Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: MyCrowzOft, Inundation, Taxation

Tonight's Slashback brings updates on Microsoft's softened stance on MikeRoweSoft.com, good news on the thankfully exaggerated demise of Niue's wireless network, and an update on Windows 98's revised appointment with fate. Read on below for the details.

You have until April 15 ... quickenman writes "I used TurboTax for many years but used TaxCut last year (2002) after they Put C-Dilla spyware into the program. TaxCut worked well (it lacked 1 form I needed) but TurboTax seemed to be a little more user friendly. I publish several free internet newsletters, "Dr M's Computer Tip List" and also "Dr M's Computer Tips"and have told my subscribers that the link to eliminate that C-Dilla spyware is still available even though Intuit no longer lists it on their web site. Go to: support.turbotax.com/kb/ViewDocument.asp?do cumentId=491&categoryId=80068"

All publicity is probably good publicity ... for Mike Rowe. bwhaley writes "Microsoft has eased is reins after the an unexpected battle from teenager Mike Rowe in defense of his "trademark infringing" domain, mikerowesoft.com. According to a Reuters article, 'Microsoft has indicated it may have overreacted to the Web site' run by Microsoft's namesake. Thanks to this Slashdot story and lots of others like it, Mike Rowe may be able to keep his domain after all."

I doubt that Mike Rowe is Microsoft's namesake ;)

Niue free wi-fi is not gone freitasm writes "In a previous Slashdot article the author said "The world's first free national wireless grid is no longer with us, after waves from Cyclone Heta swept over Niue's thirty metre cliffs, destroying everything." This turned now not to be what actually happened there. It is now known that the The Niue Internet Users Society stored everything in water proof containers before the cyclone hit the island" "Most of the equipment survived," said IUS-N technical manager, Richard St. Clair. "That's because we stored it all in a water-tight metal shipping container before the cyclone hit." "Some WiFi antennas were lost," said Emani Lui, who originally installed and tuned the antennas for the WiFi service. "But many have now been repaired or replaced and are functioning normally." Since then Telecom New Zealand has restored communications with the island."

CosmacVIP writes "The .nu domain manager says anyone who wants to help should make donations to the New Zealand Red Cross's Pacific Cyclone Relief Fund (www.redcross.org.nz), instead of registering .nu domain names, so the aid will go directly to those who need it most."

All depends on whom you ask. Greedo writes "This article at Wired contradicts earlier news that HP was working on getting WMA support built into their branded iPod. "We're not going to be supporting WMA for now," said Muffi Ghadiali, product marketing manager for HP's digital entertainment products group. However, one analyst said that between now and summer, HP may come up with a way to convert WMA to AAC, or an equivalent technical fix. I guess we wait and see."

After that, if it breaks, you get both pieces. Ieshan writes "Microsoft has just decided to resume support for Windows 98 and apparently other product lines, as mentioned in this CNN article. Well, I guess it didn't die for long. They say customers in developing countries weren't made aware of the changes. I say they probably realized that people in developing countries couldn't afford to upgrade entire networks, and might pursue alternatives."

175 comments

  1. Domain names? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mike Rowe gets to live? Yeah!!! :)

    Seriously, it's getting to the point where I wouldn't put it past microsoft to actually require a name change for guys like Mike in the next ten years... How blatantly wrong could they be? I'm surprised they didn't go after any website that had "Bob" in the name... cuz after all, that's a lot like their MS Bob...

    On the flipside though, how long before people start changing their names just so they can get domain names? I'm eyeing Natalie H. Gritts myself... sure I'm a guy... but the domain name, and the right to keep it would be priceless, and worth the ackwardness... :)

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Domain names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      On the flipside though, how long before people start changing their names just so they can get domain names? I'm eyeing Natalie H. Gritts myself... sure I'm a guy... but the domain name, and the right to keep it would be priceless, and worth the ackwardness... :)

      Who is Natalie H. Gritts? You completely lost me there.
      Sincerely,
      Emma Soffass

      Visit my on-line trading and auction site at: http://Emma'sExchange.com !

    2. Re:Domain names? by scowling · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you knew sweet fuck all, you'd know that it's their trademark that they have to defend, and that copyright is not an issue in this story.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    3. Re:Domain names? by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 1

      i don't really think that anyone will confuse MikeRoweSoft.com with Microsoft.com when looking at them spelled out (at least I hope so). And whenever anyone says the domain name, they'll have to spell it out, and then you could tell the difference. So if you never mistake one for the other, they're shouldn't be a problem, right?

    4. Re:Domain names? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is... Microsoft is such a bland name...

      Micro - micro computer, as in desktop. Rather then a mini computer that's more like a desk.

      Soft - Soft ware, as in stuff you run on a computer.

      Micro - Soft - a company who picked the most generic name possible that communicated they made software for micro computers.

      Why is it these companies pick such boring names and at the same time get granted the rights to hold them as trademarks? [old joke] They should shorten their name to MoF... at least then they will save megabytes of data with all those damn license agreements, and it would be unique in the computing world so people don't accidently step on their trademark. When your IT department asks you what you need on your PC, you can tell them "MoF Off" [/old joke]

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:Domain names? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Funny

      You think that's bad? Feel sorry for anyone with the initials S C O

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    6. Re:Domain names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it these companies pick such boring names

      So you like interesting names like Apple instead? How about Sun, Oracle, or Ford.

      at the same time get granted the rights to hold them as trademarks?

      So to have a trademark you have to have an interesting name? So all companies should be zipbangboom computers and woozywoops automotive.
      I am guessing that you consider zakezuke to be a very interesting name.

    7. Re:Domain names? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      According to the story Mike wants $10,000 for the domain. Now that there have been over 250,000 hits in such a short time, and huge publicity, he should probably ask for more if someone wants to buy it from him.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:Domain names? by jhoffoss · · Score: 5, Interesting
      All you have to do is look at Gates' net worth to see that bland works in big business. And the publicity this kid has gotten is fantastic; he'll have a good chance at having name recognition at any interview he sits down in (were you that guy with the site ten years ago...)

      I'm surprised he hasn't had to sell the damn domain just to cover his hosting costs though.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    9. Re:Domain names? by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

      The $10,000 request was a "Piss off, I'm not selling it, and this should be high enough to disuade you". Problem is, he wasn't aware that the price isn't entirely unreasonable. I had one friend sell his domain for $35K and another sold his domain for $15 (admittedly, during the .com boom). $10Million would have been more along the lines of "piss of and don't bother me". Unfortunately, he's a bit young, and so $10K seemed outrageous.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    10. Re:Domain names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a 5 because, why? I don't get it.

    11. Re:Domain names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm surprised they didn't go after any website that had "Bob" in the name

      The Church of the Subgenius would certainly counter-sue.

    12. Re:Domain names? by allism · · Score: 1

      You know, I didn't realize why Experts Exchange had a hyphen between experts and exchange in their url until I accidentally typed it without the hyphen...

    13. Re:Domain names? by Ironica · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you knew sweet fuck all, you'd know that it's their trademark that they have to defend, and that copyright is not an issue in this story.

      Let me introduce you to sweet fuck all, by pointing out that every single news story said that Mike Rowe received a notice of "copyright infringement," which may be because under Canadian Trademark law, you cannot trademark a living person's name (at least, not until it's a distinctive mark). It may also be because the idiots reporting it didn't know the difference, but if that's the case, count the poor 17-year-old as one of them, since he wrote on his own site that he had received notice of "copyright infringement."

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    14. Re:Domain names? by XO · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you know what Melissa Gates said to her mother, after her wedding night...

      "Mother, now I know why he calls it.. Micro... soft."

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    15. Re:Domain names? by XO · · Score: 1

      and strangely enough, www.ExpertSexChange.com doesn't seem to resolve to anything. LOL!!!!!

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    16. Re:Domain names? by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you like interesting names like Apple instead? How about Sun, Oracle, or Ford.

      Apple had issues because of the UK record company, or wait, still has issues due to the Itunes thing.

      Sun is again a boring name... i'm sure other Suns exist other than the sun we know and love.

      Ford is a proper name.

      Oracle is a common enough one to see in circles outside the software world.

      So to have a trademark you have to have an interesting name

      Sun Microsystems... Oracle Corp... Apple computers / Apple Records... Ford Motor Company

      Any old joe can start a small business called Sun something or another, but not Sun Microsystems. Apple only has license to object when some other Apple does something sound / music related. Ford being a proper name isn't in it self a trademark, only in relation to automobiles as in the Ford motor company. It's the price you pay for having a boring name.

      Lot's of Micro related stuff around, lots of ...soft companies. Microsoft doesn't own any rights to either Micro nor ....soft.

      I am guessing that you consider zakezuke to be a very interesting name.

      Actually, I do. It's unique, easy to spell, semi-proper name looking. It has a sence of balance as in yin/yang or your push you pull... and near as I can tell, i'm the only bugger who uses it, unlike Anonymous Coward.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    17. Re:Domain names? by macshune · · Score: 1

      *sob**sob* stop making fun of me! *sniff*

    18. Re:Domain names? by Avenger546 · · Score: 1

      I'm still lost on who the heck Natalie H. Gritts is... or what company / organization it's supposed to represent / mock. Any help?

    19. Re:Domain names? by strobert · · Score: 1

      Being in on the original site (wow that was a while ago...), the domain was run by me, and the first version didn't have a hyphen. I cracked up and pointed out the alternative words. hence they launched with the hyphen :).

    20. Re:Domain names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How charming that true love waits for Mr. Gates. Just in time for the National Day of Purity on 2/13. Seriously though, 1957 called, they want their joke template back.

    21. Re:Domain names? by parksie · · Score: 1

      I thought she was called Melinda.

    22. Re:Domain names? by fstanchina · · Score: 1

      I cant spel, you insensitiv claud.

    23. Re:Domain names? by Dogers · · Score: 0

      double trouble for them - a license to use linux and a license to use their name :)

      SCO's next endevour?

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    24. Re:Domain names? by robnauta · · Score: 0

      True... The Apple founders were Beatle fans, so they called their company Apple. When they gained success they signed an agreement with the Apple managers/lawyers (the Beatles record lable 1966-1970) that they could use the Apple name just as long as they never entered the music business.
      Of course it didn't take long before they got sued over midi software. And now again over iTunes, will they ever learn ?

    25. Re:Domain names? by noims · · Score: 1

      One caveat, though. As El Reg pointed out, Microsoft have neither acknowledged they have no claim nor apologised.

      The danger is that once the hype about this settles down, they resume the case knowing that it's now old news and won't get anything like the previous publicity.

      Noims.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world. This is just a tribute.
    26. Re:Domain names? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
      Whois says that Mr. Watkins is the Expert Sex Changer
      Registrant
      Evan Watkins
      1015 Oaklands Drive
      Round Rock, TX 78681
      US

      Registrar..: IARegistry.com (http://www.iaregistry.com)
      EXPERTSEXCHANGE.COM
      Created on..............: 12-Jun-2001
      Expires on..............: 12-Jun-2004

      Administrative Contact:
      Watkins, Evan ewatkins@austin.rr.com
      1015 Oaklands Drive
      Round Rock, TX 78681 US
      +1.512.388.0665
      Technical Contact:
      Watkins, Evan ewatkins@austin.rr.com
      1015 Oaklands Drive
      Round Rock, TX 78681 US
      +1.512.388.0665

      Name servers for this domain:

      NS.MOTIVE.COM 63.103.217.131
      AUTH03.NS.UU.NET 198.6.1.83
      --
      Yeah, right.
    27. Re:Domain names? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Of course it didn't take long before they got sued over midi software. And now again over iTunes, will they ever learn ?

      They, being apple records, or they being apple computers? When you talk about apple today, which apple do you think of, or do you think of some damn fruit company. Do Apple computers or Apple records have any protection from trademark infringement if some damn fruit company who deals primarly in apples decided to call them selves Apples?

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    28. Re:Domain names? by LegionX · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. but why should microsoft be angry about that? the poor sods end up on their web-site?

    29. Re:Domain names? by allism · · Score: 1

      I am honored to have spoken (?) with such an astute proofreader. (Not being sarcastic - that's a big part of my job as a software tester, the company I work for as part of my day job has released some doozies when they didn't run stuff by anyone but our rah-rah marketing department)

    30. Re:Domain names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares.

    31. Re:Domain names? by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      I had something similar to that happen at work. The ECom developers/sales morons wanted to setup a general questions email account for one of their new clients. So they asked to have questions.ex@company.com created. Little did they know that Exchange doesn't allow . in an email address. Yeah. And they still work here today. And they're still morons.

    32. Re:Domain names? by allism · · Score: 1

      Our marketing department goes so far as to have large volumes of stuff printed out before showing it to anyone to get input...that's why our company logo looks like a hammer and sickle (think USSR, for you really young folks).

    33. Re:Domain names? by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Sun is again a boring name... i'm sure other Suns exist other than the sun we know and love.

      Sunn makes (made?) great bass amps. Owned by Fender now (what isn't owned by Gibson or Fender these days?)

      Sunn Microsystems? Are they competing with Pignose now?

      www.sunnbicycle.com
      www.sunnbattery.com

      Newspapers
      www.thesun.co.uk
      www.sunspot.net

      Son House
      www.slidingdelta.com/bluesmen/sonhouse2.htm l
      I think a picture of him is going on our server room door.

      Sun studios (Elvis)
      www.sunstudio.com

      The original Sun
      sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov

    34. Re:Domain names? by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Or is it Ms now?

      --
      -no broken link
    35. Re:Domain names? by XO · · Score: 1

      ok, sorry, so i fucked up. lol

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    36. Re:Domain names? by FLEB · · Score: 1

      As long as the fruit company didn't go into the music business (Apple Records) or the computer business (Apple Computer).

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    37. Re:Domain names? by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Which led to one of their first system sounds being called "Sosumi".

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  2. Intuit by Aurix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know about everyone else, but we gave up on Intuit a long time ago, after they introduced a heap of serials/product keys just to install/upgrade. Between our numerous versions, and multiuser licences, trying to install Quickbooks/other Intuit shit was a nightmare. We'll never be supporting them again.

    1. Re:Intuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, upgrading hardware and can't find the key, call Intuit. I still use Quickbooks and Quicken, but switched to Taxcut years ago. It gets to be a real tough decision when your choices are Quicken or MS Money, so I stuck with Quicken (lesser of evils). It has been a while since I checked if there was a viable Open Source alternative.

    2. Re:Intuit by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      What do you use instead? I am not keen on their software either, but I haven't found a decent alternative... :P

    3. Re:Intuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a MS Money guy, for no other reason than that's what I started with and found no compelling reason to change.

      As for taxes I used TaxACT last year, and will definitely do the same this year.. It works great, and is free if you just want to print/mail a return. But I have given my support by buying their $10 version which comes with free e-file.. Not quite free/OSS but pretty close considering the alternatives.

  3. he really ought to change it by ch-chuck · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now that MicRo is famous he could give in and change it to buttheadedsoftwarearchitect.com

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:he really ought to change it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Referring to the Apple/Carl Sagan controversy?

      I saw we skip right to LawyersAreWimps.com ;)

    2. Re:he really ought to change it by Bistronaut · · Score: 4, Funny

      If he did that, Microsoft really would have a case against him. Nobody's going to confuse microsoft with mikerowesoft, but buttheadedsoftwarearchitect is getting a bit too close.

    3. Re:he really ought to change it by wolrahnaes · · Score: 3, Funny

      So that's how the BSA got their name!!!

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    4. Re:he really ought to change it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't fuckin' mess with Carl Sagan. Seriously. I will beat the spit out of you if you bring up that incident again.

    5. Re:he really ought to change it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful?

      ARGH!

  4. Re:Amazing.. by XorNand · · Score: 1, Funny

    You must be new here (along with your mods). Elesewise you'd know what "Slashback" means.

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
  5. Windows ME support? by gooberguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well it's great they're still going to support 98, but ME? Come on! ME is quite possibly the worst OS Microsoft put out. Sure XP sends stuff to MS without telling you, and 98 is unstable, but at least they are useable operating systems. The worst thing about ME is that you can't restart in DOS mode, no matter what. Even though it runs on top of DOS, and you can use a boot disk to get to DOS, ME won't let you restart into DOS mode. Networking support is also a pain. By "a pain" I mean would rather get shot than try and get ME working with a network card. One time, when I didn't know the evils of ME, I tried getting a Realtek card to work. Bad idea! After almost a week of screwing with the computer, I formatted it and put (what I think is the best thing to come out of Microsoft) Windows 2000 on it. The card worked great in 2000. I thought 2k and ME are supposed to have the same TCP/IP implementations, the ones from BSD. I bet MS could save a TON of time and money by solving all ME problems with a free format and XP home installation.

    --


    Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    1. Re:Windows ME support? by rcpitt · · Score: 1
      ME bad? You obviously never tried to run Windows 1.0 - or even 3.0

      The fact that it ran on DOS was the only thing going for it - you could still get lots of DOS software and run in character mode :)

      --
      Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
      and didn't get it
    2. Re:Windows ME support? by jowaju · · Score: 1

      Actually you can get MS-Dos support for ME. Try here:

      http://www.coease.com/dosfix.htm

      I've used it numerous times to get Partition Magic 5 to work with ME.

    3. Re:Windows ME support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think this is bad, try hooking up a scanner, camera, hell even a printer to an ME machine. It doesn't work with ANYTHING! Anyone who bought a machine with ME on it should file a class action lawsuit demanding, at the very least, a free copy of a working operating system such as 2000.

    4. Re:Windows ME support? by sessyargc · · Score: 1

      Win ME? well at work we never had problem with it, except, like all MS product, that it keeps on crashing.

      I thought 2k and ME are supposed to have the same TCP/IP implementations

      even if they have the same protocol stack implementation, its the drivers that are the ones that's totally toast. most probably its not a stack problem its a driver problem.

      --
      - not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted
    5. Re:Windows ME support? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a friend who was working at MS at the time ME came out. He didn't work on any OS stuff but he entered one of their computer rooms to work on some server stuff one late night. There were two guys from the ME team working on a computer trying to get it to install ME. This was about a week before the ME launch. Out of curiosity he asked them: "Oh, you work on the ME development team, how does ME compare to the other OS?" Without a blink, they respond: "It's a piece of crap. Don't bother installing it." Then they started laughing and opened a cooler and started drinking.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    6. Re:Windows ME support? by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Interesting? Um, ok. Let me try.

      Um, I have this friend who used to date Linus Torvalds. One time, this friend was watching Linus install Linux and um, he was really frustrated and said "Man, this whole thing sucks! Why did I ever write it!". Seriously, and then Linus pulled out a crack pipe and started smoking.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    7. Re:Windows ME support? by bhtooefr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you sure they were really on the ME team?

      After all, the Win2K team was quoted as calling 98 (the team of which would have been reassigned to ME, most likely) a "toy OS".

      BTW, this could also be a troll, as ME is as hard to install as 98 (identical installer, except for ME graphics and text). ME IS a piece of crap. The ME team might have said that (after all, chances are no Intel engineer would say the P4 was a good design, and it was essentially made by marketdroids) about their own creation, as it WAS a "trick" to make people think they were getting 2000 Home, when they were really getting 98 with a 2000 explorer.exe.

    8. Re:Windows ME support? by skorpion_of_ranax' · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that ME was released with one and only one purpose: convince the Home and Home Office user to drop "Personal" Windows and install "Business" Windows.
      Part of an overall plan to get all Windows installations on the same kernel.
      Main problem was that Win2K wasn't ready soon enough to allow the pissed-off ME users to make the switch. Hence, XP...

      --
      --- skorpion_of_ranax
      "A computer without a Microsoft OS is like a dog without a brick tied to its head"
    9. Re:Windows ME support? by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it is a toy OS. All I use it for is to run some toys. :)

      KFG

    10. Re:Windows ME support? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      I rather enjoyed WFW3.11 :)

    11. Re:Windows ME support? by DavittJPotter · · Score: 1

      Y'know, you see over and over "XP sends stuff to Microsoft without telling you" - but I've never seen conclusive evidence of just *what* stuff it's sending without your knowledge. Have any details, or are you just perpetuating a meme?

      Not a troll, I'm looking for a well-thought, sensible answer with PROOF.

      Thanks!!

      --
      "If there's hope, it lies in the proles..."
    12. Re:Windows ME support? by Jetifi · · Score: 1

      That's funny, but UnknowingFool is actually correct, in that any MS dev worth their salt will tell you that of the 9x series, 98SE is the best, and ME is the worst.

    13. Re:Windows ME support? by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
      I'm looking for a well-thought, sensible answer with PROOF.

      Wrong website, buddy. Move along.

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    14. Re:Windows ME support? by DavittJPotter · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Good one!

      --
      "If there's hope, it lies in the proles..."
    15. Re:Windows ME support? by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      I run ME on my game machine (it is the OS it came with - and I am not going to pay the Microsloth tax twice - so I stick with it).

      The key to getting performance out of ME is to disable everything you don't need - which means - basically just run systray at startup - and thats it. Once I did that it was stable as a rock (apparently one of the many 'support' applications was the source of my memory leak - and here I was thinking it was Windoze all along).

      Additionally, I decided several years ago to standardize on Linksys 10/100 NICs (they were $9 a pop at the local BestBuy). My switch is a Linksys DSL model - and I have a NetGear 4 port hub (wife and kids on that >). I have had 0 problems with these cards either in Linux - or on any Windows machines. It is worth the time saved in headaches to spend a little money to standardize - particularly for something as cheap as a NIC.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    16. Re:Windows ME support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any MS dev worth their salt will tell you that of the 9x series, 98SE is the best, and ME is the worst.

      That's like asking a garbage man which brand of garbage bag best supresses the odor of feces mixed with red-wine vomit and bile.

      If you find yourself seeking such an opinion (about Win98, that is), seek professional help.

  6. Re:Amazing.. by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Informative

    Assuming that this isn't a troll... Slashback, by definition, is a bunch of updates on earlier stories...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  7. Re:Amazing.. by iantri · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yes I do; updates on previous stories.

    These stories both were already followed up on. Do we really need another story with the same followup repeated?

    Slashdot has enough dupes already! ;)

  8. Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    why don't they sue this. It took me one whois to find it.

    1. Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://micro.soft.com/

    2. Re:Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess would be because they aren't in the same business as microsoft. They don't seem to be in any business for that matter. Looks like a placeholder to me.

  9. All is not so rosy with Niue's WiFi future? by styrotech · · Score: 2, Informative

    Possible trouble with the government owned monopoly telco according to the NBR magazine.

  10. Re:Amazing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You must be new here (along with your mods). Elsewise you'd know that mods can't be new.

  11. Free WiFi Network in Govt sights by slyall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to this article in the (New Zealand) National Business Review the Niue Government doesn't like the competition from the Niue Internet Users Society and is using strongarm tactics to protect it's phone monopoly.

    --
    "To stay awake all night adds a day to your life" - Stilgar | eMT.
  12. OldSchoolNapster by OldSchoolNapster · · Score: 3, Funny

    This seems as good a time as any to introduce my new screename. Im not worried about being sued because old-school Napster never cared about copyrights.

    1. Re:OldSchoolNapster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is amusingly untrue.

      The Offspring decided they liked Napster and thought that since Napster was allowing people to trade their music that they should be able to sell Napster t-shirts.

      Napster sent them a C&D, as reported here on. So I immediately went to the Offspring site and bought myself a t.

  13. Would they sue me? by kaizenfury7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I registered the site called MyGrowsSoft.com and used it to sell Viagra?

    1. Re:Would they sue me? by jpmkm · · Score: 5, Funny

      minegoessoft.com might be a bit more appropriate, but it doesn't sound much like microsoft.com anymore.

    2. Re:Would they sue me? by Vaystrem · · Score: 1

      Probably not.
      However if you registered: MineGrowsSoft.com they may take action.

    3. Re:Would they sue me? by aonaran · · Score: 1

      MyGrowSoft??? sound more like a program for contolling marijuana grow lights.

      With the all new MyGrowSoft 2.0 your buds will be bigger than ever, your plants taller and your dope stronger. Guaranteed, or your money back!**

      **refunds only applicable to those who live in states where Marijuana GrowOps are 100% legal.

    4. Re:Would they sue me? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I think "IGrowSoft.com" sounds more sane.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  14. My Crows Oft... by hndrcks · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...spake 'nevermore'.

    (apologies to Edgar)

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
    1. Re:My Crows Oft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (apologies to Edgar)
      Why? Did he write a poem about a crow that I'm not aware of?

    2. Re:My Crows Oft... by a1ok · · Score: 1

      Iirc, 'spake the crow, nevermore' is a line from an Edgar Allan Poe work. Which I have read ages ago, but don't remember either name or story now :(

    3. Re:My Crows Oft... by Ashtead · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the poem called "The Raven"? Where the bird talking is a raven, not a crow. ("Quoth the Raven, Nevermore"). Even though both are birds of the Corvidae family...

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    4. Re:My Crows Oft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poem called "The Raven"? Where the bird talking is a raven, not a crow.

      Which was beautifully done in one of the simpsons' halloween specials, with Bart as the raven. And people say TV is eradicating culture...

    5. Re:My Crows Oft... by a1ok · · Score: 1

      Ow - my bad! As I said, I didn't remember anything of what I'd read. Yup, it was a raven not a crow all right :)

  15. Smart and Bigger by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Was I the only one to get a chuckle from the name of Microsoft's lawyers going after Mike Rowe? "Smart and Biggar" is so appropriate, though they lacked commonsense in this case.

    1. Re:Smart and Bigger by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      They made fun of it on the news here in BC ... Smart & Biggar! (That's the correct spelling, btw)

  16. Re:Amazing.. by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

    Why is this informative? We all know what slashback is. The point is that if you post a story following up on an old story, and then post that exact same followup as a slashback (to the original story), it's a dupe. Ooh, but apparently we can be Informative by defining basic terms so I'll pick up some karma:

    A dupe, by definition, is a story that repeats exactly the same information given in an older story.

    --
    I'd rather be lucky than good.
  17. Colonel Sanders and Mike Rowe ... by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...Have something in common.
    I saw on a PBS special a few years back that the original Colonel Sanders, after selling off Kentucky Fried Chicken, opened a restuarant called the Colonel's Lady and was sued by KFC for using his name and his face to which they held the trademarks. The Colonel won eventually.

    Just thought someone might think that was an interesting precedent.

    1. Re:Colonel Sanders and Mike Rowe ... by broller · · Score: 1

      Kinda OT:
      "The Colonel's Lady" is still there, in Shelbyville, KY, and is now called "Claudia Sanders Dinner House" in what I guess was an attempt to clarify which lady it belonged to. ;)

      Ok, so take what you know about KFC and throw it out the window. This place is a very nice, sit-down dinner restaurant with high quality chicken and other country style food. Unlike KFC, you'll need a reservation. It's so choice, I highly reccomend picking one up, if you have the means.

    2. Re:Colonel Sanders and Mike Rowe ... by Rysc · · Score: 1

      It's KFC own falt. They should have included a noncompete in the sale contract.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  18. Re:Amazing.. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Informative

    Assuming your post isn't a troll: he mentioned that this contains two updates that have already been released. He wasn't refering to the original stories; he was making the point that the original stories have already had follow up stories that tell this exact same stuff. HP>Here was the follow up story posted to the original HP ipod story, and here was the follow up about windows 98 support. So what was your point again? I'm not quite sure, we'll just have to use my point: you are a fucking idiot.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  19. Obligatory Twilight Zone quote by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Dr M's Computer Tip List" and also "Dr M's Computer Tips"

    Wait a sec... DRM's Computer Tip List? DRM's Computer Tips?

    Don't fall for it! IT'S A COOKBOOK! IT'S A COOKBOOK!

    --

    ---

    WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

  20. Mike Rowe Soft is officially dead by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mike Rowe is taking down mike rowe soft because due to all the "helpful" traffic he could not pay the internet bandwidth bill. I submitted this story to slashback but the dumb editors rejected it and instead claim slashdots publicity helped the poor guy. sheesh want incredible self serving disinformation; is karl rove working for Slashdot now?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Mike Rowe Soft is officially dead by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not sure where you heard that but according to MikeRoweSoft.com the site is staying up due to the kind offer of hosting from Deafening-Urge.net. So slashdot publicity helped the guy get new hosting after slashdot publicity caused him to lose his host. It all balances out in the end.

      Thats why they call it Karma

    2. Re:Mike Rowe Soft is officially dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that was dharma.

    3. Re:Mike Rowe Soft is officially dead by Speare · · Score: 1
      So slashdot publicity helped the guy get new hosting after slashdot publicity caused him to lose his host.

      I don't want to interrupt your narcissistic fascination with the slashdot effect, but let me break it to you gently.

      When CNN has the link twice on the front page of CNN.com, and so does every other news service, plus the followup story on c|net news.com and Wired.com, the slashdot-inspired click traffic is just an unnoticeable blip in the sea of noise.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  21. TurboTax 2003 activation not required, correct? by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know why it's such a big deal with TurboTax. After I filed it, I deleted the program, and removed the spyware. You can't use TurboTax 2002 this year, so why keep it. And since TurboTax 2003 is not copy protected, might as well use TurboTax this tax year.

    1. Re:TurboTax 2003 activation not required, correct? by glinden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I did the same, but I still found it annoying. When you installed TurboTax 2002, C-Dilla was also quietly installed. C-Dilla ran all the time, taking up memory. Originally, C-Dilla would remain installed even when you uninstalled TurboTax. Only after a public outcry did Intuit decide to release an uninstaller for C-Dilla. Sure, it's not the end of the world, but it's definitely annoying.

    2. Re:TurboTax 2003 activation not required, correct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pray you dont have to correct/amend your taxes. Then you *do* need to reinstall it.

      I had to dig up an old copy of TT 1999 to deal with a mistake along the way, when the IRS discovered some unreported income I never knew I even had.

  22. Yet Another Reason To Have A Troll, +1 Mod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Patently obvious, and look at all the fishes jumping into his boat.

  23. Re:Amazing.. by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    It probably shouldn't have been mod'ed informative. It should have been considered what it was, an attempt to clarify something to someone who was confused. Depending how you read his post he did or didn't understand (and I can see it both ways, but at first saw it as the latter).

    Precisely why the fuck I would be looking for karma, I don't know. I was trying to help the guy out. That said, I feel enlightened by your post, and bet you are glad you spent those seconds of your life giving me shit. Feel better now?

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  24. Seriously, people by Wrexen · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    If Microsoft enforcing its trademark against MikeRoweSoft is an evil-empire action, what kind of precedent are we setting for other companies? I'm just going to start companies called Banc ov Amerika, Koka-Kola, Jonsen and Jonsen, Redd Hat Linucks, and Appul.

    This guy said himself that he intentionally made a homophone of Microsoft just to mess with them. It's a clear-cut case of trademark infringement. I don't see the problem here.

    1. Re:Seriously, people by sirReal.83. · · Score: 1

      let me get this straight... your name is Kola Banc Linucks Hat Koka Redd Appul Jonsen?

    2. Re:Seriously, people by Malcontent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Chances are this is not infringement. There have been numerous cases where people who used their own names as their business names have been found not to infringe.

      Of course ICANN is not a fair organization and they would have probably taken the domain from the guy but in court Mike would have prevailed.

      BTW there are thousands of companies called delta, washington, montana or whatever. It's OK for two businesses to have the exact same name. The issue is whether a reasonable person would confuse the two businesses. Maybe you would confuse the MikeRoweSoft company and Microsoft but a reasonable person would not.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    3. Re:Seriously, people by Wrexen · · Score: 1

      He does web design. Should I be able to make a Jiffy-Lube type store called Ford? I think any "reasonable" person would assume in both cases that the same company is at work, especially since Microsoft has its hand in pretty much any software-related market.

      As an aside, for made-up words like Microsoft, the trademark dilution rules are much stricter - I can't make a Verizon dish soap.

    4. Re:Seriously, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you can possibly confuse MikeRoweSoft web design with Microsoft Corporation, you shouldn't be sucking oxygen.

    5. Re:Seriously, people by psykocrime · · Score: 5, Informative

      If Microsoft enforcing its trademark against MikeRoweSoft is an evil-empire action, what kind of precedent are we setting for other companies? I'm just going to start companies called Banc ov Amerika, Koka-Kola, Jonsen and Jonsen, Redd Hat Linucks, and Appul.

      This guy said himself that he intentionally made a homophone of Microsoft just to mess with them. It's a clear-cut case of trademark infringement. I don't see the problem here.


      <IANAL>

      If you started a company called Appul that sold microcomputers and related software, then Apple might have a case.. but if your Appul company sold fertilizer or hand-tools, they'd have nothing. Likewise for Jonsen and Jonsen... do that and sell barbed-wire or plastic soda bottles, and you're not infringing anything.

      In Mike Rowe's case, he's not selling personal computer operating systems and productivity software, and it's just weird that his name, said real fast, sounds like half of Microsoft.

      In the case of your fictional Banc of Amerika, or Redd Hat Linucks, I think you might get in trouble, because they're still the exact same words as the name of the "real" company, just spelled different... and the made up versions don't have any real meaning, unlike "Mike Rowe" which is somebody's name.
      </IANAL>

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    6. Re:Seriously, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Made up is harder but still possible. GM got away with naming a car berrita and beat a trademark infringmenet case brought by the gun maker.

    7. Re:Seriously, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really a wonderful comparison. Now if only it were related to Mr. Rowe. First, Microsoft does not sell web design, in any form. Ford however, does sell auto service. You're suggesting that I couldn't name my concrete company Ford, because Ford makes the vehicles that use my roads. That's ridiculous. Microsoft sells computer hardware and software. I could even give you "computer service" as they sell tech support. But web design? Give me the link for the Micro~1 Web Design department that I can hire to create my website.

    8. Re:Seriously, people by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      'Should I be able to make a Jiffy-Lube type store called Ford?'

      Of course you should. You don't think there is a ford's jiffy lube in the US? As long as you don't use the ford logo they you are OK. Especially if your name is ford.

      " I think any "reasonable" person would assume in both cases that the same company is at work, especially since Microsoft has its hand in pretty much any software-related market."

      On what planet? Certainly not this one. Certainly not any judge.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    9. Re:Seriously, people by Wrexen · · Score: 1

      Microsoft makes FrontPage, which is a web design tool. Also, their bCentral service provides small businesses with web storefronts, so in a way they are doing web design. Also, a "reasonable" person can't possibly have any idea how many different computer-related markets Microsoft is involved in, so it's totally reasonable that a person would think that web design is Microsoft's latest business venture.

    10. Re:Seriously, people by Wrexen · · Score: 1

      "You don't think there is a ford's jiffy lube in the US?"

      That's not what I said, or at least what I meant. I can't open a store called "Ford Oil Change" and expect to not get sued for TM infringement. It's intentionally exploiting another brand's identity.

    11. Re:Seriously, people by Malcontent · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes you can. Especially if your name is ford. There is a shop in my town called toyotas only. They service toyotas and other foreign cars. They don't sell toyotas and they are not a toyota dealer. No problem.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    12. Re:Seriously, people by foomanchoochoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      A less pissweak analogy would be a Jiffy-Lube store called "Phawd".

    13. Re:Seriously, people by Bigman · · Score: 1

      But I would imagine "most people" would think Microsoft (TM) would be able to spell their own name... So 'MikeRoweSoft' really isn't confusing at all.

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
  25. Analyst my ass by rmull · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, one analyst said that between now and summer, HP may come up with a way to convert WMA to AAC, or an equivalent technical fix. I guess we wait and see.

    What??? That makes about as much sense as converting ogg to mp3. It can be done easily, but it'll be lossy as hell - they're different formats, damnit. Maybe I could an analyst and then they could pay me to be dumb. Or better yet - a pundit. Bah.

    --
    See you, space cowboy...
    1. Re:Analyst my ass by sirReal.83. · · Score: 1

      forget about that, i'm not sure how they're so uncertain with HP's ability to reencode.. WMA->WAV->AAC, in fact *->WAV->*

      but i guess we'll "wait and see" what their crack team comes up with... either that's a joke or HP is run by preschool students.

    2. Re:Analyst my ass by Alsee · · Score: 1

      WMA->MP3->OGG->JPG->AAC

      Ok boss! We have the conversion software ready!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Analyst my ass by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      However, one analyst said that between now and summer, HP may come up with a way to convert WMA to AAC, or an equivalent technical fix. I guess we wait and see.

      Moreover, one security consultant said that farmers may come up with a way to convert manure into milk, or an equilavent agricultural fix. I guess we wait and see.

  26. I'm screwed though... by Pirogoeth · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...as my real name is Vishu Al-Bazik...

    --
    Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
    1. Re:I'm screwed though... by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      That's the funniest in a while. MPU!

  27. Will MightGrowSoft.com be getting sued, too? by schmaltz · · Score: 3, Informative

    www.mightgrowsoft.com/

    This domain's been around since 1997, and their site layout is strangely familiar. Not to bring any heat on them- this must be protected parody, or IP law is seriously broken.

    Or I am crazy. Help me figure this one out.

    --
    Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
    1. Re:Will MightGrowSoft.com be getting sued, too? by Axem · · Score: 1

      I find it quite funny that the ad at the bottom is advertising pre-paid legal advice... But I think it might have to do with the notices near the bottom that the page isn't affiliated with Microsoft and the disclaimer page saying it's a parody. But then again IANAL.

      --
      We all live in a #FFFF00 submarine...
    2. Re:Will MightGrowSoft.com be getting sued, too? by jalspach · · Score: 1

      Have you tried to visit the link at the bottom of the page?...nobodys home. At least that I saw.

  28. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of "Norman AntiVirus" that got shipped with my PC :)

  29. Lawyers to apologize by localhost00 · · Score: 1

    Today, the lawfirm Luvim & Burnim, who represents both Microsoft and RIAA, plan to publicly apologize for the mixup involving MikeRoweSoft.com. The mixup was made when a secretary inadvertently swapped Microsoft files with RIAA files. Lawyers had then reported to Microsoft, not knowing they had RIAA paperwork in their briefcases instead of Microsoft paperwork. "This was totally unexpected. We didn't think it was usual for Microsoft to accuse a website of copyright violations," said Seymour Skinner. "I swore they only wanted to purchase the domain name." In a related story, the RIAA has backed down on their $100 million offer to purchase www.kazaa.com.

    --

    Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

  30. Disinformative by IANAAC · · Score: 1

    Three days ago (Jan. 19) he posted on his site the news of the offer from Deafening-urge.net.
    You posted this today, the 22nd. I can't help but point the self-serving disinformation finger back at you.

  31. funny shit by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    Damn, dude, that is seriously funny. Great reference. I don't know who modded you "insightful," but I think that's a masterfully funny post. And moreover, I think anyone who doesn't agree probably didn't get it.

    1. Re:funny shit by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  32. TaxCut vs. TurboTax by Xthlc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had a pretty horrible experience with TaxCut last year. There was a bug (triggered by my combination of being self-employed and renting my home) that refused to complete my taxes unless I filled out some fields that were non-applicable with values that satisfied TaxCut's constraints. Basically, it wouldn't let me file my taxes unless I filled them out with false and confusing information.

    I call technical support, which of course is in India. All they could help me with were monkey steps involving turning on my computer, logging into Windows, etc. There was no process for escalating actual bugs to people that can help you work around or solve them. Classic horror story of outsourced tech support.

    I wound up throwing TaxCut in the trash and filling out my forms by hand. I'm going to give TurboTax a shot this year -- hopefully I can work around the spyware.

  33. And McDonalds Corp.... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...sued the head of clan McDonald, Lord Godfery MacDonald. He said: "McDonald is one the most famous names in the world. McDonald's everywhere must be furious at the way their name is being used."

    There's nothing more dangerous than a bored lawyer.

  34. No Product Activation or Spyware in TurboTax 2003 by Xthlc · · Score: 3, Informative

    So says this PC World article

    Which is good, because (as I whinged in another comment) I had a horrible experience with TaxCut last year.

  35. Re:That makes about as much sense by Technician · · Score: 1

    What??? That makes about as much sense as converting ogg to mp3. It can be done easily, but it'll be lossy as hell - they're different formats, damnit. Maybe I could an analyst and then they could pay me to be dumb.

    Check out this business plan. We make a player. We sell tunes online. You can use someone elses inferiour tunes with our player. Try it. Compare. See how much better our tunes are?

    Am I missing anything, or is my tinfoil hat on too tight?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  36. 2002 Turbo Tax Keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  37. Dr. Mario? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I was thinking more along the lines of Dr. Mario, which you can play online in a Java applet or download for your GBA emulator.

  38. they never get their propers by t0ny · · Score: 1
    I say they probably realized that people in developing countries couldn't afford to upgrade entire networks, and might pursue alternatives

    No, I would say they are continuing to listen to their customers, just like they always do. There are SO many cases where they announced they were doing something, and they decided not to due to customers saying otherwise.

    There was the retirement of the NT 4.0 MCSE, their decision to only use adaptive tests, the retirement of NT 4.0, etc etc.

    The company listens to its customers. There is no ulterior motive here. If Burger King announced they were retiring their hamburgers to go strictly with chicken, but everyone wanted hamburgers anyway, how long would they stay in business?

    They are just following intelligent business practices, since they cant claim some kind of 'right' to having customers, any more than any other company can.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:they never get their propers by oneiron · · Score: 1

      BLASPHEMY. This is Slashdot. Never say anything positive about Microsoft again or you will feel the wrath of my monkey.

  39. There is another Microsoft... by Ashtead · · Score: 5, Informative

    Evidently it has been a while, but according to The Register there has been a dispute with an Australian maker of synthetic pillows and duvets. One of their products is also called "Microsoft".

    --
    SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    1. Re:There is another Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently it has been a while, but according to The Register there has been a dispute with an Australian maker of synthetic pillows and duvets. One of their products is also called "Microsoft".

      But can their pillows and duvets run linux?

  40. Linux Trademark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I thought Linux was a trademark of Linus, and I found this " Linux Mark Institute ("LMI") is an organization established on behalf of the Linux(R) operating system community for the specific purpose of providing a simple means of licensing or sublicensing the use of the Linux registered trademark for use in connection with software and computer products, and other miscellaneous products related to the promotion of Linux" but I read this Linux Gold Corp. also owns a 50% interest in 30 mineral claims known as the Fish Creek Prospect, located in the Fairbanks Mining Division in Alaska. Hmmmm.

    -cp-

  41. Re:Amazing.. by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    Damned straight it's flamebait... I'm proud of this one too :)

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  42. Never watched the Twilight Zone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember it was in Naked Gun when there was a crowd panicing and a religious guy was trying to palm off his "To Serve Man" books as a cookbook.

    It was pretty funny.

  43. OK, but who . . by deacon+brown · · Score: 1

    This is great and everything, but who in the world is Natalie H. Gritts?

  44. Re:Amazing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe _your_ karma would be better if you tried posting informative and interesting things instead of ranting about some possibly mis-assigned karma assigned to some other user.

    Karma's not a contest, like collecting the most toys before you die. Grow Up.

  45. Re:Amazing.. by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

    Bitch, bitch, bitch. Some of us don't read every story, so the slashback is useful.

    There's no reason why you have to come here and read the articles anyway, nor did you have to click on the slashback link. I think you just wanted to have something to bitch about.

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.