16 mb?

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  21. Great marketing by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I am far from an xbox fan, but this is another example of GREAT MARKETING. Not so much for the porn URL, but for UBIsoft and rainbow six. Do you know how many people actually went out to buy aladdin the vhs movie when the found out one of the church chapels was shaped identical to a huge penis. Thousands! During the pre-internet days teenage girls were lining up to buy aladdin to see some cock. You think I am kidding, but this is great marketing facts.

    1. Re:Great marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you know how many people actually went out to buy aladdin the vhs movie when the found out one of the church chapels was shaped identical to a huge penis. Thousands! During the pre-internet days teenage girls were lining up to buy aladdin to see some cock. You think I am kidding, but this is great marketing facts.

      No, you've got it all wrong. It's the (original) cover of The Little Mermaid that has the tower shaped like a penis. Aladdin has the voice whispering "take off your clothes" in the background.

    2. Re:Great marketing by smothra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gaaaaah!

      http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/aladdin.htm

      Maaaaah!

      http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/mermaid.htm

      Meh?

      http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/rescuers.htm

      --
      Look ma, no tpyos^H^H^H^H^H^H . . . oh crap.
    3. Re:Great marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  22. risk? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
    Hmmm...the guy buys an unused domain that shows up in a game and puts porn there. Most of his visitors will be gamers who find the site in the game, and many of those will be underage.

    A prosecutor looking to boost his "I'm tough on porn!" reputation could probably find some theory under which he could nail this guy.

    Yes, I know net porn is generally legal, but in this case you've got porn that is especially likely to be found by underage people, and also probably less likely than normal to be found by people who are actually seeking porn.

    1. Re:risk? by Eviscero · · Score: 1

      The way I look at is this: If the domain name posted in the game was unregistered, then boo on UBIsoft for not securing it prior to the release of the game. I dont see how it is this fellas responsibility to adhere to any laws since this domain name was registered prior to the game release. Since this game is played by minors, then the ultimate responsibility lays with the parents to control what their children are exposed to. I would have done the same thing; although, i dont know about the porn...

      --


      It's not what you know; It's what you can find out.
  23. Possibly not UbiSoft's fault by zero_offset · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All but the largest interactive multimedia companies get their artwork done by external graphic arts companies on a contractual basis. Granted, someone at UbiSoft is probably responsible for reviewing those assets, but even then it isn't too surprising -- I've been in that environment and I know how things can slip through when the deadline is looming.

    --

    Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  24. MoviePoopShoot.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It worked for Jay and Silent Bob

  25. Re: Yes and No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People rush out and buy crap like that, but for a different reason than the shit you're spouting. It's not teens looking for cock, it's idiots thinking they will have a collector's item once Disney (or whoever) fixes the offending art in future releases of the product.

  26. It's legal by spotteddog · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just look at WARNING PORNO SITE http://www.whitehouse.com vs WARNING US GOVT SITE http://www.whitehouse.gov

    If Billy and Dubya couldn't get this changed, UbiSoft shouldn't be able to either.

    --
    . there used to be a sig here.....
  27. did anybody even bother to check it? by maxmg · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe the website in question is http://www.carrodoleao.com/, I went and had a look when I first saw it in the game - and there is no porn there whatsoever! There might be soon, however, as the guy who owns the domain seems to be willing to sell...

    --
    I asked for a refund - and got my monkey back.