Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Extends Win98/SE Support

An anonymous reader writes "ZDNet reports that Microsoft is extending technical support for Windows 98 till 30 June 2006, despite being days away from switching support to a CD. It seems Windows 98 will also have all necessary security updates till the new expiry date." The article states that Microsoft will have "...During that time paid over-the-phone support will be available, and "critical" security issues will be reviewed and "appropriate steps" taken."

44 of 415 comments (clear)

  1. Heh by Xpilot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Having to support their own old buggy products are their biggest liability. Popularity does have its downside.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Heh by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft is dropping support for Windows 98/SE. Lots of people still use it! Pitchforks ready!!!

      Microsoft is renewing support for Windows 98/SE. Those damn buggy insecure products will never die! Pitchforks ready!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Heh by Peale · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, it's good news to me. I sell pitchforks.

    3. Re:Heh by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If M$ had actually written decent code, encouraging bug-free and secure design (ie firing anyone responsible for a buffer overflow bug), Joe sixpack-type people would have no reason to upgrade to 2k or XP.

      So why do SuSE/Mandrake/RedHat/et. al. keep coming out with new versions of their products, then? Oh, silly me, I forgot -- you want to have it both ways. MS bringing out new versions = proof of terrible code. Linux vendors doing exactly the same thing = proof they listen to the customer.

  2. Sadly Enough by j0keralpha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Corporate usage of this OS is still widespread, mainly due to inertia more than anything else. Microsoft is desperately trying to get companies to switch, but getting Officer Level peeps to understand the inherent benefits is proving to be... difficult...

    1. Re:Sadly Enough by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well I think MS realizes that if they start a push towards upgrades there is the possibility that the fees involved might push the coporates to free alternatives... Maybe by pushing for upgrades only with Office and backend items they can leave 98 on the desktops and save themselves from companies going with a mass conversion to Linux?

    2. Re:Sadly Enough by GeckoFood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Corporate usage of this OS is still widespread...

      Not just in the office, but the home user market still has a huge installed base for Win98. To completely drop Win98 would further anger a large number of customers. I am no fan of Microsoft, but I would have to say that keeping support alive for another couple of years if a wise choice if they don't want to further upset their customers.

      Some will leave Microsoft anyway, and that's unavoidable. However, this way they have time to evaluate a little better what transition to make. Microsoft will of course hope that they will all go for XP or whatever is next.

      --
      Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
    3. Re:Sadly Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It isn't inertia, it's ROI. I'd bet you a million dollars that if you magically and seamlessly transformed every Windows 98 corporate installation into 2003 or XP Pro today, that by the end of the year revenues would not be affected... at least not positively.

      Corporate change requires urgency-borne motivation. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" may be a highly ironic cliche to wield when discussing Windows 98, but it's the fundamental reason for upgrade lag.

    4. Re:Sadly Enough by elf-fire · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you think this is mainly owing to inertia??? Many SME's just have a setup that does the job. Why would they need to upgrade? One smalll company I do some consultancy work for has a custom database still running on Windows 98. Not a setup I would ever choose, but for them it works. As long as it sits well protected behind a good firewall, and the user 'administering' it knows what *not* to do security is not really a big issue. Even though I am very succesful in introducing OSS into other parts of the company I could not find a single reason for them to change this particular setup. Doing so would just cost them money. I see the same thing at many SME's that operate in a non technical market.

    5. Re:Sadly Enough by inkedmn · · Score: 5, Informative

      It only makes sense that 98 is still widely used, as upgrading to 2K/XP costs more than my mother-in-law is willing to spend on the stuff that lets her read her email...
      I ran 98SE for *years* before switching to Linux, and for John Q. Homeuser who has AOL and doesn't use the internet for anything more than checking local movie start times and ordering flowers for his wife's birthday, it's enough.

      --
      well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
    6. Re:Sadly Enough by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well I think MS realizes that if they start a push towards upgrades there is the possibility that the fees involved might push the coporates to free alternatives... Maybe by pushing for upgrades only with Office and backend items they can leave 98 on the desktops and save themselves from companies going with a mass conversion to Linux?

      :%s/MS/RedHat/g

      How is it that the devil can decide to extend the end-of-life of a 6 year old operating system for another 2 years, and yet we blast them for not thinking of it earlier and point out how many would have been burned by this abandonment, yet Our Neighborhood Hero decides to end-of-life an operating system that's slightly more than a year old, which many people just adopted, and which they didn't even have to write, just published, and we forgive them their tresspasses and blame it on the economy or whatever?

      I'd say that the end of life of redhat 7.3 and 9 is going to hit me much harder than the end of life of Windows98. My customers, too.

      But, whatever, go ahead and tell me how extending the life of an essentially dead OS just barely saved them in the zero hour from a mass exodus to linux, even though the historically most-popular linux distro wants to charge people almost twice the amount - per year - that windows costs in a one time charge (that includes, appearantly, 6 years of updates). Oh, and that verson of linux only comes with... wait for it... zero hours of tech support, and.... quarterly updates and... in downloadable format, with no physical media!

      Tell them what they've won, Bob!
      Well, Johnny, today's contestants will receive a lifetime supply of "Microsoft is not stupid", in addition to a chance to appear on the lightning round "Companies that can do no good versus companies that can do no evil". Runners up will receive Rice-A-Roni, the san francisco treat.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:Sadly Enough by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not just in the office, but the home user market still has a huge installed base for Win98. To completely drop Win98 would further anger a large number of customers. I am no fan of Microsoft, but I would have to say that keeping support alive for another couple of years if a wise choice if they don't want to further upset their customers.

      On the other hand, people who bought your product once in last century and do not plan to buy another in next two years... are not exactly the kind of customer base you proudly display on shareholders meeting. Looks like Microsoft has reached a dead-end. They don't know how to persuade their user base to upgrade - but they cannot make them do it by enforcing it. From the Microsoft's point of view, people running Win 98 are almost as evil as people running Linux - one way or another, they don't buy Win XP.

    8. Re:Sadly Enough by greenhide · · Score: 4, Interesting

      inherent benefits

      What inherent benefits?

      Okay, granted, Windows 2000, 2003 or whatever version they're peddling now is supposedly more secure and offers more features, but if an operating system works for you and you're familiar with it, what is the benefit in upgrading to an unfamiliar system?

      I think within the geek mindset, there's an assumption that of course people would always want the latest and greatest. The truth is, they want what works.

      Now, I myself use OS X, but my boss's computer runs Windows 98. He doesn't want to send Microsoft another dime -- he's somewhat upset with their crazy licensing. However, he still wants to be able to use the Windows-based software that he's got on his machine, and no, uninstalling everything and running some windows emulator on top of Linux is not something I can get him excited about.

      If it has to be called inertia, then inertia can sometimes be a good thing. I call it pragmatism.

      Or,

      "If it ain't broke..."

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    9. Re:Sadly Enough by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course with Linux the source is readily available (though presumably not for any Redhat-specific addons), so anyone who wants to continue using it and fix bugs can do so. With Win98, that's not an option.

    10. Re:Sadly Enough by JediTrainer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It only makes sense that 98 is still widely used, as upgrading to 2K/XP costs more than my mother-in-law is willing to spend on the stuff that lets her read her email...

      Ok, I confess...

      I'M still running 98SE on my home machine. Yes, still. I dual-boot with Linux, of course, but in order to use the VPN software my company provides (no, our VPN is not IPSEC unfortunately), I need Windows. And Outlook so I can get my email.

      Why haven't I upgraded? Because it's good enough. I don't want to give MS any more of my money, where I trade a working OS with bugs I'm now fairly familiar with for a new OS that's going to cost me more money and give me little benefit.

      If it ain't broke...

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    11. Re:Sadly Enough by bgarcia · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How many people in the world can actually do this? Can you face ordinary people and tell them they should use Linux for this reason?
      Try shutting your mouth and opening your mind just a wee bit, will ya?

      There are already several companies that will offer support for older versions of RedHat Linux. The only reason these companies can offer this service is because the source code is available!

      It doesn't matter if you can actually read the source to fix things! I don't buy a car because I know how to fix it, but I sure as hell want to be able to go to different mechanics across the country and have them be able to fix things!

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  3. I am actually impressed... by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow. MS has really been listening to users recently... This particular move came even faster than the idea to include a more configurable firewall and popup blocking! I am actually quite impressed. Perhaps they are learning THIS from Linux? Listen to your users and make changes quickly to fit what they want and need?

    At first you would think that they would want to "force" users to upgrade to XP/beyond but they realized that it probably will not happen for most users that are still running 98. If you can't beat them join them?

    Being a recent re-convert from Linux back to Windows (still use Linux for a lot but Windows solely for "desktop stuff") I am glad to see that it was worth paying the "MS tax" on the new computers I recently purchased.

    Just my worthless babbling,

    1. Re:I am actually impressed... by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      they are still forcing the same way they have been forcing for a few years.

      there's practically no new stuff coming out for win98(drivers, software, hardware..) and this 'support' doesn't mean that it's getting everything patched either and made sure it would run on modern hardware, it just would mean that there's somebody that would take your support call(and may or may not prove assitance enough to be of any use). now they don't just act as if win98 doesn't exist(which is pretty much what they threated to do).

      if you can't milk them one way milk them/us the other way.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:I am actually impressed... by TehHustler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes but Linux was new technology. Win98 isnt. New stuff will grow and grow, old stuff, usually, dies out.

      I can't believe we didn't hear this news sooner, Win98 is by far the largest userbase of all the MS systems, especially at home/school. Looks like they finally realised that they cant force things onto people... yet

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    3. Re:I am actually impressed... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Wow. MS has really been listening to users recently..

      Maybe, maybe not. Homeland security is now in charge of taking care of the net. Perhaps BillG got a phone call from Tom Ridge saying, "You will patch those systems." For good or bad. Leaving Win98 root exploits alone would be problematic to say the least. Its either this or the *shudder* the mandatory federal firewall.

      The above is all conjecture, but what else could make MS change its mind so quickly?

  4. Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yet "Red Hat will discontinue maintenance and errata support for Red Hat Linux 9 as of April 30, 2004"

    Someone, quick, find out how this makes Microsoft... bad and Red Hat... good....?!

  5. Error in ZDNet article. by Threni · · Score: 5, Informative

    Even if support had been switched to a CD, MS had still pledged to provide security related fixes, AFAIK.

  6. Hey! by freeze128 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where is my Windows *95* support CD?

    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      right next to my DOS 3.2 support floppy.

  7. Heh by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I actually helped two people switch from 98 this week. They both started over the phone almost identically.

    Friend(s): I can't make a boot disk, it doesn't recognize the drive anymore.
    Me: You have to go into the BIOS, change the boot order and pop in a cd.
    Friend(s): The what-os?
    Me: I'm on my way.

    These aren't dumb people, but I installed their OS's and now they think they can't handle it on their parents' computers. I do like impressing people with simple things though, like showing my nephew a yo-yo for the first time.

  8. Security? by Shakey_Jake33 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps MS is trying to look at the big picture? I mean, like it or not, a large amount of internet users, especially coperate and home users who see little reason to upgrade from their 200's, are still using Windows 98. And rightly so from their perspective. Many people just want to use the internet, do a bit of word processing now and then and so-on, and from their perspective, there is little reason to move OS, or even upgrade computer. And with such a large amount of internet users still on this OS, maybe MS saw that keeping this secure is a near-requirement? I'm sure MS would love everyone to move to XP, but I'm sure even they know that that's not happening.

  9. Longhorn release date? by Dreadlord · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if it has anything to do with longhorn release date, which is supposed to be released in 2006, or maybe they've found that they won't be able to release longhorn in 2006, so decided to extend their old OS's support?

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
  10. It just helps MS make mroe money by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find that all the time I've used Windows (since 3.1), I've never had to call tech support, and most users would be fine without ever calling. Most users will just stay with the older, outdated systems then upgrade, so Microsoft can get even more money from the few people that do call in with Windows 98 issues as last I checked they still made you pay by the minute. It doesn't require as much effort to patch an issue in 98, and the amount of money from tech support that you could rake in from keeping it supported could be a very considerable amount.

    --
    This signature was left intentionally blank.
  11. Re:Almost 10 years of a crappy OS by mhesseltine · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • Because if it isn't broken, it doesn't need fixed.
    • Because it saves money by not spending it on unneccesary hardware/software upgrades.
    • Because I don't want to give Microsoft any more money than I have to.
    • Because I'm working on transitioning to Linux desktops, but still have a couple of sticking points.

    Other than that, no reason.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  12. This is bad for Microsoft by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The holdouts are really squeezing a lot out of Microsoft

    This may have been a nice thing to do, but it's a bad business move IMHO. Companies still using Windows 98 have been shown that if they're stubborn enough, they'll get their way. Not only did Microsoft lose out on the Windows 2000/XP licenses they would've bought, they have to continue to pay to patch up the old workhorse.

    A similar thing happened with NT 4, although Microsoft didn't give in. I think they'll have a hell of a time when it comes time to EOL Windows 2000.

  13. Repackage and Sell Again by JoeCommodore · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think they should try and clean it up an then start selling it as "Windows Classic" for whatever faults it has is has been an extremely popular OS for the consumer market.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  14. I'd like to know why by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Funny
    The article doesn't delve into the reasoning behind the decision. It would be interesting to know if:
    1. Some government somewhere muttered "Anti-Trust..." or
    2. Overseas retailers started threatening a mass migration to some form of Linux or
    3. IBM's decision to migrate to Desktop Linux played a factor or
    4. Some other factors were involved.
    Some might argue that Microsoft cares about their customers but then again, some people believe in the healing power of crystals.
  15. That is a long, long period of support by ChrisWong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Continued security updates for ... 8 years? You will be lucky get 8 months from Fedora. Somebody please point me to a Linux distribution that offers that duration of support at any price. Wow.

    1. Re:That is a long, long period of support by More+Trouble · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Somebody please point me to a Linux distribution that offers that duration of support at any price.

      Given that Linux distributions are open source, if there were a market for such long support, someone would sell it. Much like a company other than RedHat is supporting old RedHat distributions. I like to call this effect "free market done right."

      :w

  16. Damn. by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is an extremely good thing for people who use Microsoft products, both in terms of what it will do now, and in terms of what it seems to hint at regarding how Microsoft will support its discontinued products.

    This means it's a horrible thing for the rest of us, because it will slow the rate at which people are becoming disillusioned and ultimately fed up with Microsoft. I had always thought that Microsoft's stringent policy of bullying and abandoning anyone who won't go along with their periodic forced upgrades is the best gift MS's competitors could have possibly recieved; now the chance to take advantage of that gift is to a certain extent gone.

    After all, it's hard to give people reasons to switch away from something they're used to, and hard to convince people to switch away from something they're used to. It's just so much easier when Microsoft creates the reasons and does the convincing for us. If they stopped doing that, we'd have to win on the actual merits of our products, and we don't want that, do we? This is a black day indeed.

  17. Could have been a black eye for MS by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a new vulnerability were to surface, and MS refuses to provide an update for the millions of Win98 users, and this causes a lot of trouble for them, it just looks bad for MS. Fair or not, given the way they are portrayed, saying, "hey, we told you, we aren't supporting that anymore" isn't going to stick. It's going to be another case of how Microsoft is responsible for another security problem.

  18. 2006 by MP3Chuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps they're extending it to 2k6 because of Longhorn? I mean, it makes sense. Just before they released XP they stopped support of 95. They probably want to wait for Longhorn before they drop support of 98. I can't see any other reason they'd support an OS for so long. (Let's ignore the fact that perhaps they should support all of their OS's regardless. Though that'd be some task.)

  19. Well, people have been suffering under WIndows 98 by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, people have been suffering under Windows 98 for years. Microsoft oughta be stuck supporting the crap they served us in the first place.

    Just desserts, man.

    I'm in the process of helping the parish office at my church to upgrade to Windows 2000, because their Windows 98 network gets screwed up about once a month. I want Microsoft to feel some of my pain, since it's their fault in the first place.

    MS, You made your crap, now sleep in it.

    This is good news because I figure it's much less likely for them to pull support for Win2k any time soon, which is actually decently stable. Anyone who needs a reliable system should upgrade from Windows 98 because it's crap, but I see no little or compelling reason to upgrade Windows 2000. Therefore, I was expecting MS to drop it like a hot potato to force upgrades. The problem with Win98 is that a lot of people are using it because they can't afford to upgrade. Therefore, MS shouldn't screw these people by forcing an expense on them they aren't willing to support this dog.

    I expect Windows 2000 will be used for a long, long time.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  20. Other countries out there by aml666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do some projects with companies in other countries (Venezuela, Brazil, ...). I have yet to do business with a company that has an OS later than Windows 98. These poorer countries/businesses(US as well) simply can't afford to upgrade. Unlike most "consumer-minded" Americans, there are a lot of people out there who actually can not see any benefit in upgrading from an OS that does what they need.

    Windows 98 works fro most small business needs (especially if they are not on the internet). I believe that this also applies to Office 97. I still use Office 2000 and OpenOffice.

    --
    www.thejulingtoncreekplantaion.com
  21. Jumping to Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My previous computer (450Mhz PIII with 64MB ram) was a Windows 98 machine. I was fed up Windows Failing me, and with Windows XP out (no way was it going to run on my machine) and MS trying to make me switch, so I switched, to Mandrake Linux in December 2001. I kept windows on there until April 2002 for the transition period though.

    KDE 2.2 was a lot better than the Windows 98 desktop and thanks to Wine I got my legacy applications working and I was incredibly happy.

    Now Ive got my new computer with SuSE 9.0 (1666Mhz with 768 Mb RAM), I won't ever want to go back to Windows if they paid me. Still I know two freinds still on Windows 9x, both with older machines, (233mhz with 32Mb RAM and 800mhz with 64Mb ram) Should I convince them to switch or convince them to get a new computer?

  22. Re:Well I still use Win98 by locknloll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2) The system runs fairly stable (not quite as stable as XP, but I crash maybe 1x per week).

    Note how Windows has changed our way of looking at computer systems & technology in general - something that only breaks down about once a week is considered fairly stable. Makes me shiver...

    --
    -- Power corrupts, but PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.
  23. Most home users don't upgrade by TintinX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem for Microsoft is that Average Joe home users, by and large, do not upgrade their OS.
    If you think back a few years to when the public were really starting to get turned on to the Internet - this would be the time of Win98 or its SE sequel.
    It was also at this time that PCs started to reach the speed and capacity that gave most people what they would want for ever more - Web, Email, Word etc.
    Quite a few of my friends and family bought computers for the first time around this period and not a single one of them is even thinking about upgrading. It's just not something that comes into their heads. They switch their computers on, check email, write a letter, book a ticket etc. and then switch them off again.
    Ergo, the home user market for Win98/SE is huge and will probably remain so for a long time to come.

  24. Some users are stuck with 98 by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they have a machine that cannot be upgraded to run Windows 2000 or XP. If they want to run 2000 or XP, they need to buy a brand new machine.

    Ironically I still know people running Windows 3.X or Windows 95 or even DOS. They cannot afford to upgrade to a newer machine or newer software. They could; however, run Linux or *BSD Unix on their systems if they knew how. Not as fast as modern machines, but enough to limp along.

    New machines can cost like $500USD to $600USD, and then they have to buy the modern software to run on them, as they cannot use the older software as the EULA usually does not allow them to switch it from one machine to another. Plus it may not run on the newer machine or use all the features.

    An alternative is to head to Wal-Mart or some other place that sells a $400USD Lindows machine and use OpenOffice.Org etc. Then they need to be retrained for the new OS and software. Then use OSS software for everything else. This of course would require the assistance of someone like a Slashdotter who is Linux savvy and can train them.

    Another alternative is to buy a used machine with 2000 or XP on it, or 2000/XP ready. Still the softare will need to be upgraded. The hardware costs will be less than the new machine.

    Yet another alternative is if they have an ATX case, to just get a new ATX motherboard, CPU, Memory, and ATX power supply. Get an all-in-one motherboard with built in Video, Audio, LAN, Modem, etc. Like an NForce2 chipset motherboard. Still need to buy 2000/XP and the software upgrades. The hardware cost will be lower than a new machine, and may be lower than an used machine.

    No matter what the option, the 98 user may have to buy new hardware to migrate to 2000/XP.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  25. I wonder if.... by tiger99 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... they were threatened with the Sale of Goods Act in the UK, and are having to support it for 7 years, as required by law. If they have to support it in one country, they in effect end up supporting it everywhere.

    The fact is, that is it is not of merchantable quality, or fit for the intended purpose, it has to be repaired, replaced (with what? XP will not run on most hardware that runs 98), or the purchase price refunded.

    In the UK, a court case established that software is in fact goods. If someone has stitched them up with threats of a class action, which would result in them replacing or refunding every single copy of 98, all I can say is well done.

    If it happened as a result of legal pressure somewhere else, again well done. The sad thing is that we may never know why, I sense the outcome of some out of court settlement with someone, somewhere, lying behind this.

    Polite request to Bill: Can I please have my money back for the copy of ME which I purchased to try to get a bug fix for 98, but which in fact never worked properly? Or, do I have to take you to the UK Small Claims Court?