Slashdot Mirror


Mars Race Heats up Further

anzha writes "It seems what was once the province of the superpowers is no longer so. ESA and the Japanese attempted their own Mars orbiters (successfully and not, respectively). The Brits fired off Beagle 2 and are talking of going for Beagle 3. Now the Canadians are talking about a probe for Mars in 2011. How long before we see the Japanese and Russians try again? Might India or China take a stab at it as well?"

51 comments

  1. Ugh, not a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    People seem to forget that Mars is not that big of a planet (less than half the size of Earth.) At this rate we'll soon have the whole damn place littered with the remnants of our missions (successful and failed.) We already have problems with space junk in LEO, how long will it be before we have problems with "Mars junk" and will it jeopardize future missions? I'm not an environmentalist or anything but I'd rather not lose a future science mission because it collided with Japan's 2006 Rover Mark VI on landing.

    1. Re:Ugh, not a good thing by Tenfish · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mars may not be a large planet, but it has roughly the same land area as Earth.

      --

      --Guns don't kill people, abortion clinics kill people.
    2. Re:Ugh, not a good thing by Tenfish · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, and another thing.

      Don't get too attached to this planet, or Mars either. Someday, we're going to be building gigantic structures in space. We'll be using the energy equivalent of many many stars total output. If you think that we're going to leave a planet in one piece, you're mistaken.

      The ultimate future of Earth and Mars, and all the other planets in our system, is that they will be complete dissassembled for raw materials.

      How will the world end? In fire? In ice? More like in a bunch of tiny pieces that were smelted into raw metals.

      --

      --Guns don't kill people, abortion clinics kill people.
    3. Re:Ugh, not a good thing by bluGill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You obviously fail to realize just how large the earth is. 1/2 the size of the earth is still a lot of land. Come to think of it, 2/3s of the earth is covered by water, so if you restrict landers to only land, there is more room on Mars. (assuming we accept your numbers, I don't feel like checking them and they sound right).

      Space junk is a problem in orbit because it is moving very fast. Space junk on Mars is not moving. Everybody will avoid the functioning rovers, because there is a lot of area to cover so it is best to cover something far away. You wouldn't make claims about the goegraphy of the earth based on only samples from your backyard, and you don't make claims about Mars from samples from one area, you try to cover them all.

    4. Re:Ugh, not a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a 20000Km reflector telescope. Whew!

    5. Re:Ugh, not a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a bigger reason this is a not a good thing? Didn't we learn anything from The Matrix? Didn't we learn anything from Doom? There are Satan worshipping demons on that planet, no doubt about it. We're talking about the end of the human race!!!

    6. Re:Ugh, not a good thing by McAddress · · Score: 1

      The ultimate future of Earth and Mars, and all the other planets in our system, is that they will be complete dissassembled for raw materials.p. im from earth you insensitive clod.

    7. Re:Ugh, not a good thing by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How will the world end? In fire? In ice? More like in a bunch of tiny pieces that were smelted into raw metals.

      While I see your point, I hope it wouldn't come to that. I don't have a problem dismantling "dead" planets like Mercury and Mars, maybe even Venus, and certainly the asteroids.

      But the Earth has so many unique features that you can't preserve outside an Earth-sized gravity well. You're not going to be able to recreate Yellowstone's hot springs and geysers on the surface of a Dyson Sphere, for example.

      On the other hand, there's the .sig I see here on Slashdot: Earth First! We'll strip-mine the other planets later...

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    8. Re:Ugh, not a good thing by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      The ultimate future of Earth and Mars, and all the other planets in our system, is that they will be complete dissassembled for raw materials.

      Possible, though I would hope that if our inheritor species reach such a level of technology, they would by that time have developed long-term thinking and ecological concerns, and would let Earth lie "fallow" to possibly develop new intelligent species. (See David Brin's "Earthclan" novels for some interesting ideas.

      But I'd say it's about 50/50 at best as to whether humanity (or possible inheritor species) ever establishes a presence beyond lunar orbit.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  2. Lessons learned vrs need to learn by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I can see others trying, but also not.

    Based upon the lessons learned from prior missions, others could be encouraged. But, based upon the numerous failures, just as easily discouraged. Then when you factor in the costs involved, you certainly can argue against it.

    What Spirit and Opportunity discover will probably be the main factor.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  3. Hopefully it doesn't turn into a collaboration by follower_of_christ · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I would love to see the ESA, China, Japan, India, England, or whoever else provide the US with more of the same competition. I believe it will poke at the pride that the US public and motivate us to work harder and be more ethical. Without ethics/integrity a society stagnates (As we are seeing today). With competition like this the US public has a reason to rally and refine itself to attempt to be the best. WIthout this competition we stagnate.

    I applaud the rest of the world for becoming competitors in the space rafe and giving the US a new determination.

  4. Why not by n.o.d.y.n.e · · Score: 5, Funny

    Might India or China take a stab at it as well?

    Maybe they can out-source the labour to the West!

    --
    Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently. - Henry Ford
  5. Hope the Japanese rethink this by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With the North Korean situation the Japan and indeed the entire Asian penninsula faces, it would probably be wise of them to forego a true space program for the timebeing. It's bad enough that North Korea is already nervous about every flinch of the peace negotiators, how much more willing would they be to simply shut down the talks if Japan decided to launch a inter-planetary missile not 500 miles away from Pyongyang?

    Leave launches to the Indians and Russians for now. When North Korea finally comes around to join the rest of us in the modern, civilized world there will be plenty of time for space exploration.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Hope the Japanese rethink this by kippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Apollot program happened during one of the darkest wars in US history. They also launched their failed probe within the last couple of years and NK didn't freak out any more than usual.

      I say Japan should go forward full force. Waiting for NK to get its act together could take centuries, seriously. No point waiting for those dolts to get it together while Japan could become one of the first multiplanet nations.

      Let the land grab begin. The more, the merrier.

  6. Right.... by FroMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    China: Going to the moon and mars ===> \. Yeah, take that US!
    India: Going to the moon and mars ===> \. Yeah, take that US!
    Japan: Going to the moon and mars ===> \. Yeah, take that US!
    ESA: Going to the moon and mars ===> \. Yeah, take that US!
    BFE: Going to the moon and mars ===> \. Yeah, take that US!
    <random 3rd world country>: Going to the moon and mars ===> \. Yeah, take that US!

    US: Going to the moon and mars ===> \. Never going to happen. It's only political showmanship.

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    1. Re:Right.... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Bravo. Too true...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  7. Smart Alex Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Might India or China take a stab at it as well?"

    They're too busy to fool with this. They have jobs.

  8. Turn the Page . . . by Dausha · · Score: 1, Troll

    Interesting how the Chinese didn't even have a viable space program until the previous Administration allowed export of the appropriate technology. Considering the earlier accusations that the Chinese government illegal contributed to his 1996 reelection, I wouldn't be surprised if they aren't able to compete with us in the race to Mars.

    But, why do I get visions of "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World?"

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    1. Re:Turn the Page . . . by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Interesting how the Chinese didn't even have a viable space program until the previous Administration allowed export of the appropriate technology.

      In point of fact, Clinton only followed Reagan and Bush the First's policy of allowing dual-use technologies to be soldto China. As with most of the right wing's charges against Clinton, this one doesn't hold water.

      (Which doesn't change that he's a rat bastard who, in any sane society, would have long ago been institutionalized for the protection of himself and others. But the same could be said of both Bushes, Reagan, Nixon, Johnson, and Kennedy - and that's giving the benefit of the doubt to the others.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  9. Wal-Mart by rixstep · · Score: 4, Funny

    We bought a water rocket kit from Wal-Mart. We're launching in April, hopefully on the first. Target: Io, moon of Jupiter. Finally anyone can enjoy the thrill of space exploration.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landings there

  10. X... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    This will all come to a climax of hilarity when they reach the two rocks crossing in the shape of an X on the surface of Mars.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  11. Canada's Mars Mission Site by Leif_Bloomquist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Odd that the article didn't link to this.

    http://www.marsrocks.ca

  12. Canadian Space Agency == Geeks? by Jorkapp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot:
    Now the Canadians are talking about a probe for Mars in 2011.

    Website Link:
    ...the CSA is interested in receiving include an orbiter, a single lander, or a network of small landers.
    Imagine that. A Beowolf cluster of Mars Landers. I wonder if they would run on linux?

    --
    Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    1. Re:Canadian Space Agency == Geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your question returns true for all space agencies, not just the Canadians.

    2. Re:Canadian Space Agency == Geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Jorkapp is a shitty programmer:
      1. error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before 'string'
      2. warning C4551 : function call missing argument list
    3. Re:Canadian Space Agency == Geeks? by sonpal · · Score: 1
      ...the CSA is interested in receiving include an orbiter, a single lander, or a network of small landers.

      Did anyone else read that as "nework of small ladders"?

      Sometimes low-tech is the way to do it, but I'm not so sure about this time...

  13. Just what we need by kippy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I keep hearing people saying that a new space race won't start because the cold war is over.

    What this is shaping up to be is a land grab which should be healthy for Mars exploration. Here's hoping. There's a lot of land up there to grab. Now let's get those crazy space treaties rewritten by some people who aren't "citizen of the world" hippies.

    1. Re:Just what we need by kommakazi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually all the land on all planets i our solar system is already legally owned by the guy who runs this site: Planetary Investments. Best to buy your space property now while it's really cheap...

  14. Why Not the UNSA? by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think all space programs should be collected under the United Nations as the United Nations Space Agency. The ESA serves as an example. Cooperation would accomplish more for more people than competition.

    Oh sure, there'd be lots of collisions between agendas and between individuals. That's to be expected. But when it happens those responsible should me marked for replacement rather than placation. It's time we grew out of that sort of nonsense and space exploration is the perfect venue for that.

    If the US and the USSR can come together in the Apollo-Soyuz project, surely today's more enlightened countries can set aside differences much less than mutually assured nuclear destruction.

    The major problem would be the same problem NASA has: professional administrators and politicians. When engineers ran things we got to the moon. When managers ran things we got "My God, Thiokol, what do you want me to do, wait until April?" and no more Challenger.

    Space exploration should be the right, responsibility and heritage of all humanity, not just those who can pry enough GNP away to put together their own team. This is not sports, this is science, and if done right, a chance to evolve socially as a planet.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Why Not the UNSA? by kippy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ths ISS is a scandal partly because it was built by a committee, not a group focused on one clear definable goal ("let's build a space station" doesn't count). The last thing humanity needs is to unite and therefore bind at the feet, the world's space agencies.

      Almost everything great done in space was the result of competition. We need more of that, not less. If no one feels any pressure to work toward a goal harder, you will have engineers and administrators world-wide leaning on their shovels for decades to come as they we continue to be bound in low Earth orbit.

    2. Re:Why Not the UNSA? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      Of course the UN never has problems with beaurocracy or political expediancy overriding logic or good sense or even ethics and morals when deciding what to do. They never have problems respondingly quickly and adequately to problems that pop up. The UN always acts in the best interest of humanity. And, as we all know, pigs can fly. So armed with these facts, your idea will be the greatest boon to space exploration our planet has ever seen. ...

      Competition is what drove the space industry to great heights. Lack of competition is what's caused it to stagnate. In every case that there's been an attempt at cooperation, it's been lackluster or outright failed. And the idea that you'd want to put a bunch of people that decided it would be neat for Libya to head the Human Rights Commission to be in charge of space exploration makes me question how in touch with reality you are.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    3. Re:Why Not the UNSA? by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      kippy (416183) sez: "Ths ISS is a scandal partly because it was built by a committee, not a group focused on one clear definable goal ("let's build a space station" doesn't count)."

      The ISS wasn't built by a committee, it was built by 3 of them: the US space agency, the Russian space agency, and the group of administrators and politicians from both sides tasked with making the other kids take turns and play nice. This last group spent so much time and energy placating nationalistic spoiled brats and making sure everybody got the same amount of things out in with their name on it, that they ended up with problems that put the English/metric SNAFU to shame. I have a long standing acquaintance who worked as a troubleshooter and problem solver, chasing down the problems resulting from this activity. I only wish I had his permission to share some of the stories.

      "Almost everything great done in space was the result of competition. We need more of that, not less."

      Just because it worked before does not mean it was the best way. Nor does it mean the world in general is served by sticking to that paradigm. The competition before was barely sublimated warfare. If we still need that, we need to grow out of that. Having multiple programs will produce massive redundancy. It would cost everyone much less and accompish far more if they worked together.

      I do expect that to take longer than competition. But I see two parallel goals here, and expect it to take more time to accomplish them both. I think the result would be worth it.

      "If no one feels any pressure to work toward a goal harder, you will have engineers and administrators world-wide leaning on their shovels for decades to come as they we continue to be bound in low Earth orbit."

      You and I must not know any of the same engineers. As for administrators, I agree. That's why engineers should be in charge from top to bottom (except for the basic science research). Engineers and scientists understand the function of structure is to support their work, and so create structures for that purpose. Administrators create structures for administrating. The former end up with mostly self-administrating functional structures based on logic. The latter create machines for covering paper with ink.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    4. Re:Why Not the UNSA? by eraserewind · · Score: 1
      Having multiple programs will produce massive redundancy. It would cost everyone much less and accompish far more if they worked together.
      While I'm sure that there will be quite a lot of redundancy in the competing programs, I have to say multiple space programs will also produce multiple different solutions to the same problem. This will lead to innovation, and efficiency as inefficient solutions fall by the wayside. If you are all focusing on one single solution then chances are that it will be missing many great ideas. Competition is good.
  15. Canadian mars probe by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now the Canadians are talking about a probe for Mars in 2011.

    They do know that liquid beer can't exist under Martian atmospheric pressures, don't they?

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Canadian mars probe by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't understand. The purpose of the Canadian Mars probe will be to determine if beer has ever existed on Mars, or if conditions favorable to the brewing of beer ever existed on Mars. To avoid possible contamination the probes will be assembled in special "sober-rooms" by foreign immigrants. Special instruments on the probe's robotic arm will include a MoisonBrador spectrometer and a 2000ml Erienmeyer yeast culturing flask.

  16. Canadiens on Mars? by gangien · · Score: 1

    It's aboot damn time, eh?

    Seriously, gl to my northernly neighbors.

    And to the US in general, are we gonna sit back and let all these stupid countries pass us by? I say hell no, time for us to get out of slumber mode and kick everyone's ass again. Nothing like a bit of competition :)

  17. How About The US? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While it's great that these other countries are providing some type of competition for the US, we have a pretty big edge for Mars right now. Only a handful of other countries have been able to get in orbit around Mars so far (Russia and the EU?), and isn't the US the only one to get a working rover on the surface (3, in fact?). Now that we have a proven method for getting rovers to the surface, I don't doubt that we'll be sending quite a few more in the near future. We'll have the most survey information about the surface, the most scientific data, the most proven methods, and are the only country that has successfully put a man on another celestial object... that sure would give us a head start for a manned mission.

    Good luck to the rest of you countries... I hope you catch up to make it more interesting. :)

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:How About The US? by kommakazi · · Score: 1, Funny

      and are the only country that has successfully put a man on another celestial object...

      Hate to be the devil's advocate, but we allegedly put a man on another celestial object "sucessfully"...

  18. Lets just leave Mars alone by MonkeysKickAss · · Score: 0

    Whats going to happen is Bush is going to mine all the good minerals and elements from Mars and there is going to be nothing left. If he has his way were going to destroy all of the US looking for oil after the Iraqis and the other Middle East countries stop selling us oil after because of all that the US has done in invading there countries saying that they cant have nuclear weapons but we can. Also most likely it will not be very good to try to do anything with Mars because there could be viruses and diseases there that we are not ready to deal with and if there was life there at one point they might have been destroyed by a massive plague. So here is a toast to the end of our civilization as it is "Cheers Mates"

    --
    MonkeysKickAss
  19. Canada in space by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    We all know that by 2011 Canada will be invaded and will become the 53rd state. I like the plan... make promises to spur on the rest of the world that you don't have to keep!

  20. Not Again by ZerroDefex · · Score: 1

    Not this again.

  21. And They're Off! by IPFreely · · Score: 1

    It's Reigel in the lead with his giant Mars robot pounding up the ridge behind the new Martian base. Quark takes over on the descent as they enter the power station. He tries to take a sortcut through the archway. Ohhh, that's gotta hurt. He's burried in an avalanch of loose bolders. Tyroid comes up from behind as they move out to the volcanic plains. He powers up and zooms into the lead. Now into the quary and the racers split. Reigel takes the center road, while Zeek takes the low road to the right and Doc slows into the shortcut on the left. They all burst out into the shuttle crash site. Zeek takes a pit stop while Reigel rushes on. Tyroid hits a bump and flies out of control. Reigel enters the abandoned Martian base first, but is overtaken again at the lava jump. Doc is first out of the valley, and takes the sharp turn onto the bridge. It's Doc and Reigel. It's Reigel and Doc. Doc hits the Brick Boost and inches out in front at the lap.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  22. You can legal all you like by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    But it's the guy standing there with howitzer pointing at your head who owns the land.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  23. The sun? by Soviet+Russian · · Score: 1

    How about trying to land a man on the sun? It's safe as long as we send him up at night.

    --
    - - - - - - (c) 2005 Irrelevant Postings, Inc.
  24. 2011 - Canada's nanobot Mars probes - oops by rcpitt · · Score: 1
    Seven years ago, due to budget constraints at the Canadian Space Agency, a decision was made to use the latest nanobot technology to save weight and allow quantity instead of quality. The objective of deciding if Martian soil would be suitable for nanobot procreation was deemed satisfactory.

    Launched from a hot-air balloon, powered by the most useful emissions from Ottawa, the probes closely approached the edge of the atmosphere where a giant sneeze sent all 50 of the little buggers far enough out into space for the solar wind to blow them to Mars.

    Today, after their multi-million mil^H^H^H Kilometer journey, they landed near the site of the latest US venture, Walmart Mars, and were trampled into the Martian dust in the stampede for opening day.

    Oops

    --
    Been there, done that, paid for the T-shirt
    and didn't get it
  25. Just Fake It by CowboyNick · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just fake it like the moon landing? I'm sure photoshop has advanced some over the past few decades. :)

    --
    -CowboyNick
  26. Yellowstone by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
    "You're not going to be able to recreate Yellowstone's hot springs and geysers on the surface of a Dyson Sphere, for example."

    Yellowstone's springs and geysers are already choked with crap from people throwing their laundry in to see it come out clean.

    Other than the rape of the American continent which will finish long before we're building Dyson Spheres, though... point taken.