Slashdot Mirror


HardOCP Sues Infinium Over Legal Threats

Cebu writes "According to GameSpot, in a less than surprising move, Kyle Bennett of tech website HardOCP has decided to file a lawsuit against Infinium Labs, makers of the forthcoming Phantom PC-based 'console'. On February 27, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division under the Declaratory Judgment Act to force the issue of Infinium Labs' repeated legal threats against HardOCP for an allegedly defamatory article written last year."

25 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. Here's my view on all this: by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last night, I posted, and got flamed to a crisp for supporting Infinium Labs. People were posting my "Home Address" by looking at a review from 2000 and looking in the area for the name in my email address (BTW, way to go on noticing the date. You got the area of Maryland a little bit off because of that.). I know Infinium is a laughing stock among the Slashdot crowd, but here is what I have to say.

    I think this has gone a little bit too far. HardOCP posted an article that was quite misleading. I don't think they they maliciously *lied*, but definitely misled it's readers. I personnally don't feel it warrants a Libel case, however, it goes without saying: I am not a lawyer! Infinium sent the letter saying that it didn't like the article and was going to sue, and then HardOCp decided to escalate by countersueing. I bet that HardOCP could have let the "lawsuit" slide and an out of court settlement would have happened, if anything. Now there WILL be a messy legal battle.

    Additionally, I don't see how hard it is to believe in the Phantom's existence. It's just a small form factor PC tied to a VPN which is the only way to purchase games. Yes, it has VERY powerful DRM, and is Microsoft's TCPA wet-dream. If the back-end didn't come together, Infinium could still make a killing selling complete systems that compete in price with the Shuttle barebones kits. It's standard PC hardware, with a few custom add-ons to integrate the hardware&softwaresides of the DRM scheme.

    [Disclaimer: Views expressed are my own and not necessarily representative of those of Infinium Labs]

    1. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      HardOCP posted an article that was quite misleading. I don't think they they maliciously *lied*, but definitely misled it's readers.

      On what points exactly do you feel that HardOCP misled their readers?

      Infinium sent the letter saying that it didn't like the article and was going to sue, and then HardOCp decided to escalate by countersueing.

      They didn't escalate, they just called Infinium's bluff. If I'm reading the news right, the legal action here concerns solely the matters that Infinium's original threats of legal action were based on. There is no escalation here at all, they've just moved the venue of discussion.

      It's standard PC hardware, with a few custom add-ons to integrate the hardware&softwaresides of the DRM scheme.

      I believe when people say the infinium doesn't exist they mean that the custom add-ons don't exist or do not have substance. I don't think anyone believes that Infinium doesn't have PC hardware.

      However I also think most people who've looked closely at what Infinium is saying believe that in the screenshot Infinium distributed where there's the kid playing Quake 3 on a TV with a phantom sitting in front of it, that you're looking at any sort of actual product Infinium has or will have.

    2. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      HardOCp decided to escalate by countersueing [sic]

      No, what HardOCP did is file a declaratory lawsuit. This is a lawsuit that forces a court to decide a set of facts once and for all. In this case, the facts under dispute are those in HardOCP's article.

      This is NOT an escalation, it's a resolution.

      Btw, I am a law student.

  2. Suggestion: by niko9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    New section for this website: lawsuits

    1. Re:Suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >> New section for this website: lawsuits

      Graphic suggestion: Justitia (Lady Justice) as a Borg. I suggest a cute one like Seven of Nine, robe optional.

  3. Is it just me? by paulschroeder · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...or does anyone else think of the organization from Robocop when they read "HardOCP?

  4. This just in... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Word has it that the Infinium console is going to be bundled with Duke Nukem Forever.

  5. Re:Lawyer Central? by gatesh8r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot has now become... Grokdot! (er... well we could make it Slashlaw, but...)

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  6. Penny-Arcade by Digitus1337 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Penny-Arcade attacked them over this (infinitum); the strip can be seen here. The CEO also states this to which Penny-Arcade responded with "So Tim thinks we did that comic strip to get more traffic driven to our site. That's a nice thought Tim but you're way off. You see unlike Infinium Labs and your doomed console, Penny Arcade is successful. How can I say this without sounding like an asshole? Penny Arcade has more readers in a given second than your site will ever have even if it were to sit and rot on the internet until time ends and the universe implodes. Hmmm, I guess I can't. Tim also says we called him to let him know it's all in fun. This again is bullshit. I don't care if he likes the comic or not. I've certainly never called the guy and I have no intention of doing so. Bottom line, the guy is a lying huckster. I guess he figured he could post that on his forum and we'd never see it. This proves he has no concept of how huge PA is. Penny Arcade isn't just a comic and a news post Tim, PA is a community and we have agents everywhere. Chances are they're watching you even now." These guys love to get into this kind of stuff.

    1. Re:Penny-Arcade by blackeye · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another poke from PA today. With posting comics every other day, they're falling behind!

  7. Headline isn't really accurate. by mcc · · Score: 5, Informative

    The way it looked to me they weren't suing them, just asking for a declaratory judgement. I guess it's a kind of lawsuit, but it looked more like HardOCP just telling a judge "These people keep threatening to sue us and it's creating uncertainty. Could you just just decide, let's pretend they'd sued us over the stuff they're threatening to sue over, hypothetically then who would win?". I don't know. i don't really understand it.

    1. Re:Headline isn't really accurate. by Aerion · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Declaratory Judgment Act, under which HardOCP is "suing," allows "any court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate pleading, may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought."

      Also, "Any such declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment or decree and shall be reviewable as such." So even if this isn't technically a "lawsuit," its result will have the same effect as the result of a hypothetical suit against HardOCP.

      (You don't really need to be told that IANAL, do you?)

  8. Good job HardOCP by jimbosworldorg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm glad HardOCP is putting their money right where their mouth is. I'm sick and tired of seeing people back fearfully away from any jackass with a lawyer.

    After all, failure to stand up to legal badgering is exactly WHY we're such a litigious society today - because of the payoff.

    --

    Coming soon to Slashdot: meta-meta-moderation!

  9. Re:Lawyer Central? by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't about law, it's about RIGHTS. I think most of us don't care (too much) about the particulars of the lawsuit but DO care that Infinium Labs is trying to silence HardOCP.com for posting a well-researched article that happens to go against what Infinium wants people to think about them.

    I think the point is that the truth is more important than an company's PR issues.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  10. What, they found them? by cryptor3 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Documents were served to Infinium Labs representatives in Florida yesterday.

    Wait, they found an address and someone to serve the papers to? Looks like Infinium Labs is making progress...

  11. The reason of US decline? by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I propose a reason for the decline of relevance of US: the amount of money used going for lawsuits (defending against bad claims and making those bad claims) vs. the amount of money that goes to new developing new ideas. so... basically, it's asshole businessmen and CEOs that see a better living from the civil law system than actually thinking themselves. Maybe if all this effort was refocused all these WELL TRAINED tech people would actually have a job. Time to expire ALL of tort law and begin again...

    --

    Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
  12. Infinium is real, thier forums prove it... by DangerSteel · · Score: 5, Funny
    I was on the Infinium/Phantom forums last week checking out what people were saying about HardOCP and what kind of games they hope come out and how they can't wait to order thier unit online starting March 31st. I tried to go to the forums today to see what new they had to say about the HardOCP lawsuit. And guess what?

    Thier forums are "down for maintenance" I guess that makes sense, they must need the hard drive in that server for the Phantom unit they will demo at E3 coming up. Well I sure hope after E3 they put the forum drive back in thier server !

  13. Re:Lawyer Central? by krusadr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh come on, this is SPORTS for geeks.

    --
    while sco {
    wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
    }
  14. Re:Lawyer Central? by 00420 · · Score: 5, Informative

    HardOCP admitted that there were a few mistakes in their first article.

    ROTFL

    Did you even read the page you linked to? If not, here's a sample:

    8. In reference to BIG, we will gladly remove the statement, "According to this article, they lived the high life on investors' money and then left investors hanging for more than $15 million dollars:" that is being brought to our attention.

    The sentence has been changed to quote more accurately, "According to this article, "Broadband executives lived the high life, sponsoring race cars in the Indy 500 and other races, hosting Hollywood parties, buying an interest in an airplane and making thousands of dollars worth of improvements to a $35 million headquarters. But last November (2000), the tech venture went bust. By then it had burned through more than $15 million of investors' money, including some from several St. Louis Cardinals owners. Roberts could not be reached for comment."

  15. To sue for libel you have to show damage... by Lunabean · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I shared a few of my thoughts on the other Infinium Labs post, but as the day has gone on, I've thought more about it and have a few more questions.

    Now, as I understand libel, for the case to stand, two things need to be proven. First, the accused deliberately lied. Second, the accuser needs proof that they were damaged by said lies. Now, the first is hard enough to prove. I, personally, don't think HardOCP set out to mislead and lie in their article, but I could see how that could be debated. However, I don't think Infinium Labs has an iota of a chance proving HardOCP's article, published five months ago, has hurt their company. Infinium Labs doesn't even have a product on the market yet, and, as someone else pointed out, type in "Phantom Console" into Google and you'll find several slams on the company.

    If Infinium Labs doesn't get launch that it expects, they only have themselves and their sketchy business practices to blame. They are an enigma wrapped in a puzzle drizzled with secret sauce. They created the atmosphere for speculation...and people began to speculate.

    Now, I'm not someone who plans on linking to my site with every post I make here, but, again, I am linking to the message that was posted on my forums yesterday. It is a copy of the e-mail sent to HardOCP, before HardOCP made it public.

    I checked the e-mail of the poster, which began with "twcbinc". I Googled that and it led me to a user at the Console Gamer Network. The user's e-mail at the Network was timr@phantom.net. Now, this didn't mean much, but it was interesting. A mod on my boards also found the post odd and traced the IP to Infinium Labs.

    Now, I'm not saying this is illegal, or even bad, but I think it's sketchy, to say the least...and I think acts like this pretty much destroy any libel case they may have. Infinium Labs is hurting themselves with every step they make...and I think any judge who looks at their tactics and history will see that. Here's the link to the post on my boards: http://www.lunabean.com/forums/index.php?showtopic =2428

  16. I worked for Tim Roberts at BIG by gserafini · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked for Tim Roberts at GlobalStreams under BIG. I was the webmaster for the only company that was purchased (rather than being created out of thin air) by BIG.

    My observation of the general business strategy that was followed at BIG could be summed up in one phrase: "Fake it 'til you make it." When we were working under the [BIG] umbrella, it was remarkable. At one point our company was instructed to hire people, not necessarily because we needed more people, but rather to increase headcount. They were still hiring until 1 or 2 weeks before BIG shut down.

    The often-expressed doubts surrounding this company and it's product (the name is completely telling) I believe are well founded. Simply reading the Phantom FAQ and their product specs should be instant signs to any observant individual.

    Step 1: Create website. (See their job postings for 3d renderers, Flash developers, etc...) Make it cool, fill it with the latest (OBVIOUS) buzzwords. DRM. Pay-per-play. Promise to deliver the cool dream application that might be possible.

    Step 2: Try to [maybe] actually deliver a product. Image is everything here, gotta keep the investors happy and the money flowing.

    Step 3: ???

    Step 4: Prof^H^H^H Take the money and spend it / run. Anyone who might think about investing in this company, or who even really hopes that what they say or sell might be worth spending some money on should do some research, due diligence and move on with their life.

    I often had a hard time working in an atmosphere where it was more important to seem successful than to _BE_ successful.

    BIG didn't work out. A lot of people quit perfectly good jobs to work with Tim and were pissed when it didn't work out. They spent a LOT of money. After that experience for some reason I REALLY wanted to work in an environment where, say for example, a real product was worked on to solve a real problem, that had real customers.

    Ah, the bitch of the reputation economy. Hope I don't get sued for sharing my personal experience and opinions.

    --
    Gabriel

  17. Suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Something I noticed that raises doubts over how serious Infinium really is... If you look at the tech specs for the machine it specifies an nVidia chip for the graphics and the nVidia logo is displayed on the site but if you look at nVidia's press section there's no press release mentioning any kind of relationship with Infinium. Take a look at the kind of press releases they do make and you'll see that they announce pretty much any partnership, even pretty minor stuff. Seems that if they had some kind of agreement to supply Infinium with any significant number of chips they'd have made an announcement.

  18. Re:Lawyer Central? by paradesign · · Score: 5, Funny
    Id appreciate you not degrading the race of elves like this. You can expect to hear from our lawyers.

    Respectfully,
    Legolas.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  19. Re:Lawyer Central? by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny
    Before I figured out that IANAL stood for "I Am Not A Layer", the whole "I anal" thing at the start of all those posts had me very confused.

    You write "confused", but perceptive readers know you mean "intrigued" or "curious".

    :)

  20. Re:Lawyer Central? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 5, Funny
    What does law conjure up that is sexual?

    Ask and you shall receive...

    Top Ten Things That Sound Dirty In Law But Aren't:

    10. Have you looked through her briefs?
    9. He is one hard judge!
    8. Counselor, let's do it in chambers.
    7. His attorney withdrew at the last minute.
    6. Is it a penal offense?
    5. Better leave the handcuffs on.
    4. For $200 an hour, she better be good!
    3. Can you get him to drop his suit?
    2. The judge gave her the stiffest one he could.

    And the number 1 thing that sounds dirty in law but isn't:

    1. Think you can get me off?

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.