Slashdot Mirror


Fuelless Flight with Air Submarine?

An anonymous reader writes "Using the same physics principles as submarines, a new company is planning a fuelless air ship. Recent advances in ultra light and strong materials are making this concept a practical reality." There's no question that changes in buoyancy can be used to propel a vehicle, but "fuelless" is going to be tricky.

16 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Uh, Submarine? by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldn't something in the air be a Supermarine?

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Uh, Submarine? by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now don't you go being a Spitfire 'round here boy.

      KFG

    2. Re:Uh, Submarine? by Jayfar · · Score: 5, Funny

      I totally agree. I'm not an aerospace engineer, but this seems like a complicated perpetual motion machine to me.

      The answer's obvious. Why of course it'll have oars - manned by passengers flying coach. They're just omitted from the initial artist's conception.

  2. Coming Soon! by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fuelless falling.

  3. Prior art? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Using the same physics principles as submarines, a new company is planning a fuelless air ship.

    Isn't a fuelless air submarine usually called a "balloon"?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  4. site design by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a little creepy that this website looks like this other famous site and that they both advocate leaving the earth for a long trip in a high-tech airship. Coincidence?

  5. Another improvement by Sideshow+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    To save on the compressed air, just fill me full of mexican food, and I could provide a cheap source of propulsion. Or we can outsource that to Mumbai.

  6. Yep... by Arcanix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because you never know when you might run out of air up there!

  7. Another name... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know... there's another name for flying without fuel. Its called skydiving!

    The only thing necessary for Micro$oft to triumph is for a few good programmers to do nothing". North County Computers

  8. Re:MOD PARENT +1 INTERESTING by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
    "And what magical backup does a 747 have when it's engines quit?"

    In the even of a water landing your seat cushions may be used as a floatation device.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  9. Re:1940s vision of the future coming to life? by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
    After all, the Empire State Building has a blimp port at the top.

    The B-25 bomber valet parking didn't work too well either.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  10. Old Navy joke? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 5, Funny
    Flight with Air Submarine

    That reminds me of the old joke back in the Navy... I think it went: There are more airplanes in the oceans than submarines in the sky.

    I guess that's no longer true. :-)

  11. Uhhh, hmmm... by La+Camiseta · · Score: 5, Funny

    The aircraft, still in development, will be similar to a submarine that changes its buoyancy, a form of gravity, to float on the surface of the sea or cruise 300 ft below it.

    What's scarrier, flying without an engine, or that the general public won't think twice about this sentence?

  12. Tumbleweed. by klocwerk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tumbleweed.

    next!

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  13. Best. Typo. Ever. by DevNull+Ogre · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'm not sure if this was deliberate (emphasis added)...
    ...suitable landing splot.
    but I think you've just discovered/created the perfect word for the site of an emergency landing. A delightful combination of splat and spot. I love it!
  14. Re:Actually it is safer by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny
    I say NONSENSE!

    If Kurt Russel and Harrison Ford can land a 747 with one engine dead and one burning, then so can I. How hard can it be?