Slashdot Mirror


Next Generation Mail Clients Reviewed

kreide writes "E-mail is the 'killer app' of the Internet; an enormous number of messages are exchanged every day, and while web-based mail has become very popular in recent years, many people still prefer the added speed and flexibility of a mail client application. In this review I compare the next generation of the most popular e-mail clients, including Evolution, KMail, Opera and Mozilla, and their usability in dealing with large number of messages."

5 of 743 comments (clear)

  1. Outlook XP/2002? Where's Outlook 2003? by DangerTenor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not a "next-generation" email client review if it does not include Microsoft Outlook 2003. Outlook 2003 boasts a great number of features and usability enhancements over Outlook 2002/XP. By including an older version of Outlook the author is skewing the comparison significantly!

    Feel free to mod me down as a troll, but the author isn't being honest with the community. Open-source folks will be better off knowing what's in the current version of commercial products, not the older versions.

    --
    Check out our infosecurity industry blog: http://securitymusings.com/
  2. Re:And what's wrong with Outlook? by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with Outlook is that it is not an email client, but rather an Exhange client. For example, there are plenty of simple IMAP functions Outlook does not support (at least in Office XP version that I mucked around with) such as saving sent mail to an IMAP folder instead of an Exchange folder (This can be hacked to work using a rule, but Outlook in itself cannot do this out of the box).

    --
    http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
  3. Killer app? by phorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    E-mail is the 'killer app' of the Internet

    Actually, the internet has had several killer apps that kept the boom going:

    a) Communication: This includes IM's and email. In the early days it was mostly email.

    b) PR0N: Actually, it's been around since the early days of the internet. Heck, I remember it was a big part of BBS's before I got on the 'net

    c) Games: This really hit when TCP/IP games became popular over the internet. Less need to lug your PC over to a friends' for a LAN party, and you mom can play solitaire with your aunt in another country

    d) Music: I know a lot of people that subscribed to high speed just to get supposed "free" music.

    Email is perhaps, however, one of the "killer apps" that has suffered the most during its time online. Games have their botters/hackers, pr0n has its misleading popups, and music has its Britneys, but by far SPAM has become one of the larger unfixed problems so far (patched, perhaps, but not fixed)

  4. Re:Outlook XP/2002? Where's Outlook 2003? by orangenormal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Poppycock. The only reason the author didn't include Outlook 2003 was because he didn't have access to it. While this is perfectly acceptable, the little blurb in the FAQ (before the author admits not having access) is pure BS. When writing an article about the "next generation of email clients" there is no justification for comparing the latest version of everything to an old version of Microsoft's product. This is, indeed, unfair and misleading.

  5. Re:Next killer app? by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    wait.... you send passwords over email? ack!

    seriously. this brings up the biggest hole in email as a communications medium: it's inherently broadcast.

    for email to really become the predominant communications medium, privacy and authentication must be dealt with. whether that's through some open encryption/signing standard like gpg/openpgp or through some proprietary technique doesn't really matter (although obviously, i'm rooting for gpg). what matters is that people a) realize the shortcomings of email in this area and b) do something about it.