Slashdot Mirror


Windows XP SP2 Could Break Some Applications

Denver_80203 writes "An article from InfoWorld states that the upcoming Windows XP Service Pack 2 could break some 'unsecure applications.' In a quote from Tony Goodhew, a product manager in Microsoft's developer group says 'It doesn't really matter how long it is going to take you to do the work; security is an important issue and developers need to start doing that work now.' Or: 'The great bulk of applications will not be affected by memory protection. The number one that leaps to mind is execution environments with just-in-time code generation. The .Net Framework is one.' Fortunately for us, they are offering a course to guide the unsecure masses."

25 of 513 comments (clear)

  1. Uh oh by Bishop,+Martin · · Score: 3, Funny

    "the upcoming Windows XP Service Pack 2 could break some 'unsecure applications.'"

    That's just about every application in Windows XP

    --
    Setec Astronomy
    1. Re:Uh oh by pergamon · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that is Windows XP

    2. Re:Uh oh by Nimloth · · Score: 5, Funny
      The upcoming Windows XP Service Pack 2 could break some 'unsecure applications'.

      Are we talking about Windows XP SP1?

    3. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      SUBTRACTED subtracted SUBTRACTED subtracted SUBTRACTED SUBTRACTED... Got it? Thanks.

    4. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is Windows. Release schedules are lazier, even with the worm writers. Besides, how do you know the one you've seen is the only one?

  2. Great! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    another reason for the company I work for to NOT migrate from Windows 2000.

    Thank you Microsoft!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Great! by ivan1011001 · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's no reason not to migrate from Windows 2000. Just don't migrate to Windows XP. You could always switch to Linux, BSD, or any operating system. Of course, now that Windows 2000 is open source, you really don't need to.

      --

      I was thinking of converting to paganism, but where the hell can you find sacrificial virgins these days?
  3. The "unsecure" list by acostin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Open Office, Mozilla, Java based applications, Apache with PHP, and other applications written by a bunch of programmers without a management control :)

  4. "Insecure Applications"? by Nobody+You+Know · · Score: 2, Funny

    "the upcoming Windows XP Service Pack 2 could break some 'unsecure applications.'" I thought service packs were supposed to FIX the operating system.

  5. The blind leading... by thestarz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fortunately for us, they are offering a course to guide the unsecure masses.

    The blind leading the seeing?

    --

    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    1. Re:The blind leading... by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you were trapped total darkness with no flashlight, the blind person is who you'd want to lead you out...when you're surrounded by utter stupidity, you want whoever is the most familiar with it to lead you out.

      --
      ...
  6. Re:.NET framework by SlightOverdose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously never had to use MFC then eh? .NET provides a nice clean set of APIs that aren't retarted.

  7. Re:These are a few insecure programs that won't wo by igloo-x · · Score: 2, Funny
    iTunes
    QuickTime
    RealPlayer

    Fuck, where do I sign?

  8. Re:Java? by LousyPhreak · · Score: 4, Funny

    no microsoft would never do this, they would be sued for doing so, you know anticompetitive business tactics and the like...

    but wait... there was something...

    --
    -- Karma: beyond good and evil - mostly affected by posting political
  9. Duh??? by Tim+Ward · · Score: 4, Funny

    QA software testers & coders will cry out in anguish over this.....more work for them to do

    I don't think the will "cry out in anguish" if they've got any sense. In today's market they'll jump for joy, knowing that their jobs are safe for another few months.

  10. Re:These are a few insecure programs that won't wo by shadewind · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this breaks insecure apps like Mozilla/Netscape/Firefox, the logical thing would be that it smashes IE into oblivion.

    --
    I couldn't come up with any better sign....
  11. Only install odd numbered service packs by Schemat1c · · Score: 5, Funny

    As superstitious as this sounds I have found this to be true over the years with Microsoft. Almost without fail the even numbered SP's have broken features and the odd numbered ones fix them. I'll wait for SP3.

    Besides, the combination of my Netgear firewall, McAfee Virusscan and just not opening strange attachments in my email protects me just fine.

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  12. Pot to Kettle by H8X55 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a quote from Tony Goodhew, a product manager in Microsoft's developer group says 'It doesn't really matter how long it is going to take you to do the work; security is an important issue and developers need to start doing that work now.

    Not to flame, cause i'm not like that, but c'mon!?!

    Pot to Kettle, "Guess who's black?"

  13. Re:Start doing that work NOW! by jimbolaya · · Score: 4, Funny
    ""Microsoft is finally starting to favor security over functionality."

    They that give up functionality to obtain a little security deserve neither functionality nor security.

    Yeah, or something like that.

    --

    There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  14. Re:What kind of moron... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    The kind of moron who needs an excuse for why his midterm wasn't ready? :^P

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  15. Re:Lets not bag on MS by skinfitz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Upgrading to 2.6 was not a forced security upgrade, but simply an option.

    Installing XP SP2 will not be a "forced security upgrade" either but also "simply an option".

  16. Yeah but... by Anti_Climax · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Will it break KaZaa?

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  17. Strange..... by azuroff · · Score: 2, Funny

    The address still says slashdot.org, but there is approval of something Microsoft has done...

    "There is nothing wrong with your browser. Do not adjust the site. WE control the comments, we control the moderators...."

  18. Brilliant Idea by polyp2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    seems like a great way to give people a longhorn

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  19. Re:Lets not bag on MS by rufo · · Score: 2, Funny

    some of us don't have the luxury of changing a distro as often as we change our shorts

    What about changing our shorts as often as we switch distros?

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.