Slashdot Mirror


HDTV On Your PC - ATi's HDTV Wonder

Spinnerbait writes "ATi is getting their new High Def capable HDTV Wonder ready for release soon and there is a preview of the card over at HotHardware. It will be an add-in PCI card that will be bundled with their All In Wonder cards initially and eventually be sold as a stand alone product. High Def on a nice 23" Flat Panel... time to drool."

42 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. Pixel for Pixel by MrHatken · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Will you be able to see pixel for pixel high res?

    1. Re:Pixel for Pixel by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I'm not mistaken, TV broadcases are not in the typical monitor proportions. That means no. But perhaps ATi understands this and has a nice interpolator on board.

      In any event, contraty to the OPs position, I do not drool over 23" of TV viewing pleasure...

  2. It seems to me... by SisyphusShrugged · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems to me that this shouldnt be to difficult, technically speaking, considering the 1080 pixel resolution is well within that normally supported on a PC monitor.

    I cant wait to get Hi-Def on my TV, have seen it before and it is the ultimate in geek-drool fest! ....mmmmm...Hi-Def TV....yummy!

  3. Component inputs? by PhotoBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From this article it looks like the HDTV All-In-Wonder card won't have any useful video input sockets on the card and there's no mention of any external connector box.

    I really want a decent means for connecting things like games consoles to my PC monitor. All the VGA boxes out there just give horrid blurry pictures because they double the scanlines of the picture. I wish someone would do a card with component or SCART inputs. :(

    1. Re:Component inputs? by AIX-Hood · · Score: 4, Informative

      This user is unfortunately thinking of using an mpeg-2 encoding board like a Hauppauge PVR-250 where there is indeed a lag. Boards like the ATI HDTV however just have direct analog and digital stream recording without any realtime encoding, so there's no lag here.

  4. HOWTO? by anish1411 · · Score: 5, Informative

    With all these stories about HDTV and big screens and wotnot, I felt inspired to hook up my TV to my computer. I have a 50-inch plasma tv, and surround sound with a hefty woofer, and - apart from the movie experience - how cool would UT2004 be on that!

    Well anyway This site [ramelectronics.net] has some useful information about wot the holes at the back of ure TV do, and various other stuff.

    1. Re:HOWTO? by Zakabog · · Score: 4, Informative

      how cool would UT2004 be on that!

      Speaking from experience, very cool.

      Except for the fact that it's VERY hard to find a comfortable gaming position in this type of setup (unless you move your desk and stuff.) I had my PC hooked up to my 56" HDTV, and my Live drive's optical output hooked up to my surround sound system, it was very very sweet. The only issue I had was trying to sit on the couch and play. No place for a wrist rest, no place for my keyboard (except my lap) it became really annoying. I eventually used my coffee table as a desk and built a chair with seat cushions, it was decent but not as nice as a chair/desk setup. It would have been much nicer if I setup the TV for a good viewing position too, it's nice sitting in front of a 21" computer monitor cause you can see everything easily. But when you sit right in front of a 56" HDTV things become very hard to see. If you're too close a lot of stuff is out of sight since it's such a huge viewing area and if you're too far you can't see things like that sniper off in the distance.

    2. Re:HOWTO? by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I did something similar (xbox through a projector) and on any game that was reasonable fast moving, I would get dizzy.

      If the image fills most of your field of vision, the movement on screen will trick your brain into thinking it is actually happening. Without the corresponding movement in your body, things can get very weird.

      I ended up having to shrink the image, and moving back. The cinematic Halo experience was not for me.

      It ended up being a lot like seeing the 'rollercoaster' IMAX. That made me sick too...

      --
      No reason to lie.
  5. Misconception? by fnj · · Score: 5, Informative

    It sounds like you likely have a misconception as to what 1080i is exactly.

    1080i is 1920x1080, 30 frames/sec, 60 fields/sec interlaced.

    Methinks this is still quite high for a PC monitor. Not to feel bad, though, because very few HDTVs can resolve every pixel of 1080i either.

    720p (1280x720, 60 fps non-interlaced) is a better match for 95+% of PC monitors, and is still very pleasing.

    1. Re:Misconception? by corebreech · · Score: 4, Informative

      My monitor (a Sony 21" GDM-F520) can do 2048x1536 @ 85Hz, and has a .22mm aperture grill no less.

      If anything, it's the graphics card that are holding things up. My GeForce 4 Ti4800SE can only do 2048x1536 @ 60Hz in 8-bit mode.

      It can however handle 1920x1080 @ 85Hz in 32-bit mode, so for 1080i viewing I should be OK.

    2. Re:Misconception? by mmortal03 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Whether or not your monitor supports the resolution or not, this still does not mean that it can fully support 720p. It has to do with the length of the electron guns in your display. I cannot find the best source for this information anymore, but there used to be a page that explained the issue. Basically very few HDTV displays currently can display 720p correctly. 720p is MORE DIFFICULT to display fully than 1080i. This is the best I could do here:

      "And if I can go completely geek on you for a second, there are very few HDTV's out there that can support 720p properly. Most HDTV sets have 7" electron guns, and they are too short to give a full 720p picture. So even if a TV says it supports 720p, if it only has 7" guns, you're missing some of the picture. Not a lot, but enough to shortchange you on what you're supposed to be getting. If you want a real 720p picture, make sure that your set has 9" guns. Most other sets will "downsample" a 720p picture into 1080i."

      from http://www.planetgamecube.com/mailbag.cfm?action=p rofile&id=88

  6. What are the capabilities of the card? by mocm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unfortunately there is not much information of what the card can do.
    Does it have an MPEG hardware decoder for HDTV, or is it only a tuner and demodulator?
    Does it have TV out or can it only display on the monitor?
    If the card is only a tuner and demodulator with PCI bridge then it's no big deal. The CPU will have to do all the decoding, maybe with a little help from the graphics card. You can do that with a lot of DVB-S,C,T cards already. With a 60Euro card you could already watch the Superbowl in HDTV, of course you needed a fast CPU.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:What are the capabilities of the card? by hazman · · Score: 5, Informative
      Does it have an MPEG hardware decoder for HDTV, or is it only a tuner and demodulator?

      It appears that this card is a ATSC tuner/demod (U.S. HDTV transmission standard). It likely passes the digital stream over the PCI bus to the video card (minimum 9600) for decoding and displaying.

      Does it have TV out or can it only display on the monitor?

      It likely does not have TV out of the card itself but you can probably use an ATI video card that has composite/svid out to display on a SDTV. The quality of the scaling is yet to be seen. Likewise, SDTV streams (tt has a standard NTSC tuner also) will likely be scaled to HDTV resolutions. Again, quality of the scaling is yet to be seen.

      The real question is how good is the ATSC tuner/demod. This has been the biggest stumbling block to comprehensive and consistent reception. The digital cliff can be very steep.

  7. Video Input and Output by tronicum · · Score: 3, Informative
    As long as there is not enough input (broadcasters) that provide HDTV stuff and suitable devices (HDTV TVs or video projectors) I would not invest a dime in HDTV.

    As with DVD they will probably change the standard or remove and add some crappy copy protection. So if you buy stuff now you will regret within a short while...

    1. Re:Video Input and Output by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are living a couple of years in the past. There are satellite TV services (Voom.com) that broadcast 30+ HDTV channels, and HDTVs aplenty in the stores. Copy protection has also been standardized.

      About the only reason to delay purchasing now is that prices are dropping fairly rapidly. Intel has entered the HDTV silicon market and is expected to drive costs of LCOS sets down by $1000 over the next year.

  8. Video on PC - Re:Component inputs? by SendBot · · Score: 4, Informative

    I really want a decent means for connecting things like games consoles to my PC monitor. All the VGA boxes out there just give horrid blurry pictures because they double the scanlines of the picture.

    With an inexpensive BT8xxx card and a decent linux box, you can use tvtime to watch beautifully scaled and deinterlaced video in realtime. I use it with my gamecube and it's absolutely fantastic!

  9. What about Linux? by fldvm · · Score: 5, Interesting
    High Def on a nice 23" Flat Panel...

    Sure if you want to run windows...

    I want My HD MythTV...

    1. Re:What about Linux? by hawkstone · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have not tried it myself, but you should be able to use the pcHDTV card. It's an HDTV card designed specifically for linux. It won't solve the cable-box problem, but it does support the OTA broadcasts.

      It has been supported to some degree in MythTV since October (v0.12), and with continued updates since then (v0.13, v0.14).

  10. Linux w/o New ATI card Windows with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it doesn't work with linux, then I don't give a shit one way or the other.

    And like most of the All-in-Wonder cards, I doubt half the features will work correctly if at all.

    Otherwise I would give up my ancient geforce2 card in a second, but for right now I have no reason to. My 19 inch monitor with my ATI wonder VE tv capture card works great for me right now.

    Oh, BTW I use the Nintendo Game cube via the composite input on my ATI card. If you want to play games and get a useable picture get a decent program, like TVTIME. Most tv capture programs for windows that I've seen in stores looks like crap on a monitor, get something that does anti-aliasing properly. Thank god for Free software.

  11. What we really need by nonmaskable · · Score: 4, Interesting

    isn't this...it's a hdtv input card that can take component inputs.

    Most HDTV uptake will come from HDTV over cable, with the decoding/descrambling done by the cable company box, which produces component outputs.

    Then our MythTV boxes will be able to record HDTV!

    1. Re:What we really need by AGTiny · · Score: 3, Informative

      You already can... it's called the Linux pcHDTV card. And no one will ever be able to make a card or other recording device with component inputs due to the copyright issues.

    2. Re:What we really need by dirty · · Score: 5, Informative

      No they won't. No consumer pc on the market can handle recording an HDTV stream. Assuming a 4:2:2 image (12 bits per pixel) you're looking at almost 90MB/s of data. No hard drive can handle a datarate of anything near that. And the only hardware MPEG2 encoders that can handle HDTV are still way above what any consumer can afford. Honestly, I doubt you could even send that stream to your video card over the PCI bus. I think you'd either need the inputs to be right on the video card, or use a special, dedicated high bandwith bus from the capture card to your video card. And even then you would have no chance to process the signal at all, so all of your deinterlacing would have to be done on the video card.

      I'm sure someday we'll be able to, but just look how long it took before we could digitally record SDTV. We need a lot more than a capture hard with HDTV capable component inputs.

      --

      -matt
    3. Re:What we really need by dirty · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry about that 4:2:2 is 16 bits per pixel I believe, not 12, 4:2:0 (IIRC) is 12. So my earlier figure of just under 120MB/s would be right.

      --

      -matt
    4. Re:What we really need by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Informative

      Erm, that's assuming no compression. HDTV is broadcast using MPEG-2 compression (specifically designed with broadcast media in mind), and the US ATSC standard specifies two data rates of 19.4 for broadcast and 38.8 for cable applications. The more often used broadcast rate is well within the capability of modern hard drives and the higher cable rate should be doable by high end drives as well.

  12. ATi TV cards are soon to become useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    The messages are pouring out of web forums, broadcasters have discovered the "copyright" tag they can send out with their programs when they're delivered... and ATi very happily kow-tows to the signal and says "sorry, this program is copyrighted and cannot be recorded" (witness last week's Enterprise).

    Pretty soon all this hardware will be worthless, since nothing will be recordable except your home movies.

    1. Re:ATi TV cards are soon to become useless by wibs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Give it a week. I'm sure the same people who let you play your video games with some number found online will provide a way for you to watch Star Trek in the afternoon.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
  13. Lag? What lag? by ClassicG · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been hooking up my game consoles to my monitor through my PC for years, and I've NEVER seen any kind of lag like you're describing. I'm not using anything fancy either - just an old PCI WinTV card and xawtv and now the awesome tvtime.

    --
    I game, therefore I am...
  14. Probably won't launch in the UK... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's little-to-no HDTV over here. The only place I've seen it in fact is in post-production studios, where they'll use it as a master-format.... Pity :-(

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Probably won't launch in the UK... by D.+Book · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't need the ATI card anyway. There's a UK-based outfit called Nebula Electronics who've been making HD-capable digital TV cards since late 2002, so you're all set for when HDTV broadcasts finally begin. The software is of reasonable quality and the support miles ahead of ATI. Here in Australia, where there's at least some HDTV broadcasts, we've been reaping the benefits of these (and competing DVB cards) for for quite some time now.

      The ATI card wouldn't even work in the UK anyway, since it's based on the American ATSC standard. I'm not actually sure what all the hubbub over this card is about--Hauppauge already beat them to it. I guess ATI's size means they get the publicity by default.

      In the UK you use the DVB standard, which is what much of the rest of the world has also settled on. This is the standard on which the Nebula and other cards are based.

  15. No support for cable htdv most likely. by psoriac · · Score: 3, Informative

    Notice that there is no slot for inserting a flash card; unless it supports an external flash drive connected to the PC via USB or similar (doubtful) this means you will not be able to watch the majority of cable hdtv channels, since they are usually scrambled and require a flash card with the decryption information in the cable box.

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  16. This company has cards that support it. by psoriac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Couldn't find it earlier, but see also this page: http://www.twinhan.com/visiontv.htm for existing TV tuner cards that support hdtv including support for cable, satellite, and scrambled sources.

    Unfortunately, these don't do 3d like the ATI. =)

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  17. Why is this news? by AGTiny · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There have been PCI HDTV cards for years that receive OTA HD. Even a cheap one that only works in Linux!

  18. Re:Linux w/o New ATI card Windows with it. by dirty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as I hate to rain on your Linux zealot parade, you do realize that TVTime uses the *DLLS* from dScaler, a Windows program, to provide the deinterlacing, right? Just because it's for Windows doesn't mean it's awful.

    --

    -matt
  19. specs vs reality by h2odragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    have you tried pushing your monitor that hard? Best i can make an (admitedly slightly older) G500 21" do is 2000x1500 @ 77Hz; any higher and the pixels distort. What your graphics card can drive it at, without strange effects, is a different question as well: with a matrox g400 i use 10px fonts and stare at this screen all day long; with a nvidia card 12px fonts and 1600x1200 made my eyes melt.

  20. Re:Linux w/o New ATI card Windows with it. by dirty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In that case why bother mentioning the operating system at all? The oringal post was giving the impression that tvtime did something on linux that was not possible on windows. That is not true. dScaler was doing it on windows first, and a lot of other projects use dScaler to handle deinterlacing. And with good cause, dScaler is an amazing program, if you have the CPU power to throw at it.

    --

    -matt
  21. What's so great about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is this card better than something like Hauppauge's WinTV-HD? At least the Hauppauge has component outputs standard. I'm guessing it's the price as the Hauppauge isn't cheap. BTW, there's a few more HDTV cards available at places like The Digital Connection.

  22. Digital cable reception possible? by mmmbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are already a number of cards available which can receive ATSC HDTV broadcasts (which require an additional antenna) in addition to analog cable and broadcast. The nice step up here is the use of their own NXT2004 chip, which provides a QAM demodulator.

    I've been looking for years now for a tuner card which will allow me to watch Time Warner's Digital Cable here in Tampa. Step one is getting a demodulator which can sync to the QAM-256 signal. Tne next big hurdle is determining if my cable provider uses a proprietary mechanism on top of that to encapsulate their streams. There are no standards here as far as I can find, just commonly used implementations.

    A cable comes into my apartment with 50+ digital channels, including the networks in HDTV. I've got a cable box that decodes it without having to put up an aerial... why can't I have a card in my computer that does the same thing? This card could end up being just another useless ATSC tuner card.

  23. ATIMMC is a buggy piece of crap by sam_handelman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have one of ATI's older graphics cards (the first or second generation of their "All in Wonder" line) - but the latest version of their software.

    And it is buggy, still. Their drivers are much better now, but in the begining they were dreadful.

    I'm still quite pleased with my setup - in a one room apartment the TV/computer combination saves a lot of space, and I can surf the net during commercials. In spite of the problems, I recommend buying one to anyone who asks. However, every three days or so ATIMMC (the process that actually plays the TV) forces me to do a hard reset.

    A lot of the problem is with win32, of course, which enters a non-responsive state when I try to kill the ATIMMC process (I don't do any actual work in a windows environment so my technical knowledge is somewhat limited - but if it walks like a kernel panic, and if it quacks like a kernel panic...). If I were still running win16 I would hardly notice something that took three whole days to crash my computer.

    Also - the early versions of their product hardly ever worked in beige boxen. It was wildly incomptabible with a large spectrum of commodity hardware (I've been told their newer cards have this problem to a lesser extent.) I mention this because I went through a lot of grief over it - but now adays building your own machine isn't worth the $50 you save anyway.

    So - while I'm really pleased with their product in spite of the flaws - I wouldn't recommend being a beta tester for the HDTV card, especially given the slow rollout of HDTV. Give ATI a year or two to iron out the flaws, and let HDTV acquire a little penetration, before bothering to buy. That's what I plan to do.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  24. pchdtv card by sdibb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nobody's probably going to see this since I posted it so late, but this was brought up at our last LUG meeting -- it's a PCI HD TV card made especially for Linux. All the drivers are open-source, etc, etc. Check it out: http://www.pchdtv.com/

  25. Late To Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    ATI is by no means the first to produce a card like this. There has been a PCI HDTV card on
    the market for over a year, produced by DVICO. Unlike most cards on the market, that keep the
    HDTV stream off the bus, and overlay the video directly onto the vga signal and you don't get to
    capture it at all, This card dumps the raw mpeg2 out to you. It will tune over the air HDTV as well
    as the HDTV you will get on cable.

    The Fusion III just came out last week, I think. It has the hardware capabilities of tuning that holy
    grail cable QAM 256, as well as over the air. And you get to play with the raw hdtv data,
    and process it however.

    www.dvico.com - manufacturer
    www.copperbox.com - retailer

  26. Re:fraud by -tji · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not exactly...

    In most areas, the digital TV stations are on the less used UHF band of the spectrum. UHF antennas are relatively small.

    One of the most popular HDTV antennas is the tiny Silver Sensor. It's resold by Zenith and Terk at Sears, Best Buy, etc.

    The last estimate I saw for HD availability was that around 95% of US citizens were able to receive HDTV. I receive no less than 20 digital tv broadcasts where I live. Even my parents, out in the middle of nowhere, receive 6 - including all the majors.

  27. Re:Digital TV in Europe by jjj · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Europe, mostly the DVB-Standard is used to transmit digital TV.

    DVB-S over Satellite,
    DVB-C over Cable,
    DVB-T for terrestrial reception.

    All three variations of the DVB-Standard can also transmit High Definition video, e.g. there is an HD channel broadcasting via the Astra satellite system on 19.2East called Euro1080 http://www.euro1080.tv.

    Some cable networks use proprietary encryption, but the basic transmission usually occurs via DVB in MPEG.

    In Australia, HDTV is available over DVB-T terrestrially.

    I don't know about the exact situation in Italy, but DVB-T has been rolled out extensively in the UK and I heard also in Scandinavia. Rollout has started in Germany with Berlin, some trials exist in Austria.

    Regarding this card:
    No, it will not be able to receive European digital broadcasts, as it uses the American ATSC Standard that uses other modulation, even though also MPEG2 is broadcast.

    But there are DVB-T PCI cards available, they cost just a bit more than the cheap DVB-S cards (starting at EUR 60) - around EUR 90, but they also do not have a hardware MPEG decoder chip on board but offload that to the CPU or graphics card like the card mentioned here.

    Digital-TV in Europe is mostly driven by the Pay-TV companies in each country with the UK and France having the most successful adoption rate - no wonder as old analog terrestrial TV offered only 4-5 channels of stuff people did not want to see (not implying that the now 500 channels piping out lots of crap are better qualitywise ;-)

    Best regards
    jjj