Slashdot Mirror


Suggested Reading for IP Lawyers?

Javert42 asks: "As graduation day comes nearer, and after reading two articles in Wired, the idea of graduate work in Computer Science isn't looking so appealing. I've been considering studying IP law for a few months, but realizing that my only experience with the matter is reading stories on Slashdot, I'd like some more input in order to form my own opinions and basic philosophy on the topics of copyrights, patents, and other IP issues, especially as they relate to computing. What reading material can you suggest that presents the key issues objectively (to start off with), and what can you suggest as far as argumentative works go?"

64 comments

  1. Reading the stories... by gooberguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been considering studying IP law for a few months, but realizing that my only experience with the matter is reading stories on Slashdot...

    You aren't really diversifying your experience then are you?

    --


    Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    1. Re:Reading the stories... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      You know the old admonition:

      "Lie down with pigs...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. Brief clear source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goatse.cx

  3. Must read document by Hungus · · Score: 1

    The U.S. Constitution. Lawyers and politicians seem to have been forgetting it lately. Course its kind of useless outside of the US and her "territories".

    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    1. Re:Must read document by mbstone · · Score: 1

      It's the judges who've forgotten all about it, which is why it ain't all that useful even in the US.

    2. Re:Must read document by Hungus · · Score: 1

      No the judges have't forgotten about it .. in fact unfortunately they are busy trying to change it. The lawyers and politicians have however just forgotten about it. But I agree with your point.

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    3. Re:Must read document by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The constitution doesn't really have a lot to say directly on the issue. Essentially it boils down to the idea that the government can pass copyright and patent laws, as long as the periods proposed are limited (and, unfortunately, 80-90 years is still, technically, "limited")

      So I'm not sure it would help.

    4. Re:Must read document by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      judges cant exactly forget it - it has to be brought up by one of the lawyers for the case he's presiding over. if they dont it up in their arguments/filings/whatever, he cannot make judgements based on it.

  4. Anything by Lawrence Lessig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:Anything by Lawrence Lessig by jharlan · · Score: 1

      I'm an IP attorney with a MS in CS, and FULLY agree with this poster that Larry Lessig's book the CODE and Other Laws of Cyberspace is an excellent primer in IP.

      --
      Techno-centric Legal Innovator
  5. Try your local law school bookstore... by mbstone · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and buy some green, hardcover West Hornbooks, or some softcover In A Nutshell summaries of copyright, patent and trademark law.

    Or you could try sites such as The Intellectual Property Page or one of several hundred other sites that a search engine would provide.

  6. Isn't that funny... by dmayle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but realizing that my only experience with the matter is reading stories on Slashdot, I'd like some more input in order to form my own opinions and basic philosophy

    And so you post a question to Ask Slashdot?

  7. Casebooks for Law Students by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would recommend picking up a few casebooks written for law students (probably available in your university bookstore, or your university's lawschool bookstore, or in your university's library or law library). These are useful for a several of reasons:

    (1) they'll give you a good, thought-provoking overview of the field;

    (2) most casebooks do not assume much background legal knowledge (though they'll probably assume *some* background legal knowledge),

    (3) the cases in the books are "boiled down" versions that present only the important bits of the cases; and

    (4) the casebooks are (relatively) objective.

    --
    "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
    1. Re:Casebooks for Law Students by inkyfellow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a law student interested in intellectual property law, I think I can safely counsel against this.

      Casebooks are written for law students, even if they don't assume much background knowledge. They are edited down judicial decisions and are kind of dense for the uninitiated.

      I'd recommend the books written by Lessig, such as "Code" and "The Future of Ideas." They're written for a more general audience, but are chock full of legal goodness.

    2. Re:Casebooks for Law Students by Dausha · · Score: 1

      Hmm, IANAL, but I am going to law school this fall; partly because I want to understand IP law. I've been reading a lot about what to expect, and talking with judges, lawyers, and current law students. From this perspective, I think the above recommendation is a bit off because:

      1. From what I understand of casebooks, they comprise court briefs of cases that either set trends or highlight a specific area of law for the subject involved. If you can read through hundreds of pages of small-print mind-numbing material, you might obtain a throught provoking overview.

      2. Casebooks assume the reader already knows what is being discussed. As I said, they are court briefs, written by judges (or their clerks) for judges, clerks, and lawyers. Those briefs end up in a casebook because the editor thought them important. Law school casebooks are not the same as "regular" text books. They are not intended for the lay reader. The fact they are used in law school does not mean they are suitable for self-learning.

      I've been told that trying to learn the law from a casebook alone is akin to trying to learn how to play bridge by reading the bridge case studies in the daily paper. I don't know about you, but I've been looking at those damned things for decades and still don't know a flippin' thing about bridge except it is a card game.

      Some of those whom either survived law school or are in law school that I spoke with have referred to casebooks as the biggest reason why they call law school the deepest, darkest pit of Hades where Satan piles the course load on your supine body and jumps up and down mercilessly for three years. That might be a bit of an overstatement by some of them, but I think the meaning is conveyed.

      Maybe you're thinking of a study aid? These do a better job of breaking the law down for you. I highly recommend them as I am using these aids to self-study before school. You might also consider an outline.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    3. Re:Casebooks for Law Students by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 1

      IAAL. All of the casebooks that I've encountered contain cases, not briefs. While its true that casebooks often do require you to figure out the legal principals/policies at play, rather than just laying them out for you like a study aid or an outline, I still believe that they can provide a useful overview. Thinking specifically of my copyright book, I would think that any person of reasonable intelligence would find the book approcable and interesting. Then again, perhaps law school and practice have warped my perceptions a bit. :-)

      --
      "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
  8. This might be useful? by Chexsum · · Score: 3, Informative

    Literary Law Guide for Authors [/. book review :]

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  9. are you in it just for the money? by manifest37 · · Score: 1

    It's seem theres an increase in cs grads who see the job market and think crap why did i get into cs the money's not there anymore? What happened to doing a job you love? Is everything just about money? I don't see how you can pick a college career and then at the end of 4 years of hard work want to throw it away and become a lawyer. I guess as you get older people see where their real strengths are.

    1. Re:are you in it just for the money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's seem theres an increase in cs grads who see the job market and think crap why did i get into cs the money's not there anymore?
      Speaking as a CS grad, I'm looking at the job market and thinking, crap the job's aren't there anymore.
    2. Re:are you in it just for the money? by gi-tux · · Score: 1

      QUIET! Let the OP leave if he/she doesn't love CS enough to go for it anyway. Sounds like the sort that would make a "good" lawyer anyway. If all they are interested in is the money, we don't want them in our profession anyway. And it seems to me that all most lawyers are interested in is finding a way to make a quick buck off someone else.

      Maybe someday half the population will be lawyers and they will each have only one client. Did you ever thing about the fact that that means that the rest of us (the non-lawyers) will have to work enough to support 3 people? Ourself, our lawyer, and the one that is suing us for something trivial. And on top of that we won't be able to work anyway because we will be in court so much of the time to make the lawyers look productive that no real work will ever get done. Maybe that is what happened to the dinosaurs, they invented law and lawyers and it drove them to extinction.

      As to lawyers, there was a bad accident around here the other day. Seems a bus that would hold 60 people ran off a bridge. It had 59 lawyers on board on their way to a meeting and all were drowned. The bad part is that there was one empty seat :-)

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    3. Re:are you in it just for the money? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      That is the best thing that could happen to the field.

      With the dotcom boom, every idiot who would have done undergraduate study bullshit courses like "business" or "education" decided to study IT or MIS because it was a money major.

      The purge that is following the boom will winnow out most of the chaff and leave the competent professionals who belong there behind. Outsourcing will devastate the big software companies in the next few years and leave the doors open for the next generation of software.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    4. Re:are you in it just for the money? by computational+super · · Score: 1

      I think there's a bit of a difference between "being in it for the money"/expecting a big paycheck after college and wondering if you're going to starve to death. The typical slashdot "I was outsourced to India" story doesn't start "I used to make $100K/yr and now I only make $40K", but "I used to make $100K/yr and now I fight with birds for crumbs of bread on the street".

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  10. The first thing you should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if thinking about studying law is stop using the term "intellectual property". There is no such thing in the eyes of the law. There is patent law, copyright law and trade secrets. They're handled totally different, and if you use that term in court, you will be told to be specific as they laugh at you.

    The second thing you should do is go elsewhere for your information. Slashdot is a cesspool of misinformation and uninformed opinion.

    1. Re:The first thing you should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't bother if I were you :)
      The same logic that outsources technology
      to India will soon turn its baleful eye
      towards US lawyers; PARTICULARLY patent
      lawyers, since most of the technical stuff
      will be made over their from now.

      Good luck; the short of it, say hello to working for walmart for a living.

  11. Some thoughts from a Cyberlaw professor by jezor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As someone who teaches Cyberlaw and runs a program on law and technology, I'd urge you to consider broadening your horizons a bit, and to focus on practical rather than theoretical discussions. As relevant as IP law is to the technology industries, it is only one small part of the whole picture. Contract law, corporate structure finance (yes, even in this post-bubble era!), privacy law and especially international law are also crucial subjects to learn.

    I'd echo the sentiments of those who said to take a look at casebooks and other law school texts in a local library. You can also go to the sources for IP law: the U.S. Copyright Office and Patent and Trademark Office have some good basic info, as does the Federal Trade Commission on privacy rules. This site has a good list of info. on doing e-business throughout the world. Finally, for an introduction to Internet-related business legal issues, you can always find my book in a local library.

    Finally, you'll need to decide if you actually want to be a lawyer. Law school is rather expensive these days, even for state schools, and the loan burden for many of our students is severe. Feel free to e-mail me if you'd like to ponder this further. {Professor Jonathan Ezor}

    1. Re:Some thoughts from a Cyberlaw professor by sir_cello · · Score: 1


      Perfect advice. I would only qualify that by suggesting that there are opportunities in IP other than being a lawyer. For example, a licesing executive, a para-legal, etc. You don't need to do a full law degree, you can (at least, here in the UK) take a masters in IP that is designed for people with technical / non-law backgrounds. Otherwise, I agree with all of your comments as I have already taken a masters in IP at Queen Mary.

  12. some suggested papers and articles by dh003i · · Score: 2, Informative

    Patent Wrongs, Illana Mercer

    Rethinking Patent Law, Gene Callahan

    Against Intellectual Property, Stephen Kinsella

    1. Re:some suggested papers and articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These sound like nice well-rounded, unbiased sources...

  13. Ask Groklaw? by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously, go read Groklaw. And maybe call up a local attorney. Certainly somewhere in your circle of friends/family, someone has contact with some kind of attorney. Finagle an informational interview.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  14. I feel a disturbance in my trousers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    legal goodness makes my list of oxymorons for 2004.

    1. Re:I feel a disturbance in my trousers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU anarchist. Laws are still good, just not bad ones. If given the choice between the law against murder and the DMCA, i'd choose getting rid of the DMCA any day.

  15. Law school by Basje · · Score: 1

    I'm a programmer by trade, and have worked as a consultant for almost 6 years now. Almost 3 years ago, I started attending Law school, on top of my daytime job.

    This semester, I'm taking a class on intellectual rights, which was the reason I started anyway. I'm glad I did the whole course, rather than just this part, as IR is just too much embedded in the justice system to single out. It's a lot of effort, but it's worth it.

    One important thing I learned: never represent yourself in court. Even lawyers don't. Even if you read these documents, or some casebooks as suggested earlier, please go see a lawyer when you've got a problem.

    --
    the pun is mightier than the sword
  16. Studying IP Law by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    Learn the law, then form opinions and philosophies.

    The world doesn't need anymore crusading lawyers. If you know what the law means, you will be able to suggest intelligent modifications and interpret it correctly.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  17. IP Lawyer Reading Material by rogabean · · Score: 1
    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  18. You've Already Failed by ari_j · · Score: 1

    Don't go to law school. You've already demonstrated that you aren't willing or able to do any footwork of your own when it comes to research (you only know things you've read on Slashdot, and you posted and Ask Slashdot for more information), which is a strong counterindication to being a successful law student. Save yourself the hassle and cost of applying and the cost of attending for that first year.

    1. Re:You've Already Failed by Feynman · · Score: 1
      which is a strong counterindication to being a successful law student

      While this may be a worthy point, you may want to check a dictionary.

    2. Re:You've Already Failed by mbstone · · Score: 1

      mod parent up

    3. Re:You've Already Failed by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, I stand corrected and am a better person for it. Thanks. :)

  19. cyberlaw syllabus by jnana · · Score: 1
  20. Whu? by FFFish · · Score: 1

    You want to become an IP lawyer.

    Would that be IP lawyer, as in those scum-sucking demons from hell that patents ridiculous "it's doing X... on the Internet!" claims, then runs about suing that ass off everyone and their dog who thought about it before you?

    Would that be IP lawyer, like those cursed unnameable evil ones who work for SCO, stealing open-source code and claiming it for their own?

    Would that be IP lawyer, like the ones who are racing around the world patenting perfectly ordinary plants and animals so that no one else may benefit by them?

    And you ask Slashdot for advice?

    Damn, I'd hate to be on the receiving end of that question.

    (Is there any such thing as a good IP lawyer?)

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Whu? by {8_8} · · Score: 1

      What about the lawyers on the other side of the situations you describe? What about the lawyers who are fighting the SCO suits? "Good", like many things in the world, depends on the viewer's perspective.

      Interesting response, however. It made me think.

    2. Re:Whu? by FFFish · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for the multitude of scum-sucking slime lawyers, like the SCO creeps, there wouldn't be a need for the opposing "Good" laywers that fight against them.

      There are good lawyers in the IP industry, hell, yes.

      They are not, IMO, in the majority.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:Whu? by djeaux · · Score: 1
      There are good lawyers in the IP industry, hell, yes.

      Something tells me the "good" lawyers are doing an awful lot of pro bono work for nonprofits, while the "bad" lawyers are getting paid well ... or rather the partners are getting paid well for the work that their less-well-paid associates are doing.

      I think it was Woody Allen who said, "The good people sleep much better at night than the bad people. Of course, the bad people enjoy the waking hours much more." Probably applies to lawyers as well.

      Q: What's the difference between a lawyer & a catfish?
      A: One is a bottom-dwelling scum-sucker & the other has gills.

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    4. Re:Whu? by JoeBuck · · Score: 1

      Well, there are the lawyers working at the EFF.

    5. Re:Whu? by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Lawyers just do the bidding of their clients. The lawyers for SCO include David Boies. I bet a lot of slashdotters loved him when he was fighting against George Bush, against Microsoft, or for Napster. But he gets another client and he becomes an "evil lawyer".

      /. loves IBM's attorneys now, but both firms on IBM's side are large (300+ attorneys) firms that will possibly, someday, be on the side that you don't approve of. Then, they will become "evil".

  21. Here are some good books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start with this one and if you pull anything like what SCO is doing, you will proabably want to read this one before you head to prison.

  22. From a law student: Don't go to law school... by cleetus · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...unless you really want to become a lawyer. This means that you really know what lawyers do, like doing it, and like doing it for 60+ hours per week .

    Look up some IP lawyers at the larger firms in your area and give them a call. Ask questions about the quantity and quality of their day-to-day workload. And I'm not talking partners, I'm talking associates--'cause that's what you'll start off as.

    IP law is interesting, and I am enjoying learning it, partly because so much of it is wrong ;) The problem is that few associates get to work on anything so interesting.

    There are other options besides becoming a lawyer once you graduate of course, but they are few and far between. Oh, and don't forget about the crushing debt!

    YMMV of course, and IANALY (y = yet), but most associates I know would counsel against becoming a lawyer.

    cleetus

  23. Read Slashdot! by stuffduff · · Score: 1

    Any lawyer stuck on where to investigate can find a wealth of information here. They can Google and Altavista and Metacrawler. The point is that researching IP in hardcopy is a total joke. IP lives at internet speeds now and without 'catching the wave,' so to speak they will always be in the wake of progress.

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  24. I'm an IP lawyer by geeklawyer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What you really need to do is get some practical experience of the law. Its not enough to read /., though all the IANAL's are good for a laugh. Obviously you understand that you typically get one end of the spectrum on this site. Thats not a bad thing and I agree with the policy concerns the majority here express. But its also important to take it from the other end too - understand the paranoia and, yes, greed of business. You should do this because you will virtually never be representing FOSS companies. As a lawyer you are a hired gun and sometimes your firm may ask you to represent some piece of slime like SCO. How are you going to handle that? If you're an associate and keen to progress you aren't going to say to your senior partner "screw you, I'm not on that team." You are or you're out - and out probably means out of the profession - unlike me few lawyers get to choose their clients and even I dont get to choose as often as I would like.

    You'll need to develop a thick skin - as this thread shows most will hate you. Many will despise you; some will mean it, some follow the mob, some envy your money. It only ever changes when they need you or if like me you help out Free software users/companies. You have to let it bounce off, and if you can't it's not the job for you.

    Practical exposure to the law will help: ask law firms if there are any prospects for temporary work, internships, offer to work free for a couple of weeks, whatever - you'll be really really lucky if you succeed. Or try a free legal advice project anything to get a handle on real law. It's enough to convince some people the law is not for them - for others it cements the motivation. By the way I recommend pro bono work for FOSS groups or digital campaign groups; it's a great antidote to regular clients & just feels good.

    Once you've done that google & start reading a wide variety of stuff; but dont confine yourself to rant pages like /., Lessig has done some very thoughtful policy essays. But also hang out in the inventors & business Usenet forums and ask them: you need a variety of views and user objectives. Contrary to what /.'ers think its not ALL about megacorps screwing over the little man. As for reading material if you want to get a handle on policy you'll find that you wont understand the best texts until you have a good grounding in IP law. At the same time the 101 course materials tend to be a bit dry so I dont have any good suggestions - but the USPTO site is quite interesting.

    The professor raises the other important point which is finance. Its an expensive long process to undertake and the competition is ferocious. Lots of people burn out and some get there only to wish they hadn't. Understand that you might also find yourself practising in an area you hadn't intended: you might want to be an IP lawyer but you might wind up doing crime or corporate finance crap because that's all you could get; it's happened to a few friends of mine. yech.
    Good luck!

    --
    -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
    journal
    1. Re:I'm an IP lawyer by stuffduff · · Score: 1
      I'm in Health Informatics, and we have several specialized news services. Unfortunately the minimum time from acceptance for publication in a peer reviewed journal to publication typically runs from 18 months to three years. Additionally, we wait for the data in those Journals to be released in searchable electronic format, that's usually another year. So now we're talking 2.5 to 4 years.

      Then there's the little matter of people actually accessing the data, verifying for themselves the validity of the data and sharing it with their peers. This too is often measured in years. Now we're up to 3+ years (often as many as 8 years) behind 'the wave' minimum. Even the New England Journal of Medicine has recognized this fact and has, on occasion, published the results of some specific studies on their website prior to publication in their journal.

      My point is that while IP layers may be pressed into obfusticating the environment surrounding a technology by their greedy masters, the folks at the USPTO need to 'bridge the gap' between the previously published material and the bleeding edge of technology; in order to be more completely informed when evaluating patents. Just because the legal precedents in the process of evaluation do not require the use of these new technologies does not mean that the mechanism of evaluation is flawless!

      Many of these so-called 'bad patents' are more-or-less 'legalized crimes' forcing the redistribution of wealth in ways that benefit a very few (rewarding the criminals) and the common middle class wage earner ends up paying the bill. I hate to see money disappear from my pockets because it is 'legal' for some IP lawyers and USPTO clerks to be uninformed!

      --
      "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    2. Re:I'm an IP lawyer by geeklawyer · · Score: 1
      I'm certainly not defending 'bad patents'. In fact I don't even defend 'good' patents - I think they are a very poor way to encourage innovation and have little objective economic justification. And that's European patents - The US patent system is even worst; probably the worst in the western world.

      Your point about the USPTO, if I understand you correctly, is right and even they recognise and admit it. The have problems of too few and too inexperienced patent examiners and it's a particular problem in the software arena. The consequences of poor examination do indeed have just the bad effect you complain of: poorly examined patents gives power to the patent licence farms.

      --
      -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
      journal
    3. Re:I'm an IP lawyer by stuffduff · · Score: 1
      My view of patents for software is that they are the antithesis of innovation. However there are a few notable exceptions; such as token-ring. Between the dns translation patent and today's modification of the XFree86 terms I wonder (jokingly) if I could file a patent for the technology to include copyright information in source code. On the flip side I constatly have to fight my bosses who won't put my work into the public domain to try and convince them that there is nothing patentable in it! But back to the point at hand:

      If we're on the same page; then what harm would happen if a USPTO examiner were to read /. for general background information and/or post a question relating to the background material on which the patent is based? I recently had a runin with the sh/bash command SET. So I posted a question in the newsgroups and not only found out the what and why of the problem, but the how and history of the solution.

      With so many knowledgeable people out there, a well constructed question to the right collective (usenet, slashdot) might save hundreds of hours in terms of looking where the light is better, without compromising the integrity of their investigations. They need not take the information gleaned therein as gospel, but as an opportunity enhance their worldview, specifically where it comes to the internet and opensource movements. While the entire history of each may not be represented, there are enough clues to enable the investigators to follow, and in many cases contact the principals, to determine the truth to both their personal satisfaction and professional standards.

      After all, you're admittedly a /. reader and contributor so there is value here; and clearly it goes beyond entertainment!

      --
      "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  25. Check patent bar requirements by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

    If you want to be a patent attorney, you should check whether your undergraduate degree meets the requirements. Mine didn't: for CS only, your degree must be from a school with a specific accreditation, which my highly prestigious/snobbish Ivy League school didn't have. I suspect this is because they think somebody out there is giving "computer science" degrees for how-to-use-Microsoft-Word courses.

    Anyway, as a result, I'm now a corporate lawyer instead. You don't need to be a patent attorney to do litigation, or trademarks and copyrights and other soft stuff, but, if you're a techie on the inside, you want it.

    If your school's not properly blessed, see if you can cram in some extra chemistry or physics to meet the hour minimums.

    --
    I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
  26. You can get lost in wikipedia! by redog · · Score: 1

    http://www.wikipedia.org
    Has great reading about software patents trademarks technology and much much more.

  27. Proof... by eurleif · · Score: 1

    Proof that trolls never check their facts. It's been down for a while now, sorry.

  28. Here's an argumentative piece for you by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 1
    I don't think this would have anything not already familiar to one has studied the law, but it would help you to understand the controversy in more depth.

    My objective in writing Links to Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads was to give the legions of peer-to-peer music downloaders a basic lesson in history, copyright law and political activism, in hopes that they might use their considerable numbers to bring about copyright reform.

    I give all the links that the article title promises in order to get p2p users to come read it, and link to it from their own websites. But my real objective is to give them an education while I have their attention.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  29. Re:From a law student: Don't go to law school... by ari_j · · Score: 1

    I've never met a lawyer who recommends becoming one.

  30. No need to learn the law before law school by angle_slam · · Score: 1

    If you've already decided to go to law school, there is no need to learn about the law before you attend. You'll have plenty of opportunity to learn the law after you start law school.

  31. my suggest by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    Though not entirely IP-related, one book I really enjoyed reading latest was People's History of the Supreme Court by Peter Irons.

  32. Lessig's suggestion: Judge Posner textbook by caduguid · · Score: 1

    From the Lessig blog December 19:
    Posner is a friend. I was his clerk. But the best thing about being his clerk is that he does his own writing, which means the clerk's job is just to disagree. But in the area of copyright and patent, I've found less and less to disagree with. Indeed, if you want a brilliant and balanced analysis of a wide range of IP issues, from the perspective of economics, see his (and Professor Landes') latest book, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law.

    I haven't read it yet, but am eagerly awaiting its arrival from interlibrary loan.

  33. Suggested Reading for IP Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that so many thoughtful people like you are interested in the technical details of IP law is a really Good Thing (R). The more people who understand how things really work, the more there will be who can intelligently push for change. Start with the primary sources: the U.S. Constitution, the Copyright and Patent statutes -- all available either free at a good University library or dirt cheap from the U.S. Government Printing Office. I'd suggest at least skimming through the legislative history contained in the Committee Reports for the last few revisions of the law. These contain good summaries of both statute and case law up to their publication that are sometimes more illuminating that the treatments you'll find in other books. Oh, yeah, and as a former trial lawyer myself (now happily up to my ears in system administration work) I'd suggest looking into political rather than legal activism as a route to "do something" if you decide you want to get involved. IP law is one of those areas where I think political action is most appropriate, particularly where it is exerted in earnest for the public good. The law courts are usually an adequate vehicle for resolving individual disputes, but often fail miserably as a forum for creating fair and balanced public policy.

  34. There's a lawyer glut by Animats · · Score: 1

    I have an interest in the law, but no desire to be a lawyer. I know many lawyers, and I hire them on occasion. Other than trial lawyers, who are like fighter pilots, lawyers tend to either be boring or bored with their work.

  35. IP law reading by Groote+Ka · · Score: 1
    EPC (European Patent Convention) by Singer/Stauder.

    You don't need to know US law, your patent will be issued anyway. :-P
    The only thing you need is a good mouth: according to my colleagues in the US, you can work it all out during an interview.