Slashdot Mirror


SimpleTech Announces 8GB Compact Flash Card

alterego writes "Digital Photography Review is reporting that SimpleTech has announced 2, 4, 5 and 8GB Type II Compact Flash Cards utilizing its patented IC Tower stacking technology. This comes just a month after Hitachi announced its 4GB HD in under an inch, and less than one year after Lexar announced the first 4 GB CF card, marking a huge leap in drive density. And at only $5,999 it is sure "to meet budget and performance requirements.""

39 of 279 comments (clear)

  1. reliability? by plinius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They're rushing these products to market so fast with new semiconductor technologies, I'm beginning to wonder about reliability. This is storage after all, not a processor: if these data is lost you can't just reboot and start over.

    1. Re:reliability? by peter_gzowski · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm always concerned with the reliability of these cards. I think their ability to keep their state wanes over time, although I don't know what that time period is. With the Type II cards, battery life is also an issue, as they suck much more juice than the Type I. The article says that they have a 5 GB Type I card, which would bring my Nex IIe up to the storage capacity of a Mini iPod, if I could afford either :). I'll just have to wait a year or two for these cards to be in the hundreds instead of thousands.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
  2. Only $5,999? by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just in time for V-Day! I'm stocking up and getting every member of my harem one.

    Being a /. member, of course, this will be yet another costless Valentine's Day for me.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  3. And to all the naysayers... by carl67lp · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...who said it couldn't be done for less than $10,000! Ha!

    It's at just the right price point for those who might be on the fence with CF cards. Although you can, of course, get an extra 11GB for only $50 more...

  4. can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Interesting
    seriously.. what does it take to yank my hard drive, insert one of these, and drop that weight/power consumption/fragility of my drive?
    (yes, I know it takes six grand)

    what would the access times be like? comparable to a 42000 rpm drive? 5400? 10,000 sata?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by MoronGames · · Score: 5, Informative

      The access times, I think, are much faster than hard drives, but the transfer rates are somewhat lower. If I remember correctly.

      --
      hey!
    2. Re:can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by RainbowSix · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Using a flash card would be worse than a disk. Sure it has access times an order of magnitude faster than a hard disk (200ns according to the first google hit for "compact flash access time") but bandwidth sucks at less than 20MB/s while cheap desktop drives are getting between 30-60 sustained (tom's hardware review of Seagate Baracudda 7200.7)

      Furthermore since flash has limited flash cycles that is much less than that of a hard drive, your /tmp directory will have you buying a new card in no time.

      --
      --------
      It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    3. Re:can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by myc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      given the smaller form factor of flash cards, why not just RAID a bunch of smaller cards together? According to pricewatch. a 1GB flashcard is about $160.00 US. 160*8 = 1280, which is a little below 5 times the cost of the 8 gb card, and also gives you increased bandwidth. For a portable device that doesn't need oodles of space for multimedia files, you wouldn't even need this much disk space. the only thing that is worrisome is the limited flash cycles.

      --
      NO CARRIER
    4. Re:can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by AlecC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Using a flash card would be worse than a disk. Sure it has access times an order of magnitude faster than a hard disk (200ns according to the first google hit for "compact flash access time") but bandwidth sucks at less than 20MB/s while cheap desktop drives are getting between 30-60 sustained (tom's hardware review of Seagate Baracudda 7200.7)

      But for most operations on a normal desktop system, access time is 99% of total transfer time. Most disk transfers are of the order 4-16kb - less than 1 millisec while transferring. Whereas disk average access time struggles to reach 4 millisec. Excluding, of course, things like streaming video.

      Furthermore since flash has limited flash cycles that is much less than that of a hard drive, your /tmp directory will have you buying a new card in no time.

      Much more relevant. You would have to do without a swap partition (buy morE dram). I think some flas drives are clever wnough to map out bad blocks invisibly, so /tmp shouldn't kill you too soon.

      But for $6k, how many complete disk based system can you drop/lose?

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    5. Re:can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by mst76 · · Score: 4, Informative
      seriously.. what does it take to yank my hard drive, insert one of these, and drop that weight/power consumption/fragility of my drive?
      About 20 bucks.
      what would the access times be like? comparable to a 42000 rpm drive? 5400? 10,000 sata?
      I would guess that access time is much faster than hard disks, but throughput is much lower. Current CF cards operate in PIO mode, with a max of 8MB/s. The new specification allows up to 16MB/s (still PIO I think). But the speed of current flash chips are still way below that.
    6. Re:can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by MyHair · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Furthermore since flash has limited flash cycles that is much less than that of a hard drive, your /tmp directory will have you buying a new card in no time.

      I read somewhere that at least some flash disk devices will remap writes to evenly 'wear' the flash chip even if the writes are supposedly 'physically' in the same location. But I don't know how well that mechanism scales to 8GB or how it affects speed. I also don't know how long such a wear-managed device would last under a typical workstation or server load, but at least /tmp wouldn't burn a hole through the chip in 20 minutes.

      On the other hand, for a filesystem with few updates and many reads (some web servers and a few databases--think LDAP), this device could be neat for a low-latency but faster-than-network throughput network server. But I'll wait until the price drops a few thousand.

    7. Re:can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Put loads of RAM in, make /tmp a RAM disk. Oh, and turn off swap.

    8. Re:can I replace my laptop hard drive now? by bbsguru · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually, that would be a RACE: A Redundant Array of Cards, Expensive. Since Johnny Cochran already patented the term, industry insiders are banking on the name MEMORY. That's a Massively Expensive Matrix Of Redundant Yottabytes.

      hmmm.... Registered Trademark Pending?

  5. WHAT??!?! by uprightcitizen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sweet Jesus, almost $6K for a memory card?

    Honestly, who the hell needs this?

    Even professional photographers couldn't possibly have a use for this instead of two 4GB disks.

    But hey, I guess this means that mass solid state storage for hard drives really isn't far off, at least for PDAs.

    1. Re:WHAT??!?! by dubdays · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The one good thing that can/will/may come out of this is simply the new advances in non-volatile memory technology, even if there isn't a sustainable immediate need for an 8GB CF card. I mean, seriously, how cool would it be to have an 80GB solid-state HD in a few years???

  6. Digital Camera/Camcorder dilemna by swordboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With this, and digital cameras like Canon's new S1 IS with digital image stabilization and DV-quality movie capture, I'm not sure why anyone would need a camcorder anymore. Err... rather, cameras and camcorders are going to be on-in-the-same very soon...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Digital Camera/Camcorder dilemna by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Err... rather, cameras and camcorders are going to be on-in-the-same very soon...

      At the consumer level, that may well be true. Most people with point and shoot consumer digital cameras never print their photos, and those that do don't often print anything much bigger than a 4x6 or a 5x7. So, having the extra resolution of a still camera doesn't really do much good for them anyway. The resolution of a video camera would handle their still images just fine.

      However, an 8GB $6,000 CF card is not a product for somebody buying a $299 consumer camera :) Honestly, I can't figure out who it's aimed at. I'm a professional photographer, and I'm a pretty heavy shooter, and I'll generally only fill up about 2.5 1GB cards at a wedding. I'm not worried about having to change cards, as with a 6MP camera I'll get about 400 shots to a card, and there's plenty of dead time there to swap. Portrait and magazine photographers certainly don't need this. Actually, most serious magazine/fashion photographers shoot tethered, anyway. Sports photographers need speed (which this card has, but so do the SanDisk Ultra/Extreme II cards), and there's plenty of time at football game to swap out cards every 600 shots (assuming you're using a 4MP 1D or D2H. That might change when the 8MP Canon 1D mark II comes out this April...). Really, I would specifically NOT buy a card this big, simply because I'd be afraid of putting all my eggs in one basket. If I had somebody's wedding spread across three cards, and one of them was damaged/destroyed/lost/whatever, that would be horrible, but at least I'd still have the other two (yes, I backup with a portable harddrive at every opportunity). But if I had it all on one 8GB card and it died...ouch.

      Maybe an 8GB card will be practical when DSLRs all have 20MP (which probably never will happen...) but in the meantime, it's expensive overkill.

      * My shots/card figures assumed JPEG capture, not RAW. For RAW, cut my numbers in half.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  7. Replace Hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They're still a "little" expensive, but when you least expect they're be affordable. And 8GB is a lot of space. My root partition is 4 GB and my home partition is a lot bigger :-D but lot's of stuff could be saved on DVDs...
    Main point is, quiet computers are the new trend, and quiter than this is impossible. So, when do you think this will replace hard drives?

  8. One day... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the future, compact flash cards will be so large and so expensive that only the richest people in the world will have one. $5,000 - 8GB compact flash card $80 - 160GB Western Digital 7200RPM at Best Buy (wait for a sale) Unless there's a $4900 mail in rebate on the compact flash card, then no way.

  9. trouble with CF is that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    after a certain number of writes (many fewer than hard disks) it dies.

  10. what about life span of these things? by deadmongrel · · Score: 4, Informative

    If I remember right(somebody correct me if I am wrong) flash cards have some max rewrite cycle. Even if its high, it still won't beat my 2.1 GB seagate from yesteryear in lifespan.

    1. Re:what about life span of these things? by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Informative

      My 2.1G drives had stiction problems and ended up in the trash.

      Flash is still on the order of 100,000 writes, but good software will write evenly and manage bad blocks. The big problem is still the 10^2 cost difference. Notebook drives are around $0.33/MB.

  11. You know... by MoeMoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know the computers you work with are pretty damn old when you see a Flash Card that's larger than your hard drive (can't make this stuff up people, Maxtor 6.2 GB HDD)...

    How long until we see the obligatory "Yea, but how much pr0n can it fit" posts?

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  12. 4GB Hitachi for around $200 in mp3 players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    here is a post on fatwallet about removing it, to use in other devices. since it retails for around $500 this can be a good deal.

    post

  13. Re:reliability? - an after thought by pohzer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True.

    SanDisk brought us SanDisk Ultra, rated at 60x speed. Then they reminded us that if we really want it to keep it's memory at low temperatures (such as outdoor photography in winter) then we really need to buy SanDisk Extreme (same speed, higher temperature tolerance).

    Seems to me these hardware manufacturers are taking a clue from the software industry. The "implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose" is intended to protect consumers against such crap. But then, if you can shrink-wrap the product with all sorts of disclaimers of warranties (even implied warranties) then hey, why not? Cheating is cheating, and everybody is doing it, so it must be ok.

  14. When will it all be solid state? by OriginalSpaceMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm waiting for the day that my PC doesn't have a hard drive, CDROM drive, or anything else mechanical in it. If 8GB can be put on a CF card, being about 1" x 1" x .25", when is more development going to be put into replacing my 60GB hard drive with something the same size (3.5 inch standard HDD size) that uses eprom or something similar? I don't care about smaller and smaller and smaller sizes of hardware, I care about not having to deal with the motoro of my hard drive dying in 4 or less years.

    --

    You talk better than you fool!
  15. Only uses for this - by i-Chaos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only uses for an 8GB flash card that I can think of is digital video shoots. I'm guessing that read/write time will be about the same as current CF cards, so it's not going to be steller (not enough on an 8GB media), so you'll want to stream to it slowly. I mean, a photographer wouldn't have a reason to tote around 8GB worth of pictures, because he can always get to a terminal where he can sync pictures over an internet account. I mean, for $6000, I think he has no choice...

    And in regards to using this for video, why would you? There are DVD-based DV Cams out there that will write to 4.7GB discs that cost $1.5 each, so why bother spending 6 grand on something that can be done for $3? Plus, DVDs can be read almost anywhere these days, whereas you need to carry a special reader for CF.

    What I really want to see is an 8GB thumbdrive for CHEAP!

    --
    ...I am proof that intelligent beings are not always intelligent...
  16. Hard drives makers should take note... by blcamp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems to me that Seagate, WD, Maxtor et al should be paying close attention (and perhaps they are).

    With Flash getting more and more mainstream, and with the now high volumes being made available, hard drives are becoming less and less necessary for commodity products such as desktops and notebooks. The latter especially will make the switch from HDs to Flash, to lighten up the power and physical load.

    If Flash sees overall performance and shelf-life improvements rivaling HDs (more so than what it does already), HDs may well be relegated to a place in history/tech museums... right next to the analog cameras.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
  17. Yeeesh, take a chill pill people! by whiteranger99x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first remarks i hear is "why would anyone buy a $5999 8GB memory card... ...when they could buy 2 4GB cards, 4 2GB cards, ad nauseam ...who could possibly use that much space ...That could store a lot of PORN and DVDs (mayhaps porn DVDs....im guilty here :P)"

    But I digress, lets consider other technologies that we all thought we could never afford, and consequently never use. About 10-15 years ago, wouldn't our 256MB+ RAM and 30+ GB HDs run in the thousands or even millions for that stuff then. Give it time, and it will hopefully be cheap for all ;)

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  18. great news all around by Monkey+Overlord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This great news. People should keep in mind that 1Gb cards used to cost this much, just a few years ago ... now you can get 1Gb cards for $200 bucks or less. Considering that new cameras can output huge files, extra storage is very welcome. 8Gb is a lot of JPEGS, but only about 1000 RAW files ... which is not a lot if you are a pro and shooting an event. My only complaint is probably with the write speeds ... these cards need to get faster.

  19. embedded / military systems by Samuel+Nitzberg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It could be a good item in high-cost systems with stringent weight / space / heat dissipation requirements, where there may not be many good solutions, regardless of cost.

    Sam
    http://www.iamsam.com

  20. Can I replace my Bootable CD by Bishop923 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Better question would be if this could be adapted to work like a bootable CD. Imagine having a Knoppix-like distro on one of these things, You could upgrade packages piecemeal without having to burn a new CD, you could store data back to the card and it would fit in your wallet. It has 12x the storage of a CD, 3-4x the transfer rate, and faster access times by several orders of magnitude.

    What are we waiting for again?

  21. Boot from USB/Flashcard by MtlDty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How feasible is it to make a 'boot from USB' option to a PC BIOS?

    I know its not an option currently, but with all the advances in personal storage recently it would make sense for motherboard manufacturers to consider adding some kind of ASIC that allows the USB to be used as a boot device.

    The next step is to move all device driver software from the operating system to a dedicated flash ROM embeded on the motherboard.

    These two advancements would then enable people to carry around an entire OS on a flashcard/portable USB disk. You could simply slot in your flashcard and boot up your own OS (be it windows or linux) on any PC, at home/work/hotel. You dont need to carry a bulky laptop, all your data (and applications) can be on portable storage.

    I imagine making the device driver software update a motherboard embeded flash chip is the most awkward part, but it makes much more sense to me to have the hardware drivers linked firmly to the hardware they drive (and not part of the OS as they are currently)

    Just something I've been thinking about for years, but with all the recent advances recently I think its slowly becoming more possible?

    1. Re:Boot from USB/Flashcard by mst76 · · Score: 4, Informative

      > How feasible is it to make a 'boot from USB' option to a PC BIOS?
      > I know its not an option currently, [...]

      Actually, it's been in lots of PC BIOSes in for a few years now. The problem is that it is still not as reliable as floppy/hd/cdrom boot: some usb devices work, some don't. Also, there seem to be a number of different usb boot standards, usb-fdd, usb-zip, usb-cdrom, usb-hdd.

  22. Actual, factual information. by Masque · · Score: 4, Informative

    The 2, 4 and 5 are type I, not type II. Here's the actual press release:

    New 8 GB Card Utilizes Company's Patented IC Tower Stacking Technology

    SANTA ANA, Calif., Feb. 9 PRNewswire-FirstCall -- SimpleTech, Inc. (Nasdaq: STEC), a designer, manufacturer and marketer of custom and open-standard memory solutions based on Flash memory and DRAM technologies, today announced the industry's highest capacity CompactFlash with an 8 GB Type II card using the Company's patented stacking technology. The Company also announced 2, 4 and 5 GB Type I cards and a significant increase to the write speed of its entire ProX line of CompactFlash cards. The products will be unveiled at the PMA (Photo Marketing Association) trade show held at the Las Vegas Convention Center from February 12-15, 2004. SimpleTech will exhibit in booth N-64.

    "We combined the latest silicon with our patented IC Tower stacking technology and produced the highest density CompactFlash card available in the world," said Ken Roberts, director of product marketing at SimpleTech. "This card also uses a high speed controller with 10 MB/sec write speed -- the fastest on the market today."

    SimpleTech's IC Tower(TM) stacking technology allows multiple NAND Flash components to be stacked together to provide increased memory and storage densities that provide enhanced capacity in its 5 mm Type II cards.

    Delivering a breakthrough write speed of up to 10MB/second, SimpleTech's ProX CompactFlash cards enable images to be saved faster to the CompactFlash card and significantly reduces the wait time between digital photography shots.

    ProX CompactFlash cards incorporate Xcell(TM) technology, with a new advanced controller that provides an exponential increase in throughput for writing the picture file, delivering fast, accurate recording of high-resolution images and outstanding reliability.

    SimpleTech customers are offered a free trial of PhotoRescue software. Customers can download the photo recovery software onto their computer, and either insert the Flash card into a reader, or dock their camera, and view thumbnail images of their pictures. If one of the images on the card is corrupted, the rescue software allows the image to be recovered.

    All SimpleTech CompactFlash cards come with a lifetime warranty backed by SimpleTech's reputation for quality and support.

    Pricing and Availability

    Manufacturers suggested retail pricing for ProX CompactFlash cards ranges from $89.99 to $5,999 to meet budget and performance requirements. Samples of the new ProX CompactFlash Type I cards in 2, 4 and 5 GB capacities and the 8 GB type II cards are expected to ship during the first quarter of 2004, with production anticipated during the second quarter of 2004.

  23. Sports photographers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sports photographers are the only people really for whom this is remotely useful. Toting an 8 megapixel camera which takes 8.5 frames per second they may just need the space, and they may be willing to pay not to have the card space run out at an inopportune moment. "Hey guys, could you do that touchdown again? My CF card ran out of space, I've got a new one in, now though and my magazine really wants this shot!" What I can't understand, though, is why it wouldn't be far more cost effective for the photographer to have a WiFi card in his camera and a WiFi enabled laptop or large storage device in his bag. Battery life? Is it really worth $6000 ?

  24. NOT a bad price by jridley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I see a lot of people expressing surprise about the price. For the target market, these are very reasonably priced. Pro photographers are out in the field shooting with $6000 bodies, sometimes multiple ones, and $2000+ lenses, maybe several in a bag besides the ones on the bodies.

    They're not targetting people with a $1000 consumer point-n-shoot, and CF is not good for HD replacement in most cases due to low bandwidth and rewrite lifetime issues.

    Having to stop shooting to change media half as often is WELL worth it. You don't want to have to tell your editor "There was a pulitzer-prize shot, but I missed it because I had my head down changing CF cards right at that moment."

    1. Re:NOT a bad price by mst76 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Having to stop shooting to change media half as often is WELL worth it. You don't want to have to tell your editor "There was a pulitzer-prize shot, but I missed it because I had my head down changing CF cards right at that moment."
      A 2GB card costs under $200 and stores about 300 pictures in RAW mode from a 6MP camera. If you still can't see well in time that you need to change your card, maybe you shouldn't be in the professional photo business. How many pictures fitted on a 35mm roll again?
  25. Why not have a RAID array of flash cards? by blorg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lots of reasons. The sort things that use 'the smaller form factor of flash cards' aren't going to appreciate the CF card (already the largest form of flash storage) growing in size by a factor of eight. You've reached near 2.5" (laptop) hard-drive style sizes already, possibly larger with the necessary controlling circuitry. Factor in the expense of implementing the RAID controller in said portable device, and I don't think you're onto a winner. GB for GB, it is hardly a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks either.