Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

ZDNet Examines SCO Indemnity Options

Posted by timothy on from the which-walnut-is-your-choice? dept.

Ursus Maximus writes "David Berlind of ZD NET has posted a major opinion/research piece. What do you all think? I don't like the story at all, but he does seem to have made more of an effort to try to find reasons to back up SCO's claims than any of their other supporters have."

4 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. ADD MOD TO LAMESNESS FILTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Someone needs to modify the lameness filter to remove this crap....

  2. Wait, there is no need for Indemnity by tdwebste · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If we only wait a little longer soon, we will see there is no need for Indemnity from SCO's threat.

    So the whole article by ZDNet is pointless.

    However there is a real problem on the horizon, and that is software patents. SCO is a dead horse, and a waste of time.

    Support the fight against BAD patents.
    http://www.ffii.org/

  3. Re:Microsoft shill ? by westlake · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Ziff-Davis is a Microsoft shill.

    Guaranteed to score at least 4 points. The predictable, all-purpose, mod this one up high! Slashdot response to anyone who prints a story the true Linux zealot doesn't want to hear

  4. Re:Microsoft shill ? by black+mariah · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This from someone that can't properly capitalize a sentence. For all we know it could be one of his EDITORS that thought "its" was INCORRECT.

    --
    'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.