Slashdot Mirror
ZDNet Examines SCO Indemnity Options
Ursus Maximus writes "David Berlind of ZD NET has posted a major opinion/research piece. What do you all think? I don't like the story at all, but he does seem to have made more of an effort to try to find reasons to back up SCO's claims than any of their other supporters have."
How is my post a "rant" any more than the original post to which I was replying to or, indeed, your own post? Do I fly off the handle attacking people? Am I derogatory because something or someone is at odds with my views? Am I pushing an agenda down people's throats? Or am I merely making observations based upon both first-hand and common experience?
In short, is every comment or opinion that you disagree with a rant?
Please, feel free to debate the level of ZD's bias towards Microsoft (real or imaginary). But please show me the same courtesy as I've shown the original poster by responding to my comments in a rational manner without resorting to snide remarks just because you don't like what my I have to say.
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
So exactly how much of the lega filings have YOU read, anonymous pussy?
'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
Nice way to not pay any attention. He first states that he doesn't believe developers to be under any fire because they will simply replace the infringing code. He later states that SCO HAS TALKED ABOUT SUING TORVALDS AND MORTON. He does NOT say that they are likely to be sued. Someone mod this down to about "-9 Didn't pay much attention".
'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.