Slashdot Mirror


Spirit Rover Communications Error

cybrthng writes "Through yesterdays press release and the current Nasa Briefing there is news that they are having communications errors with contacting spirit. Is she lost or is it something akin to the Pathfinder failures that happened? Or did little green people claim an expensive tonka truck toy?"

25 of 824 comments (clear)

  1. Opportunity by Kiriwas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm really praying for Opportunity now. We may really need that rover if some good data is to come out of these missions.

  2. Let's hope its just software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But Spirit was only transmitting "pseudo-noise", a random series of zeroes and ones in binary code and not anything the scientists could decipher. - BBC News

    It sounds like we still have power and an antenna. Hopefully its just some software error will need a reboot to correct the problem. I think they were late debugging this stuff and actually had to upload the software after the launch. Maybe they missed something.

    The only issue I heard was some voltage spikes when the high-gain antenna was rotated. They were not reproduced but perhaps some underlying problem has occurred.

    Up to now, NASA has made this look so easy. This is a wake-up call. Putting robots unto another planet is still an epic achievement and so much is left to go wrong even after the landing is over.

    Let's hope this is just a red screen of death and a reboot will shake things loose.

    1. Re:Let's hope its just software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This simply highlights the issue of the robustness
      of pure hardware (vs) software. The transmitter
      being nothing other than an autonomous h/w it
      could still function perfectly. I think NASA
      had relied too much on the software(since it
      could allow to "program" anything), making the
      entire system unnecessarily complex. Also
      I am not sure how good environment protection
      the h/w computer system modules have. I feel
      the problem is just due to harsh variations
      in the martian atmosphere, breaking up the
      computer system h/w on the rover. A system
      wide reset may not help recover from such a
      situation, unless there is hardware redundancy
      involved at a device level.
      I feel that NASA totally forgot the critical
      nature of time(where they could have started off
      speedily instead of sitting duck, banking on
      the unreal time they have before the solar
      panels are covered with dust). It is also
      possible, a forbidden command is sent out
      accidentally, destroying the h/w - if this
      is the situation, it will be never reach the
      public, and will just get buried forever with
      those who are responsible.

  3. Check it out... by Mz6 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I found this not too long ago... It's a simulated bird's eye view from MER-B or the Opportunity Rover looking at Mars. It's supposed to land at around 9 PM PST on January 24.

    I sure hope this does better than some of the others so far.. Otherwise we might already know it's fate.

    --
    Hmmm.
  4. Lander Camera by FussionMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Too bad NASA couldn't put a small camera and transmitter on the lander. If they had perhaps it would have been possible to see what attacked poor Spirit.

  5. Re:not as bad as it sounds. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Interesting

    By now they have probably rebooted it (forced it through safe mode to clear any software fault; space vehicles never really go all the way "down"), so if it's still happenning I would say it's either a hardware fault or corruption of essential software or data in (putatively) nonvolatile memory (not unreasonable in high-rad environments).

    If it is corruption of secondary memory, and since they can send valid commands, presumably they can attempt to upload new data/code to fix it.

    If they haven't forced it through safe mode, then they're not too worried and are more interested in characterizing the problem than getting on with the scientific mission. Which is a good or a bad thing depending on which sort of information is more valuable. I'm sure the guys in the software group have their bias.

  6. Reboot? by danwiz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Will the rover reboot under current conditions? How common is it to need to reboot a remote spacecraft?

    I guess it was fun while it lasted ...

  7. Maybe Garbled Commands? by cflorio · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "A rainstorm in Australia yesterday interfered with commands being uplinked to Spirit. At that time, the spacecraft sent a short signal indicating it had received the instructions but engineers said the strength of the uplink was much lower than desired and that not all of the commands got through."

    Is it at all possible that getting half commands or garbled commands has confused Sprit?

  8. Re:Worst case: Opportunity by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So even if Spirit gives up the ghost, her kin can carry on the flame (albeit in a less interesting location).

    Not if the problem is due to a design fault. That's the drawback of sending multiple identical probes: if one is intrinsically fucked, they all are.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  9. HEY NASA -- USE ATOMIC BATTERIES YOU DUMMIES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    NASA Keeps screwing up because it all depends on solar for the rovers thats why.

    DUMB WAY:
    US Gov spends Billions on these sorts of programs for a rover to go up for a few weeks. If any dust gets on the solar panels, after 90 days its get dark, recharge. A few nice pics...

    SMART WAY:
    Put a damn atomic battery on these things! You don't need to worry about dust on the solar cells, recharge issues, power down-up worries, constant juice. And..

    The rovers could run for weeks, even years, plus
    the power could be used to HEAT the electronics and prevent this -100F issue that craps it all out...

    these engineers need to think out of the box and stop being politically correct.

  10. Re:Mars is a dangerous place by WyerByter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, I mean when Kennedy called for landing a man on the moon we were getting one successful launch for every four or five attempts. But this Mars thing, us Americans are only getting two successes for every three attempts. Maybe we need to improve our success rate before going.

    Does no one study history, America needs a challenge in order to rise up to it.

    --

    This signiture copied from somewhere.
  11. From the webcast by Cat_Byte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They were just saying there are many sequences of events that could cause this. If it sensed the battery was overly discharged it will stop sending data & wait for a recharge. It could be as simple as this.

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  12. ones and zeroes... by in4mation · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But Spirit was only transmitting "pseudo-noise", a random series of zeroes and ones in binary code and not anything the scientists could decipher. - BBC News

    I'm telling you I've been contacted by aliens. What if those 1's & 0's are martian encoded binary?. Any martian translators in the house?

    Maybe the message is "please don't send us your junk we want Britney Spears"

  13. Re:Mars is a dangerous place by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not only will there be more automated missions to Mars before we go there, there should also be many more people on the Moon and in orbit before we go to Mars. Using Lunar resources (oxygen for the engines, if nothing else) will simplify a Mars mission and related experience will also help.

    Actually, there probably should be a refueling station in Earth orbit. Lunar fuel/oxydizer would make trips to the Moon much cheaper. Particularly if reusable Lunar lander-shuttles are active.

    Launching directly from Earth to the Moon is quite difficult. That's why most people expected a trip to the Moon would be based from an Earth space station -- nobody expected the ridiculously powerful engines which allowed the Saturn V to exist. The huge Saturn V is what allowed us to toss all the mass necessary for a lunar expedition up to Earth orbit.

  14. What does the Spirit OS look like? by bshroyer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or, more clearly, what do the operating routines look like? Does anyone have a flowchart that would show the data flow? What sort of error checking is done on incoming data? What sort of encryption is done on incoming/outgoing data? (Cartoon bubble: I picture a script kiddie with a powerful transmitter sending SQL injection to Spirit...)

    What does the system do if it determines it has had an unexpected result/crash? How is such a system designed and tested?

    I've never thought about it before - but a system like this must have redundant levels of i/o security, internal error checking, exception trapping, and some sort of self-repair, all built within multiply redundant systems.

    Would any details of the embedded system architecture / program structure be available to the public?

    --
    The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
  15. Life by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe they've already discovered signs of life and are using the communications story as a cover up while they figure out how to best handle the news.

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  16. Re:Radio update by tie_fightertk069 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The beagle team response: I feel your pain

  17. Re:not as bad as it sounds. by billimad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    also

    NASA has experience with uploading new software (including os) to deployed spacecraft to correct defects.

  18. INFORMATION ON THE PATHFINDER/SOJOURNER FAULT: by Featureless · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I thought it would be interesting to dig up and re-read the accounts from the last time there was a "serious" software glitch on the ground on Mars:
    There's a lot of rumor and inconclusive news about Spirit floating around right now, so this is entirely subjective, but I'm getting the feeling this, too, is a software fault of some kind. Put most simply, you could interpret what we're reading right now as "we received the ACK tone for our instructions but didn't get the data back we expected."

    These kinds of problems are not unprecedented, and furthermore I'm under the impression there are options for dealing with even serious OS-level trouble that would shock and awe the average general purpose computer user.
  19. you joke by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But one of our first satellites (I worked for a very small satellite firm) had a debug terminal for informational messages it spat out as it ran. No, we never expected to receive a keypress on this terminal... but we did most of our testing with this terminal because if something went wrong, we'd want to be able to see the error messages.

    When we tried to run the satellite without the terminal, the low level hardware CTS/DTR loopback wasn't present and the satellite hung when it tried to send its first character to the console. We caught that only a couple weeks before shipping the thing, too!

  20. Earth 0 - Mars 3 by bbowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems as if lots of us, country wise are having problems landing something on the surface of mars. No pathfinder, lost beagle 2, possibly another lost rover in the process... Is there something we're missing here that Mars is hiding from us? Satellites seem fine around the planet but as soon as something lands it dies.

    Mars: "Pathfinder...check, beagle2...check, Spirit...in the process..."

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
  21. Wouldn't It Be Nice.... by reallocate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...to have an engineer on scene to fix it.

    Robots are great until they break.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  22. It's ALIVE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The 4:00 EST update confirms that NASA did receive the test confirmation signal back from Spirit. At least a couple of it's legs are still kicking. :)

  23. Just curious . . . . by codifus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why are the Martians assumed to be green when they live on a red planet?

  24. I believe your hoax theory... by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Except that it's a hoax covering a MUCH bigger story than you anticipate. First, the rover lands. Than GeeDub announces a HUGE space program out of the blue. Now, we can't communicate with it. So, that means that it went up there, found something that we have to have/retrieve, and now they are cutting us off from the information stream. See how that works?