Slashdot Mirror


Intel Devises Chip Speed Breakthrough

Chad Wood writes "According to the New York Times (free reg. req.), Intel has demonstrated a research breakthrough, making silicon chips that can switch light like electricity. The article explains:''This opens up whole new areas for Intel,' said Mario Paniccia, a an Intel physicist, who started the previously secret Intel research program to explore the possibility of using standard semiconductor parts to build optical networks. 'We're trying to siliconize photonics.' The invention demonstrates for the first time, Intel researchers said, that ultrahigh-speed fiberoptic equipment can be produced at personal computer industry prices. As the costs of communicating between computers and chips falls, the barrier to building fundamentally new kinds of computers not limited by physical distance should become a reality, experts say.'"

43 of 465 comments (clear)

  1. Intel's secret breakthrough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "We've taken two AMD chips and put them both dual configuration with a giant 'Intel' sticker on top. Then, we sell it for twice what we paid, and get the lusers... err, I mean... users to buy it because it says 'Intel Inside.'"

    1. Re:Intel's secret breakthrough by blair1q · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's telling that someone modded a unique posting of personal experience as "redundant."

      It's telling me the pro-Asslon community is willing to corrupt political systems to pretend their favorite product is superior to that produced by The Evil Empire.

    2. Re:Intel's secret breakthrough by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah hah, you've cleverly chosen secret option D) I don't understand my own hardware.

      AMD FX 64
      Mobile AMD Athlon 64

      You aren't talking about the same chips at all.

  2. We all know, of course. . . by jafac · · Score: 4, Funny

    that it will have to be x86 compatible, or it will never fly.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  3. EMP by potpie · · Score: 5, Funny

    This kind of technology seems like a very healthy step toward making computers resistant to electromagnetic waves and/or pulses (aided also by the rise of optical storage devices), which is great for us humans now. But now what are we going to use against the "squiddies" when they come for our hovercrafts?

    --
    Esoteric reference.
    1. Re:EMP by ibullard · · Score: 2, Funny

      We follow Monty Python's advice and fill them with eels.

    2. Re:EMP by jsse · · Score: 5, Funny

      This kind of technology seems like a very healthy step toward making computers resistant to electromagnetic waves

      Your joke reminded me of an instance when I saw a co-worker sitting on a P-IV box while working on it. I took the chance to play some prank on him.

      "It could fire your 'eggs'"
      "What?!"
      "You know what clock speed this thingy is running?"
      "2.4GHz, why?"
      "What's the wave frequency of a microwave oven?"
      (jumping up)"....OH SHIT"

      (It's just a joke. I don't think the CPU has enough strength to fry your 'eggs'. Even so, the wave can't penatrate the metallic case) :)

  4. New AOL IntelSpeed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    With new AOL IntelSpeed (tm) I can compute faster than ever! All my friends and family use AOL IntelSpeed (tm), too!

  5. We're trying to siliconize photonics by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We're trying to siliconize photonics"

    We're trying to morph bleeding-edge content
    We're trying to facilitate sticky experiences
    We're trying to productize user-centric convergence
    We're trying to empower extensible networks
    We're trying to synthesize revolutionary ROI
    We're trying to matrix e-business technologies
    We're trying to cultivate impactful relationships

    ....yada yada yada...

    ...Look, how fast will the thing go, and will I end up starting a fire in my PC from overheat?

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  6. Modders: Each box with a laser toy inside!!! by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 4, Funny

    Photonics == lasers
    So this technology should also revolutionize the mod scene and therefore dramatically effect Slashdot's front page.
    I wonder how many kids will accidentally burn their eyes out looking into the light?

  7. Moore's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...or is this (Moore's Law)^2 ?

    Better yet...will this be meazured in LHz (Ludicrous-hertz)?

  8. As a duck by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am far more interested in overquacking then I am in overclacking.
    overclocking is right out. ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Faster-than-light computers? by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...building fundamentally new kinds of computers not limited by physical distance should become a reality...

    So they've broken the lightspeed barrier? Amazing!

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  10. Re:Still binary.. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    01111001 01100001 00101100 00100000 01001001 00100000 01110100 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01100001 01100111 01110010 01100101 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101111 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 00100000 00101101 00100000 01101000 01101111 01110000 01100101 01100110 01110101 01101100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01110111 01101001 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100101 01101110 00100000 01110011 01101111 01101111 01101110 00101110 00100000 01001001 00100000 01100001 01101101 00100000 01110111 01100101 01100001 01110010 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110011 01100101 00100000 01110100 01110111 01101111 00100000 01101011 01100101 01111001 01110011 00101110 00101110 00101110

    Know what I mean?

  11. But can we TRUST this intel? by Sebastopol · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given the current press reports from the White House and David Kay, how do we know we can trust this intel?

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:But can we TRUST this intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Even if the intel is not reliable; the ends will justify the means.

  12. Re:Still binary.. by condition-label-red · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't the "bi" in "bit" mean two? So we would have to call three states a "trit"; and four states a "quit" to keep them straight.

    --
    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
  13. Re:Whoo now by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    He said he was "Bond, James Bond"..then ordered a martini.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. Lightspeed limitations? by Stonent1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So now the only barrier is the speed of light? Or do I need a nice warp core sitting in my living room to overclock?

  15. Re:Still binary.. by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    but would 12 states be a twit? ;)

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  16. Re:Still binary.. by irokitt · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, maybe you are right. And I think we should also stop counting in base-10. I mean, we've been doing that for, like, forever. And it would be so cool to count in base-13. And maybe we should live in tepees. Because they're cool.

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  17. Re:Still binary.. by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

    01110111 01100101 01101100 01101100 00100000 01110111 01101000 01100101 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101111 01110011 01100101 00100000 01100111 01101001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00101100 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100011 01100001 01101110 00100000 01110011 01110111 01101001 01110100 01100011 01101000 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101011 01100101 01111001 01110000 01100001 01100100

  18. Re:damn universe.. by nomadic · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think the universe might disagree.

    That universe, thinks he's so smart...

  19. Re:Can someone tell me.... by PalmKiller · · Score: 5, Funny

    Um, that might not be wise. If you try to overclock past the speed of light, I think that will cause a rift in the Time/Space Continuum. :P

  20. Re:Whoo now by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Funny

    "What did Moore have to say about this?"

    He said that it was Bush's fault that we don't have this technology already. He was then booed by the audience at the awards show.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  21. Re:Still binary.. by gilrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, you would have tits (Tertiary digITs).

  22. Finally.... by vwjeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Computing at the speed of light. Oh, wait, bottlenecks. Damn you serial ATA Hard Drive!!!

  23. Re:Can someone tell me.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is much better than early forays into this technology by AMD where the heatsink would fall off of the processor & the resultant heat would generate the light.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  24. Stickers make it go faster! by TheDukePatio · · Score: 5, Funny
    What's more likely is that they had a couple highschool kids lower the chips 2", crazy glue a spoiler on, install neon undercarriage lights, a fake pushbutton labeled "Nitrous", and stickers, LOTS of stickers.

    New Codename: Ricer

    --
    To Alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems.
  25. Hail Photons! by andy55 · · Score: 1, Funny


    I, for one, welcome our new photon overlords.

  26. Re:Still binary.. by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think they are normally called "trits".

    On the otherhand, Google only got 5090 hits for "trits" and 16,600,000 for "tits", so perhaps that is the more common term. I see, however, that the top hit for "tits" is about bird-watching, so this alternative meaning may have contaminated the results.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  27. Re:Still binary.. by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Funny

    Respectfully... I distrust the discussion of "third base" from a computer geek :)

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  28. Re:Photonics by Snoopy77 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know you're a slashdotter when:

    You search through issues of Peoeple and Sports Illustrated to find a copy of Photonics Spectra.

    --
    "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
  29. Re:Still binary.. by MrHanky · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not upgrading before we have CLits (CL in Roman numerals should be something like 150). 150 states for each bit is what you need for serious realtime porn-rendering, man!

  30. HOP by forkboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hooked on Photonics worked for me!

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  31. Re:Google link (KW) by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have you ever noticed [especially the french] how much vacation these guys have? I work in the US with a UK, French, and German team. These fucking guys are always on vacation. They're fucking genuises, but don't get to work often enough to get shit done....

    --
    ymmv
  32. Re:damn universe.. by xorbe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ahh, but if we went through the Earth, max latency is ~85ms!

  33. Breakthrough? by Grave · · Score: 5, Funny

    SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 11 -- Intel scientists say that they have made silicon chips that can switch light like electricity, blurring the line between computing and communications and presenting a vision of the digital future that will allow computers themselves to span cities or even the entire globe.

    Great! I was getting so tired of my computer being only 5lbs and man-portable! I can't wait for these new planet-sized computers. Mine's going to be called the Death Star.

    1. Re:Breakthrough? by psoriac · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wouldn't "Unicron" be a better name for something like a planet-sized computer?

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  34. Re:Photonics by natrius · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know you're a slashdotter when you can't spell "people".

    </cheap shot>

  35. Re:Still binary.. by LittleBigLui · · Score: 2, Funny

    So instead of being "yes"/"no", bits should offer more possibilities, like "maybe", "can i call a friend?" and "CowboyNeal"?

    --
    Free as in mason.
  36. Re:Can someone tell me.... by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny


    When is it that one thinks 'okay, I have enough porn now' ?

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  37. Re:Breaking the laws of physics? by TheInternet · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was under the impression that physical distance was always a limitation...?

    Depends on which physics you want to use. :)

    - Scott

    --
    Scott Stevenson
    Tree House Ideas