Slashdot Mirror


King Rat

CrankyFool writes "Never having been a huge graphic book fan, I didn't discover Neil Gaiman until my appreciation for Pratchett led me to find Good Omens. Years after Good Omens I discovered urban fantasy as done by Gaiman and hungrily devoured American Gods and Neverwhere. After raving about Neverwhere, someone recommended King Rat by China Mieville (rather than James Clavell, who wrote a very, very different King Rat ) to me. Well, I'll give any author a chance, especially after they'd been reviewed so positively on Slashdot (see an earlier review of Perdido Street Station)." Read on for the rest of CrankyFool's review. King Rat author China Mieville pages 320 publisher Tor Books rating 8 reviewer CrankyFool ISBN 0312890729 summary Saul Garamond is blamed for his father's death, broken out of jail, and finds out his the half-human heir to the rat kingdom and a thousand-year-old conflict. Things go downhill from there.

King Rat is incredibly similar to Gaiman's American Gods and Neverwhere -- I've purposefully not looked into the chronology of publication so I don't want to assert who was influenced by whom, but some significant elements of Neverwhere -- London as a setting, the critical presence of rats, a malevolent, almost-unkillable foe -- and American Gods -- a protagonist who loses someone dear to him very early in the work (Shadow loses his wife in AG, while Saul loses his father), and who struggles through a new understanding of his role in the world, a new appreciation for the fact he was born for a specific destiny, and a rebellion against his father. Hell, one character actually appears in both American Gods and King Rat.

There's probably a very strong correlation between people who liked American Gods and Neverwhere and people who'll like King Rat. At the same time, King Rat's tone is incredibly different -- it's not a derivative of Gaiman's work as much as it is a close family relation. It's almost totally bereft of humor, unlike Neverwhere, and not quite as awash in a palpable sense of loss as American Gods (especially given Shadow's ongoing relationship with his wife). Unlike the other two books, I found this one a little slow to get into, reading five pages here, ten pages there, until it finally hooked me.

King Rat's story revolves around Saul Garamond, who comes home one night to find that someone has killed his estranged father -- and the police think it's him. Garamond is broken out of prison by the title furtive character, who lost his dominion over the rats in the Hamlin catastrophe, and who introduces himself as Saul's uncle. So yes, the protagonist of King Rat is, in fact, Prince Rat (who is half man and half rat).

The rest of the book is the detailing of the conflict between the Rat, Bird, and Spider people and the pied piper of Hamlin who, in fact, turns out to be quite evil and fond of killing things.

Music is at the core of King Rat, from the basic most powerful talent of the nemesis, to the particular defenses of Saul (since he's a halfling, neither human-snaring music nor rat-snaring music alone could get him), to the interweaving of Saul's story with that of Natasha, a friend of his and a jungle-music DJ. Parts of the book, discussing the music arrangement and the role of bass in the actual communication of emotion to an audience, felt like they might be lost a little on a reader who hasn't been awash in that rhythm in a club. Thankfully for the vast majority of slashdotters, that's not a huge part of the book and even if you've never gone clubbing, held a rhythm, or danced your ass off, you're not likely to be alienated by it.

Mieville decided to end the book and the conflict in a way that felt more ambiguous than it could have been. While I applaud any author who doesn't bow and scrape to the convention that if you have a battle between good and evil, evil must be completely vanquished by the end of the work, I couldn't help feel that Mieville ended the book in such a way at least partially so a sequel could be written, featuring largely the same characters. It left me uneasy and on the verge of feeling a little cheated.

So that's the downside. On the upside, I found Saul's characterization engaging, interesting, and real. Saul is not as good of a man as we all would like to be, but he's probably as good as most of us get to be. Especially in the beginning, he's pretty wretchedly whiny. He's not exceedingly brave, or truthful, or kind. He's just ... a guy, with some special powers due to his parentage, thrust into a reality that is wildly different from his own, and he does his best to adapt to it. Saul's friends, Natasha Fabian and Kay, can't be drawn with as fine of a stroke because the book isn't about them, but they're still interesting and nuanced. Pete, the piper of Hamlin, is rather less complex. He's evil. He's strong. He is, in Jules' immortal terms, a bad motherfucker. With a flute.

Darn decent book, I'd say. If you liked Neverwhere (and can stand urban fantasy that isn't funny), or American Gods (and can stand urban fantasy that isn't set in the U.S.), you owe it to yourself to check it out.

China Mieville's official website was down last time I checked -- you may have more luck finding stuff about him at his unofficial home page.

You can purchase King Rat from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

29 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. Previously Read Books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For your next review, perhaps you could start out by saying what the book's about, instead of referring/comparing to other books?

    1. Re:Previously Read Books? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why should he? A review isn't about retelling a story, it's about helping other people decide whether or not they want to read it. By immediately awknowledging the similarity of the work to works by other popular authors, you can pique the interest of people who are interested in those authors.

      Shit, I wouldn't have cared if I hadn't seen Gaiman's name. I just read (and liked, despite myself) American Gods and was hoping to find something new with the same epic feel and mythological flavor, only with a denoument that wasn't as glib...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Previously Read Books? by lysium · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I just read (and liked, despite myself) American Gods and was hoping to find something new with the same epic feel and mythological flavor, only with a denoument that wasn't as glib...

      He bit off more than he could chew. It's very hard to fit such an exestential concept into a story, without the climax (and denoument) being embarassing. Think of the movie Contact, and then consider how much better it would have been with the 'alien encounter' climax written out.

      Gaiman is an excellent writer; he just needs a little mental distance from graphic novel plotting, IMHO.

      I suggest Gene Wolfe. He creates a tone and atmosphere similar to Gaiman's, with more distance from the present world. Wolfe is very skillful with the written word. The vocabulary and descriptions are amazing.

      ===========

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    3. Re:Previously Read Books? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd rather think of the book Contact, which had the alien encounter written in but a much more satisfying ending that made you realize just how optimistic Sagan was.

      Worst thing about the film adaptation was that it turned Sagan's theme upside down. In the book, a level headed scientist who bucks religious nonsense and uses human creativity to discover the underlying truth of the universe and its creation. In the film, a level headed scientist is COURTED by religious nonsense and in the end discovers that science isn't everything. In short, they de-Sagan'd it. The outrage is indescribable...should have sent a poet...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Previously Read Books? by lysium · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You know, I don't think the movie entirely twisted Sagan's point. After all, in more than a few of his books, he relates joy of, and hope in, science as the religion of the future. Sagan's optimism is nothing more than a very strong belief in the 'rightness' of science, is it not?

      Also, at the end, it was not science itself that was flawed, but the people in charge of it. That kind of reminds me of why religions suck in the real world...and perhaps that was the point.

      But yes, the book was many times better.

      ==-----==

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  2. Authors overusing themes... by freerecords · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. has been a long standing problem with everyone. This book is not unique in the way that the outline is so cliche, but it still underlines a big point. It has been extremely rare to find books with completely original themes recently, you seem to have the framed school, the lawyer school, etc. What has happened to the Chuck Palahniuks of the world? Even his books have become too samy samy.. is it me, or do we need another Wodehouse to rise up?

    --
    tim
  3. Gaiman... by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At first, I thought he was cool... but the novelty of his work is quickly wearing off. American Gods didn't turn my crank, and his much lauded "American from a British perspective" was bull, even a Canuck like me can see that. The fairy tale about Star and Wall (I forget the name) came out pretty bland. Maybe I'm just not a fantasy person, but IMHO he should stick to comic books. Still, Good Omens was wonderful, easily topping much of Pratchett's solo work.

    Oh well, YMMV.

    1. Re:Gaiman... by APDent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good Omens was wonderful, easily topping much of Pratchett's solo work.

      I'd say it was better than some of Pratchett's earlier work, and not as good as most of Pratchett's later work. I like Good Omens a lot (I've read it a couple of times), but Pratchett's books about the city watch are more consistently interesting and better written. Night Watch is a fine example of this, as is the recently reprinted (in the US) Guards! Guards!.

    2. Re:Gaiman... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Funny
      Graphic books, not comic books! Even though they're still read by the same audience who live with their parents, it's different, dude!

      Now excuse me while I spank the monkey to a cartoon show. Er, I mean, anime.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  4. Ummm Hello by Zebbers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The similarities that the author of the review that alludes to a hint of suspicion of influence and or plaigarism is retarded. Most content is recycled and reissued. There isn't much in original ideas or plots...its how those plots are developed and examined that make the difference.

    A billion books probably start off with the protagonist losing a loved one. Hello.

    1. Re:Ummm Hello by Jotaigna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so it does Disney, have you noticed the protagonist is always a child whos parents are divorced or dead? (Lion King, Bambi) or have racial differences(Pocahontas), kinda exploiting our own traumas to relate to the characters...

      --
      "The quality of life is inversely proportional to the number of keys on your keyring."
    2. Re:Ummm Hello by Walter+Wart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not just a Disney thing. Stories for or about children usually start by freeing the child from the presence of the parents. At least if the parents are the sort who do their job - which is to protect their kids from the sorts of dangerous and traumatic events that make for really good stories :-)

      The fish out of water is one of the most common storytelling tropes. One of the first things the author has to do is remove the water.

      --
      The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
  5. Great... another SCO story? by baywulf · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I saw the title "King Rat" I thought this was another SCO story.

  6. Also check out Tim Powers by Coventry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you like modern, urban fantasy, then check out Tim Powers' Fischer-king series (its not officially called that, but thats what I consider it). Start with 'Last Call' and then work you way up. The whole series predates Gaiman's work by many a year, and I have no idea if the similarities of style and type of story are due to coincidence or influence. Actually, I enjoy just about everything I've gotten my hands on from Tim Powers, including 'Anubis Gates' and 'The Drawing of the Dark' (which could be considered part of the Fischer Kind series, just set in the past by several hundred years).

    I will say this though - many of the books have a similar, almost formulaic feel to the main character. The details may be different, but the fact that they just lost someone they love in the begining of the novel tends to be eirily similar. That said, its not always there, and the details of whom, how and why are always very different.

    --
    man is machine
  7. Home page by MooCows · · Score: 4, Informative

    This seems to be his new homepage.

    I read the other book (Perdido Street Station) a week ago. I though it was pretty good.
    (although perhaps with an overdose of unconnected storylines)
    There's a sequel to that one out too, called The Scar

    --
    The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
    30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
  8. Symptomatic of historical revisionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least with Gaiman's "American Gods" the author was recasting mythological figures in a new light, and while criminally negligent in his characterizations, it was nevertheless a fascinating read.

    In this book, however, I find much to despise, and it reminds me of how Julie Taymor butchered Shakespeare's "Titus" by recasting it in a pseudo-fascist-modern period. Or how "Cold Mountain" romanticizes the South and ignores the issue of slavery. Or how Gibson's "Braveheart" becomes an anti-English Scottish propaganda piece, though it has more holes than a pound of Swiss cheese. Can't so-called "artists" leave well enough alone? The same happens here -- the historical town of Hameln is twisted into Hamlin, and an allegory of emigration become an epic battle of good versus evil.

    To wit: Hameln is a town in Lower Saxony, Niedersachsen, in Germany. In the Middle Ages thousands of German emigrants, enticed by tax breaks and offers of free land, made the thousand mile trek to Transylvania, then more or less a part of the kingdom of Hungary. Of course, it was the skilled classes that left, and the young, leaving behind the old and the weak.

    Thus an exciting and influential event in the course of European history is manipulated for the sake of low-class genre fiction by a Gaiman-imitator.

    I think I'll stick with Turtledove.

  9. What if you didn't like American Gods? by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Insightful
    American Gods felt trite and familiar to me, a re-hashing of themes and ideas that never truly gelled into something with its own sense of originality. I loved Neverwhere, which is what got me to read AG, but Gaiman fell a few notches in my estimation with AG.

    So, the question is, if you loved Neverwhere, but American Gods left a bad taste in your mouth, how will King Rat fare?

  10. Borribles by APDent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't want to assert who was influenced by whom, but some significant elements of Neverwhere -- London as a setting, the critical presence of rats, a malevolent, almost-unkillable foe...

    I assert they were all influenced by Michael de Larrabeiti's The Borribles , which was published in 1976. I'm probably wrong -- it's been years since I read this, and I was quite young when I did -- but I vividly remember London and rats. The Borribles was the first of a trilogy, all of which have been out of print for a long while; however, while Googling for the link, above, I made the happy discovery that they have been reissued (ISBN: 0330490850).

  11. Perdido Street Station by abigor · · Score: 4, Informative

    The only other Mieville book I've read, Perdido Street Station, didn't impress me at all. Underneath the hey-wow story setting - a city set amongst the ribs of a giant, dead beast - I found a pretty typical storyline, and some truly godawful writing. I mean, exposition and description are nice, but come on.

    Right now, I'm reading a bunch of Elmore Leonard. Does anyone write better dialogue than this guy? No. His books are taut and practically impossible to put down - unlike Mieville's, which I struggled mightily to finish.

  12. More in this vein by Walter+Wart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been a fan of China Mieville since his now-impossible-to-find story "The Tain". He's part of a non-movement in F&SF which owes a lot to Jack Vance, Michael Moorcock and similar. Largely British, mostly urban, and set in worlds where reality's gears are missing a few teeth.

    If you like King Rat you'll probably enjoy his other books (Perdido Street Station and The Scar) and books by authors like...

    Tim Powers, Jeff Vandermeer, Ian MacLeod, Neil Gaiman, Johnathan Carroll, Alan Moore, M. John Harrison, Forrest Aguirre, Jeffrey Ford, and Jasper Fforde. Mary Gentle, Gene Wolfe, and Borges will almost certainly also appeal.

    And of course, if you have $200 just lying around doing nothing you will want to get a copy of the Codex Serafinianus just to squick yourself.

    --
    The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
  13. Re:Clavell by TwistedSquare · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You sir, are as bad as the original troll. A comic book, like a cartoon is a medium, not a genre. It is a means of delivery, like a (live-action) film or a (words-only) book. There can be excellent comic books/graphic novels (Sandman was given glowing reviews by many many major newspapers and other reviewers) and poor books, just as there can be poor graphic novels (almost every Superman comic ever published) and good books.

    Likewise, the Simpsons is superior to huge amounts of other shows, despite being a cartoon. Then again there are crap cartoons that fall well below the mark. The point is, do not discriminate based on the medium, but rather the individual creations If you do not, you are just as narrow-minded as a troll who only loved comics and cartoons.

  14. What? (Titus) by juuri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did you even watch Titus all the way through? It is absolutely brilliant, aware that most of the audience wouldn't be able to empathize with the true shock and horror as Shakespeare wrote it Taymour grabbed familiar, but horrible things from all over the 1900s to allow modern audiences to fully feel the disgust and discomfort originally intended.

    Perhaps you should watch it again with an open mind? This time try going past the first few minutes, okay?

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  15. That's NOT incredible... by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please, please stop using the word 'incredibly' to describe things that, incredibly, are really quite credible after all.

    The book is similar to Neverwhere? Good. Thanks for the info, but pardon me if my eyes don't exactly widen with amazement.

    Mieville's writing style is similar to Gaiman's but different? Fine. It's nice to know, but exactly leave me choking on my sandwich.

    Ahh...the scent of freshly picked nits!

    --
    **>>BELCH
  16. It's OK, but... by Cragen · · Score: 2, Interesting
    it's not as good as China's more recent stuff. Not-so-good-China-Meiville is still better than 90% of the rest of SFF. Speaking of the other 10%, I just finished the Hyperion series (4 books) by Dan Simmons. I am now doing something I have never, ever, done before. I am returning straight to book one and starting over. Take all your favorite adjectives and add "and moving." to the end. Stunning. (The Matrix is rumored to have stolen its plot from the Hyperion books. Now that Hyperion is, supposedly, going to become a movie, some joke about the irony that people will say Hyperion is a rip-off of Matrix.) Read the books. Moving.

    cragen

    ps. Lest ye think this is new, I think the first Hyperion book, conveniently named "Hyperion", came out around '89.

  17. which one did they move? by __aatzdk8508 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "made the thousand mile trek to Transylvania"

    they must have gone the narvik route then. I think Transylvania and Germany are a little closer together than that

  18. Re:Hmm... by cmpalmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your mileage may vary...

    Perdido Street Station was weird, imaginative, and thought-provoking, but ultimately (IMHO) sort of boring and pointless. I recommend it, but I didn't feel that it lived up to the hype. I am looking forward to reading The Scar.

    I loved 85% of American Gods. Unfortunately, the 15% that I didn't like was the resolution. Yes, it had one. Yes, I understood it. For some reason I just wasn't satisfied by it, for reasons I can't quite put my finger on. I wasn't bored by it (the book or the ending), but I felt that a book so strongly resonant about, well, American gods, would ultimately have something profound to say. I got my hopes up when the gods of the modern world got center stage, but the resolution of the story was, alas, not very interesting to me.

    Overall, I liked Pratchett's Small Gods, which shares a similar philosophy about deities, much better.

    --
    -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  19. Re:Clavell by Dinglenuts · · Score: 2, Informative

    This guy ain't no troll, he hit it spot on. Stop pretending that cartoons for five year olds are legitimate entertainment and go stock up on your Clavell collection right now.

    --


    Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  20. Re:Not to be confused with by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I agree- King Rat was a great book.

    I think 'Anti-Hero' got a new meaning with that book.

    But I have had a hard time explaining the whole thing to my wife, she usually stops me in the middle with an "oh, gross".

    --
    No reason to lie.
  21. Drum'n'bass (Jungle) music by PollyJean · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I adore China Mieville's work. I had the pleasure of meeting him at a convention last year. He's a brilliant, interesting guy who writes brilliant, interesting novels.

    I'm a bit disappointed that the reviewer downplayed the drum'n'bass aspects of King Rat. It's part of why I love the novel. It's rare that an author can so strongly render a subculture that revolves so much around music. The musical fusion that is drum'n'bass is fascinating, both from a dancing point-of-view and from a headphone music point-of-view. When I read King Rat, I found it exciting that the novel ended up hinging on the interplay between rhythm and melody, and that the importance of rhythm - so often under-appreciated in Western music - was essential to the plot.

    I've read all three of Mieville's published novels. I prefer Bas-Lag (the world of Perdido Street Station and The Scar. I believe the forthcoming Iron Council also takes place in Bas-Lag) to the London of King Rat. But I enjoyed the time I spent there in reading the novel and would highly recommend it. And if people who read King Rat take the time to discover drum'n'bass, especially the best stuff from the 90s, then even better.

    --
    Think like a person of action, act like a person of thought. --H. Bergson