Slashdot Mirror


Idea Management/Navigation Software?

psychonaut asks: "My work involves a lot of research and writing, and I often find myself jotting down brief notes on scraps of paper, in text files, in the margin of books, etc. The idea is to later use these ideas as the basis for various papers or even books I plan to write. However, because I have no central repository for all these ideas, finding long-forgotten thoughts and citations months after I've recorded them becomes a nightmare. Can anyone recommend an open source knowledge management, visualization, and navigation software I could use to bring together and classify all these disjointed ideas?"

"The system should be hypertext-based, allowing explicit links between nodes, but it would be nice if it could also derive some relations on its own. Having built-in support for referencing web links, printed publications (BibTeX integration?), and arbitrary files would be great. Text-based and perhaps also non-text-based searching capabilities (e.g., graphical visualization of node relationships) would also be very useful.

I've looked at some wiki systems but the choices seem overwhelming, and most of them are geared towards collaborative rather than individual work. Is there some wiki or database system that does what I need, or should I be looking for something in an entirely different paradigm?"

27 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. Bite your pride by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you can bite your pride and use closed source, Microsoft One Note sounds like exactly what you're looking for.

    1. Re:Bite your pride by CoolHnd30 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rather than going Microsoft, maybe you should use freemind. I've been using it the last six months on Linux and Windows, and am very pleased with it.

    2. Re:Bite your pride by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rather than going Microsoft, maybe you should use freemind. I've been using it the last six months on Linux and Windows, and am very pleased with it.

      Now I know nothing about Freemind beyond what I saw following the parent post's link, but the when front page of the site asks, "Did FreeMind make you angry?" you really have to wonder.

  2. I Have A Hideously Bad Idea... by X-wes · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you don't care how crude this idea is, you could try this out:

    Take all of the scraps you write, and spend a bit of time making 75-100 DPI scans of them. Place all of the images into a folder for "notes" and such. Inside this folder, categorise all the files by using folders/directories.

    This does not meet the requirements you set out; and like I said, it's horribly crude. However, it is simple to implement and can easily be combined with any web server software to form an easily accessible knowledge base.

    Being a student, this is the system I use to categorise my notes and papers. It is simply not the best system, but it rarely gets any simpler than this.

    Hope this was at least slightly interesting.

  3. Maybe try DENIM? by wan-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    The DENIM Project might be something you could look into. It is a tool for web page and UI design but it should be easily adaptable for your needs (especially with its export to HTML). You could also try Visual Thought though it is no longer developing nor supported (but is more tailored to what you're describing than DENIM).

  4. Emacs is what you need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I sure it has what you want somewhere in it.

  5. try a book by JackBuckley · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't mean this as flamebait, but how about keeping a medium-sized notebook with you all the time. As a professor and researcher, I have found that nothing works better than an "idea book" for keeping notes from reading, paper ideas, sketches, equations, proofs, diagrams, etc., all together.

    I have a small notebook (between 3x5 and 8.5x11) that I keep in my briefcase to and from work and jot everything down in it. It never crashes, it takes only seconds to include complex graphs or equations (no equation editor or LaTeX tags needed!), and can even be backed up via xerox (which I have done with ripped pages--just staple the copied page back in!).

  6. Personal Brain by dFaust · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's not open source, and you do have to sign up to download it (just username and email, I think... and I've been on their list for years and only get maybe 2 emails a year from them)... but it is free and it's a pretty nifty piece of software, allowing you to make large webs of thoughts, relate any node to any other node, link files & emails, etc.

    If you're running Windows, it's at least worth checking out. http://www.thebrain.com

    1. Re:Personal Brain by bergeron76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why doesn't the Open Source community come up with a common XML foundation for information organization and design toward it?

      Seriously, by starting with VERY BASIC meta tags (NAME, KEYWORD, DESCRIPTION) we could exponentially expand the productivity of OpenOffice, etc...

      The KEY (no pun intended), however, is going to be linking these features among different apps. I can't even count how many times I've done a "locate project | grep png" and NEVER found the image that I was looking for.

      Unity is key...

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    2. Re:Personal Brain by __past__ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should one come up with a new one when there already are plenty XML formats that can be used for knowledge organization, like XML Topic Maps and RDF?

    3. Re:Personal Brain by jdclucidly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that information is rarely heirarchial and XML only serves to force us in to making it be stored heirarchially. Information is more like a web of relationships. In graph theory, this is a simple, connected graph.

  7. Palm Piece by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use Memo Plus on the Palm, which is merely a hierarchical notepad.

    I have things sorted into a hierarchy that works for me.

    But oh, how I would love a cross-platform product that offered deep integration with email, address book, bookmarks, calendar, and random notes, with multiple hierarchical and/or directed graph maps, and good search capabilities. In my fantasy world, it'd run on my PC and on my Kyocera smart phone, and would be compatible with stuff on both ends: Firefox, Thunderbird, the Palm address book, etc. If I didn't have a job, that's what I'd be building right now...

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  8. Visual Tools for Brainstorming by stonebeat.org · · Score: 2, Informative
  9. MindManager by Mindjet by Bazouel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have a look at Mind Manager by Mindjet.

    I use it regularly and I'm still finding new uses for it. It's *very* easy to use yet powerful.

    --
    Intelligence shared is intelligence squared.
  10. xaraya by an_mo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have set up a cms (content management system) to do just what you mention and it is working great.

    Contrary to most other cms'es of the PHP-Nuke series, xaraya has the flexibility to manage all publication types (FAQ, articles, reviews) into one single module, which avoids lots of clutter. You can add fields to each type. Myself, I have created a "research blog" publication type (where I describe what I do each day in a blog format), and then "reviews" (for the books I read), "articles" (the articles I read), "todo", "docs" (for things I keep forgetting). Each of these publication types have one or more category trees associated with them (with some trees overlapping) so that I can search/display my blogs by category and/or by pubtype. Finally, I have set it up so that only I can access it. The permission system allows for you to set up different kind of access to the different pages depending on various criteria.

    Using a full blown cms may be overkill but the flexibility and extendability is great. To mention your needs, you can use the autolink module to generate automatic links in your modules, and so on..., search works great, for BibTeX you'd probably need to create your own hooks, which I believe vouldn't be terribly difficult.

    A wiki might work, but your pages would look identical across tasks and categories, and I like the ability to visualize different pubtypes and/or categories differently. The tendency to generate a mess is enormous in wikis, but with a single user less so. Good luck.

  11. Slim pickings by eykd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Open source offerings in this area are slim to none, and I've tried everything I can get my hands on. The best I've found is KeyNote, a Windows-only tabbed notebook/hierarchical outliner. I recently converted all my text-file notes over to KeyNote, and found it to be a sweet little package. Highly recommended, although it doesn't really meet any of your other specifications (no hyperlinking, etc., outline-view only).

    If you don't mind a web environment, Wikis provide easy editing and hyperlinking, but visualization is not their strong suit. If you like the idea of wikis, but don't want the web, and don't mind paying $12 for closed-source, WikidPad is an excellent, flexible, Windows-only option (and mildly extendable with an embedded Python interpreter). Combines a tree/outline view and Wiki-like syntax & automatic hyperlinking.

    If you don't mind closed source, The Literary Machine provides a lot of power in a Windows environment. The basic version was free last I checked, though he's ceased development on it in favor of the Pro version ($20), which is being actively developed and integrates a number of new features (but I haven't tried it yet). It organizes everything based on a non-hierarchical keyword association system, and while it takes some getting used to (and can be downright messy sometimes), it does allow for the discovery of connections between notes that you might not have put together otherwise.

    If you don't mind closed source, paying through the nose ($145), and OS X, then there is one app which fits all of your other qualifications: Eastgate's Tinderbox has powerful hyperlinking, programmable agents, RSS and web integration, powerful search, graphical visualization, and plenty more. To tell you the truth, my next computer will probably be a Mac because of this one, though a Windows version is on the horizon (was slated for an early 2004 release, but looks like it's slipped back to Real Soon Now). This has been the sleeper hit of the past couple years--everyone who uses it raves about it, but it's relatively unknown.

    1. Re:Slim pickings by eykd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoops. Here's the link for KeyNote.

    2. Re:Slim pickings by An+Anonymous+Hero · · Score: 3, Informative
      If you don't mind closed source, paying through the nose ($145), and OS X

      Ah, if we're talking Mac OS X then you might want to look at VoodooPad. Quite a bit cheaper (has a free version actually), and seems to do much of what the poster wants.

  12. todo.txt as recommended at ETCON by quiddity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    life hacks notes by cory doctorow (more at bottom)
    "It's the 10-second rule: if you can't file something in 10 seconds, you won't do it. Todo.txt involves cut-and-paste, the simplest interface we can imagine."
    "Power-users don't trust complicated apps. Every time power-geeks has had a crash, s/he moves away from it. You can't trust software unless you've written it -- and then you're just more forgiiving.
    Text files are portable (except for CRLF issues) between mac and win and *nix.
    Geeks will try the Brain, etc, but they want to stay in text."

    --
    .
    . hmmm
  13. I use a combination... by bob_calder · · Score: 3, Informative

    of sketchbooks and Idea Knot although I am going to try
    MAK as a group project.

    It's awfully dangerous to be honest around here. You get modded as a troll. Actually, I have three sketchbooks going right now.

    --
    Any preoccupation with ideas of what is right or wrong in conduct shows an arrested intellectual development. (Wilde)
  14. Re:Wiki or blog software by WayneConrad · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, minimalists love wikis. I'll describe a Wiki for those who haven't seen one: A wiki is a web site where you can modify the pages (usually cgi driven). In its purest form, a wiki is a collection of web page anyone can read or modify, but most wiki software now allows you to restrict access in various ways. Most wikis also version control their pages, so you can undo mistakes made by you, or if it's a world-writable wiki, undo mistakes made by others.

    Ward Cunningham wrote the canonical wiki, but there are many others now.

    A wiki is somewhat easy to modify (typing your changes into a CGI text box is OK but not the greatest), very easy to search, and pretty easy to link pages together. It's biggest advantage is that you can read and edit it from from anywhere you have a browser. I use a wiki to store notes and links -- I don't keep bookmarks on my browser anymore, so now it doesn't matter which browser I'm using or what computer I'm on. I just set my browser home page to my wiki page that has all my links on it.

    If you don't want to run your own, there are wiki sites that will lend you space to do your own thing in (Here's one public wiki, but there are others.

  15. I use Treepad by rhild · · Score: 2, Informative

    Treepad is a tree-based PIM, organizer, word processor with too many features to list here, that I've been using for about a year.

    The combination of organizing your notes in a tree, with hyperlinks between nodes, and a good search feature makes it a great way to keep track of things.

    It isn't open source, but there is a free 'lite' version, plus a couple inexpensive full-featured versions (including versions for Linux).

  16. Review page of Windows outliners by Grabble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some people think The One True Way is to use outliners. (shrug) It depends on your work style.

    This really useful page...

    http://john.redmood.com/organizers.html

    ... lists a bunch of Windows outliners, along with personal opinion on usage and features.

    I have been in your exact shoes and have installed Twiki and have the following generalization...

    Wiki's aren't as easy to use as they seem. When using a wiki, there's actually a very distinct (but non-obvious) obstacle course between the urge to write and the actual start of writing and it negatively impacts your productivity more than you realize.

    ... but that's just a generalization from my own experience. I'm still a believer, but not a user.

    "Someday, I'll fix it."

    Extra comments: Jot + serves me well as a catch-all sort of scratchpad... I'm only an Alt-Tab away from writing, and I also like its indentation model.

    The folks behind The Brain are patent fuckwads... they actually patented the idea of using lines to connect thoughts. Avoid them.

  17. Re:idea by tin_the_fatty · · Score: 2, Informative
  18. Try kaspaliste by TrackerChamp · · Score: 3, Informative
    You might want to try the KDE program Kaspaliste which is more or less what you are looking for.

    Kaspaliste is a literature database. It handles all kinds of books, articles, journals, webpages etc. The database goes beyond storing bibliographical information. There is the possibility to create annotated links between pieces of information (like the content of a book chapter) and to group links into categories.

    The user interface works just like a web browser: You may follow the links to open records. You may walk back and forward through previously edited records, change fields, and create or delete links, publication, authors etc. on the fly with just one mouseclick.

    Kaspaliste does not only store pieces of information about publications. It stores files as well. Kaspaliste handels various formats like html, pdf, ps, dvi and pictures (depends on your KDE-installation since the kpart-technology is used). You can for example store ocr'ed parts of interesting publications. The fulltext search covers these files.

  19. And another.. by tyndyll · · Score: 2, Informative

    Again, not open source but what I've foun dvery handy for colating information is MyInfo. I've used for everything website design to D&D campaing planning. Also exports to HTML and pretty cheap too...

    --
    Morale seems good, considering, although high spirits are just no substitute for eight hundred rounds a minute
  20. Re:I maybe reading it wrong... by t-maxx+cowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Correction to the annonymous cowards suggestion.
    http://everydevel.com

    --
    Regards,

    Ryan Pritchard
    Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies