Slashdot Mirror


First Preview of GIMP 2.0 Ready for Testing

molnarcs writes "The first preview of GIMP-2.0 is available. It can be installed side-by-side with GIMP 1.2 - so there is no need to uninstall 1.2 to test it. According to this README, some parts (gimp-perl and GAP) were removed from the main package, and will be released as separate modules. Use the mirrors listed on the homepage to download the source code. (Also available for FreeBSD via ports)." Apparently the GIMP is finally adding CYMK support, for those of you working in the print world.

16 of 563 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yes but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    To copy money on Photoshop CS, its easy. Here is how to get around it.

    1. Open up image in ImageReady.
    2. Click import image to Photoshop
    3. Have funny money fun :D

    Adobe are stupid.

  2. Re:Screenshots? by locutus_borg · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is one here....
    http://openosx.com/gimp2/screenshots.htm l

    --
    - It is easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them. - Alfred Adler -
  3. Re:Yes but.... by capoccia · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does it allow me to copy money? I hear programs like this are in short supply. :)

    I copied some currency with the GIMP recently. No problems at all.
    http://kandent.com/archives/2003_11/funny_money.ht ml

  4. The List of mirrors is slashdoted. by chrestomanci · · Score: 4, Informative

    Africa ftp://ftp.is.co.za/applications/gimp/ Australia ftp://ftp.planetmirror.com/pub/gimp/gimp/
    http://ftp.planetmirror.com/pub/gimp/gimp/
    ftp://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/gimp/
    http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/gimp/
    ftp://gimp.zeta.org.au/gimp/gimp/ Austria ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/graphics/gimp/gimp/ Finland ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/graphics/packages/gimp/ France ftp://ftp.minet.net/pub/gimp/
    http://ftp.iut-bm.univ-fcomte.fr/pub/gimp/ Germany ftp://ftp.fh-heilbronn.de/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/gim p/
    ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/misc/grafik/gimp/
    http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/misc/grafik/gimp/ Greece ftp://sunsite.ics.forth.gr/sunsite/pub/gimp/ Ireland ftp://ftp.esat.net/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/
    http://ftp.esat.net/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/ Japan ftp://SunSITE.sut.ac.jp/pub/archives/packages/gimp /
    ftp://ftp.u-aizu.ac.jp/pub/graphics/tools/gimp/
    http://www.ring.gr.jp/pub/graphics/gimp/
    ftp://ftp.ring.gr.jp/pub/graphics/gimp/
    http://mirror.nucba.ac.jp/mirror/gimp/
    ftp://mirror.nucba.ac.jp/mirror/gimp/ Korea ftp://ftp.kreonet.re.kr/pub/tools/X11/ftp.gimp.org / Netherlands http://gnu.kookel.org/ftp/gimp/
    ftp://gnu.kookel.org/pub/gimp/ Norway ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/gimp/ Poland ftp://ftp.tuniv.szczecin.pl/pub/Linux/gimp/
    ftp://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/graphics/gimp/ Romania ftp://ftp.kappa.ro/pub/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/
    ftp://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/pub/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/
    http://ftp.iasi.roedu.net/mirrors/ftp.gimp.org/ Russia ftp://ftp.sai.msu.su/pub/unix/graphics/gimp/mirror /
    http://gimp.tsuren.net/mirror/gimp/

  5. Re:The problem with gimp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently you don't know what you're talking about..and neither do the people who modded you insightful GIMP 1.3.x/2.0 does a lot to address the user interface issue; (most, AFAIK) of the previously isolated windows can be docked.

  6. Re:Difficult to use or? by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

    I generally find Gimp very easy to use, even easier in some ways than Photoshop (although I think the difference between which you're comfortable with largely comes from whether or not you find top menus or context menus more convenient).

    The actual methodologies you use between the two are very similar, although newer Photoshops have some interesting capabilities that Gimp doesn't have. For even very advanced graphic design, Gimp can certainly do it. Its got more features than people were using to do any imaging work a few years ago with things like Photoshop.

    Courses that cover techniques could certainly be useful, with the understanding that the actual steps may be different in Gimp. Knowing what to do is more important than how to do it.

  7. Re:Screenshots? by jcupitt65 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a shot of 1.3.23 (I think), the final is pretty similar.

  8. Mandrake Cooker has it by G�tz · · Score: 4, Informative
    The package gimp1_3 in the Mandrake Cooker contribs is already at version 2.0pre1. Users of 9.2 should be able to install it too.

    Go to Easy Urpmi and add a Cooker contribs source if you don't have one already. Then type urpmi gimp1_3 and you're done.

  9. CMYK support getting closer, but not here yet by ubiquitin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wanted to clarify one point from this slashdot posting: GIMP 2.0pre1 has plugin or two that can handle some CMYK functionality, but this is not the release that uses gegl, or the generic enhanced graphics library. GEGL is the project that will bring all the bells and whistles necessary for proper colorspace support.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
  10. Re:Screenshots? by jeremymh · · Score: 5, Informative

    screenshot of the default setup running under gnome.

    The interface has some very nice improvements. Each tool window can be dragged around, to dock things together (see the tabs on the layers window? Behind that are paths, undo history etc)

    You don't have to right click on an image to do functions to the image, it has them up the top of that window, making it more friendly to new users.

  11. Re:Windows version? by dylan_- · · Score: 4, Informative
    So, will there be a Windows version anytime soon for us Windows users (over half of ./), or are we stuck with the ancient 1.2.5?

    I'm running 1.3.23 on my Win2K machine. Download it from http://www.gimp.org/~tml/gimp/win32/downloads.html

    You may have to wait a bit till gimp.org gets back on its feet...

    I had a problem in that it didn't detect my fonts, and I had to grab fontconfig from http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/WindowsInstall to fix it. The new interface took a little getting used to, but I like it now.
    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  12. Screenshots by ghostis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are some decent screenshots

    -ghostis

    --


    Computer Science is all about trying to find the right wrench to bang in the right screw. -T.Cumbo?
  13. Re:What's wrong with window-in-window? by vidarh · · Score: 4, Informative
    MDI that uses nested windows consistent with the current window manager is a "problem", though it shouldn't be hard to provide an X protocol extension to allow windows to have managed sub-windows (I think, though I'm not sure, that it might be feasible to do it even without a change to the server itself, by letting apps ask the window manager directly to reparent it's windows, but there might be restrictions that stop this). The reason nobody has bothered doing this is that MDI is a giant hack which had as it's sole purpose to "work around" a problem created by the menu-per-window mechanism of Windows, which is the defacto standard also for X apps.

    It's confusing as hell to most users, but was considered more or less a necessity due to avoid reproducing toolbars etc. for all document windows.

    AmigaOS and MacOS avoided similar issues with an app-wide menu at the top of the screen, and in AmigaOS' case with "screens" as a more generic type of grouping (because screens weren't restricted to having Windows from one app)

    In X you can get the same grouping by keeping an app on a virtual screen, so MDI serves very little purpose. Using virtual screens gives you the advantage that there is one less mechanism for the user to understand.

    Increased screen real estate and configurable and draggable toolbars also lessen the problem of losing screen realestate by duplicating toolbars in each document window.

    To sum it up, MDI was a hack to solve a problem that's mostly gone away.

  14. Re:gimp is too complicated for me... by Thornae · · Score: 4, Informative

    the one thing on my list of needed software is a SIMPLE photo editor

    Well, a quick search on Freshmeat (bookmark it, you'll find it very useful) suggests the following:
    If you're not after actual re-touching capability, VIPS might be what you want. (Oh, you are. Oops.)
    Well, for the princely sum of US$25, JPhotoBrush Pro looks good (there's a trial version available for download).
    For very basic manipulation, IV might do. And if you want something really basic...
    If you're willing to play with something considerably less mainstream, PyWiew caught my interest for being pure Python. Does sound a bit esoteric, though.

    Finally, you could see for yourself what else is out there. There's more than freshmeat, of course. Like the Linux section of Tucows.

    Incidentally, if you have the time to learn it, Gimp can be very useful. Best way (like all *NIX at home learning) is to find someone who knows what they're doing and get them to teach you.

    P.S. - If you like Linux, try FreeBSD sometime. Not as popular or well covered, but has advantages too.

    HTH, etc.

    --
    |>
    Here be Dragons
  15. Re:Difficult to use or? by sootman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Book links:

    Grokking The GIMP - 100% free online or you can buy a copy.

    ORA GIMP Pocket Reference -- prettty handy. You might find that in your local B&N or Borders or whatever.

    Of course, both of these are for The GIMP 1.2.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  16. Re:Difficult to use or? by t'mbert · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the responses here are typical. Typical of those who think "different is better" and that we all have time to devote to this.

    I tried and tried to use Gimp over the years, I tried to read through the manuals online...it was PAINFUL. Even the easiest things escaped me. I just wanted to do X very simple procedure, and I spent hours trying to figure out how to do that. I even found newsgroup postings from people trying to do what I was doing and getting responses like "it's just a little different, you have to hold shift-alt drag the mouse and stand on your head to draw a box." Duh.

    And then I picked up a trial copy of Elements 2.0, figured it out in about 30 seconds and was doing what I needed to do. I paid my $100 two days later and will never go back. It's super-fast on my machine too.

    The lesson: Gimp is different for the sake of being different, which means it's a higher learning curve than I'm willing to give it. I'll gladly pay someone who's taken the time to make their software work in a way that users expect these days.

    Take a page about design from Joel on Software, guys. The Gimp isn't worth my time.