Slashdot Mirror
A Deep Space Primer
phil reed writes "With the latest Mars missions still in the news, people might be curious about what it takes to actually run a deep space mission: how a spacecraft is designed, how the communications are handled, what kind of project management is in place to make it all work. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory has a primer online that gives broad general coverage of all aspects of putting a satellite into orbit and how to manage it once it's there. Fascinating reading, with lots of links to more detail."
Too many windows on your screen may tax computer "power" causing animations to run too slowly, but if they're too fast, you might choose to run additional programs to use up computing power and slow the animations.
So it looks like JPL's also providing a newbie guide on "tweaking your system." :-)
I'd like to see how someone with a 3.0 GHz PC handles this...
-Rob
Marriage doesn't have to suck!
It's nice to see that space exploration has come so far in my lifetime. When I was a boy during WWII, travel to Mars, even by machines, was just science fiction, and the stuff of magazine covers. Most of the world's scientists and engineers were at work developing weapons of war, and for some of them, rockets, high altitude airplanes, etc. were allowed projects that laid the foundation for today's space miracles.
Would you really want them back?
The objective of these missions is to learn more about mars.. if we were just interplanetary joyriding, then, yes, I'd want the rover back -- but that's not the case here.
Besides, the rovers are only a small portion of the cost of the mission - even if we could magically get these back for free, it would be worth the effort to build new rovers that incorporate the things learned on previous missions and provide new and different capabilities.
HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
R.I.P. DNA
"Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
If you think the cost is mind boggling, you haven't seen what it would cost to if they were designed to return to earth when they were done.
Humans have yet to perform any "Deep space" exploration.
The Voyager missions come the closest, but still remain fairly near home, on any meaningful interstellar scale.
The linked article discusses interplanetary exploration. Quite a bit of a difference.
your ping pong ball example is essentially how a electrical wire works. The electrons don't actually travel the length of the wire, they just "push" the ones next to them. Yet this is still limited by the drift velocity of electrons which is slower than the speed of light.
I think the only way to do speed up the conversation would be quantum entaglement but that's not been done outside the laboratory.
Something that works like a very long tube filled with ping pong balls for example. Push one into one end and one pops out the other instantly, no matter how long the tube
why that won't work
Erm, JPL is part of NASA. Caltech manages JPL, and therefore a part of Caltech, but it's also as much a part of NASA as KSC, JSC, or any of the other NASA facilities.
NASA used to have a project devoted to seriously studying what it would take to achieve interstellar travel. Unfortunately, funding for it got cut off in 2002. However, they did manage to publish several papers and still have their results online at the BPP site.
Here is a quote from the abstract of one of their papers: