Slashdot Mirror


HardOCP Sues Infinium Over Legal Threats

Cebu writes "According to GameSpot, in a less than surprising move, Kyle Bennett of tech website HardOCP has decided to file a lawsuit against Infinium Labs, makers of the forthcoming Phantom PC-based 'console'. On February 27, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division under the Declaratory Judgment Act to force the issue of Infinium Labs' repeated legal threats against HardOCP for an allegedly defamatory article written last year."

89 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. Lawyer Central? by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Has /. become a place where the geeks talk law?

    --
    Stay tuned for new sig...
    1. Re:Lawyer Central? by gatesh8r · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot has now become... Grokdot! (er... well we could make it Slashlaw, but...)

      --
      Karma whorin' since 1999
    2. Re:Lawyer Central? by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't about law, it's about RIGHTS. I think most of us don't care (too much) about the particulars of the lawsuit but DO care that Infinium Labs is trying to silence HardOCP.com for posting a well-researched article that happens to go against what Infinium wants people to think about them.

      I think the point is that the truth is more important than an company's PR issues.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:Lawyer Central? by slycer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's always been articles like this, and, imo, always *should*..

      However, they *should* fall under the YRO category and not gaming.. this has a weak weak link to gaming in any regards (I mean, who REALLY believes that Infinium is coming out??).

    4. Re:Lawyer Central? by August_zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Couldn't have said it better myself really.

      Though infinium is a joke, the practice of using legal threats to silence bad press is something that is becoming more and more popular. I for one am glad that someone is playing hardball with them.

      I really look forward to watching Infinium go down the toilet, I think when the dirt surfaces its going to be some funny stuff, like Enron, only instead of a gigantic corporation it will be happening to a make-believe company run by elves and faeries. I can already see them circling the drain...

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    5. Re:Lawyer Central? by krusadr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh come on, this is SPORTS for geeks.

      --
      while sco {
      wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
      }
    6. Re:Lawyer Central? by 00420 · · Score: 5, Informative

      HardOCP admitted that there were a few mistakes in their first article.

      ROTFL

      Did you even read the page you linked to? If not, here's a sample:

      8. In reference to BIG, we will gladly remove the statement, "According to this article, they lived the high life on investors' money and then left investors hanging for more than $15 million dollars:" that is being brought to our attention.

      The sentence has been changed to quote more accurately, "According to this article, "Broadband executives lived the high life, sponsoring race cars in the Indy 500 and other races, hosting Hollywood parties, buying an interest in an airplane and making thousands of dollars worth of improvements to a $35 million headquarters. But last November (2000), the tech venture went bust. By then it had burned through more than $15 million of investors' money, including some from several St. Louis Cardinals owners. Roberts could not be reached for comment."

    7. Re:Lawyer Central? by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 2, Funny
      What exactly does a dot conjure up in your mind that it is sexual?

      Oh, Pac-Man! We must not! We can not! It is not permitted!

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    8. Re:Lawyer Central? by paradesign · · Score: 5, Funny
      Id appreciate you not degrading the race of elves like this. You can expect to hear from our lawyers.

      Respectfully,
      Legolas.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    9. Re:Lawyer Central? by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny
      Before I figured out that IANAL stood for "I Am Not A Layer", the whole "I anal" thing at the start of all those posts had me very confused.

      You write "confused", but perceptive readers know you mean "intrigued" or "curious".

      :)

    10. Re:Lawyer Central? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 5, Funny
      What does law conjure up that is sexual?

      Ask and you shall receive...

      Top Ten Things That Sound Dirty In Law But Aren't:

      10. Have you looked through her briefs?
      9. He is one hard judge!
      8. Counselor, let's do it in chambers.
      7. His attorney withdrew at the last minute.
      6. Is it a penal offense?
      5. Better leave the handcuffs on.
      4. For $200 an hour, she better be good!
      3. Can you get him to drop his suit?
      2. The judge gave her the stiffest one he could.

      And the number 1 thing that sounds dirty in law but isn't:

      1. Think you can get me off?

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  2. Here's my view on all this: by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last night, I posted, and got flamed to a crisp for supporting Infinium Labs. People were posting my "Home Address" by looking at a review from 2000 and looking in the area for the name in my email address (BTW, way to go on noticing the date. You got the area of Maryland a little bit off because of that.). I know Infinium is a laughing stock among the Slashdot crowd, but here is what I have to say.

    I think this has gone a little bit too far. HardOCP posted an article that was quite misleading. I don't think they they maliciously *lied*, but definitely misled it's readers. I personnally don't feel it warrants a Libel case, however, it goes without saying: I am not a lawyer! Infinium sent the letter saying that it didn't like the article and was going to sue, and then HardOCp decided to escalate by countersueing. I bet that HardOCP could have let the "lawsuit" slide and an out of court settlement would have happened, if anything. Now there WILL be a messy legal battle.

    Additionally, I don't see how hard it is to believe in the Phantom's existence. It's just a small form factor PC tied to a VPN which is the only way to purchase games. Yes, it has VERY powerful DRM, and is Microsoft's TCPA wet-dream. If the back-end didn't come together, Infinium could still make a killing selling complete systems that compete in price with the Shuttle barebones kits. It's standard PC hardware, with a few custom add-ons to integrate the hardware&softwaresides of the DRM scheme.

    [Disclaimer: Views expressed are my own and not necessarily representative of those of Infinium Labs]

    1. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      HardOCP posted an article that was quite misleading. I don't think they they maliciously *lied*, but definitely misled it's readers.

      On what points exactly do you feel that HardOCP misled their readers?

      Infinium sent the letter saying that it didn't like the article and was going to sue, and then HardOCp decided to escalate by countersueing.

      They didn't escalate, they just called Infinium's bluff. If I'm reading the news right, the legal action here concerns solely the matters that Infinium's original threats of legal action were based on. There is no escalation here at all, they've just moved the venue of discussion.

      It's standard PC hardware, with a few custom add-ons to integrate the hardware&softwaresides of the DRM scheme.

      I believe when people say the infinium doesn't exist they mean that the custom add-ons don't exist or do not have substance. I don't think anyone believes that Infinium doesn't have PC hardware.

      However I also think most people who've looked closely at what Infinium is saying believe that in the screenshot Infinium distributed where there's the kid playing Quake 3 on a TV with a phantom sitting in front of it, that you're looking at any sort of actual product Infinium has or will have.

    2. Re:Here's my view on all this: by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree that neither side is coming into the dispute with clean hands here. HardOCP's first edition of the article was not perfect, even they admited that there were several points that needed to be retracted. However, HardOCP handled their mistakes gracefully by retracting what they were proven wrong on.

      Infinium thought they had weak prey, so they overreached and added a few threats that they wouldn't be able to follow through on either. They might have even been hoping that they could scare HardOCP into shutting down completely.

      It's hard to run a news organization of any kind without at least having a laywer within reach. Whenever you say bad things about businesses, you'll eventually run into somebody who thinks thye have more lawyers than you can ever afford...

    3. Re:Here's my view on all this: by MBCook · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I disagree. I think that at the time HardOCP did a great job. And for quite a while many here on /. (and elsewhere) have thought that the phantom was just... aptly named.

      That said, while I am still quite scepticle of the whole thing, I have to admit I no longer think the console is just vaporware. Between the press demo they did a few months ago for a few select members of the press (which at least had photos of the thing), to fact that they will have an 8,000 square foot booth at E3 I think this might not be vaporware. It could still fail miserably and be nothing like they've promised, but at least they seem to be doing more than saying "we have a great console, we'll prove it later" like they did for so long.

      The proof is in the pudding. Nintendo's DS, the Phantom, and more are going to be shown at E3. It should be very intersting.

      And let's face it. Suing someone priting facts about you that don't look good more than a year after they were posted (and when you still haven't shown any real proof to anyone yet) just doesn't look good for your company.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Here's my view on all this: by screwballicus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I bet that HardOCP could have let the "lawsuit" slide and an out of court settlement would have happened, if anything. Now there WILL be a messy legal battle.

      Well of course they could have settled on this attrocious claim. And that might perhaps be judged the reasonable thing to do, if concessions to outrageous litigiousness simply because it's litigious are to be the expectation of private bodies in our society. But as of now, many of us still value due process of law over concession to threat. And so be it, that due process of law take its course here.

    5. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Aerion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I bet that HardOCP could have let the "lawsuit" slide and an out of court settlement would have happened, if anything.

      But that would be taking "the easy and cheap way out of this situation," as Kyle Bennett said, and would be "throwing away [HardOCP.com's] credibility." The point of the countersuit is that HardOCP doesn't want to let this thing slide. That should have been pretty obvious when they posted the threatening letters from Infinium on their site.

    6. Re:Here's my view on all this: by ValourX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope you'll pardon me for saying so, but if you felt "misled" after reading that article then you may have a reading comprehension problem. Whether you do or not, failing to recognize that it is fundamentally wrong for a corporation or individual to attempt to silence a free voice on the Internet is the reason why you got flamed so hard.

      The vocal majority is that way for a good reason. If you find that you have differing or opposing opinions, you should ask yourself why. If you truly feel you're correct in your assent, then you'll have to be eloquent and state your opinion clearly and offer a reasonable and detailed explanation why you're on the other side. If you can't do that, you will face the wrath of the vocal majority.

      It is never right for someone to threaten a media outlet because they don't like what a writer has to say. HardOCP was 100% correct in refusing to remove the letter and 100% correct in offering to fix any factual errors. There being none, there should be no cause for dispute.

      As for your home address... if someone on the Internet really wants to find where you live, they can. Over one million people in the Rochester metro area can find my address and phone number from the phone book that is issued to everyone who has a land line. No one's up in arms about that, are they? You can get lots of people's names, addresses and phone numbers just by searching publicly available tools or by looking up the owner of a domain.

      Personally, I'm glad you got flamed; you deserve it if you spoke out against HardOCP in this issue. As an Internet journalist and writer I think it's of extreme importance that everyone recognize that HardOCP is in the right in this matter according to the facts as they have been presented, and that Infinium Labs was appallingly wrong for doing what they did.

      -Jem
    7. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Disevidence · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wisely see you have removed your sig.

      Oh wait, you haven't, despite the admission you haven't played anything on a phantom.

      Waspish comments aside, HardOCP do have the perfect right to sue them, and saying "I think this has gone a little bit too far" is rather counter-productive. HardOCP is forcing the issue here and now, to stop what could possibly be endless months of legal threats, with no action. No-one likes legal threats, and the HardOCP team have moved to clear this up.

      The blame lies solely on Infinium Labs. They could of just politely asked HardOCP to correct a few errors in the article (which OCP did), but they then proceeded to wax lyrically about legal threats, which was unneeded. Of course, they could of done alot better by ignoring the article, and getting on with making the phantom, or providing some proof to the contrary, but instead they threatened to sue.

      To me, that doesn't sound like a secure company.

      Hint: To stop flammatory comments, much like my opening lines, change your .sig to "Assigned Beta Tester". HTH.

      "Additionally, I don't see how hard it is to believe in the Phantom's existence"

      I'd like to have evidence, not faith.

      --
      Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
    8. Re:Here's my view on all this: by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They didn't escalate, they just called Infinium's bluff. If I'm reading the news right, the legal action here concerns solely the matters that Infinium's original threats of legal action were based on. There is no escalation here at all, they've just moved the venue of discussion.

      To call the bluff would just be responding to the threat of a lawsuit with a challenge to sue. This is a little further, HardOCP filed the lawsuit for them...

    9. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      HardOCp decided to escalate by countersueing [sic]

      No, what HardOCP did is file a declaratory lawsuit. This is a lawsuit that forces a court to decide a set of facts once and for all. In this case, the facts under dispute are those in HardOCP's article.

      This is NOT an escalation, it's a resolution.

      Btw, I am a law student.

    10. Re:Here's my view on all this: by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you ARE a phantom BETA tester I have to ask- Have you received your hardware? Have you played games on the system? What games?

    11. Re:Here's my view on all this: by kamikazichaser · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hang on, how did HardOCP mislead their readers? I read the article and now have the distinct impression that the phantom gaming console will remain just that: a phantom. It also appears that IL's claims of having many game developers signed up were at least premature if not completely false. It seems to me that this is exactly what someone should get out of the article and has been supported by independent sources. Malicious or not, Steve, the author, didn't lie as far as I can tell. What IL wants Kyle to remove from HardOCP are Steve's opinions and the information he used to form those opinions. I don't think that's going to happen without a court order.

      As for a messy legal battle, perhaps you don't understand what they filed. Kyle filed a "declaratory judgment lawsuit" in order to "clear the air and terminate the flurry of demands, allegations, and defamatory Internet posts directed against HardOCP..." This will bring the situation to a head. Hopefully, it will also be the first step to end this rather silly situation.

      But really, do you feel that IL has been honest and open about the state of their, um, product?

    12. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    13. Re:Here's my view on all this: by aliens · · Score: 4, Informative

      I didn't know that advocating a non-litigous solution

      That is not what you are suggesting. You are suggesting that HardOCP give in to the litigation threatened by Infinium.

      A non-litiguous solution would have been, Infinium's CEO (Roberts) sends a letter to HardOCP(Kyle) saying, "You hurt my feelings with your article please take it down" and Kyle could have said yes or no, that is a non-litigious solution.

      If you read the article and Infinium's response, the article did not contain false information, merely information that isn't very flattering for Infinium's CEO.

      What HardOCP are doing is simply bringing this to a head weeks or months before it gets bounced back and forth between the two companies.

      It's like a bandaid, rip it off quickly rather than picking at it.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    14. Re:Here's my view on all this: by aurum42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Are you affiliated with Infinium at all? Even after re-reading your posts, I'm not certain why you are such a vocal defender of this company, which seemed at least initially to be a sham, according to evidence gathered by HardOCP.

      I've read the original HardOCP article, and they seem to have done a thorough job of investigating Infinium, and the evidence is overwhelming that at least at some point of time, the company was just a po box. From their evidence, tt is also quite plausible that the CEO is a dotcom era slash-and-burn artist, who went through VC funding for several companies and never delivered. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? I'm certain all of us would like to hear of it.

      --
      "The slave who knows his master's will and does not get ready...will be be beaten with many blows."Luke 12:47-48
    15. Re:Here's my view on all this: by djrogers · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uhh, the link says that they will be 'setting up shop in' an 8000 sq ft section of a hall, not that the whole 8000 sq ft will be theirs! An 80x100ft booth at ANY trade show would be outrageous for all but the largest of companies... Shoot, does Infinium even have anough employees to man a booth that size?

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    16. Re:Here's my view on all this: by gaijin99 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You must remember, free speech does not come "free".
      While true, it ain't right. Our legal system is seriously broken when person foo can say something truthful about megacorp bar and because he doesn't have money for a fancy gang of lawyers he gets taken to the cleaners. That's the way it is, but that doesn't mean that's the way it should be.
      When I say they should have kept things quiet and let things slide, I meant a compromise reached by both sides.
      HardOCP offered compromise early in the game, they received a threat and politely offered to correct any (imaginary as it turns out) factual errors. I have a more hardline view: when any person or corp has a legal threat as their first resort I think that compromise has already gone out the window. The person threatening legal action has already discarded compromise as an option. More to the point that sort of oppressive nastyness should not be met with any toleration at all. Anyone who's thought process goes: "I don't like what this person is saying so I'll get my high power legal team to threaten his entire livelyhood" deserves no sympathy. The only appropriate action is to do whatever is in your power to ruin them because they've already decided to try and ruin you.

      Had Infinitum Labs sent a non-legally threatening letter politely noting factual errors and requesting that they be corrected things would be different. But from what I can tell the thought of trying a non-litigous solution never crossed their minds. So screw 'em.

      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    17. Re:Here's my view on all this: by dirk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally, I'm glad you got flamed; you deserve it if you spoke out against HardOCP in this issue. As an Internet journalist and writer I think it's of extreme importance that everyone recognize that HardOCP is in the right in this matter according to the facts as they have been presented, and that Infinium Labs was appallingly wrong for doing what they did.

      While I think Infinium labs is wrong, I have to completely disagree with the idea that this guy deserved to be flamed. While you stand up for HardOCP's rights, you encourage people to shout down this guy if they disagree. Why encourage him to think about his position and state it eliquently if you are just going to shout him down when he does so? HE has every right to state his opinion just as HardOCP does. Just as you have every right to disagree. But flaming is not disagreeing, it is badgering, shouting down, and harassing without any intelligent thought. And that is the last thing anyone should be encouraging.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    18. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Fermier+de+Pomme+de · · Score: 2, Funny
      Infinium is saying they have a good legal hand so HardOCP should fold and go home.

      HardOCP thinks that there legal hand sux.

      HardOCP calls and says let's see the cards...

    19. Re:Here's my view on all this: by black+mariah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, by retracting some ambiguous statements and replacing them with some quite specific statements that basically were even more annoying than the originals, and completely in line with what Infinium was demanding.

      Notice how Infinium hasn't bothered to call Penny Arcade on their numerous articles on the Phantom. They probably know how big PA was and don't want to fuck with them. They probably had no clue about HardOCP and figured they'd be an easy target. Good guess, but wrong.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    20. Re:Here's my view on all this: by smcn · · Score: 3, Funny
      they will have an 8,000 square foot booth at E3

      You can find a layout of their booth here
    21. Re:Here's my view on all this: by bugbread · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, my guess is that they're underestimating the impact of PA. Since PA is basically talking smack, and HardOCP is talking facts, they're more worried about the effects on investors from actual dirt being dug up. Investors are unlikely to be swayed by PA's implications that Infinium's CEO is on LSD or kills dogs to orgasm, while the HardOCP article would make them look very hard at where they were going to put their money.

      On a side note, PA has been talking about going out to actually see the Phantom (apparently, they've been invited to check it out but have ignored the invitation, which comes as a bit of a shock)

    22. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shouting people down is fine.

      Suing them for speaking is not.

      Free speech is a bitch somethetimes.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    23. Re:Here's my view on all this: by black+mariah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Under basic business sense you don't want to piss off your target audience by screwing with websites they frequent. That's another reason why Infinium wouldn't want to go after PA, because PA has a LARGE readership and every one of them is a potential customer. HardOCP, on the other hand, is geared more toward computer hardware than consoles (I am aware they cover consoles too, but it's mainly about computers).

      The comics PA does are one thing. There is very little you can say in a comic that isn't parody or protected somehow, that much is true, but the front page which usually harbors some more biting commentary is probably open season as far as libel is concerned.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    24. Re:Here's my view on all this: by black+mariah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good point, but the front page commentary has been a bit more smack-talking than the comics have. Going as far as to call Infinium's CEO a 'huckster'. The LSD and dog kill orgasm (WOW, good band name...) things are obvious parody, but not everything they're saying is.

      I wouldn't be surprised if they got to wherever they were going to be shown the console and were then handed NDA's. Knowing those guys, they'd probably laugh their asses off and tell the Infinium dudes to lick Dave.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    25. Re:Here's my view on all this: by the+arbiter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps someone here can help me understand: it seems that requirements for the positions at Infinium posted on Craig's List are, well, odd.

      The "Senior Software Engineer" only has to have a Bachelor's degree? Four years experience? Strange.

      No mention of what test tools are to be used. This is bizarre. They vary somewhat, experience with one or another seems to be kind of, well, important.

      What dev platform is to be employed? Seems you'd want your coders to be familiar with it. Maybe they feel that the uber-coders with 3 years experience they're hiring will be competent and churn out perfect code with any or all of them.

      Software Program Manager performing systems engineering duties? Peculiar.

      This all strikes me as somewhat odd, certainly like nothing I've seen in my dev experience. Perhaps someone more enlightened than myself can grant me the benefit of their wisdom, for I am puzzled. Or geniunely retarded.

      --
      Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
    26. Re:Here's my view on all this: by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Informative

      Attempting to intimidate someone into sumbission through fraudulent legal threats is EXTORTION.

      No... attempting to intimidate someone with legal threats you have no intention to follow through with is called BARRATRY.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  3. Suggestion: by niko9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    New section for this website: lawsuits

    1. Re:Suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >> New section for this website: lawsuits

      Graphic suggestion: Justitia (Lady Justice) as a Borg. I suggest a cute one like Seven of Nine, robe optional.

    2. Re:Suggestion: by Liselle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmm... do you mean something like this? There is already a "The Courts" topic, is that not specific enough?

      --
      Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    3. Re:Suggestion: by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why am I unable to hear the parent post in anything other than Comic Book Guy's voice?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    4. Re:Suggestion: by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interesting offtopic anecdote:

      Soon after John Ashcroft took office, he had both Lady Justice and her male counterpart (who wears a loin cloth) in the Justice Department lobby covered in blue curtains. Both have been on display for 80 years. He was apparently terrified that his picture would be on the front page with an aluminium tit over his shoulder. The symbolism of shrouding Lady Justice is obviously lost on him.

      -B

  4. Is it just me? by paulschroeder · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...or does anyone else think of the organization from Robocop when they read "HardOCP?

  5. This just in... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Word has it that the Infinium console is going to be bundled with Duke Nukem Forever.

    1. Re:This just in... by screwballicus · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know what the best thing about Duke Nukem Forever's release will be?

      No more Duke Nukem Forever jokes.

      Think of the kittens....

  6. Holy crap! by Trillan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, that's one way to completely fail to keep legal costs down.

    /me grabs a bag of popcorn and waits for the show...

  7. Penny Arcade better get moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...if they want to keep up with HardOCP. Maybe they can put their lawsuit in the form of a cartoon.

  8. Then the court orders to produce evidence... by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Funny

    And in order to win, Infinitum Labs has to produce Phantom, that is all great, kicks major ass and generally proves all derogatory articles untrue. Case dismissed, gamers rejoice, console enters trade :)

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  9. Business Models by dirkdidit · · Score: 4, Funny

    So apparently nobody's business model revolves around selling anything anymore, just suing the shit out of everything that makes them pissed off?

    First SCO, now Infinium. They should merge and specialize in lawsuits.

  10. Penny-Arcade by Digitus1337 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Penny-Arcade attacked them over this (infinitum); the strip can be seen here. The CEO also states this to which Penny-Arcade responded with "So Tim thinks we did that comic strip to get more traffic driven to our site. That's a nice thought Tim but you're way off. You see unlike Infinium Labs and your doomed console, Penny Arcade is successful. How can I say this without sounding like an asshole? Penny Arcade has more readers in a given second than your site will ever have even if it were to sit and rot on the internet until time ends and the universe implodes. Hmmm, I guess I can't. Tim also says we called him to let him know it's all in fun. This again is bullshit. I don't care if he likes the comic or not. I've certainly never called the guy and I have no intention of doing so. Bottom line, the guy is a lying huckster. I guess he figured he could post that on his forum and we'd never see it. This proves he has no concept of how huge PA is. Penny Arcade isn't just a comic and a news post Tim, PA is a community and we have agents everywhere. Chances are they're watching you even now." These guys love to get into this kind of stuff.

    1. Re:Penny-Arcade by blackeye · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another poke from PA today. With posting comics every other day, they're falling behind!

    2. Re:Penny-Arcade by Trejkaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Never mind that they posted four articles in one day... now that was falling behind!

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  11. Headline isn't really accurate. by mcc · · Score: 5, Informative

    The way it looked to me they weren't suing them, just asking for a declaratory judgement. I guess it's a kind of lawsuit, but it looked more like HardOCP just telling a judge "These people keep threatening to sue us and it's creating uncertainty. Could you just just decide, let's pretend they'd sued us over the stuff they're threatening to sue over, hypothetically then who would win?". I don't know. i don't really understand it.

    1. Re:Headline isn't really accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know. i don't really understand it.

      Which is why, of course, you have a score of: 5, Informative. Makes perfect sense.

    2. Re:Headline isn't really accurate. by Aerion · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Declaratory Judgment Act, under which HardOCP is "suing," allows "any court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate pleading, may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought."

      Also, "Any such declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment or decree and shall be reviewable as such." So even if this isn't technically a "lawsuit," its result will have the same effect as the result of a hypothetical suit against HardOCP.

      (You don't really need to be told that IANAL, do you?)

    3. Re:Headline isn't really accurate. by sakusha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IANAL, but this seems like the only way for HardOCP to counter these legal threats. Note that the letters were written by an Infinium person, not a lawyer. A real lawyer wouldn't make threats like "remove THIS content or I'll sue." No lawyer would ever do it, they'd first write a cease and desist letter, then if no action was taken, they'd sue without further notice. You can't say things like "if you don't do X, I'll sue you." That is barratry, using a threat of lawsuit for extortion. You get disbarred for making threats like that.

  12. Interesting choice of law firm... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A little quick googling on the term Storm &Hemingway reveals that the law firms primary business is usually on the plantiff's side of copyright and trademark disputes... they're the guys who go after those who are infringing.

    Nice to see that they can take a /. friendly position too...

    1. Re:Interesting choice of law firm... by Amarok.Org · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not such a strange move... if you're afraid that a particular firm might get used against you, you engage their services first. You prevent your opponent from being able to use them, as no firm can represent both sides in a dispute (it's just a minor conflict of interest).

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    2. Re:Interesting choice of law firm... by Sangui5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Saying that it isn't a strange move is an understatement--large corps regularly retain counsel simply to monopolize the availability of the best firms. On the up side, that every large corp is attempting this tends to fragment the law firms--if Ford has a firm on retainer, then somebody else can hire that firm to fight Toyota, and vise versa. So the little guy isn't completely screwed, unless you'd like to sue an entire industry. But if you have that many enemies, you're SOL anyway...

  13. Good job HardOCP by jimbosworldorg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I'm glad HardOCP is putting their money right where their mouth is. I'm sick and tired of seeing people back fearfully away from any jackass with a lawyer.

    After all, failure to stand up to legal badgering is exactly WHY we're such a litigious society today - because of the payoff.

    --

    Coming soon to Slashdot: meta-meta-moderation!

  14. ObSimpsons quote by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jimbo Jones: You let me down, man. Now I don't believe in nothing no more. I'm going to law school.

    Homer: Noooo!

  15. Bigger problems by CovertBeaver · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Infinium should be more worried about what the SPCA will have to say about this.

  16. Does TX have an anti-SLAPP law? by phr2 · · Score: 3, Informative
    California does, so if this suit had happened there, HardOCP would be in a position to collect money damages, from what I understand. (SLAPP = Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, when someone exercises First Amendment rights and you sue them to intimidate them into shutting up).

    California Anti-SLAPP Project

  17. Well, I guess it was inevitable... by amuro98 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As SCO has shown us, when you can't make money by producing useful products, you can always make money by suing people.

    The article that Inifium is annoyed at is over a year old now. Wasn't Infium's Phantom supposed to have already hit the market by now?

    If anything, HardOCP's article should act as a warning to investors that infinium is just a scam.

  18. About Your NDA. by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Doesn't your NDA prohibit you from talking about the product you are testing?

    1. Re:About Your NDA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't think that goes into effect until they actually send out test units.

  19. What, they found them? by cryptor3 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Documents were served to Infinium Labs representatives in Florida yesterday.

    Wait, they found an address and someone to serve the papers to? Looks like Infinium Labs is making progress...

    1. Re:What, they found them? by Lando · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really making progress. They are a public company now due to some waving of stocks at the end of 2003, acquiring some guy's consulting firm.

      So they have had to have a viable business address to get the paperwork filed..

      Anyway... I find it interesting reading the SEC filings that their whole concept comes down to a VPN to deliver content which they haven't started on yet.

      Reading the latest reviews, where they actually show a box... Nice packaging, but couple of thoughts... If they are running a vpn and drm why do they need to communicate with ssl? Additional thoughts abound as to how long they expect their ssl encryption to be valid as one side the the communication is compromised...

      Shrug, must be one of those things like the sealed unit the console comes in. It's impossible to take the plastic appart to get at the insides... right?

      Anyway, all smoke and mirrors so far. I like how they have $5000 stock, no incoming capital, yet set the value of the stock to 5000 times it's starting price and run a 4 to 1 split on all outstanding stock... wow, instead of $5k they are now worth a cool $25 million... Oh and they say their chief competitors are xbox, nintendo and sony. Somehow I doubt even if they did have $25 million they could compete head to head with their competition...

      Just goes to show what I know about business... I always thought it was about trying to make a product which you then sold to make money.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  20. The reason of US decline? by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I propose a reason for the decline of relevance of US: the amount of money used going for lawsuits (defending against bad claims and making those bad claims) vs. the amount of money that goes to new developing new ideas. so... basically, it's asshole businessmen and CEOs that see a better living from the civil law system than actually thinking themselves. Maybe if all this effort was refocused all these WELL TRAINED tech people would actually have a job. Time to expire ALL of tort law and begin again...

    --

    Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
    1. Re:The reason of US decline? by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a) what decline

      The last time I looked, we were supposed to be a country of INDIVIDUAL liberty. We are NOT a country of individual liberty anymore, we're a country where huge powerful organiztaions beat up on little people for their own reasons. When the constitution was created it was because a huge organization was beating up little people, but then it was a government. Now it's concentrations of people and momeny called corporations... it's the same thing. Going back to that state of being is a decline, IMHO.

      So we should throw out 900 years of legal development because you don't like some of the people who file lawsuits?

      What I like is not relevant... the problem is that tort law has become a sword instead of a shield. And the US laws that create this problem are NOT 900 years old.

      All laws should expire on their own anyway... they were never meant to work forever in all situations.

      --

      Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
  21. Infinium is real, thier forums prove it... by DangerSteel · · Score: 5, Funny
    I was on the Infinium/Phantom forums last week checking out what people were saying about HardOCP and what kind of games they hope come out and how they can't wait to order thier unit online starting March 31st. I tried to go to the forums today to see what new they had to say about the HardOCP lawsuit. And guess what?

    Thier forums are "down for maintenance" I guess that makes sense, they must need the hard drive in that server for the Phantom unit they will demo at E3 coming up. Well I sure hope after E3 they put the forum drive back in thier server !

  22. So Penny Arcade just might be right... by mobiux · · Score: 4, Funny
  23. You can sue over legal threats? by krusadr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ooooooh SCO.

    You are so in the shit.

    --
    while sco {
    wget -O /dev/null http://www.sco.com?sco=litigious%20bastards
    }
  24. Where did IL's fourms go? by IgD · · Score: 4, Informative

    Shortly after this fiasco began, IL took their forums offline. One guy wrote he was a millionaire investor and wanted to tour IL so he could vouch for their credibility. Others questioned the lawsuit and asked specifically what was wrong with the HardOCP article. I don't think anyone ever got a meaningful reply. The former forums can be found at http://forum.phantom.net. All that is there now is a message that reads "We will be re-launching the forums soon. Down for maintainance, we are upgrading to new software and adding more features. Admin."

  25. To sue for libel you have to show damage... by Lunabean · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I shared a few of my thoughts on the other Infinium Labs post, but as the day has gone on, I've thought more about it and have a few more questions.

    Now, as I understand libel, for the case to stand, two things need to be proven. First, the accused deliberately lied. Second, the accuser needs proof that they were damaged by said lies. Now, the first is hard enough to prove. I, personally, don't think HardOCP set out to mislead and lie in their article, but I could see how that could be debated. However, I don't think Infinium Labs has an iota of a chance proving HardOCP's article, published five months ago, has hurt their company. Infinium Labs doesn't even have a product on the market yet, and, as someone else pointed out, type in "Phantom Console" into Google and you'll find several slams on the company.

    If Infinium Labs doesn't get launch that it expects, they only have themselves and their sketchy business practices to blame. They are an enigma wrapped in a puzzle drizzled with secret sauce. They created the atmosphere for speculation...and people began to speculate.

    Now, I'm not someone who plans on linking to my site with every post I make here, but, again, I am linking to the message that was posted on my forums yesterday. It is a copy of the e-mail sent to HardOCP, before HardOCP made it public.

    I checked the e-mail of the poster, which began with "twcbinc". I Googled that and it led me to a user at the Console Gamer Network. The user's e-mail at the Network was timr@phantom.net. Now, this didn't mean much, but it was interesting. A mod on my boards also found the post odd and traced the IP to Infinium Labs.

    Now, I'm not saying this is illegal, or even bad, but I think it's sketchy, to say the least...and I think acts like this pretty much destroy any libel case they may have. Infinium Labs is hurting themselves with every step they make...and I think any judge who looks at their tactics and history will see that. Here's the link to the post on my boards: http://www.lunabean.com/forums/index.php?showtopic =2428

  26. USPTO sucks at trademarks too it seems... by Satan's+Librarian · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Kinda funny, Phantom registered "Built by Gamers, for Gamers" - there's a "tm" at the end of the product sheet on their site. Apparently, it actually is registered, too.

    But, seems like that's a pretty common phrase in the industry and has been so for years....

    Hell, it's even used to refer to [H]ard|OCP's own RatPadz.

    A poster above suggested a new section on Slashdot for lawsuits... I think that's a great idea. SCO's newsworthy lawsuits may be dying out finally, but Phantom might keep the section viable for a year by itself. Especially if that "Pre-Order" link starts working and consumers get suckered as well as investors, or if they decide to defend their *cough* "Intellectual Property" *cough* by suing half the gaming industry for trademark infringement.

    Wonder if that's where they hope to make a profit?

    1. Re:USPTO sucks at trademarks too it seems... by rei_slashdot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interplay has had "By Gamers for gamers" for YEARS. I say Interplay sues Infinium.

  27. From someone who lives in Sarasota.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dear Friends,

    When I first heard about Infinium I was curious myself, especially since it's hq is my hometown. After reading the original article, I too drove down to longboat key and saw the supposed "hq" which indeed fit the description in the article. Shortly thereafter, they did acquire some very nice rental space on main st. I haven't been in the building, but rent is definitely not cheap in this area.

    The local paper has had a number of articles about Infinium and they might be of interest. You can find them at www.heraldtribune.com.

    I too looked for info on the founder, and his own resume which I found published on the Internet did indeed make him seem like a shady, take your money and run type. The fact that he lives on Longboat Key where the median family income is $107,983 shows that he's done pretty well. [wikipedia] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longboat_Key%2C_Flori da

    1. Re:From someone who lives in Sarasota.... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Dear Friends,

      Do I know you or do you just want to borrow money?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  28. I worked for Tim Roberts at BIG by gserafini · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked for Tim Roberts at GlobalStreams under BIG. I was the webmaster for the only company that was purchased (rather than being created out of thin air) by BIG.

    My observation of the general business strategy that was followed at BIG could be summed up in one phrase: "Fake it 'til you make it." When we were working under the [BIG] umbrella, it was remarkable. At one point our company was instructed to hire people, not necessarily because we needed more people, but rather to increase headcount. They were still hiring until 1 or 2 weeks before BIG shut down.

    The often-expressed doubts surrounding this company and it's product (the name is completely telling) I believe are well founded. Simply reading the Phantom FAQ and their product specs should be instant signs to any observant individual.

    Step 1: Create website. (See their job postings for 3d renderers, Flash developers, etc...) Make it cool, fill it with the latest (OBVIOUS) buzzwords. DRM. Pay-per-play. Promise to deliver the cool dream application that might be possible.

    Step 2: Try to [maybe] actually deliver a product. Image is everything here, gotta keep the investors happy and the money flowing.

    Step 3: ???

    Step 4: Prof^H^H^H Take the money and spend it / run. Anyone who might think about investing in this company, or who even really hopes that what they say or sell might be worth spending some money on should do some research, due diligence and move on with their life.

    I often had a hard time working in an atmosphere where it was more important to seem successful than to _BE_ successful.

    BIG didn't work out. A lot of people quit perfectly good jobs to work with Tim and were pissed when it didn't work out. They spent a LOT of money. After that experience for some reason I REALLY wanted to work in an environment where, say for example, a real product was worked on to solve a real problem, that had real customers.

    Ah, the bitch of the reputation economy. Hope I don't get sued for sharing my personal experience and opinions.

    --
    Gabriel

  29. Suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Something I noticed that raises doubts over how serious Infinium really is... If you look at the tech specs for the machine it specifies an nVidia chip for the graphics and the nVidia logo is displayed on the site but if you look at nVidia's press section there's no press release mentioning any kind of relationship with Infinium. Take a look at the kind of press releases they do make and you'll see that they announce pretty much any partnership, even pretty minor stuff. Seems that if they had some kind of agreement to supply Infinium with any significant number of chips they'd have made an announcement.

  30. Can we use this DJ Act to sue SCO? by Attaturk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But surely that's a good point. Quoting the article:

    In a press release soon to be made public, lawyers representing KB Networks (the Bennett-founded entity that owns HardOCP), refers to the suit as one based on a legal statue commonly referred to as the "Declaratory Judgment Act." HardOCP lawyers explain the act as one that "permits a person or entity being threatened with lawsuits from another party to force the issue to be decided, rather than having to operate under a cloud of uncertainty and intimidation."

    Could linux users use the same approach to sue SCO for threating them too??

  31. astroturfer? by rei_slashdot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Go away, Tim.

  32. "..will have.."?!? by PhoenixOne · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They said they "will have" a both at the 2003 GDC, E3, and even the "Xtream Dev Conf" (for the 50 people that showed up I guess ;)). I'm not ready to write them off 100%, but they are always "about to show" us something great but never do. It is hard to trust them.

    Maybe this will be the second coming of home entertainment, but until I see a dev machine with my own eyes (hey, I signed up as a developer over a year ago!) they are not worth my time.

    --
    Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  33. All the research you need by AndrewWood · · Score: 3, Insightful
    All the research you need can be found on Infinium's very own web sites. Read every press release, look at the site (design by 2advanced. Infinium can't even take credit for the cool flash, which is the only thing of "substance" in sight), read the comedy that is Tim's resume page, look at how they word everything, and read between the lines.

    I'm not going to post my play-by-play analysis, but suffice it to say, I agree with you about one thing. Anybody who's interested should indeed do their own research. (and have a few good laughs and amazed slaps of the forehead while they're at it)

  34. Infinium Stock by sandalwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine you are some non-tech-savvy investor, and all you know about Infiniujm Labs is what you see here. Not so bad, right? So I think the reason Infinium is so intent on protecting its image is because of this fragile bubble they have built around the stock.

  35. Discovery is gonna be fun by Facekhan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since among the many disputed statements in HARDOCP articles is whether the Phantom is vaporware, filing a suit is a great way to find out whether the thing actually exists. If Infinium challenges the statement that they don't really have a product, then they have to show that they do have a product and HARDOCP gets to see it.

  36. Is anyone surprised... by Walkiry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that the Phantom forums have been shut down for a while now? I guess *someone* saw this one coming and decided to conveniently tell the boss it'd be a good idea to "upgrade to a better forum software" as soon as possible.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!