Slashdot Mirror


Bell Labs Plants Nanograss to Cool Mobile Chips

LoadWB writes "TechWeb has an article about Bell Labs' new liquid cooling technology for mobile processors. The tech, called 'nanograss' is described as 'tiny tubes that spray liquid on chip hot spots.' The use of this cooling technology reduces the power required to actively remove heat from mobile processors. Other applications are possible, but it seems it was primarily developed for use with mobile CPUs."

109 comments

  1. Maybe Apple can use this by badriram · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple could maybe use this and come out with those wonderful g5 powerbooks some time soon.

    Ahhhh.... G5 powerbook....drooling...

    1. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ahhhh.... G5 powerbook....drooling...

      That's an aweful lot of power for a one-button mouse to be in charge of!

    2. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by MukiMuki · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the heck are you all happy about, they basically just invented bukkake cooling!

    3. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you just can't make a joke these days without Mac user's getting their little pink panties in a wad.

    4. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use that drool to extinguish the fire in your lap.

    5. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by raalynthslair · · Score: 1

      so use a mouse with more. You can customize your mouse buttons anyway you want if you use a standard USB mouse with more. ^_^

      --
      -- "You must be the change you desire to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi --
    6. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea! That way you can have mouse buttons set up for alternate weapons... strafing... throwing grenades...

      Uh... nevermind.

    7. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh.... G5 powerbook....drooling...

      Now your CPU will be the one doing the drooling!

    8. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in time for the release of Unreal and Quake 3 for OSX. It turns out, idsoft ponied up a lot of dough to hire Microsoft developers to write DirectX9 for OSX. This will be done in 3 years, when Doom 3 makes it's debut on the Macintosh.

    9. Re:Maybe Apple can use this by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      As a guy who has a 5 button optical mouse on my PowerMac, I have to say I agree with you in principle... But, How the fuck do you expect me to whip out a PowerBook G5 while I'm on a train, plug in the mouse, use it in cramped quarters, not piss of the guy sitting next to me... I think you get the drift.

      If Apple made a two-button PowerBook with a scroll wheel, I'd own it. Plain, and simple.

  2. Yes ... by kimsh · · Score: 4, Funny

    but can you smoke it?

    1. Re:Yes ... by Erratio · · Score: 3, Funny

      You'd need a nanobong (or nanopipe or nanopapers, etc.) and a way to hold it. Then you'd just have to make sure you don't get pulled over by any cops with microscopes.

      --
      I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
    2. Re:Yes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much for a dime bag?

      -B

    3. Re:Yes ... by wed128 · · Score: 1

      could you make a nanobong out of nanotubes?

  3. What's next, the nano-bong? by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 3, Funny
    What's next, the nano-bong?

    Seriously, though, the technology looks pretty cool. The article likens it to a radiator so liquid is recycled in the closed system and liquid applied to the spot that needs it most. Only the requisite amount of liquid would be pushed through the system in order to reduce energy costs of pushing the liquid. Neat stuff.

    1. Re:What's next, the nano-bong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this nano-bong sounds intriguing. You could carry your stash internally and smoke it up internally right under the man's nose. That could really put the kibosh on the drug war.

    2. Re:What's next, the nano-bong? by Rostin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm confused, because it sounds like the "nanograss" is some kind of little temperature-actuated valve. More likely: The real idea is not that liquid is applied only to problem areas, but that heat-removal is applied only to problem areas. Channels lined with tiny fins are cut all over the die, and liquid is pumped all through them. Liquid flowing through channels in cool areas is heated less than liquid flowing through channels in hot areas. The energy savings comes from needing a lot less coolant (meaning less cooling and pumping), which is in turn a result of the intimate contact between the coolant and the die, and the huge heat transfer area from all those fins (relative to what you'd have w/ just empty channels).

  4. nanograss by Foktip · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its so small, it requires a microscipe to roll a doobie.

    1. Re:nanograss by Guppy06 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I thought running Microsoft bloatware had the same effects on processors.

    2. Re:nanograss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's get small! (Steve Martin 70's ref.)

    3. Re:nanograss by Graff · · Score: 1
      The use of Nanotechnology is the most powerful proposition...

      Yet another plagarism by this troll. You can find this text right here, this poser I mean poster just copied it verbatim.
  5. But doesn't that mean ... by jrl87 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That we will have to refill whatever liquid they spray on the chip periodically.

    And you know it will be some over priced propriatary form of water ......

    1. Re:But doesn't that mean ... by prat393 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it's collected somewhere, cooled, and reused. It's a closed system; the article compares it to a car radiator.

    2. Re:But doesn't that mean ... by frazzydee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think that the price of the liquid would be too much of an issue, since:
      1: it only sprays minute amounts
      2: you could always choose to fill it up with another liquid instead (anybody know the going price for liquid nitrogen?
      I think the real issue is if the average person be willing to open up their computer every few months to fill up the tank. Most average users i know would not be very willing to do that.

    3. Re:But doesn't that mean ... by Erratio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The system would probably designed so that the life of the cooling system would be long enough that the laptop would be outdated (on a decent scale) by the time it needed some kind of maintenence. A planned lifetime of about 5 years or so. When the time came the solution would probably be just to replace the mechanism rather than refill it (not to say that you couldn't do it anyway). The cost vs. life would be affordable though, and not having to worry about a way to refill the liquid would allow for greater control over the heat, and cheaper production costs. And for the non-techies who may have to endure this...the percentage would probably be about the same as laptop fans dying now.

      --
      I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
    4. Re:But doesn't that mean ... by NeoThermic · · Score: 2, Informative

      'the article compares it to a car radiator.'

      And how many times have you re-filled (or your garage during an MOT) your radiator fluid?

      I suspect that there might be a need to refill it after a long time...

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    5. Re:But doesn't that mean ... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Why does this make me think of Dune (sadly I can only recall the game), where they build structures in the desert to collect moisture? Perhaps computers of the future will come a desk-version of these?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    6. Re:But doesn't that mean ... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      as a company, and not a saintly non-profit organization that there to fullfil our every geek dream, I'd figure it's need a top up at least every few months. And they likly make it 20-30 dollars a fill. Likly the whole razor/razor blade model.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    7. Re:But doesn't that mean ... by Erratio · · Score: 1

      Replacing razor blades are something that normal people wouldn't be afraid to do. The average person isn't going to want to pay in time or money to get something like that done every month for their computer (regardless of how little of either), and considering it would be a new inconvenience rather than something that's always been there, a massive amount of people would be alienated, and avoid the technology. From a business standpoint it would be far more profitable to get a new technology adopted by as many manufacturers as possible, so things like that will be avoided (and costs will be controlled). If, for some inane reason, you felt compelled to refill every couple of months and were willing to pay for it, then all the power to you, but blaming anyone other than yourself is like suing McDonald's for getting fat.

      --
      I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
    8. Re:But doesn't that mean ... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It's about $1.79/liter, IIRC... (got the cryogenic storage tank refilled not too long ago)

  6. Nanograss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's get small! Early and often. Apologies to Steve Martin.

  7. New error message.... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Error 0C001A41 - Processor has run out of liquid coolant. Please refill, then reboot.

    1. Re:New error message.... by prat393 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pretty soon there'll be a gasoline powered chip, or at the very least a laptop fuel cell.

      Technology: applied ingenuity in order to keep everything exactly the same.

    2. Re:New error message.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gives a new meaning to leaky apps or leaking memory.

    3. Re:New error message.... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Pretty soon there'll be a gasoline powered chip,

      So Tin Allen is into computers now?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  8. Re:Amazing! by DoorFrame · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I think the "in diameter" was implied by the fact that the sentence structure was parralleling the previous sentence . If Item A is several hundred microns in diameter, and Item B is 100 microns, I think it's safe to say (unless we're being tested on logic here) that Item B is 100 microns in diameter.

    You're overreacting.

  9. Where does the energy go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You still have the problem of getting the energy from the cpu out of the computer, just because you move it from the chip to the liquid doesn't really help all that much in itself. You still have all the same old problems. Apparently they have managed to come up with something, but it doesn't really seem to be such a great innovation as it is being hyped up to be..

    1. Re:Where does the energy go? by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

      It goes to the NanoExhaust, of course!

    2. Re:Where does the energy go? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Interesting

      but it doesn't really seem to be such a great innovation as it is being hyped up to be..

      Thanks, you saved me from starting a thread on that issue. I kept thinking "well, where does all this fluid go to cool off?".. The amount of fluid and circulation will be dependant on the CPU. If it's a hot running P4 or AMD64, then the resivor needed for proper cooling will be similar to that of a normal water cooling kit. While eliminating the need for a water pump, which can be made tiny enough to be insignificant compared to whatever you have to use as a radiator to dissipate the gathered heat.

      Personally, I'd trust a water cooling rig before something like this. Due to the teenie, tiny nature of the tubes, I could imagine any microscopic particles in the fluid would eventually clog it up. For instance, the chemicals released as the processor ages would be likely to collect and clog an area a few microns across, easily. Since it's a passive system, there would be no means to flush the blockage out via the pump. At least with normal liquid cooling, the user can repair problems before they cripple the system. With a solid-state solution like this, you'd be dead in the water.

    3. Re:Where does the energy go? by robslimo · · Score: 1

      The issue is the hotspots. The heat dissipation is not uniform over the entire die. Also, the die only covers a relatively small area of the package; the rest just accomodates bond out and routing to all the pins to the outside world.

      The concept here is to apply cooling where it's needed most and, presumably, to distribute the heat load across the die more uniformly. Now, if they could couple that with a closed coolant system in the package as a whole, that would really help.

    4. Re:Where does the energy go? by Persol · · Score: 1

      Getting that heat away from the chip is the first concern. After that is is a fairly simple job to disperse it. Instead of using huge fins on the chip, you can now move that energy away from the chip where you have more room and ways to remove the heat from the box.

      It's the same way the radiator in your car works. It's only moving the thermal energy to a different place, but it's a place which absorbs the heat at a higher rate.

    5. Re:Where does the energy go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it. There are no fluids to cool off. They spray it in tiny drops and it evaporates taking heat with it. All they need to do is to dispose of steam.

    6. Re:Where does the energy go? by kfg · · Score: 1

      It's the same way the radiator in your car works.

      That would be with a fan.

      KFG

    7. Re:Where does the energy go? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      If that was the case, it's not a closed system like they claim it to be. Considering they used a car's cooling system as an analogy, there is no blow-off of coolant unless overheating causes a dangerous expansion of gasses and the safety valve gets blown open.

      If it was an open system, it would be even more dangerous of a system to manage, as you would have to remember to top off your coolant before using the laptop. This would increase the chances of microscopic particles clogging the works to the point of making a failure very probable.

      From what I gather, the system is, in fact, closed. It would spray the fluid on the hotspots, then evaporate, be collected in a little dome, drip back through to a resivor (the part they leave out), then collect enough to cause gravity and/or the gas expansion in the prior steps to propel the fluid back to the cpu.

    8. Re:Where does the energy go? by brokenbeaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are already systems for moving miniscule amounts of liquids, for example for doing liquid chromatography (scroll down to "Environmental Sensors and Subsystems"). You could probably set up a system where the liquid circulates to a cooling area under the heating/cooling driving force. The advantage of this system would be to have this working fluid in much more intimate contact with the hot areas.

      "I could imagine any microscopic particles in the fluid would eventually clog it up."

      Given the standards for cleanliness in the IC industry, i'm sure this will not be a problem.

      "For instance, the chemicals released as the processor ages"

      Most metals and oxides are highly insoluble in most solvents.

      "With a solid-state solution like this, you'd be dead in the water."

      Since there is a liquid involved, this is not a solid-state solution - it's hard to get solids to circulate to draw off heat. One of the advantages of micromechanical systems is their reliability. Odds are the circulation system will not fail before the chip becomes obselete.

    9. Re:Where does the energy go? by chemman · · Score: 1

      I would hope the liquid would be energy dissapative in itself. If it has a high enough heat capacity it can soak up and spread the heat out, effectively increasing it's area to dissipate.

  10. Nano Nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, John Deere has just released the "NanoMower".

    The NanoHippy add-on (for nanograss collection) is TBA. NanoNarc soon to follow. No word as to the cooling effects of either.

  11. Hmm. . . . by ookabooka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Brings a whole new meaning to watering the grass. . .
    Seriously though, its nice to see some new heat dissipation technologies. . . but it still comes down to how much thermal energy the chip pumps out. . . this is merely equivalent to a more efficient fan/heatsink. Though it should keep the chips at a cooler temperature (compared to their standard air counterparts) your laptop is still gonna get way too hot to put on your lap.

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    1. Re:Hmm. . . . by moreati · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If it works, it will push the envolope, improving not just total power consumption, but weight, volume & temperature also.

      We already have water cooling at the macro level - a radiator + pump + heat exchanger + resevoir system will give a lower temp and less noise for the same or better heat removal capacity eg . these.

      The improvement this would provide is watercooling at the micro level, just to the most critical components. The improvement in heat conductivity from the chip to the cooler should mean lower temps for the same transfer. Cooler.

      The bore of the tubes implies 50 ml liquid, rather than upto 1 litre (2 pints) currently used. Lighter.

      Less water for the same heat transfer means a smaller pump. Lower resistance in the chip due to lower temps would mean less power disipation. Longer running on batteries.

      On the air side (dissipation from the cooler to the environment), heat exchanger tubing with ~100 micron diameter (the artivle soesn't say they've done this, but it seems a logical extension) gives enourmous surface area/unit volume, giving better dissipation for the same airflow. Quieter.

      So I would surmise this is ideal for laptops, it improves all 3 of the key features - weight, longevity and actually-able-to-use-it-on-my-lapiness.

  12. Will the pipes clog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's cool, but it sounds awfully complex. Wouldn't small amounts of impurity gum up the works pretty quickly?

    1. Re:Will the pipes clog? by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, probably so.... but since it's a *closed* system, this would presumably not ever happen unless part of a "nanotube" broke off and started floating around in the fluid, or something along those lines.

      It's sort of like saying "A hard drive sounds like a cool idea. But wouldn't a small amount of dust gum it up?" Yep - but that's why they're sealed, air-tight, and initially built in clean rooms.

    2. Re:Will the pipes clog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They have licensed some new technology from Nintendo called Super Mario something, I can't really recall the details, but apparently it's some kind of digital plumber thing...

  13. Wow by Un0r1g1nal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This looks like really good stuff, being able to localise the temperature dissipation would be handy for lots of technologies. I hope that this one gets developed fully and hits the markets soon. The better the cooling capacity the more we can clock our chips :)

    As for having to refill the cooling agent periodically, I doubt that this would be a problem with mobile phones, this would be a completly self contained cooling system, much like a heatsink is today, (only a heatsink doesnt have a liquid running around the inside of it :P). The likelyhood is that by the time the liquid would need replacing - if ever, the phone would be at lesat a few years old, and so the owner would probably have it lying around in some drawer since they got their brand spanking new top of the range all singing all dancing holographic video phone...

    --
    If at first you DON'T succeed, Skydiving is NOT for YOU!!
    1. Re:Wow by h3l1x · · Score: 1
      As for having to refill the cooling agent periodically, I doubt that this would be a problem with mobile phones, this would be a completly self contained cooling system, much like a heatsink is today, (only a heatsink doesnt have a liquid running around the inside of it :P).

      One thing to keep in mind is that this system doesn't magically make heat disappear. It just moves it around more efficiently. In a cell phone, we will probably hit a comfort limit before we hit a heat dissipation limit. Do you want to hold an additional 40 to 60 degrees centigrade in your hand? Not dangerous certainly, but not entirely comfortable....

  14. Sounds like a great idea by Timesprout · · Score: 0, Funny

    but what happens when the mad nano cows invade your CPU for dinner?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  15. so.... by MoFoQ · · Score: 2, Funny

    so the next gen laptops will use less power, be cooler, powerful, AND stoned?

    1. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh great so now a hard drive company can claim that its too stoned to 'recall' where it saved my data.

      Damn you drugs!

    2. Re:so.... by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

      that's nothing new though.....remember the GXP's?
      hell, most of my WD drives have temporary amnesia sometimes.

  16. Cool! by Phidoux · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Processor I mean!

  17. Grass So small... by PrimeWaveZ · · Score: 1

    The cops can't find it!

  18. This seems very similar to heat pipes by mikeophile · · Score: 1

    Just lots of them on a microscopic scale.

  19. So, they invented swet by Dan+Aloni · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope it doesn't come with odors.

    --
    0x2b or not 0x2b, the answer is -1
  20. Limited Applications by JonLatane · · Score: 0

    While this technology is great and all, it strikes me that it much have only limited applications. Most notebooks these days are designed to minimize power consumption. In doing so, most notebook processors generate minimal heat. The only practical application for this would be high-end desktop replacements, which can generate insane amounts of heat. I remember an old gaming laptop I had that would get so hot playing UT2003 I would have to stop playing because it burned my fingers.

  21. Prior Art by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Funny
    tubes that spray liquid

    Im pretty sure I saw this technology being used in porno.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Prior Art by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      We all know that porn is the technology testbed.

      --
      hey!
  22. Cost? by Bl33d4merican · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure...this is a great idea, but how much will it cost? Anybody else remember the days where a good cpu fan cost significantly more than the $20 it does today? Not to mention the cost of refilling the coolant. Yes, you will have to do that. Those of us who have a car know that the radiator fluid must be changed ...oh every five to eight years or so. Keeping in mind the a computer's life span is much shorter, but also taking into account that a computer is often left on and running for days on end, it would probably have to be replaced at least once or twice. I also doubt this is something most users could do--and even some techies might have problems. (Is the coolant toxic?) How much would it cost to have somebody 'service' your computer's cooling device? If such problems aren't answered I doubt the product will be viable in the home-use market.

    --

    Every windows user is a sadomasochist.

    1. Re:Cost? by SeaDour · · Score: 1

      I imagine the coolant could come in a tiny little plastic tank that is plugged into the coolant sytem on the motherboard. When it gets low you could simply remove the tank, drop it off to be recycled and get a new one at Office Depot -- not unlike ink jet cartridges!

  23. New marking on CPUs: This Side Up by chiph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't this require a CPU to be operated in only one orientation?

    Chip H.

    1. Re:New marking on CPUs: This Side Up by addbo · · Score: 1

      Er... don't they have to be already anyways?

      Addbo

    2. Re:New marking on CPUs: This Side Up by chiph · · Score: 1

      Not especially -- as long as the processer maintains electrical and mechanical contact with both the socket & heatsink, it'll run fine.

      I was also curious because they're using laptops in microgravity on the ISS & space shuttle. Convection currents don't, uhh, convect in those environments, as there's no such phenomenon as "heat rising" there. Thermal management has to be either via direct contact (aka heat pipes), or assisted in some fashion (Peltier coolers, big fans, etc).

      Chip H.

  24. Crack! Splash! D'oh! by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cooling liquids in portable devices. Sounds like a bad idea to me. What if you break it? That would most definitely not be fun.

    1. Re:Crack! Splash! D'oh! by addaon · · Score: 1

      Right, because current portable devices don't have heat pipes filled with liquid or anything.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  25. now your CPU can spooge over the place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when it sees your hi-res porn collection, good to see its finally getting involved instead of just sitting there counting numbers

    A>S

  26. usually called MEMS fluidics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was called MEMS fluidics before, and is being researched at many places for at least 2-3 years now. The term nanograss is just a buzz word to take advantage of the term "nano". If the channels are 100s of microns, how can they be "nano"? Its obviously a marketing term. Lots of research is going on in MEMS fluidics, specially for molecular biology and diagnosis. Thinsg like lab-on-a-chip, etc.

  27. Steam?? by adzoox · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this produce steam or condensation? Water or liquids don't just disappear - if there is no other form of matter created that means build up - right?

    What happens if another substance gets mixed into this liquid?? - say a piece of carbon from the chip??

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  28. Like clogged inkjets? by argent · · Score: 1

    Elaborating on the messages about clogging and heat dissipation...

    Inkjet printers are made with disposable heads attached to the ink cartidge, because clogging of those tiny pipes is a real problem. I can just see you powering your nanograss-cooled computer up after an extended downtime and having it overheat because the tubes were clogged.

    And you still have to get rid of the heat somehow.

    Hopefully as more information becomes available we'll find that there's some general misunderstanding about what the actual technology is.

  29. I think this has been done by mgrassi99 · · Score: 1

    Maybe by Cray a while back? Can someone confirm?

  30. fans power-hungry coolant systems? NOT by Avian+visitor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Chip-generated heat, for example, can cause blade servers in densely packed racks to overheat, and can suck up notebook battery juice by requiring power-hungry coolant systems.

    Your average CPU fan will consume approximately 0.5W of power. It is cheap, relatively reliable and it works.

    This fan alone would run for about 70 hours on a 3000mAh battery. Compare that to the average battery life time of a modern laptop and you will see that fans are not exactly power-hungry coolant systems.

    Why replace something that works well? I believe we need more efficient chips, not better cooling technology.

  31. micrograss seems more apropriate by iwein · · Score: 1
    In the case of chips, they would be used in channels that could be as much as several hundred microns in diameter

    I always thought that nanotechnology was things that were in de order of a nanometer in circumference.

    and added to that: where is my superconducting chip anyway? reading the publications from Bell Labs in nature around 2001 and 2002 i thought they would come up with that stuff pretty soon. here is a funny story about that. Sorry about the pwd protection
    --
    Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:micrograss seems more apropriate by iwein · · Score: 1

      sorry, broke my link in the last preview.

      --
      Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
  32. A word from technology inventor by nanograss · · Score: 5, Informative

    Guys, certainly a great pleasure to see so much interest in our technology.

    Unfortunately, the TechWeb article is not that accurate. In particular, the statement that "nanograss" consists of tiny tubes that can spray liquid on chip hot spots is totally off mark.

    What we call "nanograss" is a carpet of tiny nanocolumns (or nanoposts, but not tubes) each several hundred nanometers in diameter that cover the surface of say microchannel. The posts are treated with water repellant polymer coating and thus are not easy to wet. As the result the cooling liquid (such as water) can't penetrate inside this carpet and stays suspended on the tips of the nanoposts. Thus, flow of a liquid in a microchannel that has walls covered with the nanograss requires much less pressure head than in a regular channel. The liquid literally slides along the walls without touching them suspended by a tiny layer of air as in air hockey table.

    Now, the trick is that we can intentionally design the nanograss such, that it can hold the liquid suspended on nanoposts only at the temperatures below a certain predetermined threshold. If the temperature exceeds this threshold the liquid sags through the nanograss and gets into direct contact with the wall. Needless to say that in this case thermal transfer from the wall to the liquid is greatly enhanced; the thin layer of air that isolates the wall from the cooling liquid is now gone. Thus the microchannels with the coolant that are located above the hottest areas on the chip (so-called hot spots) will have coolant penetrating through the nanograss and thus provide much better cooling exactly where the hot spots are. The system is self-adjusting and would automatically adapt to any arrangement of the hot spots. The obvious applications are in CPU and GPU cooling, as well as in telecom power electronics.

    In addition to the application in cooling, there are multiple applications in other areas, ranging from electrical nano-batteries and biochem lab-on-a-chip devices to seagoing vessels. Indeed, wherever we have liquids we also have solid surfaces that contact them; thus you can think of a countless nanograss applications out there.

    For those of you who are interested in further details the link to the Bell Labs press release is

    http://www.newstream.com/cgi-bin/display_story.cgi ?12664

    Also, the work will be published in May, 11 issue of Langmuir.

    Best Regards, Tom Krupenkin

    1. Re:A word from technology inventor by rikkus-x · · Score: 1
      If the temperature exceeds this threshold the liquid sags through the nanograss and gets into direct contact with the wall.

      Excuse my ignorance, but why is this better than just letting the liquid flow over the entire wall?

    2. Re:A word from technology inventor by nanograss · · Score: 3, Informative



      There are two reasons. First of all, in order to achieve the most effective cooling at the minimal coolant flow rate what you really want is to keep the whole surface of your chip at a constant predetermined temperature (which is mostly defined by the nature of the chip and the temperature of the surrounding environment). The heat flux that you can transfer through the wall to the fluid is directly proportional to the temperature difference between the chip surface and the cooling liquid, with the coefficient of proportionality called heat transfer coefficient (this is sometimes referred as a Newton's Law of Cooling). The heat flux is distributed over the chip very unevenly, with the hot spots providing much higher flux than the rest of the chip. Thus, in order to keep the chip temperature constant over the whole area you need a way to adjust the heat transfer coefficient depending on the particular location on the chip surface. Nanograss gives you exactly this ability, as I described in my earlier message.

      Secondly, nanograss provides you ability to strongly reduce the pressure drop required to push the liquid through the microchannels in your cooling system. Thus, you can use much smaller pump to push the coolant around.

      In the existing systems no optimization like the one described above is attempted. As the result one ends up substantially overdesigning the cooling system in order to keep the chip (and especially the hot spots) cold enough.

      Hope this helps.

      Tom

  33. Cool Tech by An-Unnecessarily-Lon · · Score: 0

    I would like to see this used in cars to upgrade computers in cars. The more Tech we include in the design of cars the more power we can squeeze from them. 2004 Corvette 405hp 21-29Mpg. Engineering at its finest.

  34. Hard drives ARE NOT SEALED by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Look at the little air filters on them.

    Look at the operating specs, where they are only certified up to a certain altitude.

    Hard drives ARE NOT SEALED.

  35. HOMER by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 1

    "...and it's all thanks to YES-I-Can-ibus"

    --
    Obama is a twitter sock puppet
  36. Nanofluid by corngrower · · Score: 1

    Remember to replace the nanofluid every three years or 36,000 minutes.

  37. What a Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a total waste of energy. Instead of minimizing heat, shouldn't these companies be focusing on how to capitolize off it?

  38. nanograss by fat32 · · Score: 0, Troll

    The use of Nanotechnology is the most powerful proposition to come down the pipe in all of recorded history. It provides the power to recreate the world within the scope of our imagination. What a seductive possibility. But, all of the repercussions of of our actions must be thought out. The nanograss idea is interesting, but the role of actual grass is pervasive. Modifing existing grass seems vastly safer and wiser than attempting to make a leap to all NEW nanograss. Our track record for anticipating the results of such moves have historically been poor.

  39. Nano Dust by jeoin · · Score: 0

    I wonder who cuts the grass and dusts on the weekends.. surely that is a consideration?

    --
    Jeoin
  40. nanograss shall allow... by Mihai+Cartoaje · · Score: 1

    ...future chips to be bigger and consume more electricity, which in turn shall allow them to support more junk instruction sets.

  41. What makes you think we're guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh?

    1. Re:What makes you think we're guys? by nanograss · · Score: 1

      Yes, to be polically correct I should have said guys and gals.

  42. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it wasn't. Read it again ... they would be used in channels that could be as much as several hundred microns in diameter. A human hair is about a hundred microns.


    When referring to the diameter of the channels, (which also have a length attribute), the following sentence assumes that the reader makes the syntactical association. This is exactly the same as the phrase "If the baby won't eat the cabbage, boil it". Although the reader knows that the writer is not talking about boiling babies alive, the very fact that the writer's style has assumed they will make the connection denotes a poor writing style.

    Remember, "assuming" makes an "ass" out of "u" and "me".