Slashdot Mirror


New Cast Information For 'Hitchhiker's' Movie

Kathleen writes "I was listening to the old Hitchiker's radio plays, and feeling nostalgic, I decide to check out how the movie version was going along. Well, they've filled out some important parts, Zaphod and Marvin have been cast. Zaphod is played by Sam Rockwell who's most recently been in Matchstick Men and Confessions of a Dangerous Mind. Marvin is being played by Warwick Davis (Who was Willow Ufgood in Willow). Slartibartfast will be played by Bill Nighy. This news is a little distressing, since I was under the impression that Stephen Moore would still be handling the voice of Marvin."

24 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. Narrator by Jonin893 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can only hope they have a compotent narrator, a good percentage of the jokes in the book/radio show are from the narration of book passages and exposition.

    1. Re:Narrator by Jonin893 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I figure it shouldn't be that hard to find a good narrator. Basically every video that my teachers try and make me watch in history courses is narrated by some guy with a british accent. Although Bond talking about digital watches would have a certain level of entertainment value.

    2. Re:Narrator by Xolotl · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The best would have been Peter Jones, the narrator from both the original radio series and the TV series. He had a particularly distinctive voice which made him wonderful as The Book (the narration in the HHG is actually the voice of the Guide itself), so much so that a number of documentaries even had their narration done in the same style with him reading it.

      Unfortunately, he died in 2000, but there are so many recordings of him, including all the right fragments from the radio series, that if they really wanted to they could use his voice anyway.

  2. Marvin by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Marvin is being played by Warwick Davis (Who was Willow Ufgood in Willow). ... This news is a little distressing, since I was under the impression that Stephen Moore would still be handling the voice of Marvin.
    This may not be as bad as it initially sounds; James Earl Jones didn't 'play' Darth Vader, either. However, he did a nice job as Vader's voice.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    1. Re:Marvin by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You beat me to it. There is indeed precedent for hiring a little person to fit inside the robot "costume", but having someone else provide the voice.

      Actually I think that would be the majority of robot movies.

      We don't need to fear. . .yet.

      KFG

    2. Re:Marvin by PressReturn · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But wasn't Marvin actually tall?
      video still

      --
      When I speak, no one believes me. When I write it down, people know it's true. (Basquiat)
  3. I wonder by Bobdoer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How far will they have to pare down the book to make a three hour (or so) movie?

  4. Well, I'll probably watch it. by ArekRashan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sam Rockwell seems like a particularly good choice for Mr. Beeblebrox. I just wonder who will get the tap to be Mr. Prefect.

  5. Burn Hollywood Burn by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Insightful


    another American atrocity this way comes

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  6. Where's Your Source? by DaveRomigh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alright, kiddies.. am I the only one who's kept their head here?

    Kathleen, you cite NO sources in this - just links to the actors' pages on IMDB.com.

    What gives? We're now posting news articles with no sources at all? Let me rummage around for my bullshit flag.

  7. Just a reminder by rblancarte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not that you /.ers can be trusted to actually read a page BEFORE commenting on it, but IMDB.com does add this note to projects that are still in the planning stages (like HhGTTG):
    Note: Since this project is categorized as being in production, the data is subject to change or could be removed completely.

    --
    It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
  8. Re:The Garth Jennings Fan Club by Snad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Second, to the anti-Garth Jennings camp, could it possibly be any worse than a low budget 1980's BBC TV production?

    Yes, it could easily be much, much, worse. I'm taking bets it will be an unwatchable disaster but hope to be amazed to the contrary. Jenning's moron value aside, most of the casting announced is already extremely dodgy. Add to that the film is being made in Hollywood and you've got an almost sure fire loser.

    Not that I have anything against Hollywood per se, but they just don't seem to get British culture (witness the absolute travesty that is the upcoming Thunderbirds movie - did they even watch any of the TV series?).

    I actually sorta liked the BBC TV series, believe it or not.

    One of the reasons the BBC TV series really worked was because of the limited effects, though some of them were really complicated for the TV of the time. All the "computer" parts for the Guide were (apparently) done by hand...

    Anyway, with the (comparative) lack of budget they had to rely more on (shock!) acting and (horror!) humour to make it work. And it did (Trillian perhaps excepted).

    Putting an MTV director in charge of Guide style humour and class is like having Bill Clinton teach Japanese schoolgirls - you know damn well someone is going to get screwed, and there's going to be a hell of a mess!

  9. Re:It's going to blow by Kupek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Someone else on slashdot, during the last hitchiker thread, addressed the issue of changes quite well: the series has appeared in a variety of mediums, and each time it was different than it was in the other mediums. It's going to be no different with the movies. So try to just enjoy the ride instead of saying, prematurely, "This person isn't right for this party for reasons x, y and z."

  10. Re:This is Good by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Since it's not a BBC production, it stands a chance of having production values above that of a 2nd grade art class."

    Crack jokes about it if you like. But HGtGttG was and Dr. Who were far better than the scifi we have today. When you have '2nd grade art class' effects, you have to focus more on making the script interesting.

    Frankly, I wouldn't complain a whole lot about the fx they had back then. I recently purchased the DVD for Hitchhiker and they actually stunned me with one of their effects. The guide had a full color animated screen. Today that'd be done with either a PocketPC (like in Nemesis) or by digitally adding the imagery later. What they did back then was they found a neat way to funnel light from a projector in that thing. Ingenius.

    It's also worth mentioning that the animations they did for the guide won awards. Despite being hand-animated, they were quite effective in selling people on the idea that they were watching a computerized presentation of the information the Guide contained.

    As an artist who does that kind of work, I found Hitchhiker to be surprisingly good, even today. I nitpicked it far less than I did Episode II.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  11. Garth Jennings directs? by ravepunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He's the title designer for "Da Ali G Show" for chrissake. I do not believe that the delicate sarchasm in Adams' work can be trusted to a music video director who designed the titles for a reasonably good TV show.

    In both the radio show and the BBC TV Series, what made the jokes work was the voice characterization and acting. Without a good director at the helm who has a letter perfect sense of comic timing and voice characterization necessary to pull off the sarchasm, this movie will fail. My vote would have been to use a Disney cartoon director taking on live action for the first time if they wanted to save money.

    Of course, I was the one that poopoo'ed the idea of Peter Jackson doing LOTR, so who the Hell am I to comment?

    - ravepunk :/

  12. Re:It's going to blow by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm enthrilled to see that the mods agree with this racist bullshit.

    Just cause the guy is black doesn't mean it's going to be Men in Black nor that there will be Hip Hop. JC what a bunch of stereo-typical crap.

    Maybe there IS going to be Hip Hop. So the fuck what?

    I don't remember Douglas Adams ever pointing out the color of Ford's skin.

  13. Re:Missing Data! by robbot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man on the Moon is also brilliant.

  14. Re:It's going to blow by blincoln · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just cause the guy is black doesn't mean it's going to be Men in Black nor that there will be Hip Hop. JC what a bunch of stereo-typical crap.

    Uh, somehow I don't think it's because he's black, but because he's a hip-hop musician.

    I'm not familiar with his work, but usually when Hollywood hires a musician for a part, it's to cash in on the image they've already built up for themselves (e.g. David Bowie in Labyrinth, Sting in Dune, Henry Rollins in every film he's ever been in).

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  15. Re:It's going to blow by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmmm... you folks are definitely out to lunch who think I'm racist. I mean, my cousin is considered black for god's sake (her father was black/native american). My point is that Hip-Hop and the HHGTTG don't mix any more than Masterpiece Theater and an Italian Gangster film do. I wouldn't mind if they picked say... Laurence Fishburne to play Ford, I think he'd do a good job with it. I mean... you're not going to pick Britney Spears to play Anne Frank, Marie Curie or even a Doctor Who companion and actually think it would work? As far as the other person who suggested that guy from RedDwarf (I'm assuming you mean the Lister character) I think he'd be an excellent choice.

    Sorry, you can be an idiot and paint me with the racism brush, but it's not going to stick. The only problem I've got with the casting is that they didn't pick a more British type of hipster. Thank god they didn't cast that idiot Kidd Rock as Zaphod. Now that would have been a total tragedy.

  16. What's Important by rpeh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It really doesn't matter who plays whom. What's more worrying is that Adams' script is being rewritten. HHGTTG is probably the finest comedy written thus far in human history and the idea that somebody could do better than DNA is tantamount to heresy.

    The main reason the film has never been made is that Adams was never happy with what Hollywod was offering. Do we really thing he'd be happy with some droid scriptwriter massacring his work?

    If The Powers That Be didn't like DNA's script, they don't deserve to benefit from it.

    1. Re:What's Important by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hollywood depends on idiots like you. You consistently go and see films that you don' t want to see. Have you ever thought about voting with your wallet?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  17. Re:It's going to blow by Von+Helmet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, and they're still stilted.

    I assume you're basing this on TV that's actually made it over to the US, right? In which case yeah, it probably sucks. There's good British TV and films, but hardly any of it is popular, so I doubt much of it makes it over the pond.

    Enough with the period pieces and Hugh Grant already. And there's nothing funnier than a British "gangster" film.

    Period pieces? You mean Pride And Prejudice or Shakespeare or something? It's great literature. Get over it. Just because it wasn't made in the last 20 minutes doesn't mean it's worthless.
    As for Hugh Grant, believe me, we're all as sick of him as you are.
    Gangster films? I assume you mean Guy Ritchie's films - Lock, Stock... and Snatch, right? You'll be referring to them as they're about the only British gangster films going, and certainly the only ones that will have made it as far as the states. I guess they're a bit of an acquired taste, but the truth is if you know anything about London, Cockney's, Pikey's etc they're fucking hilarious films.

    We already know you guys have brown teeth, so that doesn't shock us. Trying to look tough and talking in a gay British accent is just too funny.

    Brown teeth? Whatever. Go tell Vinnie Jones he's got a "gay" accent... see how far that gets you.

    Like that nerd Dizzy Rascal. WTF is up with that loser ?

    That's Dizzee Rascal. And yes, loser. Won the Mercury Music Prize, though goodness knows how.

    Anyway. Please refrain from sweeping generalisations about our country. Believe me, we could all come up with some pretty brutal generalisations about yours given what we see of it on TV.

  18. Hip-hop (was Re:It's going to blow) by aswang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Before you criticize, it might be worthwhile to know what you're talking about. I can't believe you just equated Mos Def with Nelly. That's a lot like equating the Beatles with N'sync.

    In case you cared, Mos Def, unlike many self-styled "MCs," is a real artist, a poet who started off in spoken word venues like the Brooklyn Moon. Unlike the commercialized hip-hop spewed by Clear Channel radio stations targeted at white suburbanites to reinforce their stereotypes of people of color, Mos Def actually has a positive message for the urban counterculture, rooted in the Civil Rights Movement, and the struggle of people of color everywhere to attain equality.

    I have a feeling that Mos Def and Douglas Adams would have had a lot to talk about. After all tHHGttG saga talks a lot about the disgusting excesses of capitalism and the rampant insanity of corporate culture (see Magrathea and the collapse of the Galactic Stock Market, the Sirius Cybernetic Corporation, Hotblack Desiato being dead for "tax purposes," the awesome satire in the sequence involving the Golgafrinchans, and the fact that the enemy in the final book is an evil corporation), the way the powers-that-be and the media manipulate the masses (remember, anyone you actually meet is the product of a deranged imagination, the fact that most everything is "somebody else's problem" makes it possible to create a good stealth device, and there's the irony when the tourism industry's campaign in Ursa Minor Beta backfires when they state that "when you are tired of Ursa Minor Beta, you are tired of life," and then there's the message in front of tHHttG which advises "Don't Panic!") and then there's the whole idea of revisionist history and the desecration of ancient sites all in the name of progress and profit (as in the story of the Cathedral of Chalesm, the poet who was bought out by the pen company and who had to plagiarize his own work in order to get them written, and more obviously the destruction of Earth in order to make way for a hyperspace bypass), the pointless destruction wrought by war (see the Silastic Armor fiends of Striterax, and the Krikkiters after them, and then those guys who fought wars just because they saw strange things in the sky, and ended up killing mostly the peaceful forest people in the middle), the evil of racism (again, the Krikkiters) and the fact that the people who want to have power shouldn't be allowed to have power (wonderfully lampooned by the description of the guy who actually runs the universe)

    I think Mos Def would make a great Ford Prefect.

  19. PLEASE NOT MOVED TO AMERICA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure even the most patriotic of American slashdot readers will agree with me that the Englishness of the piece should be retained, and Arthur Dent not moved to New York state etc. etc. That said, I am mindful of the fact I said similar things about High Fidelity and was shown to be completely wrong.