Slashdot Mirror


RFID Casino Chips

scubacuda writes "Could casinos be the next Gillette or Wal-Mart? New Scientist and others report that casinos could soon start using RFID tags to spot counterfeits and thefts, and also to monitor the behaviour of gamblers. Embedded RFID tags should make the chips much harder to counterfeit, and placing tag readers at staff exits could cut down on theft by employees. (With companies like Infosys helping clients identify and plan pilot RFID projects, we'll no doubt be seeing more and more companies dabbling in this area. Those interested in reading objections to RFID use should check out the position paper issued by CASPIAN, EPIC, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Junkbusters, ACLU, Meyda Online, EFF, and PrivacyActivism.)"

33 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Ouch for card counters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They can more easily monitor your swing of bet levels......

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Ouch for card counters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Card counting is ALWAYS legal, as long as there is no mechanical assistance...

      :-)

      But, most casinos don't allow you to play BJ there is they think you are a counter. I've never heard of a casino being 'advantage' player friendly. If they did, I can only guess they'd have the worst possible game set up...as far as dealer stands, payoffs...shuffle after each deal.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Ouch for card counters... by glorf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article talks mainly about being able to identify the chips as being authentic. I think that installing the equipment at each betting spot on the table to read the different IDs, lookup the dollar value in a central database and do the math to figure out total bet would be a little much. It would take some serious hardware to do real-time tracking of every chip in play. Considering that dealers, pit-bosses and the eye in the sky already are fairly good at catching counters (who can't take the casino for too much if they don't want to get banned), I don't think the ROI would be there for such a massive system.

      Having a few readers in the cage to verify authenticity before giving out cash in exchange, would be a much more efficient use of RFID.

    3. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Pave+Low · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I believe there's already technology that can constantly monitor bettings, though I'm not sure how widely its implemented. The eye in the sky can see that without RFID.

      Anyways, spotting a lone card counter really isn't that hard anyways. To be a really effective counter, your betting levels needs to swing wildely from 10-1 if you're using a hi-lo count, and pit bosses can see it a mile away.

      It's team play that is really hard for casinos to spot, like when a spotter can call other people in when a shoe is hot, and they can bet huge.

      --
      SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    4. Re:Ouch for card counters... by B'Trey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if that's true, which I'm not at all certain of, I don't see it as an issue. You have no right to card counting.

      In fact, I don't see this as an issue at all. The casino already knows how many chips I buy, they can keep track of how many I win, and I cash them in before I leave.

      The real issue with RFIDs is that they can be used to track people over time, and for purposes much different than their announced use. I'd have absolutely no problem with Wal-Mart (or whoever) using RFIDs to track inventory if they were somehow turned off when I purchased the merchandise, somewhat like the magnetic devices that are currently used for anti-theft measures.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    5. Re:Ouch for card counters... by leonardluen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      those continuous shufflers aren't allways as good as the casino wants them to be...you are correct that you can't count them, but i believe sometimes they can have patterns as to how they shuffle.

      some people are really good at tracking a shuffle of a normal dealer, i have seen it done before without use of anything but your own brain...you can use some of these same techniques on a continuous shuffler. it is a lot harder than counting though!

      and it is a good thing that not everyone counts(successfully) otherwise all the casinos would switch to these continuous shufflers.

    6. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it illegal for the casino to count cards?

      No, it's called preferential shuffling, and it's perfectly legal. However, if they used RFIDs in the cards, at the very least they'd have to tell you, in which case no one would play blackjack at that casino. Well, actually, some people probably would, but not as many.

      And this wouldn't be legal in Atlantic City, because all game rules in Atlantic City have to be approved by the government.

    7. Re:Ouch for card counters... by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could do that to one or two chips and get away with it. But if you come in with a whole pocket full of them, they would probably kick you out and bar you.

      Casinos are all about trying to make the customer happy so they can take their money. The minute you go from someone they can make money from to someone they suspect is trying to unfairly take money from them they start playing hardball.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    8. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Prong · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Casinos like to foster 2 myths about card counting. First, that it's illegal (it's not), and second that you'll be declared persona non grata if they "catch" you doing it. The truth is that casinos tolerate counters on a regular basis, for a number of reasons:
      • Card counting is damn hard. As an exercise, cut 20 random coupons out of the Sunday supplement, memorize the products and the discounts. Go to your local supermarket, buy a normal week's groceries, taking advantage of the coupons (without looking at them), and factoring in the "advantage buys". If you're single, buy 2 weeks, with an eye on the stuff you don't buy much (toilet paper, cleaning stuff). Keep a running total in your head. At checkout, if your total cost and total coupon savings are within 25 cents of the actuals, you may have a future as a card counter.
      • Given the fact that most people who try card counting are both bad and obvious, the casinos don't comp them, which cuts the cost of business. Overall, casinos understand shaving odds. After all, two single number bets on the roulette table shaves the house odds. Which brings me to the third point:
      • I know exactly zero card counting systems which push the player into postive odds. The really good systems cut the house advantage to .5% or slightly better, but the odds are still with the house in the long run. The counter is depending on a run to make his or her money, along with the right betting scheme (counters tend to be progressive bettors).

      That being said, an extremely good counter can bet on (excuse the pun) being blacklisted in Las Vegas, but that's a tiny, tiny percentage of players overall. An average card counter will simply be denied perks, and be viewed with some suspicion. If you play 250-500 hands a year, the comps more than offset the average counter's edge. If you play more that that, it depends on how good a counter you are.

      Now that I've vented, I'll get back on topic. RFIDs in casino chips bother me not. The privacy implications for someone who gambles are nil, and the advantage in more accurate play tracking so outweigh any privacy issues, it's not even funny. You don't take chips home (are you stupid? they have cash value only in the casino), the first thing you do when you sit at a table in Vegas is utter the words "I want to be rated", and _every casino wants to keep its player to itself. Hence their reluctance to sell their mailing lists.

      A Final Thought: If you find yourself up $75k at the $20 minimum table and a host offers you a suite and RFB, ask for show tickets, take the deal and walk away. And send me some money for my sage advice. :)

      -Prong
  2. Oh no,! They'll.. wait.. what does this add? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As soon as you walk into a casino you're already under the eye of man many cameras monitoring the place. What will this add? I mean Casinos are already Big Brother incarnate, All RFID chips will mean is that you can't cheat.

  3. Link me to them... by tgd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a great use for RFID tags. Watch all the chips, watch where the move, and track which ones I have.

    I love to go to the casino and play card games like Blackjack or more importantly Craps. Accurate tracking of chips tagged to me would mean two things: accurate comping and the ability to have a technical solution to ensuring payouts are correct.

    Those of you who have played craps at a busy table will know what I mean -- the accuracy of your payouts when you win is always in the hands of the "dealer" working your half of the table. I've been payed wrong many times, sometimes in my favor, sometimes not. Sometimes money comes in from bets I forgot I had on the table, sometimes I wonder if I got missed on a payout.

    If this means that questioning a missed payout can be more accurate or means at a minimum the casino can see in aggregate when they have someone working the table who consistently makes payout errors, more power to them.

    This isn't a privacy issue. If you think you have one spec of anonymity or privacy in a casino, you're nuckin futs.

    1. Re:Link me to them... by curunir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're making the assumption that you lose money over time. In that case, you absolutely want them to know how large of a donation you're making so they can give you the appropriate tote bag. But for people who play in a manner in which the house does not have a statistical edge (read: card counters), this kind of tracking is a pain in the neck.

      Ever notice when you're sitting at a blackjack table and the pit boss comes over and asks the dealer how you're doing? If you think this is just about comps, you're fooling yourself. Casinos want to know whenever someone is up so they know who to watch for being a counter. Since there's nothing illegal about counting, the game is really about them identifying the counter before he takes too much of their money. It's that cat and mouse game that's where the real fun in Vegas lies for a lot of us.

      That's what these RFID's are about...they're upping the ante for more simply identifying card counters. If you can have a computer monitor whether a player is up or down, you drastically reduce the number of people you have to watch. Currently, if you feel the pit boss is taking note of you, you can just color out and move to a different table. With RFIDs, they'd much more easily be able to watch you by the security cameras. That and they'd be able to track you between tables unless you visit the cashier every time (a pain, especially when you hit that magic $10,000 mark.)

      They can talk about employee theft all they want, but as other posters have pointed out, security measures are already extremely tight and employee theft isn't really that big of an issue. The bigger issue is that blackjack has been broken statistically but is still makes very good profits because the vast majority of players are clueless. This seems like just another salvo in the war against the clued-in.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
  4. It's a private business. by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As such, they are free to do whatever they like to stem losses, gain advantage over customers, etc.

    If you don't like it, you can go to another casino that doesn't use RFID chips. Ain't America grand?

  5. More power to 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's finally happened. The SlashThink phenomenon of "RFID is bad" has officially deteriorated into irrelevancy. This time, we're apparently supposed to think that RFID in casinos has something to do with our rights. It doesn't, and shouldn't. Nobody goes into a casino against their will, and nobody should be surprised that casinos exist for the sole purpose of tracking and taking money. For casinos to *not* use RFID to their advantage would be stupid and irresponsible.

  6. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by introverted · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why would anyone even take the chips out of the casino anyway?

    I doubt they care too much if you take the chips out of the casino. After all, chips that go away don't have to be converted back into cash -- it's just that much extra profit.

    What they don't want is for you to walk out the door with a stack of $1 chips and bring them back made to look like $100 chips. Presumably the RFID would also make it easier for them to detect fake chips that had never been in any casino before.

  7. Yes, privacy in a casino is highly sought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (Posting anonymously under fear of karma loss from that knee gently jerking back and forth in the Slashdot community. "Ahhhh! He's not agreeing with my anti-RFID stance! Heretic! Mod him down!")

    How does this even remotely relate to "your rights"? Casino chips are the equivalent of "disney cash" in theme parks, IE under normal circumstances they are only used within the casino itself. Preventing loss would make the casino more money, and they might even use that to raise your pay tables when you're gaming.

    The articles mention monitoring gamblers, but come on... you're in a casino! Your movements are tracked by a hundred cameras from the time you walk in to the time you walk out. Casino employees on the floor are designed to monitor your movement and habits and either 1) ask you to leave or 2) give you a free buffet coupon, depending on what you are doing. You have no privacy whatsoever and very little anonymosity in a casino. Sometimes that works out to your advantage.

    Yes, there are bad uses for RFID. I don't see this as being one of them. Next thing you know people will be crying out because a warehouse wants to use RFID on crates for inventory control.

    Oh, wait...

  8. Hilarious by Pave+Low · · Score: 4, Insightful
    All this crowing about privacy in a private establishment that has cameras covering every square inch of the property, that use computer databases and face-scanning technology to track counters and scammers, that have security everywhere because millions of dollars are passed around everyday.

    And also watched by the government gaming commissions closely, lest their gambling license get taken away or worse.

    And you're worried about fucking RFID technology in their chips?

    Casinos are one of the few places you should absolutely stay away if you are so paranoid like that.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
  9. Suck if the RFID broke on your $1000 chip... by TheBeck · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Sorry sir this is not our chip, I going to have to confencate it."

  10. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by OECD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not like they'll be tracking you with their chips at the grocery store.

    No, they'll be tracking you at the tables. "Comps" are bestowed based on how much money you wager. If the chips are associated with you when they're sold, then they can track where and when you wagered it and comp you accordingly.

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
  11. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, if you cash out $10K or more at a time...you have to fill out forms for the IRS/US Gov....they really like to track things like that.

    So, say you have a really good night...you cash out $9999, walk out with the rest...cash it out in small doses over time so you stay under the $10K radar. That way, all cash.....hard to track that.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  12. Ah, the party line: by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    File-sharing: Sure there are illegitimate uses for the technology, but there are a few legit uses. DON'T BAN IT.

    RFID: Sure there are a few legit uses for the technology, but there are illegitimate uses. BAN IT!

  13. "Your Rights"? by gkuz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What rights do you have in a modern casino, exactly, other than the right to have them take your money from you? Cameras everywhere, those "bonus cards" or whatever they're called, plain-clothes security staff everywhere, your every move is watched fourteen different ways.

    I manage to avoid the surveillance problem and keep all my money by the simple expedient of not entering their establishment.

  14. GOOD for them!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, they're using RFID tags in their own property to at the very worst, track your behaviour while on their property.

    They're NOT putting these in items you buy, they're NOT using them to track you out the door, and they DO have a very real need to prevent counterfeits. There's increased security for them, and no invasion of privacy for their customers.

    Where's the problem here? Geez, between this and the "forged colour mars photos," it MUST be a slow news day.

    Oh, wait--both of these were posted by Michael. Interesting...

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  15. Whaaaat? (Re:GOOD for them!!!) by phr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What are you talking about, no invasion of privacy? If Wal-Mart wanted to put an RFID tag on your forehead when you go through the entrance, so they could track every item you looked at, would you not feel invaded as long as they took it off when you left?

    And why do you think you'll only be tracked while on the casino property? Most people who go to Vegas stay there for several days, and keep their chips with them when they leave the casino for the night, until it's time to go home. They don't cash out at the end of every session. Most casinos will in fact accept chips from other casinos. You can use Luxor chips at Caesars, and so forth. You can bet that the Caesars will install the equipment to install Luxor's and everyone else's. So you'll be tracked no matter what casino you go in. For that matter, every local restaurant may also install equipment to read the RFID's and they'll track you too.

    Worst of all, the local muggers may also get RFID equipment. Walk past one on the sidewalk on the way to a restaurant with $3000 in chips in your pocket, and the mugger will know the demonination, serial number, and issuing casino of every chip. It makes their target selection a lot more efficient. They could even give you an automatically printed receipt to file with your police report, but somehow I don't think they'll do that.

    Sheesh.

  16. Who'd have thunk it, a legit use by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Casino chips are not something that the casino sells to you. You borrow them as an alternate counting mechanism. Putting RFID tags on THEIR OWN PROPERTY that STAYS THEIR PROPERTY, and STAYS ON THEIR OWN PREMESIS to prevent theft is fine. I'd say the same about museums putting RFIDs on those portable audio players and headphones they give you to walk around exhbits with, or shopping carts at grocery stores. It's theirs, it stays theirs, it stays on premeisis, they have a right to protect themselves against theft.

    That is NOT the case if something is being actually sold to me. Ownership is changing hands at WalMart or wherever you shop, and I don't want something that is becoming MY property to come with auto-tracking mechanisms. If I want an auto-tracking system, I'll damn well install it myself.

    But at a casino, what is being sold is entertainment, not poker chips. The chips are on-premesis loaned use, and so tracking those against theft is perfectly legitimate. Ownership is not changing hands, so RFIDs are not infringing on my property or privacy rights.

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  17. There is a huge difference by RomulusNR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    between RFIDs in something I OWN AND PAID FOR, and RFIDs in something that I AM ONLY BORROWING.

    Now, if casinos sell souvenir (poker) chips... hopefully those wont have active (rfid) chips in them.

    Hell, they should put RFIDs in rental DVD/VHS cases, so they can track down the bastard who hasn't returned that one copy of THX1138.

    Actually, inventory departments of companies might do well to RFID their equipment, especially with a wireless network full of floating laptops...

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  18. Re:I don't understand gambling by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    casinos and gambling can be entertaining and fun. if you sit down at a blackjack table with $40, a few people you know, and spend three hours there chatting with folks and having fun, thats not entirely bad entertainment even if you lose all $40. if you walk away with all your money you've gotten a few hours of free entertainment. if you're a little lucky and a bit smart you can make some pocket change or coffee money for the week. there's always the possibility you walk away with a few hundred dollars, which ads to the entertainment value.

    always gamble responsibly though. the worst is people who get addicted and gamble away their family's food or rent money.

  19. great idea, IMHO by the_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in a case like this, this is an excellent use for RFID. protecting your own property by tracking the stuff that's yours using tags that you put in your own stuff is a perfect way to cut down on theft. in a casino, this is especially important. and having an RFID detector when people cash in makes for a good way to make sure the proper amount of money is redeemed.

    i still don't want these things in my jeans.
    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  20. It'll make the mugger's lives easier by nickovs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If all the casino chips have microchips inside them then the pick-pockets and muggers along the strip will be able to tell from a distance who has chips in their pockets and be able to home in on them! You can stand by the exit of the casino with a pocket RFID reader and when your PDA lets you know someone just walked by with $10,000 in chips in their pocket you can signal to your heavies down the street!

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  21. Fluffy version of story submission by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I submitted Gambling with RFID a day or so ago, but the accepted one is much better. Oddly enough, the company Chipco International makes no mention of RFID chips on their site. I wonder how unhackable those chips are?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  22. Denial Of Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The main flaw with RFID that retails haven't worked out yet is a denial of service attack. Broadcast lots of RFID signals, at something more than minor power, and you can cause real problems.

    Blackmailers will love it

  23. Finally... by qtp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a situation where I think RFID is the Right Way To Do It(tm). If the casinos are using RFID to verify that the chips are actually thier chips before payout, and to prevent employees from walking out with stolen chips, then that's thier right and this seems a reasonably innocuous measure.

    I'm sure that there's lots of people who are crying "invasoon of privacy", etc, but this is one situation where you truly decided to play by thier rules when you walked through that door, and keeping track of thier own property is in no way an invasion of thier employees or thier customers privacy.

    --
    Read, L
  24. Cool. More efficiency in mugging by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If people are walking around outside with casino chips, all a mugger will have to do is scan them to see which ones are worth the effort of a robbery. No more knocking over some old lady and just getting chump change.