Slashdot Mirror


Northwest Gives Personal Data to NASA

Tree writes "Following four months on the heels of JetBlue's confession that they released passenger data to the Feds against their stated privacy guidelines, the Washington Post is reporting that Northwest has now admitted that they've done the same thing during a time period when they said they weren't. Nice. They were once my favorite airline."

17 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Not NSA but NASA? by TheAngryArmadillo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was sure the submitter meant the NSA but looking at the story it really was NASA.

    Are they going to be sharing this info with the Martian Immigration Service?

    1. Re:Not NSA but NASA? by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed. I thought that MSN had simply mistakenly put NASA instead of NSA and the poster hadn't picked up on it too. The clincher however is the reference to "Ames Research Center" which is indeed a NASA facility. I guess they don't want Marvin the Martian visiting the US anytime soon...

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Not NSA but NASA? by cyclist1200 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think they're trying to keep out illegal aliens...

  2. It's the lying that hurts... by blackdefiance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like my parents used to say... "It's not that we're so angry that you did [insert bad thing here], it's that you lied to us about it.

    1. Re:It's the lying that hurts... by buelba · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Depending on what happens to Northwest's stock price on Tuesday, this one may really hurt. Under the Securities Act of 1934 and rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder:

      It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange,
      To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud,
      To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or
      To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person,
      in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.
      In practice, what this means is that if a company (whether or not through a director or officer) lies about something material to the stock price, people who buy during the period of market manipulation (essentially, from the date of the lie until the truth is revealed) can recover for their damages (generally but not always what they paid minus the "true value" of the stock when they bought it).

      Setting the "true value" of a stock on a given date, absent the market manipulation, is obviously an excursion into the hypothetical. One strong indicator, however, is how much the stock falls when the truth is revealed. So watch Northwest when the market opens and, if it falls a lot, expect to see securities lawsuits as well as privacy lawsuits.

  3. Bad news, Mr. al-Hassan..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're sending you to Mars because of your ties to terrorist groups. Nothing personal, you understand, right?

  4. Repeat after me... by lisany · · Score: 5, Funny

    We do not live in a police state. The Government trusts us. Donald Rumsfeld is infallable. All hail Bush.

  5. Privacy Implications by barenaked · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what will you when every toll road you travel on by car passes your travel details automatically to law enforcement based on your license plate? Or when one day every intersection has a camera collecting this kind of information? Or when there's a camera doing face recognition on every street corner, evaluating whether you are a terrorist or not? Will you just stay at home all day? I think a more proactive stance is needed here. Getting the general public to understand the privacy implications of these systems so they stop voting for people that put them in place is probably a lot more effective.

  6. How about a database of privacy violaters? by Genghis9 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Somewhat akin to that project at MIT (Government Information Awareness) detailing public figures, there should be one for public companies noting when, where, what.

    Then it should be easy to boycott and avoid them.

  7. Silly Northwest airlines! by xankar · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Jetblue jumped off a bridge, would you?

    --
    ~To choose doubt as a philosophy of life is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation. -Yann Martel
  8. Airlines in an impossible position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    To those who make jokes about "Martian Immigration" and the like, remember that it's the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The agency has a large role in promoting aviation safety.

    On a separate point, remember that an airline that is pressed by the Government to violate its passengers' privacy is likely in an impossible position: "turn over your passenger records, or we have the security people strip-search all your passengers at the gate and we start safety inspections on every one of your planes 5 minutes before departure. You'll never have a customer again."

  9. surprise, surprise... by tuxette · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Privacy policies in the US aren't worth the bandwidth they waste. And they will continue to be worthless unless they're backed by strong national (not just state) privacy legislation similar to the Norwegian Personal Data Act or the EU Personal Data Directive.

    That way, people don't have to be worried about "loopholes" in privacy policies such as the one indicated in a NYT article on the same subject:

    The company said in a statement: "Our privacy policy commits Northwest not to sell passenger information to third parties for marketing purposes. This situation was entirely different, as we were providing the data to a government agency to conduct specific scientific research related to aviation security and we were confident that the privacy of passenger information would be maintained."

    According to for example Norwegian law, this transfer would be unlawful unless the data subjects consented to the transfer.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  10. With codesharing it's hard to avoid the bad ones by wike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a flight last week on Delta (not my favorite airline either) but when I showed up to the airport and had problems with Delta's (we don't want to talk to you so we make you deal with a machine) self-check in kiosk I found out that I was actually flying on Northwest. Huh? Apparantly even though I booked Delta, they codeshare with Northwest. I wonder if my passenger information is now in Northwest's database.

  11. Not the NASA! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really, the FBI can come over and arrest me, the NSA can deploy a task force in the North Sea standing by to obliberate most of Northern-Europe and the CIA can drug my beer but not the NASA! Dear Eris, they might decide to drop that Saturn V on my house, do you have any idea how much that blasted things weighs?

  12. Re:Northworst? by ari_j · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least you have options. I lived in North Dakota for 21 years, and Northworst essentially has a monopoly there. I had to drive 2 hours to get on a damn DC-9 to Minneapolis (another of NWA's hubs, along with Detroit and Memphis) and take a transfer from there. While in college, I was prone to drive the 4 1/2 hours to Minneapolis and fly Frontier or Sun Country from there.

    That said, I flew a Northworst/KLM combination flight to Athens and back. KLM is no comparison to Northworst - wonderful service; attractive, friendly stewardesses; better seats; and more. If you have to spend 2 hours on Northworst to get 10 hours on KLM, do it.

    But for domestic flights that go over or near Denver en route, I now prefer Frontier. Especially with their revamped fleet of Airbuses. I recently flew with them on a plane that had only been in service for 2 weeks since it was brand new, replete with DirecTV in every seat-back. (I didn't pay the $5 because I had a book, but I watched the moving map a lot.) A little more expensive than other 'budget' airlines, but worth it in terms of service and comfort.

  13. Re:For a good reason by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    everybody has something to hide.

    If you don't agree, please post all you credit card numbers, with expiration dates, checking account number, with routing information, all logon and passwords to any thing you have. If you have nay children, please post there names birthdate, secret words, and schedules. Please post you employeer, employee number, annual salary/income.

    Also please put a web cam in every room of your house so we can watch whatever you do. Be sure to post your drivers liscense information, all ID numbers.

    So, you still got nothing to hide?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. Re:For a good reason by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And the government, and the people within it, have never misused their powers or information that has been provided to them.

    Nixon jumps out at me, for some reason here.